PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “management.”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2026

Management of neonates born to mothers with reactive serologic tests for syphilis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The dramatic resurgence of maternal and congenital syphilis in the United States highlights the need for their optimal management as syphilis in pregnancy can result in substantial neonatal morbidity and mortality. This review summarizes current epidemiology and discusses guidance on the management of neonates born to mothers with reactive serologic tests for syphilis. RECENT FINDINGS: Timely communication with local health department professionals is essential for optimal management of mothers with reactive serologic tests for syphilis and their neonates. Knowledge of maternal syphilis treatment history by partnering with local jurisdictions can circumvent much of the incertitude surrounding neonatal management. All neonates born to mothers with reactive serologic tests for syphilis should be tested using a nontreponemal ('lipoidal antigen') test. However, a reactive test may only indicate maternal nontreponemal IgG antibodies that are transferred transplacentally to the fetus. Therefore, neonatal management depends on maternal history and treatment for syphilis as well as clinical, laboratory, and radiographic findings in the neonatal evaluation. Existing management algorithms are complex, highlighting the need for a more practical, yet safe, approach. SUMMARY: A neonatal management guideline is proposed that may simplify the management of neonates born to mothers with reactive serologic tests for syphilis while advocating for expanded use of single-dose benzathine penicillin G therapy.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Alarms and alarm management with automated versus conventional ventilation in neurocritical care patients.

INTRODUCTION: False or clinically irrelevant alarms are a major driver of ICU alarm fatigue and nursing workload. Ventilator alarms make up a large share, and although automated ventilation modes can reduce manual adjustments, their effect on alarm burden is still unclear. This issue can be particularly relevant in neurocritical care patients, where precise ventilator and alarm management is imperative for patient safety. OBJECTIVES: This explorative post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial compared alarm frequency and management between automated ventilation and conventional ventilation in neurocritical care patients. METHODS: Ventilator alarms and manual ventilator changes were captured continuously from the ventilator for up to 24 h per patient. The primary endpoint was a composite of workload-relevant alarms; with alarm management interventions at the ventilator as a key secondary outcome. Additional endpoints included redundant alarms, alarm duration and ventilator management. RESULTS: 13 patients received automated ventilation and 24 received conventional ventilation. No difference was observed in workload-relevant alarm frequency between automated and conventional ventilation (3.28 [2.87 to 4.30] vs 3.73 [1.66 to 7.33] alarms per hour; P = 0.81), while alarm management interventions at the ventilator were lower with automated ventilation (0.14 [0.10 to 0.15] vs 0.21 [0.17 to 0.31] interventions per hour; P = 0.01). Other alarm frequencies, duration of alarms and ventilator management were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial in neurocritical care patients during the early phase of mechanical ventilation, automated ventilation did not reduce the frequency of total or workload-relevant alarms, nor their duration, but was associated with fewer alarm management interventions compared to conventional ventilation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Automated ventilation may not reduce alarm frequency in neurocritical care patients, but the observed reduction in alarm-related bedside interventions suggests a potential benefit for nursing workload.

Humans↗