SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Vision Screening”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Assessing the predictive ability of the test-positive findings of an elementary school vision screening.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the predictive ability of the test-positive findings of an elementary school vision screening program, conducted by 2nd-year optometry students, in identifying children with eye or vision disorders. METHODS: A modified version of the Modified Clinical Technique (MCT) vision screening was administered to elementary children from a below-average socioeconomic neighborhood in Houston, Texas. Comprehensive eye and vision examinations were provided to the available children who failed the vision screening. The screening was administered by groups of 2nd-year optometry students with the assistance of a 4th-year optometry student, and supervised by a faculty member licensed to practice optometry. The follow-up examinations were provided by supervised 4th-year optometry students in a clinical setting based at the elementary school. Positive predictive values calculated from the screening and examination findings estimate the probability that a failure on one or more of the screening tests would identify children with eye or vision disorders. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of the test-positive children examined were found to be true positives by the criteria developed in a study of vision screening methods in Orinda, California from 1954 through 1956. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive ability of this study's test-positive findings for identifying eye and vision disorders was found to be less than the predictive ability of the Orinda Study findings. This reduced predictive ability of the present study resulted in a larger number of children being overreferred for examinations than had occurred in the Orinda Study. The reduction in the ability of the test-positive findings of the current study's screening program to identify accurately children with eye and vision problems is most likely due to the limited experience of the optometry students conducting the screening program. The inability of this retrospective study to evaluate the accuracy of the test-negatives is a major limitation in assessing the total effectiveness of this vision screening program. Although the present study may indicate some value in optometry students conducting elementary vision screening programs, a prospective study which could assess the predictive ability of both test-positive and test-negative findings, as well as determine the sensitivity and specificity of the screening program, is needed to assess more fully the effectiveness of school vision screening programs using professional students.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Project Universal Preschool Vision Screening: a demonstration project.

OBJECTIVES: Visual disorders among preschool-aged children are common, yet screening is infrequent. The purpose of this project was to implement the vision screening recommendations proposed by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and National Eye Institute Vision Screening in the Preschool Child Task Force: monocular visual acuity and stereopsis testing. METHODS: Four sites fully participated in the implementation of the task force recommendations with 3- and 4-year-old children. Two of the sites worked with primary care practices (testing performed by staff); 2 worked with community-based programs (testing performed by lay volunteers). Each site tracked number of children screened by age, as well as proportion testable, referred, and with documented follow-up evaluation. RESULTS: Variations in implementation of the recommendations were observed. Successful screening among 3-year-olds ranged from 70% to 93%; referral rates were 1% to 41%, and follow-up rates were 29% to 100%. Successful screening among 4-year-olds ranged from 88% to 98%; referral rates were 2% to 40%, and follow-up rates were 41% to 100%. The proportion of 3-year-olds who were treated was significantly different between the community-based sites (n = 20) and the primary care sites (n = 2). Similarly, the proportion of 4-year-olds who were treated was significantly different between the community-based sites (n = 36) and the primary care sites (n = 11). CONCLUSION: . The variability across pilot sites in numbers successfully screened and numbers referred suggests that all aspects of preschool vision screening need thorough review before the goal of universal preschool vision screening can be realized.

Child Health Services↗

PubMed1999

Preschool vision screening: negative predictive value for amblyopia.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Single optotype tests of visual acuity are widely used for preschool vision screening in order to optimise cooperation with testing. These tests may, however, underestimate the visual acuity deficit in amblyopia because they lack visual crowding. This study assessed the resultant negative predictive value (NPV) for amblyopia. METHODS: Cohort study of 936 children in the Cambridge Health District selected by date of birth. The presence of amblyopia among children who had passed preschool vision screening was determined using Snellen line acuity as the reference test. Preschool vision screening was conducted at 3.5 years of age by community orthoptists. The screening assessment comprised Sheridan-Gardiner single optotype test of visual acuity (referral criterion 6/9 or worse in either eye), cover test, ocular movements, 20(Delta) prism test, and TNO stereotest. RESULTS: The overall NPV of preschool vision screening for amblyopia was 100% (95% CI 99.4% to 100%). Most children with amblyopia were detected by the Sheridan-Gardiner single optotype test of visual acuity, but the other screening tests were necessary to prevent any false negatives. In isolation, the Sheridan-Gardiner single optotype test of visual acuity has a NPV for amblyopia of only 99.6% (95% CI 98.7% to 99.9%). CONCLUSION: Preschool vision screening using a single optotype test of visual acuity does achieve a high NPV for amblyopia, but only under certain conditions. These comprise a low threshold for referral (6/9 or worse in either eye) and the inclusion of a cover test and tests of binocular function in the screening assessment.

Amblyopia↗

PubMed1999

A new approach to vision screening in schools.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of visual "defects" among a sample of young schoolchildren and evaluate a new system for vision screening in schools. METHODS: A new system for vision screening in schools has been developed. The system is based on a computer program which may be run on a low specification personal computer. Information about the child's symptoms, history and family history is acquired by means of a parental questionnaire and entered into the program prior to the vision screening. Distance visual acuity and stereopsis are measured directly on the computer screen and colour vision is assessed using a reduced Ishihara test. The program carries out an "expert" analysis of the questionnaire data and the vision test results and determines the most likely diagnosis. Reports for parents, teachers, optometrists, doctors can be generated automatically and statistics relating to the overall screening program are available. An evaluation of a prototype version of the system was carried out on 245 schoolchildren aged between 5 and 8 years. RESULTS: Overall, 48 children failed the screening (excluding colour vision deficiencies), 32 of whom were unaware of any problem with their eyes. Comparison of the result of the vision screening with the outcome of a full eye examination gave a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 96.1%. CONCLUSION: A significant number of young school children have unsuspected remediable visual defects. The computer-based vision screener provides an efficient, sensitive and specific method for screening in schools.

Child↗

PubMed1994

Vision screening with the RDE stereotest in pediatric populations.

The usefulness of the Random Dot E (RDE) stereotest in screening the vision of school-aged children for vision problems has been established. As a single screening procedure, the effectivity (phi) of the RDE (phi = +0.52) is greater than the widely used Snellen acuity technique (phi = +0.36) and faster to complete. Very-low-birthweight (VLBW) children have a higher incidence of vision problems including strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive error than children born with normal-birthweights (NBW's). My purpose was to determine: (1) whether a group of young children at high risk for vision problems could perform random dot stereotesting and (2) an age appropriate pass/fail criterion for stereoacuity screening. Furthermore, categorization as pass or fail by each screening method studied [stereoacuity (RDE), visual acuity [Teller Acuity Cards (TAC) and Broken Wheel (BWA)] and refractive error] was compared for independent agreement with vision examination results. The subjects were a cohort of NBW and VLBW) (< 1500 g) children matched at birth for maternal age, ethnic origin, time of hospital birth, and parity. Results of a masked investigation of 30 children [VLBW (N = 10) and NBW (N = 20) children] tested at 3 years of age (mean age = 3.0 years, range 2.11 to 3.1 years) showed that (1) 86.7% were able to complete the 168 sec arc random dot stereoacuity task when a two-alternative forced-choice preferential-looking paradigm was used for testing, (2) the specificity and sensitivity were 88.2%, 76.9% (RDE); 81.2%, 64.3% (TAC); 52.9%, 92.3% (BWA); and 94.1%, 61.5% (refractive error), respectively, (3) the reliability the RDE stereoacuity screening was greater (k = +0.66) than any of the other procedures studied, and (4) there was 73.3% agreement on test-retest categorizations between observers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Child, Preschool↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Vision screening requirements under 52 Early and Periodic Screening Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) Programs.

A 1979 survey of vision screening requirements in 52 Early and Periodic Screening Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) programs revealed that 17 percent of the programs had no requirements, and 17 percent required only distance visual acuity testing. An additional 25 percent required distance vision and ocular muscle-fusion tests only, and the remaining programs required various combinations of three or more tests. Fewer than two-thirds of the programs with requirements had referral criteria for the tests. The ages at which initial testing was required also varied among the programs. The differences in requirements were not related to the demographic, socioeconomic, and other variables analyzed in this study. Programs with specific referral criteria, however, had a higher percentage of referrals for vision screening than those without such criteria. Because of the variability in vision screening standards and referral criteria observed among the programs, the authors conclude that national standards are needed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1993

Vision screening for infants and preschool children.

Eye examinations and vision screening at the recommended ages are preventive health measures that can yield immense benefits in preventing visual loss. Educational programs can be designed to provide parents and healthcare workers about children's eye screening and referral procedures.

Child, Preschool↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The Vision First Check Program in British Columbia: a preschool vision screening program for children age two and age three.

The Vision First Check Program was developed in consultation with ophthalmology and optometry representatives on the provincial Vision Advisory Committee and piloted by participating optometrists in four communities in BC between January and June 1998. This preschool vision screening program provides for one vision screening for children aged two and three at no cost to the family or the Medical Services Plan of BC. The screening is by optometrists, the marketing of the program is coordinated through public health, and the data collection is coordinated through the Medical Services Plan as a no-fee item.

British Columbia↗

PubMed1996

Baltimore Vision Screening Project.

PURPOSE: This study estimates the prevalence of common visual disorders (amblyopia, strabismus, refractive errors) in a group of inner-city school children. In addition, the study addresses the issue of access to care for vision-screening programs, specifically for children with recognized difficulties in obtaining routine medical care. METHODS: School children from an inner-city elementary school were enrolled into a prospective vision-screening program combining the identification arm (screening) and diagnostic/treatment arm (ophthalmic examination). The screening consisted of Snellen E optotypes presented at a 10-foot test distance. Each child failing the vision screening was examined by an ophthalmologist at the school using standard protocol. This allowed the authors to examine all children identified through the vision-screening program. RESULTS: Six-hundred eighty children were screened during the 1993 to 1994 school year. Eleven percent (76) failed the vision screening and were examined, 68 of whom failed the ophthalmic examination. The estimated prevalence of visual morbidity was as follows: amblyopia, 3.9%; strabismus, 3.1%, and refractive errors, 8.2%. CONCLUSION: Amblyopia, strasbismus, and refractive errors were found in relatively high frequencies for this population sample of inner city children. These findings underscore the necessity of comprehensive vision-screening programs that integrate follow-up care. Children with limited access to specialized eye care must be provided with a mechanism for obtaining these services.

Amblyopia↗

PubMed1978

Visual disorders in 7-year-old children with and without previous vision screening.

An analysis of visual defects among 310 children referred from a vision screening of 2 178 7-year-old children revealed a 50% frequency of significant eye defects among the referrals (7% of screened children). Of the screened children, one group (1 530 children) had previous visual screening three years earlier. The other group (648 children) had no previous vision screening until the age of seven. A comparison between the two groups showed that the risk of finding a new significant eye disorder in a school entrant was more than 6 times greater for a child who was not examined in his preschool years, and the risk of finding an amblyopic child was more than 10 times greater. The results do indicate the need for continuation of the present vision screening program of pre-school children.

Astigmatism↗

PubMed2004

Vision screening for children: current trends, technology, and legislative issues.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to examine current trends in vision screening for children. RECENT FINDINGS: Literature within the past year regarding children's vision screening has been dominated by clinical validation studies of autorefractors or photoscreeners that allow the detection of amblyogenic refractive errors, misalignment of the eyes, or media opacities. New technologies reported include wave-front analysis for amblyogenic factors and a visual evoked potentials-based screening tool for the preverbal child. Studies evaluating the goals of the screening program, the target population, and the physical limitations of the screening environment have prompted multipronged or hybrid studies designed to more accurately detect vision problems, particularly in the preschool child, in whom cooperation and cognitive development affect reliability of results. State and federal legislation in the United States has been proposed or adopted to regulate and partially fund pediatric vision screening and comprehensive examinations. SUMMARY: Through improvements and new developments in technology, study design, the efforts of organized medicine, and legislative initiatives, vision screening for children continues toward the goal of bringing all children with eye disease or vision problems to treatment in a timely fashion.

Child↗

PubMed1998

Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs. National Children's Eye Care Foundation Vision Screening Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the ability of healthcare professionals and lay volunteers to grade photoscreening photographs. DESIGN: The study design was a cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: One hundred children 3 years of age or younger received a complete ophthalmologic examination and were photographed using the Medical Technology Innovations (MTI) photoscreener. Twenty-six children had normal examination results, and the remaining 74 children had conditions that are of interest for pediatric screening, including strabismus, refractive error, media opacities, and ptosis. Eighteen volunteers, including pediatric ophthalmologists, pediatricians, ophthalmic technicians, health department nurses, Prevention of Blindness Society personnel, and Lions Club volunteers, graded each of the 100 photoscreening photographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of vision screening and of photograph grading were measured. RESULTS: Results from various graders yielded sensitivities ranging from 37% to 88% and specificities ranging from 40% to 88%. No single grader achieved sensitivity and specificity both greater than 70%. The grading of the manufacturer's representative had a sensitivity of 43% and a specificity of 85%. Sensitivity decreased to 31% for strabismus and 18% for refractive error when the correct type of strabismus or refractive error was required to be considered true-positives. Results were not positively correlated with the ophthalmologic knowledge of the participant. CONCLUSIONS: The wide variability in sensitivities and specificities among graders indicates inconsistent photograph interpretation skills or deficient screening guidelines or both. For off-axis photoscreening as implemented by the MTI system to become a useful vision-screening method, additional photograph interpretation skill transfer may be beneficial, although not necessarily sufficient.

Allied Health Personnel↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Binocular Polaroid Test for vision screening of pre-school age children.

We report the results obtained with the Binocular Polaroid Test in a large population screening devised to detect vision disturbances in pre-school age children. The Binocular Polaroid Test is a new test for rapid detection of small unilateral scotoma in the binocular visual field. The test was performed on 1566 children age 3 to 6 years in a field examination. The reliability of the test was controlled in a study examination. A complete study examination was performed in 60 of the 96 subjects with a positive response to the test. One hundred subjects selected at random among those with a negative response were used as controls. The study examination disclosed vision disturbances in 41 of the 60 children with a positive response to the Binocular Polaroid Test. The remaining 19 results were normal. No vision disturbances were detected in the control group. The predictive value and the "phi" coefficient were calculated. The results indicate that the Binocular Polaroid Test appears very suitable for vision screening in pre-school age children for whom an early diagnosis is of paramount importance for treatment and prognosis of a vision alteration.

Child↗

PubMed2006

Preschool vision screening in pediatric practices.

A national sample of pediatricians was surveyed to evaluate preschool vision screening practices (response rate 55%, 377 of 690 eligible respondents). The rate of acuity screening for 3-year-old children was low (35%), but increased for 4- (73%) and 5-year-old children (66%). Few used photoscreening or autorefraction (8%). Common barriers were that screening is too time-consuming and children are uncooperative. Half reported that there should be separate reimbursement for vision screening. Financial incentives may be important for ensuring the delivery of preschool vision screening, as well as adoption of emerging screening technologies if such devices are shown to be effective.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Improving preschool vision screening programs.

Early detection of amblyopia is important, but many preschool-aged children do not receive vision screening. Factors that account for missed opportunities in detecting vision problems in early childhood include the difficulty of evaluating vision in an uncooperative child or in an infant and toddler. Methods need to be found to improve the low rate of preschool vision screening. In Missouri, a study has begun on preschool vision screening to find the most cost-effective method.

Amblyopia↗

PubMed2004

The Seoul Metropolitan Preschool Vision Screening Programme: results from South Korea.

AIM: To report on a new model of preschool vision screening that was performed in metropolitan Seoul and to investigate the distribution of various ocular disorders in this metropolitan preschool population. METHODS: Vision screening was conducted on 36 973 kindergarten children aged 3-5 years in a stepwise manner. The first step was home screening using a set of five picture cards and a questionnaire. The children who did not pass the first step (VA <0.5 in at least one eye or any abnormal responses on the questionnaire) were retested with regular vision charts at the regional public healthcare centres. After this retest, some children were referred to ophthalmologists. The referral criteria for visual acuity were <0.5 at 3 years and <0.63 at 4 or 5 years in at least one eye. RESULTS: Of those screened, 7116 (19.2%) children did not pass the home screening tests and 2058 (28.9%) out of the 7116 were referred. The results of the ophthalmological examination in eye clinics were only available for 894 children (43.4%) of those who were referred. The rest of the children did not visit ophthalmologists because they had been checked at an eye clinic, were currently under treatment, or for personal reasons. Refractive errors were found in 608 (1.6%) children. Astigmatism was associated in 78.2% of ametropes. Amblyopia was discovered in 149 (0.4%) children and refractive error was the major aetiology with a predominant rate (82.5%). Manifest strabismus was detected in 52 children. The positive predictive value of vision screening for any ophthalmological disorder was 0.77, and 0.49 for significant disorders requiring treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This preschool vision screening model was highly accessible to the children and their parents, easy to administer, and effective to detect a variety of ocular disorders. However, the participation rate of the referred children in the examinations by ophthalmologists was quite low. The performance and efficiency of this screening programme need to be optimised with further revision.

Amblyopia↗

PubMed1996

Preschool vision screening: outcome of children referred to the hospital eye service.

AIMS: To assess the outcome of children referred to the hospital eye service (HES) from an orthoptist based preschool vision screening programme. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of children referred from screening during a 2 year period. Children were screened by community orthoptists at 3 1/2 years of age. The main outcome measures were (1) HES findings for children referred from screening, and (2) visual outcome for amblyopic children after completion of treatment. RESULTS: The attendance rate at screening was 79.3% (6794 children): 348 children (5.1% of those screened) were referred to the HES. The HES findings were refractive error (32.9%), amblyopia (29.9%), false positive referral (20.1%), strabismus (13.2%), and other ocular disorders (3.9%). The positive predictive value of screening was 79.9%. Screening detected 48 children with straight eyed amblyopia and 43 children with strabismic amblyopia. A visual acuity of 6/9 or better in the amblyopic eye was achieved by 87.2% of straight eyed amblyopes and 64.3% of strabismic amblyopes (chi 2 = 5.27, p = 0.02). Residual amblyopia of 6/24 or worse occurred in only 5.6% of amblyopic children. CONCLUSION: Most amblyopic children detected by preschool vision screening achieve a good visual outcome with treatment. While treatment earlier in the sensitive period might be expected to give improved results, it remains to be demonstrated that preschool screening results in a better outcome than screening at school entry. Preschool vision screening also detects a significant number of children without amblyopia who have reduced vision due to refractive errors. This group of children must be included in any analysis of the cost effectiveness of preschool vision screening.

Amblyopia↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Study of chart designs and optotypes for preschool vision screening--I. Comparability of chart designs.

Design variations in children's distance vision screening charts contribute to inconsistencies noted in preschool vision screening programs. This study compares children's distance visual acuity on two chart designs: logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LOGMAR) vs a chart of 'standard' design. In theory, the LOGMAR chart offers the advantages of improved precision in measuring inter-patient differences and greater consistency of follow-up measurements. Our findings indicate the following: 1) the ability to complete a test depends upon the child's age, not on chart design; 2) isolation of symbols is required more frequently for the LOGMAR charts than for the standard charts; and 3) on average, children have slightly poorer visual acuity scores on LOGMAR charts than on standard charts.

Child, Preschool↗