PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “artificial intelligence (AI)”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Enhanced fracture detection on radiographs with AI assistance for clinicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency radiographic interpretation for fractures is prone to missed or misdiagnoses. Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to become a powerful tool to assist clinicians in fracture detection. PURPOSE: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess whether AI improves clinicians' ability to detect fractures on radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1, 2010, and October 10, 2025. A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies was performed using a Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were included . The pooled sensitivity of clinicians increased from 77% (95% CI: 72-81) to 87% (95% CI: 83-90) with AI assistance, while the pooled specificity improved from 88% (95% CI: 85-90) to 92% (95% CI: 89-94). The corresponding AUC values were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92) before and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97) after AI assistance. Eight studies were rated as high risk of bias. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression identified potential sources of heterogeneity, including fracture location, AI model type, high risk of bias, and reference standards. CONCLUSION: AI assistance significantly improves clinicians' diagnostic performance in detecting fractures on radiographs for extremity and trunk fractures.

Humans↗

A review on the integration of artificial intelligence into coastal modeling.

With the development of computing technology, mechanistic models are often employed to simulate processes in coastal environments. However, these predictive tools are inevitably highly specialized, involving certain assumptions and/or limitations, and can be manipulated only by experienced engineers who have a thorough understanding of the underlying theories. This results in significant constraints on their manipulation as well as large gaps in understanding and expectations between the developers and practitioners of a model. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are making it possible to integrate machine learning capabilities into numerical modeling systems in order to bridge the gaps and lessen the demands on human experts. The objective of this paper is to review the state-of-the-art in the integration of different AI technologies into coastal modeling. The algorithms and methods studied include knowledge-based systems, genetic algorithms, artificial neural networks, and fuzzy inference systems. More focus is given to knowledge-based systems, which have apparent advantages over the others in allowing more transparent transfers of knowledge in the use of models and in furnishing the intelligent manipulation of calibration parameters. Of course, the other AI methods also have their individual contributions towards accurate and reliable predictions of coastal processes. The integrated model might be very powerful, since the advantages of each technique can be combined.

Artificial Intelligence↗

Artificial Intelligence for Natural Products Discovery and Development.

Natural products (NPs) remain a cornerstone of modern drug discovery, offering stereochemical complexity and diverse bioactivities that precisely modulate therapeutic targets, refined through billions of years of evolution. However, their research has long been hindered by inefficient, empirical workflows, high resource consumption, structural complexity, and the "multicomponent, multi-target" nature of their mechanisms. The exponential growth of genomic, metabolomic, and spectral data has overwhelmed conventional analytical methods, exposing critical bottlenecks in handling high-dimensional, heterogeneous datasets that exceed human interpretive capacity. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative paradigm to address these challenges, integrating multi-omics and chemical data to shift NP research from fragmented empiricism toward mechanism-driven, precision-oriented development. By leveraging deep learning architectures- including graph neural networks, Transformers, and diffusion-based generative models-AI enables systematic decoding of NP biosynthesis, automated structure elucidation, rational target identification, knowledge extraction from vast unstructured scientific literature, and de novo molecular design. This review comprehensively surveys recent advances in AI applications across the full NP discovery and development pipeline, encompassing genome mining, structure-based and ligand-based virtual screening, multimodal structural characterization, lead optimization, and biosynthetic pathway engineering. We further examine the emerging roles of protein-centric, molecule- centric, and multimodal foundation models, as well as large language models, in bridging genotype-to-chemotype gaps and unlocking unstructured scientific knowledge. Finally, we discuss critical challenges including data scarcity, representational limitations for complex stereochemistry, physical plausibility in generative models, and the urgent need for experimental validation, while outlining future directions toward autonomous experimentation, closed-loop optimization, and human-AI collaborative discovery.

Artificial intelligence↗

Comparative study of intelligent models for the prediction of bladder cancer progression.

New techniques for the prediction of tumour behaviour are needed since statistical analysis has low accuracy and is not applicable to the individual. Artificial intelligence (AI) may provide suitable methods. We have compared the predictive accuracies of neuro-fuzzy modelling (NFM), artificial neural networks (ANN) and traditional statistical methods for the prediction of bladder cancer. Experimental molecular biomarkers, including p53 expression and gene methylation, and conventional clinicopathological data were studied in a cohort of 117 patients with bladder cancer. For all 3 methods, models were produced to predict the presence and timing of tumour progression. Both methods of AI predicted progression with an accuracy ranging from 88-100%, which was superior to logistic regression, and NFM appeared to be better than ANN at predicting the timing of progression.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

Privacy, security, and reliability risks of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a systematic review of empirical evidence.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare information systems, supporting clinical decision-making, imaging analysis, and predictive modeling. While these applications offer operational and clinical benefits, they also introduce emerging risks to patient privacy, data security, and system reliability. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review empirical evidence on privacy breaches, security vulnerabilities, and misuse associated with AI applications in healthcare settings. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library were searched for empirical studies published between January 2015 and November 2025 that evaluated AI use or misuse in clinical diagnosis, treatment, or decision-making. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data using a standardized form. Findings were synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity in study designs, AI methods, and reported outcomes. RESULTS: Of 7,285 records identified through database searches and 205 through citation screening, 22 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning multiple clinical domains and data modalities, predominantly medical imaging applications. Five recurring threat categories were identified: patient re-identification, membership inference, unauthorized access and adversarial exploitation, input manipulation, and misuse or overinterpretation of AI outputs. Across studies, AI models were shown to encode latent biometric signals across diverse data types, limiting the effectiveness of traditional anonymization and synthetic data approaches. Adversarial attacks and input manipulation were also shown to compromise diagnostic performance and system integrity. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides empirical evidence suggesting that contemporary AI systems in healthcare introduce privacy and security risks that may challenge traditional assumptions about data protection. These findings underscore the need for privacy- and security-by-design approaches and governance frameworks that address risks across the AI lifecycle.

Humans↗

Computer-assisted decision making in medicine.

This article reviews the strengths and limitations of five major paradigms of medical computer-assisted decision making (CADM): (1) clinical algorithms, (2) statistical analysis of collections of patient data, (3) mathematical models of physical processes, (4) decision analysis, and (5) symbolic reasoning or artificial intelligence (AI). No one technique is best for all applications, and there is recent promising work which combines two or more established techniques. We emphasize both the inherent power of symbolic reasoning and the promise of artificial intelligence and the other techniques to complement each other.

Computers↗

The Role of Artificial Intelligence for Intimate Partner Violence Prevention: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV), encompassing physical, sexual, emotional and economic abuse, remains a pervasive global health concern. Traditional prevention efforts face obstacles such as underreporting, delayed detection and limited personalised support. Emerging artificial intelligence (AI) approaches offer new opportunities to enhance IPV prevention. AIM: This systematic review maps and synthesises evidence on AI-driven tools in IPV prevention based on studies published between 2004 and 2024. METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and PROSPERO registration, we searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore and Web of Science. Eligible studies explicitly evaluated AI technologies targeting IPV prediction, screening, intervention or support delivery. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). RESULTS: Of 1304 records initially identified, 41 studies met eligibility criteria. AI applications ranged from machine learning (ML) for risk prediction and natural language processing (NLP) for IPV detection in clinical and social media data, to image analysis for forensic evaluation and chatbot-based support. Predictive modelling demonstrated strong discriminative performance, while NLP-based screening detected IPV with notable sensitivity. Chatbots showed feasibility and user acceptability, but evidence of their direct impact on reducing IPV incidence was limited, with one randomised controlled trial showing a modest reduction. Key challenges identified included algorithmic bias, data privacy risks and barriers to integration across health and social care systems. DISCUSSION: AI-informed interventions show promise for improving IPV detection, risk assessment, and scalable support, but questions remain about long-term effectiveness, ethical fairness, transparency and equitable implementation. Future interdisciplinary research should address these concerns to responsibly deploy AI in IPV prevention. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings highlight the importance of trauma-informed, culturally responsive care and provider training in AI applications. Nurse-led innovation and policy advocacy will be crucial for safe, equitable integration of AI in IPV prevention.

Artificial Intelligence↗

Diagnosing the undiagnosed: AI-enhanced multimodal modeling for placental mesenchymal dysplasia in high-risk pregnancies.

Placental mesenchymal dysplasia (PMD) is a rare vascular placental disorder that mimics molar pregnancy but often coexists with a viable fetus, making its misdiagnosis potentially devastating. In high-risk pregnancies, artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced multimodal modeling - incorporating imaging, genomics, proteomics, and clinical features - offers a transformative diagnostic strategy. Leveraging Bayesian hyperparameter optimization for model refinement, this approach improves diagnostic accuracy while reducing uncertainty and clinician hesitation. Recent clinical studies support its efficacy and interpretability through SHAP and LIME models, while real-time surgical enhancements using Bayesian methods highlight its broader clinical utility. Despite current challenges such as data heterogeneity and integration barriers, multimodal AI provides unprecedented resolution in placental analysis, enabling precise differentiation between PMD and similar fetopathies. Ultimately, this advancement supports timely, non-invasive diagnosis, personalized management, and emotionally informed decision-making aligned with ethical AI implementation standards.

Bayesian optimization↗

Next-generation brain proteomics: Integrating single-cell, spatial, and multi-omics for clinical biomarker discovery.

The mammalian brain's functional complexity arises from the sophisticated architecture of neurons and glia. This network is essentially defined by its dynamic proteome, which reveals the functional execution underlying neural computation and disease. This review integrates the technological leap in neuroproteomics. It has moved beyond bulk tissue proteome cataloguing to high-sensitivity single-cell and spatial resolution. We detail how next-generation platforms, such as TIMS-PASEF and Orbitrap-Astral, have enabled deeper and faster phenotypic profiling of limited brain samples. However, the proteome coverage remains constrained by dynamic range, sample loss, ionisation bias and incomplete detection of low-abundance regulatory proteins. We further examine how such studies have revealed the proteomic remodelling that drives lineage specification and synaptic plasticity by linking temporal protein expression waves to biological function. Crucially, we delineate the clinical translational trajectory, illustrating how aberrant signatures are verified in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and validated in plasma to support precision medicine. Finally, we argue for the necessity of "fused" multi-omics integration and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to decode the non-linear molecular logic of brain pathology.

Humans↗

Artificial intelligence techniques for bioinformatics.

This review provides an overview of the ways in which techniques from artificial intelligence (AI) can be usefully employed in bioinformatics, both for modelling biological data and for making new discoveries. The paper covers three techniques: symbolic machine learning approaches (nearest neighbour and identification tree techniques), artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Each technique is introduced and supported with examples taken from the bioinformatics literature. These examples include folding prediction, viral protease cleavage prediction, classification, multiple sequence alignment and microarray gene expression analysis.

Algorithms↗

Knowledge-based educational systems.

In knowledge-based educational systems, the key concept is that information and procedures are represented in the same data structure. These structures can search for each other in flexible and, consequently, very robust ways. At the Air Force Human Resources Laboratory (AFHRL), our researchers are building computer environments that know what they know, know how people can best use them, and know how to draw inferences about their state--self-referential electronic tutors. In September 1986, artificial intelligence researchers participated in AFHRL's Research Planning Forum for Intelligent Tutorial Systems (ITS). This essay reviews the state of the philosophy, art, and science of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to education. Then it summarizes the research issues which were presented, discussed, and better defined in this Forum--namely the nature and representation of 1) expertise modules, 2) student diagnostic modules, 3) adaptive instructional and curriculum modules, 4) instructional environments, and 5) man-machine interfaces. Advances in artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and instructional discourse have provided a means for investigating human learning, for representing an individual's own "knowledge processing." Research and development in knowledge-based educational systems seems promising, not only for helping people learn how to perform complex tasks, but also for explicitly expressing how people learn to learn. Therefore, would it not be wise to establish a scientific legacy for the development of effective knowledge-based tutorial systems which is informed by the best studies of mind and meaning, language and thought, purpose and paradox?

Artificial Intelligence↗

AutoPVPrimer: A comprehensive AI-Enhanced pipeline for efficient plant virus primer design and assessment.

Plant viruses pose a significant threat to global agriculture and require efficient tools for their timely detection. We present AutoPVPrimer, an innovative pipeline that integrates artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to accelerate the development of plant virus primers. The pipeline uses Biopython to automatically retrieve different genomic sequences from the NCBI database to increase the robustness of the subsequent primer design. The design_primers_with_tuning module uses a random forest classifier that optimizes parameters and provides flexibility for different experimental conditions. Quality control measures, including the evaluation of poly-X content and melting temperature, increase primer reliability. Unique to AutoPVPrimer is the visualize_primer_dimer module, which supports the visual evaluation of primer dimers-a feature missing in other tools. Primer specificity is validated via primer BLAST, which contributes to the overall efficiency of the pipeline. AutoPVPrimer has been successfully applied to the tomato mosaic virus, proving its adaptability and efficiency. The modular design allows customization by the user and extends the applicability to different plant viruses and experimental scenarios. The pipeline represents a significant advance in primer design and provides researchers with an effective tool to accelerate molecular biology experiments. Future developments aim to extend compatibility and incorporate user feedback to consolidate AutoPVPrimer as an innovative contribution to the bioinformatics toolbox and a promising resource for the advancement of plant virology research.

DNA Primers↗

[RGSS-IDJ and its application to cranial computed tomography].

RGSS-IDJ is developed as the Japanese version of Report Generation Support System for Imaging Diagnosis (RGSS-ID), which is a developmental computer system that applies artificial intelligence (AI) methods to a reporting system. Now RGSS-IDJ supports the report generation of cranial computed tomography. A representation scheme called Generalized Finding Representation (GFR) is proposed, to bridge the gap between natural language expressions in the radiographic report and AI methods. GRF for RGSS-IDJ is the same as for RGSS-ID. The basic style for entering the findings on the radiograph is the dialogue system with the routine of query and answering it by selecting items with a mouse. This system encodes the input findings into the network expressions, which are represented as the list form in the LISP computer language. And, it reserves them into the knowledge data base. The content of the report will be able to be utilized for various analyses within AI paradigm. The final radiographic report is made in the natural Japanese language.

Artificial Intelligence↗

Decoding the spatiotemporal patterns of food spoilage microbial communities: Integrating multi-omics and artificial intelligence to enable precision preservation.

In the global food supply chain, food wastage caused by spoilage has resulted in significant economic losses, food shortages, and environmental pressure. This process is fundamentally driven by the spatiotemporal dynamics of microbial communities. However, traditional research methods struggle to elucidate the complex mechanisms of spatial heterogeneity, interspecies interactions, and functional succession. This limits the development of effective preservation strategies. This review systematically reviews the cutting-edge progress of integrating multi-omics technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) to study food spoilage microbial communities, breaking through this bottleneck. We propose an intelligent theoretical framework that could potentially analyze microbial metabolic activities and predict dynamic shelf life if implemented. The conceptual framework integrates multidimensional data, including spatial metabolomics, temporal metatranscriptomics, single-cell transcriptomics, and longitudinal metagenomics. It can also be combined with AI models, such as graph neural networks. The article elaborates on the principles and applications of spatio-temporal monitoring technologies, such as nano secondary ion mass spectrometry, hyperspectral imaging, and the Internet of Things sensing. Through illustrative cases of typical perishable foods, it also explores how such a multi-omics - AI system might be applied to spoilage warning and precise intervention. Additionally, the article addresses the current challenges in data coverage, model generalization, and federated learning implementation. Then the research further explores emerging areas such as engineered probiotics, edge AI, and microfluidic sensing. These areas are targeted at transforming food preservation from an empirical control approach to a data-driven, precise regulatory framework. This transformation provides theoretical support and technical approaches for developing a smart, sustainable food preservation system.

Multiomics↗

How Following Medical Artificial Intelligence Advice Can Mitigate Malpractice Liability: Cross-National Insights from a Randomized Trial.

Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly influences clinical decision-making, yet its recommendations may diverge from standard care. Although malpractice concerns are thought to discourage physicians from following AI advice, experimental evidence from the United States suggests the opposite: lay jurors are more likely to hold physicians liable when they reject AI recommendations. Whether this pattern extends to systems in which court-appointed experts, not lay jurors, determine liability remains unknown. Methods: To examine how physicians and laypeople in expert-based and lay-juror legal systems evaluate physicians' acceptance or rejection of AI recommendations, particularly when those recommendations deviate from standard care, we designed a randomized vignette study: a 2 &#xd7; 2 factorial design varying the AI recommendation (standard vs. nonstandard care) and a fictional physician's decision (accept vs. reject). The study was conducted online in 2023 among nationally representative samples of U.S. and German adults and from 2023 to 2024 among German physicians. In total, 387 German physicians, 2291 U.S. adults, and 2283 German adults participated; those not completing the survey or failing attention checks were excluded per preregistered criteria. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 vignettes, varying the AI recommendation (standard vs. nonstandard care) and physician's decision (accept vs. reject). The reasonableness of the fictional physician's decision was measured, rated by participants on a Likert scale. Results: Analysis, following preregistered exclusion criteria, included 248 German physicians, 1202 U.S. adults, and 1358 German adults. Physicians accepting standard-care AI recommendations were rated more reasonable than those rejecting them (U.S. laypeople: t = 5.36; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97; P < 0.001; German physicians: t = 2.47; 95% CI, 0.14-1.30; P = 0.02; German laypeople: t = 4.14; 95% CI, 0.27-0.76; P < 0.001). Ratings of physicians accepting versus rejecting AI nonstandard-care recommendations were statistically equivalent. Equivalence was tested at an &#x3b1;-value of 0.05 using a two 1-sided tests procedure, reported with 90% CIs per standard convention (U.S. laypeople: t = -4.90; 90% CI, -0.1 to 0.36; P < 0.001; German physicians: t = -1.76; 90% CI, -0.12 to 0.67; P = 0.04; German laypeople: t = 5.35; 90% CI, -0.35 to 0.06; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Across the United States and Germany, samples representative of lay jurors and court-appointed experts viewed accepting standard-care AI advice as more reasonable, whereas accepting or rejecting nonstandard-care AI advice was judged similarly. Contrary to predictions, malpractice liability regimes do not necessarily pose a barrier to AI use in precision medicine.

Artificial Intelligence↗

The future of precision oncology and artificial intelligence in Belgium: scenarios and policy responses.

PURPOSE: Precision medicine, also known as personalized medicine, enables the provision of tailored health services to patients. In the prevention, early detection, and treatment of cancers, precision medicine is highly promising, given the increasing use of genomic profiling for diagnosis and adapting therapies in several tumor types. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can support this process by analyzing vast amounts of relevant data. However, high-quality data and financial investments in the health system are essential for the implementation of precision medicine and AI solutions in routine cancer care. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Building on the quantitative outcomes of a foresight exercise published in another study, this article collects qualitative data to gain more detailed insights into the future of precision oncology in Belgium and discusses the role of AI in this field. It reports the results of a series of expert workshops, focusing on four hypothetical future scenarios that are centered around technological and economic issues that must be overcome for the widespread use of precision oncology in Belgium. FINDINGS: The study concludes that all four scenarios discussed in the workshops would require supportive policy measures in Belgium, which should go beyond mere technological and economic considerations, such as involving patient associations and the public in policy design or creating multi-disciplinary expert groups for precision medicine. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to employ foresight methodology to illustrate possible future scenarios, scrutinize feasible approaches for implementing precision oncology in Belgium, and discuss the use of AI in this context.

Belgium↗

Applications of artificial intelligence systems in the analysis of epidemiological data.

A brief review of the germane literature suggests that the use of artificial intelligence (AI) statistical algorithms in epidemiology has been limited. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using AI systems in large-scale sets of epidemiological data to extract inherent, formerly unidentified, and potentially valuable patterns that human-driven deductive models may miss.

Algorithms↗

AI-Driven Multi-Omics Integration of Synthetic Colon Adenocarcinoma for Cluster-Guided PROTAC Candidate Design Targeting KRASG12D.

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death, yet its molecular heterogeneity remains poorly translated into individualized treatment. We present a reproducible artificial intelligence (AI) framework that integrates multi-omics benchmarking, sample-level drug prioritization, E3 ubiquitin ligase selection, and shape-anchored Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) design for KRASG12D in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). A controlled synthetic benchmark comprising 425 tumor and 41 simulated normal profiles, parameterized to match The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) distributions, was used for pipeline verification. Among sixteen methods, the Balanced Latent Integration with Stability Selection (BLISS) model achieved the highest silhouette width (0.86) and competitive agreement (Adjusted Rand Index, ARI, 0.90). The pipeline was validated on real data: a TCGA COAD cohort (186 tumors) with independent Consensus Molecular Subtype (CMS) labels and a CPTAC cohort (104 tumors). Integration modestly recovered CMS (ARI 0.28), and stage, not molecular cluster, drove survival (log-rank p = 0.005 versus 0.81). Sample-level prioritization differed from cluster-level ranking in 82.6% of profiles, below chance (p < 0.0001), without indicating efficacy. Candidate NOVEL00489 showed a good MM-GBSA estimate, matching the reference ASP3082. Compounds are computational candidates requiring experimental validation. This establishes a transparent benchmark for in silico degrader generation in precision oncology.

Humans↗