PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “laparoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

[Complications of gynecologic laparoscopy. Multicentric study of 7,604 laparoscopies].

In a series of 7,604 laparoscopic procedures, the authors report one death and a rate of 2.76 per thousand (21 cases) for complications requiring laparotomy. When exclusively diagnostic laparoscopic procedures are considered (1,191 cases) this rate drops to 1.67 per thousand. The likelihood of laparotomy being required is directly related to the degree of importance of the laparoscopic surgical procedure. For major laparoscopic surgery the rate of laparotomy is 4.46 per thousand (18 cases), whereas it is only 0.42 per thousand (1 case) for minor laparoscopic surgery (p less than 0.01). Intestinal injuries represent 52.4% (11 out of 21) of cases requiring laparotomy. The main problem with this type of accident is to recognize them, because in almost half the cases (42.8%; 3 out of 7) the intestinal injury went unseen during the laparoscopic procedure and gave rise to peritonitis. Vascular complications are less frequent and required laparotomy in only 8 cases (38%; 8 out of 21). This low level of complications is yet further proof that laparoscopic surgery is a reliable technique and does not involve a high risk of laparotomy, provided that the surgeon has received specific training.

Female↗
PubMed1980

[Laparoscopy in the detection of hepatic metastasis of early bronchial cancer (100 laparoscopies)].

Staging 125 cases of primary lung cancer, peritoneoscopy for detection of liver metastasis was done each time it was possible. 100 peritoneoscopies were done, 92 were available. Tolerance was excellent. First investigation showed 16,3% liver metastasis. Higher frequency (35,3%) is found in oat cells carcinomas and lower in epidermoids (13,1%) and adenocarcinomas and/or undifferentiated (7,1%). Above all, in 7,6% of cases, peritoneoscopy alone was able to give diagnosis of liver metastasis not detected by other means. Peritoneoscopy shows no false positive, is safe and more effective than scans of biologic tests, can be repeated, and must become part of staging of lung cancers.

Carcinoma, Bronchogenic↗
PubMed1999

Analysis of laparoscopy in trauma.

BACKGROUND: The optimum roles for laparoscopy in trauma have yet to be established. To date, reviews of laparoscopy in trauma have been primarily descriptive rather than analytic. This article analyzes the results of laparoscopy in trauma. STUDY DESIGN: Outcome analysis was done by reviewing 37 studies with more than 1,900 trauma patients, and laparoscopy was analyzed as a screening, diagnostic, or therapeutic tool. Laparoscopy was regarded as a screening tool if it was used to detect or exclude a positive finding (eg, hemoperitoneum, organ injury, gastrointestinal spillage, peritoneal penetration) that required operative exploration or repair. Laparoscopy was regarded as a diagnostic tool when it was used to identify all injuries, rather than as a screening tool to identify the first indication for a laparotomy. It was regarded as a diagnostic tool only in studies that mandated a laparotomy (gold standard) after laparoscopy to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopic findings. Costs and charges for using laparoscopy in trauma were analyzed when feasible. RESULTS: As a screening tool, laparoscopy missed 1% of injuries and helped prevent 63% of patients from having a trauma laparotomy. When used as a diagnostic tool, laparoscopy had a 41% to 77% missed injury rate per patient. Overall, laparoscopy carried a 1% procedure-related complication rate. Cost-effectiveness has not been uniformly proved in studies comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy has been applied safely and effectively as a screening tool in stable patients with acute trauma. Because of the large number of missed injuries when used as a diagnostic tool, its value in this context is limited. Laparoscopy has been reported infrequently as a therapeutic tool in selected patients, and its use in this context requires further study.

Contraindications↗
PubMed2006

The stress caused by laparoscopy in sheep and its alleviation.

AIM: To determine the plasma cortisol response to laparoscopy in ewes and investigate means of reducing it. METHODS: Ewes without lambs at foot (n=40) were subjected to one of three control or one laparoscopy treatments (n=10 ewes/treatment), being: no restraint or drugs; acepromazine maleate (ACP) control and no restraint; ACP and restraint in a cradle for 5 min; and laparoscopy following ACP. Additional ewes with lambs at foot (n=30) were subjected to: laparoscopy following ACP; laparoscopy following ACP and ketoprofen; and laparoscopy following detomidine. Drugs were injected 20 min before treatment, after a first blood sample had been taken. Blood samples were taken by jugular venepuncture from the ewes 20 min before treatment and at 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min after treatment, while all ewes were held in a pen. Plasma was harvested and assayed for its concentration of cortisol. RESULTS: Plasma cortisol concentrations (PCC) remained constant in ewes in the control restraint group for 80 min. In ewes given ACP, PCC increased for the first 20 min after treatment but then returned to pre-treatment concentrations. PCC of ewes given ACP and restrained in a cradle were elevated above pre-treatment concentrations for 90 min. PCC in ewes subjected to laparoscopy following sedation with ACP increased to a peak at 40 min and returned to pre-treatment concentrations after 60 (with lambs) or 120 (without lambs) min. When ACP and ketoprofen were given before laparoscopy, PCC peaked at 20 min and returned to pre-treatment concentrations by 40 min. PCC of ewes given detomidine before laparoscopy remained at pre-treatment concentrations throughout. PCC of ewes subjected to laparoscopy with ACP sedation only were greater than those of control restraint, ACP control, and ewes subjected to laparoscopy after being given ketoprofen or detomidine between 20 and 60 min after treatment. PCC of ewes subjected to laparoscopy were greater than those of control ewes placed in a cradle at 20 and 40 min. PCC of ewes given ketoprofen were lower than those of ewes subject to laparoscopy following ACP. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy, even after sedation with ACP, caused some distress in ewes, as evidenced by increased plasma cortisol levels. Plasma cortisol response was alleviated by the administration of ketoprofen and eliminated by detomidine, probably because of both analgesic and sedative effects of the latter drug.

Acepromazine↗
PubMed1984

Open laparoscopy. Commentary.

Open laparoscopy has been receiving increased attention in the US and internationally. However, opinions differ on its appropriate role in laparoscopy services. In the US some surgeons remain comfortable using closed laparoscopy for all patients, including some who have had previous abdominal surgery. Some centers are using more open procedures, especially for training programs and for cases where open laparoscopy may be indicated, as described by Dr. Hasson in this "Bulletin." Others have converted to performing all laparoscopy by the open technique. The Planned Parenthood Federation of America encourages minilaparotomy and open laparoscopy for tubal occlusion n its facilities because of the greater inherent potential for patient safety with these approaches. AVS has not provided open laparoscopy equipment to international programs, although some projects have used an open technique. Neither the World Federation of Health Agencies for the Advancement of Voluntary Surgical Contraception nor the AVS Science Committee has addressed the role of open laparoscopy in international programs. This is due in part to insufficient worldwide experience in open laparoscopy. However, this does not preclude AVS from providing such equipment for open laparoscopy in the future. In the US approximately 300-500 Hasson cannulas have been commercially distributed annually for the past 4-5 years. About 2000 may be currently in use in the US. Therefore, among the 6915 hospitals registered with the American Hospital Association in 1982, a substantial proportion may now provide access to open laparoscopy equipment. Studies in the US are not yet available to fully assess the safety of open laparoscopy. However, general comparisons of complication rates for open and closed laparoscopy may not be appropriate since many surgeons reserve the more complicated cases for open laparoscopy.

Americas↗
PubMed2005

CA 19-9 levels predict results of staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer.

Laparoscopy has emerged as an important staging procedure for determining resectability of pancreatic cancer. However, a small fraction of patients with pancreatic cancer benefit from its use and therefore the routine application of laparoscopy remains controversial. We hypothesized that serum CA 19-9 levels may identify patients who will or will not benefit by laparoscopy. We retrospectively reviewed our database of 63 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent staging laparoscopy and correlated findings with CA 19-9 levels. Overall, laparoscopy identified metastatic disease in 12 patients (19%). None of those required any further operation. The resectability rate (patients who underwent resection after laparoscopy) was 73.5%. There was one false-negative laparoscopy (1.6%). Patients with higher CA 19-9 levels had significant higher odds of having metastasis identified by laparoscopy (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.24; P = .04). There was no patient with CA 19-9 levels below 100 U/ml in whom metastatic disease was identified during laparoscopy: 18 patients (28.6%) with CA 19-9 levels below this cutoff point had negative laparoscopy and could have avoided the procedure had this cutoff been used for screening. This would have increased the laparoscopy yield to 26.7%. In patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, low CA 19-9 levels predict low probability of metastatic disease; in those patients, laparoscopy can be spared. On the contrary, patients with elevated CA 19-9 have an increased probability of metastatic disease, and these patients may benefit from diagnostic laparoscopy.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Short-term morbidity and long-term recurrence rate of ovarian dermoid cysts treated by laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term morbidity and the long-term recurrence rate of ovarian dermoid cysts in women treated conservatively by laparoscopy with the outcomes in women treated by laparotomy. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre cohort study compared the outcomes of removal of dermoid cysts by laparoscopy with removal by laparotomy. All specimens were confirmed histologically as dermoid cysts. We reviewed all medical records and identified all surgical interventions for dermoid cysts over a 10-year period (1993-2003) in two academic centres in Quebec City. Of the 299 women treated for ovarian dermoid cysts, 167 were treated by laparotomy and 132 were treated by laparoscopy. To compare short-term morbidity, we excluded those who had undergone ophorectomy or any concomitant surgery, and we consequently reviewed the records of 98 patients in the laparotomy group and 100 patients in the laparoscopy group. To compare long-term recurrence rates we excluded only those patients who had had oophorectomy. In total, 245 women with available follow-up were identified as having ovarian cystectomy (95 in the laparoscopy group and 150 in the laparotomy group). Two-tailed Fisher exact test was used for analysis of categorical variables, and Student t test or Wilcoxon rank test were used for analysis of continuous variables comparing the two groups. Life table analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method was performed to assess the risk of long-term recurrence. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the cyst in women who had a laparotomy was significantly larger than in women who had laparoscopy (8.27 cm vs. 5.94 cm), and significantly more women in the laparotomy group had bilateral cysts (16% vs. 5% in the laparoscopy group). In women who had laparoscopy, operating time was greater (P = 0.0363), but blood loss was less (P < 0.0001) and duration of hospital stay (P < 0.0001) was shorter. Spillage of the cyst's contents occurred in 18% of cases in the laparoscopy group and in 1% in the laparotomy group. Conversions of laparoscopy to laparotomy occurred in 11% of cases, mainly because of cyst size. Postoperative complication rates were similar in the two groups. Reintervention rate was 4.2% in the laparoscopy group and 0% in the laparotomy group (P = 0.0217). Using life table analysis, the probability of recurrence at two years was 7.6% (95% confidence intervals 2.9, 19.2) in the laparoscopy group and 0% in the laparotomy group. CONCLUSION: Ovarian cystectomy performed by laparoscopy is associated with a higher incidence of intra-abdominal spillage than laparotomy, but this not associated with any increase in morbidity. Laparoscopic treatment results in a shorter hospital stay and less intraoperative blood loss than laparotomy, but it is associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertile women].

UNLABELLED: Tubal pathology with tubal blockage due to the pelvic inflammatory diseases is one of the most frequent causes of infertility in a woman [1]. The two most important diagnostic procedures which are used for evaluation of tubal patency are hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic hydrotubation [4]. SUBJECT: The aim of the study was the comparison of hysterosalpingographic and laparoscopic findings and determination of accuracy of these two procedures in the diagnosis of tubal patency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied and compared the results of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in 102 infertile women who were operated on at the Narodni Front Hospital of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Belgrade during 1993 and 1994. Of 102 operated women 47 women were with primary infertility and 55 with secondary infertility. The patients were from 20 to 41 years of age, the average 28 +/- 2.4 years. RESULTS: Of one hundred and two operated women tubal blockage was found in 94 (92.1%) patients. Unilateral hydrosalpinx was found by hysterosalpingography in 16 (15.7%) subjects and bilateral hydrosalpinx in 30 (29.4%) women. Unilateral hydrosalpinx was found by laparoscopy in 17 (16.1%) patients and bilateral hydrosalpinx in 32 (31.4%) subjects. The concordant findings by hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the diagnostics of unilateral hydrosalpinx were found in 76.5% of cases, and in bilateral hydrosalpinx in 70.4%. This difference was not statistically significant. Unilateral tubal blockage was identified by laparoscopy in 26 (25.5%) patients and bilateral in 27 (26.5%) subjects. The concordant findings by hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in unilateral tubal blockage were found in 61.5% of cases, and in bilateral tubal blockage in 70.4% of women. The total concordant findings by hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in tubal blockage were found in 65.7 of cases, and concordant findings after hysterosalpingography and surgery were noted in 61.7% cases. The findings by laparoscopy and surgery were in harmony in 86.3% patients. Ovarian abnormalities were found by laparoscopy and surgery in 22 (21.6%) women. Pelvic adhesions were found by laparoscopy in 42 women of 49 patients in whom pelvic adhesions were found during the operation. Uterine congenital anomalies were found by laparoscopy in 3 (2.9%), women and by hysterosalpingography in 6 (5.9%) patients. DISCUSSION: Of 102 operated women tubal blockage was found in 94 (92.2%) women. Unilateral tubal blockage was found in 38 (40.4%) patients, and bilateral tubal blockage in 56 (59.6%) subjects. Hysterosalpingographic and laparoscopic hydrotubation findings in the diagnosis of tubal patency were concordant in 65% of cases, hysterosalpingographic and operative findings in 61.7% of patients, and laparoscopic and operative findings in 86.3% of subjects. Although concordant findings of 65.7% were noted in this study, which were similar to findings of other authors, the percentage of 62.5% [4], and 76% was observed [5]. During the operation pelvic adhesions were found in 49 patients, and laparoscopic in 42 women only. Ovarian abnormalities were found by laparoscopy in 22 (21.6%) patients, while uterine fibroid was found in 10 (9.8%) subjects. Uterine congenital anomalies were found by hysterosalpingography in 6 (5.9%) cases and by laparoscopy only in 3 (2.9%) patients. The advantage of visual hysterosalpingography seems to be in identification of some congenital uterine anomalies. However, the advantage of laparoscopy is identified by the possibility of visualisation of some other pelvic abnormalities which may be the cause of infertility. CONCLUSION: There are some hysterosalpingographic and laparoscopic advantages and disadvantages in the diagnosis of infertility in women. Only by using both procedures accurate results can be achieved in the tubes, the uterus and the ovary, that can be a cause of infertility in women.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy for early diagnosis of abdominal complications after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: In the early postoperative period after major cardiac surgery using extracorporal circulation, abdominal complications can have serious consequences with a mortality rate of up to 70%. Early diagnosis and the timely institution of therapy are the most important factors to improve the outcome; however, clinical evaluation of the abdomen is difficult in these patients. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a minimally invasive procedure with low procedure-associated morbidity, even in critically ill patients. The aims of our study were to investigate the safety of laparoscopy in critically ill patients suspected to have intraabdominal pathology following cardiac surgery and to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy compared to laparotomy in this setting. METHODS: A total of 17 patients were included (13 male, four female, age 52-80 years) in the early (3-30 days) postoperative period after cardiac surgery using extracorporal circulation (10 ACVB, four valve replacement, one aorto-coronary-venous-bypass (ACVB)+ valve replacement, two cardiac transplantation). Clinical and laboratory findings included distended abdomen (17 of 17), elevated white blood cells (12 of 17), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (13 of 17), and elevated lactate levels (11 of 17). The decision to perform laparotomy was taken in all patients on the basis of their clinical condition. Diagnostic laparoscopy was always performed immediately before laparotomy. The laparoscopic findings were then compared to the laparotomy findings. RESULTS: In one patient, laparoscopy showed no abnormal findings, this was confirmed on laparotomy. Five patients were found to have massive distension of the large bowel without ischemia on both laparoscopy and laparotomy. Colonic ischemia of the right hemicolon was found laparoscopically in six patients, which was confirmed in all cases by open resection and histological workup. Three patients suffered from acute cholecystitis, which was correctly diagnosed by laparoscopy in all cases. In one patient, laparoscopy revealed fibrinous peritonitis without other findings. Open exploration failed to identify the cause of the peritonitis in this patient. Laparoscopy showed no pathological findings in one patient, but laparotomy then revealed necrotizing pancreatitis confined to the lesser sac. There was one laparoscopy-associated intraoperative complication (6%) in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic laparoscopy is a minimally invasive procedure that can be performed at low intraoperative risk in critically ill patients and has a high sensitivity (94%) for the correct diagnosis of intraabdominal complications after major cardiac surgery. These results suggest that bedside laparoscopy should be considered for all patients with equivocal abdominal symptoms in this setting.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome.

In this study, we compare the prognostic significance of hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy for fertility outcome. In a prospective cohort study in 11 clinics participating in the Canadian Infertility Treatment Evaluation Study (CITES), consecutive couples who registered between 1 April 1984 and 31 March 1987 for the evaluation of subfertility and who underwent HSG and laparoscopy were included. Unilateral and bilateral tubal occlusion at HSG and laparoscopy were related to treatment-independent pregnancy. Cox regression was used to calculate fecundity rate ratios (FRR). Of the 794 patients who were included, 114 (14%) showed one-sided tubal occlusion and 194 (24%) showed two-sided tubal occlusion on HSG. At laparoscopy, 94 (12%) showed one-sided tubal occlusion and 96 (12%) showed two-sided tubal occlusion. Occlusion detected on HSG and laparoscopy showed a moderate agreement beyond chance (weighted kappa-statistic 0.42). The adjusted FRR of one-sided tubal occlusion at HSG was 0.80, whereas two-sided tubal occlusion showed an FRR of 0.49. For laparoscopy, the FRR were 0.51 and 0.15 respectively. After a normal or one-sided occluded HSG, laparoscopy showed two-sided occlusion in 5% of the patients, and fertility prospects in these patients were virtually zero. If two-sided tubal occlusion was detected on HSG but not during laparoscopy, fertility prospects were slightly impaired. Fertility prospects after a two-sided occluded HSG were strongly impaired in cases where laparoscopy showed one-sided and two-sided occlusion, with FRR of 0.38 and 0.19 respectively. Although laparoscopy performed better than HSG as a predictor of future fertility, it should not be considered as the perfect test in the diagnosis of tubal pathology. For clinical practice, laparoscopy can be delayed after normal HSG for at least 10 months, since the probability that laparoscopy will show tubal occlusion after a normal HSG is very low.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The role of laparoscopy in intrauterine insemination: a prospective randomized reallocation study.

BACKGROUND: We questioned whether a laparoscopy should be performed after a normal hysterosalpingography before starting intrauterine inseminations (IUI) in order to detect further pelvic pathology and whether a postponed procedure after six unsuccessful cycles of IUI yields a higher number of abnormal findings. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, the accuracy of a standard laparoscopy prior to IUI was compared with a laparoscopy performed after six unsuccessful cycles of IUI. The major end-point was the number of diagnostic laparoscopies revealing pelvic pathology with consequence for further treatment such as laparoscopic surgical intervention, IVF or secondary surgery. Patients were couples with medical grounds for IUI such as idiopathic subfertility, mild male infertility and cervical hostility. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were randomized into the diagnostic laparoscopy first (DLSF) group and the same number was randomized into the IUI first (IUIF) group. The laparoscopy was performed on 64 patients in the DLSF group, 10 patients withdrew their consent from participation and three patients (3%) became pregnant prior to laparoscopy. In the IUIF group, 23 patients remained for laparoscopy because pregnancy did not occur after six cycles of IUI. From the original 77 randomized patients, 38 patients became pregnant and 16 patients dropped out. Abnormal findings during laparoscopy with therapeutic consequences were the same in both groups: in the DLSF group, 31 cases (48%) versus 13 cases (56%) in the IUIF group, P = 0.63; odds ratio (OR) = 1.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5-3.6. The ongoing pregnancy rate in the DLSF group was 34 out of 77 patients (44%) versus 38 out of 77 patients (49%) in the IUIF group (P = 0.63; OR = 1.2; 95% CI: 0.7-2.3). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy performed after six cycles of unsuccessful IUI did not detect more abnormalities with clinical consequences compared with those performed prior to IUI treatment. Our data suggest that the impact of the detection and the laparoscopic treatment of observed pelvic pathology prior to IUI seems negligible in terms of IUI outcome. Therefore, we seriously question the value of routinely performing a diagnostic and/or therapeutic laparoscopy prior to IUI treatment. Further prospective studies could be performed to determine the effect of laparoscopic interventions on the success rate of IUI treatment in order to rule out completely the laparoscopy from the diagnostic route prior to IUI.

Adnexal Diseases↗
PubMed1997

Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with acute leukemia and suspected hepatic candidiasis.

To assess the value of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of suspected hepatosplenic candidiasis in patients with acute leukemia, a retrospective analysis of 28 laparoscopies was conducted. In all but two cases, imaging of the liver showed focal lesions before laparoscopy. Diagnosis of hepatic candidiasis was established significantly more often when the biopsy was targeted at white nodules (in 12 of 22 laparoscopies) than when targeted randomly or at scars (0 of 6 laparoscopies) (p = 0.017, chi-square test). Yeast was detected more often if the laparoscopy was performed during the three-week period after recovery from neutropenia (in 8 of 12 laparoscopies) than when performed later (in 4 of 16 laparoscopies) (p = 0.028, chi-square test). In addition to the 12 laparoscopically diagnosed patients, eight (29%) patients were diagnosed with disseminated Candida infection by other methods. In another eight (29%) patients the causative agent was not identified. No bleeding or other problems occurred after the laparoscopy. Laparoscopy-guided liver biopsy is most useful if biopsies are targeted to macroscopic lesions and if laparoscopy is performed soon after recovery from neutropenia.

Acute Disease↗