SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “microRNA”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Use of RNA polymerase II to transcribe artificial microRNAs.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenously encoded approximately 22-nt-long RNAs that are generally expressed in a highly tissue- or developmental-stage-specific fashion and that posttranscriptionally regulate target genes. Regulatable RNA polymerase II promoters can be used to overexpress authentic microRNAs in cell culture. Furthermore, one can also design and express artificial microRNAs based on the features of existing microRNA genes, such as the gene encoding the human miR-30 microRNA. Overexpression or inappropriate expression of authentic microRNAs may facilitate the study of their normal functions and expression of artificial microRNAs may permit effective, regulated RNA interference in vivo.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2003

Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs.

Plants with altered microRNA metabolism have pleiotropic developmental defects, but direct evidence for microRNAs regulating specific aspects of plant morphogenesis has been lacking. In a genetic screen, we identified the JAW locus, which produces a microRNA that can guide messenger RNA cleavage of several TCP genes controlling leaf development. MicroRNA-guided cleavage of TCP4 mRNA is necessary to prevent aberrant activity of the TCP4 gene expressed from its native promoter. In addition, overexpression of wild-type and microRNA-resistant TCP variants demonstrates that mRNA cleavage is largely sufficient to restrict TCP function to its normal domain of activity. TCP genes with microRNA target sequences are found in a wide range of species, indicating that microRNA-mediated control of leaf morphogenesis is conserved in plants with very different leaf forms.

Arabidopsis↗

PubMed2004

A custom microarray platform for analysis of microRNA gene expression.

MicroRNAs are short, noncoding RNA transcripts that post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression. Several hundred microRNA genes have been identified in Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila, plants and mammals. MicroRNAs have been linked to developmental processes in C. elegans, plants and humans and to cell growth and apoptosis in Drosophila. A major impediment in the study of microRNA function is the lack of quantitative expression profiling methods. To close this technological gap, we have designed dual-channel microarrays that monitor expression levels of 124 mammalian microRNAs. Using these tools, we observed distinct patterns of expression among adult mouse tissues and embryonic stem cells. Expression profiles of staged embryos demonstrate temporal regulation of a large class of microRNAs, including members of the let-7 family. This microarray technology enables comprehensive investigation of microRNA expression, and furthers our understanding of this class of recently discovered noncoding RNAs.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Myogenic factors that regulate expression of muscle-specific microRNAs.

Since their discovery as key regulators of early animal development, microRNAs now are recognized as widespread regulators of gene expression. Despite their abundance, little is known regarding the regulation of microRNA biogenesis. We show that three highly conserved muscle-specific microRNAs, miR-1, miR-133 and miR-206, are robustly induced during the myoblast-myotube transition, both in primary human myoblasts and in the mouse mesenchymal C2C12 stem cell line. These microRNAs were not induced during osteogenic conversion of C2C12 cells. Moreover, both loci encoding miR-1, miR-1-1, and miR-1-2, and two of the three encoding miR-133, miR-133a-1 and miR-133a-2, are strongly induced during myogenesis. Some of the induced microRNAs are in intergenic regions, whereas two are transcribed in the opposite direction to the nonmuscle-specific gene in which they are embedded. By using CHIP analysis, we demonstrate that the myogenic factors Myogenin and MyoD bind to regions upstream of these microRNAs and, therefore, are likely to regulate their expression. Because miR-1 and miR-206 are predicted to repress similar mRNA targets, our work suggests that induction of these microRNAs is important in regulating the expression of muscle-specific proteins.

Animals↗

PubMed2025

The advantage of periodic over constant signalling in microRNA-mediated regulation.

Cells may exploit oscillatory gene expression to encode biological information. Temporal features of oscillations, such as pulse frequency and amplitude, are determinant for the outcome of signalling pathways. However, little effort has been devoted to unveiling the role of pulsatility in the context of post-transcriptional gene regulation, where microRNAs act by binding to RNAs and regulate their expression. Here, we study the effects of periodic against constant microRNA synthesis within minimal microRNA-target networks. We find that there is a repressive advantage of pulsatile over constant microRNA synthesis, and that the extent of repression depends on the frequency of pulses, thus uncovering frequency preference behaviours. We show that the preference for specific input frequencies is determined by relative microRNA and target kinetic rates and can lead to exclusive frequency-dependent repression on distinct RNA species, thereby highlighting a potential mechanism of selective dynamical target regulation. Moreover, we show that frequencies observed in periodically expressed microRNAs, such as those involved in circadian rhythms and development, can be selectively favored. Our findings might have implications for experimental studies aimed at understanding how periodic patterns drive biological responses through microRNA-mediated signalling and provide suggestions for validation in synthetic networks.

MicroRNAs↗

PubMed2006

The expansion of the metazoan microRNA repertoire.

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs have been identified as crucial regulators in both animals and plants. Here we report on a comprehensive comparative study of all known miRNA families in animals. We expand the MicroRNA Registry 6.0 by more than 1000 new homologs of miRNA precursors whose expression has been verified in at least one species. Using this uniform data basis we analyze their evolutionary history in terms of individual gene phylogenies and in terms of preservation of genomic nearness across species. This allows us to reliably identify microRNA clusters that are derived from a common transcript. RESULTS: We identify three episodes of microRNA innovation that correspond to major developmental innovations: A class of about 20 miRNAs is common to protostomes and deuterostomes and might be related to the advent of bilaterians. A second large wave of innovations maps to the branch leading to the vertebrates. The third significant outburst of miRNA innovation coincides with placental (eutherian) mammals. In addition, we observe the expected expansion of the microRNA inventory due to genome duplications in early vertebrates and in an ancestral teleost. The non-local duplications in the vertebrate ancestor are predated by local (tandem) duplications leading to the formation of about a dozen ancient microRNA clusters. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that microRNA innovation is an ongoing process. Major expansions of the metazoan miRNA repertoire coincide with the advent of bilaterians, vertebrates, and (placental) mammals.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Microrna Expression in Aurelia aurita Metamorphosis.

INTRODUCTION: In animal taxa and jellyfish, the same genome encodes for the different phenotypes that characterize life stages that follow each other during ontogeny. This situation underscores the existence of profound regulation of genomic information at the epigenetic level. MicroRNAs are fundamental epigenetic regulators. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of microRNA regulation during jellyfish metamorphosis and to explore the existence of evolutionarily conserved microRNAs. METHODS: Specimens belonging to the 4-metamorphosis stages of A. aurita (polyps, ephyra, young, and adult jellyfish) were bred and collected. The expression of 2,549 miRNAs for each stage was tested using microarray technology. The comparison of microRNA expression for each phase was performed using line plot analysis and Principal Component Analysis of variance (PCA), while the identification of microRNA clusters was performed via volcano plot analysis. RESULTS: A remarkable number of A. aurita miRNAs specifically hybridize with a human miRNA library. Each metamorphosis stage is characterized by a different level of expression of miRNAs: 1) Polyp vs. Ephyra stage: 128 upregulated, 2 downregulated; 2) Ephyra vs. Young stage: 2 upregulated, 135 downregulated; 3) Young vs. Adult stage: 69 upregulated, 6 downregulated. Specific functions inferred from known activities of corresponding miRNAs in higher animals (PubMed database) appear to be coherent with the correlated experimental model. DISCUSSION: Present results reveal that microRNAs with human homologs undergo specific expression changes throughout Aurelia aurita metamorphosis. This observation reinforces the hypothesis of a shared evolutionary origin of certain miRNA families between Cnidaria and Bilateria. The dynamic and stage-specific regulation pattern observed suggests that miRNAs play a key role in orchestrating the complex transitions involved in jellyfish development. These findings point to a broader conservation of epigenetic mechanisms, such as miRNA-mediated gene silencing, which may have emerged early in metazoan evolution and contributed to the regulation of cell differentiation and phenotype modulation. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the importance of Aurelia aurita as a model for investigating miRNA-driven epigenetic regulation in non-bilaterian animals. The identification of human-homologous miRNAs provides novel insights into the evolutionary stability of the epigenetic machinery and suggests conserved regulatory functions across distant taxa. Although limited by the use of a human-based microarray platform, the data presented here lay a solid foundation for future studies employing sequencing and functional assays to further explore the role of miRNAs in cnidarian development and evolution.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Architecture of a validated microRNA::target interaction.

MicroRNAs are small approximately 22 nucleotide regulators of numerous biological processes and bind target gene messenger RNAs to control gene expression. The C. elegans microRNA let-7 and its target lin-41 were the first microRNA::target interaction to be validated in vivo. let-7 molecules form imperfect duplexes with two required let-7 complementary sites in the lin-41 3' UTR. Here, we show that base pairing at both the 5' and 3' ends of the let-7 binding site, as well as the presence of unpaired RNA residues in the predicted duplexes, are required for lin-41 downregulation. In this study, our model for microRNA::target interactions also demonstrates that the context of a microRNA binding can be critical for function, revealing an unforeseen complexity in microRNA::target interactions.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

The C elegans hunchback homolog, hbl-1, controls temporal patterning and is a probable microRNA target.

hunchback regulates the temporal identity of neuroblasts in Drosophila. Here we show that hbl-1, the C. elegans hunchback ortholog, also controls temporal patterning. Furthermore, hbl-1 is a probable target of microRNA regulation through its 3'UTR. hbl-1 loss-of-function causes the precocious expression of adult seam cell fates. This phenotype is similar to loss-of-function of lin-41, a known target of the let-7 microRNA. Like lin-41 mutations, hbl-1 loss-of-function partially suppresses a let-7 mutation. The hbl-1 3'UTR is both necessary and sufficient to downregulate a reporter gene during development, and the let-7 and lin-4 microRNAs are both required for HBL-1/GFP downregulation. Multiple elements in the hbl-1 3'UTR show complementarity to regulatory microRNAs, suggesting that microRNAs directly control hbl-1. MicroRNAs may likewise function to regulate Drosophila hunchback during temporal patterning of the nervous system.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

PubMed2005

Human microRNAs target a functionally distinct population of genes with AT-rich 3' UTRs.

While investigating microRNA targets, we have found that human genes divide into two roughly equal populations, based on the fraction of A plus T bases in their 3' UTRs. Using the Gene Ontology database, we find significant functional differences between the two gene populations, with AT-rich genes implicated in transcription and translation processes, and GC-rich genes implicated in signal transduction and posttranslational protein modification. Better understanding of the background distribution of nucleotides in 3' UTRs may allow improved prediction of microRNA-targeted genes in humans. We predict at least 1,200 KnownGene transcripts to be regulated by microRNAs. The large majority of these microRNA targets are in the AT-rich 3' UTR population. However, notwithstanding this preference for AT-rich targets, microRNA targets are found preferentially to be regulatory genes themselves, including both transcription factors and posttranslational modifiers. These results suggest that some processes involving mRNA, of which microRNA regulation may be just one, require AT-richness of 3' UTRs for functionality. A relationship, not simply one-to-one, between these 3' UTR populations and large-scale genomic isochores is described.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

PubMed2006

MicroRNA fingerprints during human megakaryocytopoiesis.

microRNAs are a highly conserved class of noncoding RNAs with important regulatory functions in proliferation, apoptosis, development, and differentiation. To discover novel regulatory pathways during megakaryocytic differentiation, we performed microRNA expression profiling of in vitro-differentiated megakaryocytes derived from CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitors. The main finding was down-regulation of miR-10a, miR-126, miR-106, miR-10b, miR-17 and miR-20. Hypothetically, the down-regulation of microRNAs unblocks target genes involved in differentiation. We confirmed in vitro and in vivo that miR-130a targets the transcription factor MAFB, which is involved in the activation of the GPIIB promoter, a key protein for platelet physiology. In addition, we found that miR-10a expression in differentiated megakaryocytes is inverse to that of HOXA1, and we showed that HOXA1 is a direct target of miR-10a. Finally, we compared the microRNA expression of megakaryoblastic leukemic cell lines with that of in vitro differentiated megakaryocytes and CD34(+) progenitors. This analysis revealed up-regulation of miR-101, miR-126, miR-99a, miR-135, and miR-20. Our data delineate the expression of microRNAs during megakaryocytopoiesis and suggest a regulatory role of microRNAs in this process by targeting megakaryocytic transcription factors.

Antigens, CD34↗

PubMed2004

Structural aspects of microRNA biogenesis.

One of the biggest surprises at the beginning of the 'post-genome era' was the discovery of numerous genes encoding microRNAs. They were found in genomes of such diverse organisms as Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Homo sapiens which implies their important role in multicellular life evolution. The number of microRNA genes is estimated to be nearly 1% of that of protein-coding genes. Their products, tiny RNAs, are thought to regulate gene expression during development, organogenesis, and very likely during many other processes, by hybridizing to their target mRNAs. The cellular functions of mRNAs that are regulated by microRNAs are only beginning to be revealed, and details of this regulation mechanism are still poorly understood. In this article we discuss the possible mechanisms of microRNA biogenesis with special emphasis on their structural aspects. We have focused on the factors and effects that may be responsible for the existing length differences between different microRNAs, and for the observed length heterogeneity within some individual microRNA species.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

MicroRNA functions in animal development and human disease.

Five years into the 'small RNA revolution' it is hard not to share in the excitement about the rapidly unravelling biology of microRNAs. Since the discovery of the first microRNA gene, lin-4, in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, many more of these short regulatory RNA genes have been identified in flowering plants, worms, flies, fish, frogs and mammals. Currently, about 2% of the known human genes encode microRNAs. MicroRNAs are essential for development and this review will summarise our current knowledge of animal microRNA function. We will also discuss the emerging links of microRNA biology to stem cell research and human disease, in particular cancer.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Simple, quantitative primer-extension PCR assay for direct monitoring of microRNAs and short-interfering RNAs.

There has been a surge of interest in the biology of microRNAs and the technology of RNA interference. We describe a simple, robust, inexpensive assay for quantitative analysis of microRNAs and short-interfering RNAs. The method relies on primer extension conversion of RNA to cDNA by reverse transcription followed by quantitative, real-time PCR. Technical parameters critical to the success of the assay are presented. Measurements of microRNA levels are sensitive, with most assays allowing measurements in the femtomolar range, which corresponds to tens of copies per cell or less. The assay has a high dynamic range and provides linear readout over differences in microRNA concentrations that span 6-7 orders of magnitude. The assay is capable of discriminating between related microRNA family members that differ by subtle sequence differences. We used the method for quantitative analysis of six microRNAs across 12 tissue samples. The data confirm striking variation in the patterns of expression of these noncoding regulatory RNAs.

DNA Primers↗

PubMed2006

MicroRNA modulation of RNA-binding protein regulatory elements.

We propose that microRNAs could modulate RNA-binding protein binding sites in a dynamic manner. We suggest that the cis-regulatory code targeted by microRNAs is, at least in part, the same as that read by mRNA-binding proteins. Our hypothesis predicts that microRNAs indirectly or directly bind to RNA-binding protein binding sites. Alternatively, the microRNA-mRNA interactions can themselves be the target of an mRNA-binding protein. Lastly, we envision examples where multiple mRNA regulatory elements are simultaneously influenced by microRNA-mRNA interactions such that the binding of one or more microRNA results in conformational changes in the structure of the mRNA, thereby, either revealing or masking a second regulatory element.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

MicroRNAs in vertebrate development.

The vertebrate genome contains hundreds of small non-coding 'microRNAs' that have been implicated in controlling the expression of potentially thousands of target genes. Presently, only a handful of these targets have been characterized. Recent reports of microRNA 'sensors', microRNA microarrays and the creation of vertebrates that lack all microRNA activity will aid in determining the roles played by microRNAs, and the genes that they regulate, during vertebrate development.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Gene regulation by microRNAs.

The role of small RNAs as key regulators of mRNA turnover and translation has been well established. Recent advances indicate that the small RNAs termed microRNAs play important roles in animal development and physiology. Cellular activities such as proliferation, morphogenesis, apoptosis and differentiation are regulated by microRNAs. The expression of various genes are regulated by microRNAs, and several microRNAs act in reciprocal negative feedback loops with protein factors to control cell fate decisions that are triggered by signal transduction activity. These observations implicate small RNAs as important mediators of gene regulation in response to cell-cell signaling. The mechanism by which microRNAs silence gene expression is post-transcriptional, possibly influencing the stability, compartmentalization and translation of mRNAs. This mechanism is an efficient means to regulate production of a diverse range of proteins.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Insect microRNAs: Structure, function and evolution.

The small regulatory non-coding RNA molecules, known as microRNAs, have been recognized as potential regulator(s) of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. In Drosophila melanogaster, microRNAs have been identified that control important developmental processes such as apoptosis, cell division, Notch signaling, neural development and oogenesis, among others. Once activated through a step-wise maturation process, a microRNA can potentially regulate more than 50 target genes temporally and spatially in Drosophila. Thus, it is of tremendous importance to understand how these small RNA molecules have evolved and how they are expressed and regulated to impact cellular function and the associated evolutionary fitness. Studies of microRNAs in diverse insect species using the genome sequences (at least 49 insect genome sequences are in progress) may provide important clues to better understand the natural selection of microRNA genes in particular and their impact on biological functions in insects in general.

Animals↗