SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30Linked to original sources

PubMed1988

Usefulness and limitations of colonoscopy in a proctological clinic.

Colonoscopy is a superior diagnostic tool for the detection of cancer of the colon. Its limitations include that it is not always available and there is a great deal of discomfort for the patient. It should therefore be used as effectively as possible. The goal of this retrolective cohort study was to analyze the usefulness of colonoscopy, especially by relating it to the subsequent therapeutic impact. Indication-related groups included "rectal bleeding," "other symptoms suggestive of malignancy," and "follow-up." In 714 patients selected as a result of admission to the proctological unit of our surgical clinic, a carcinoma was discovered in 9% and an adenoma in 13.4%. Patients with rectal bleeding were found to benefit most from colonoscopy since active therapeutic management followed in 56% of the cases. On comparison, there was a direct therapeutic impact in only 10% of the colonoscopies performed for follow-up. Identification of additional factors such as mucosal proliferation markers may help to improve the efficiency of endoscopy by more specifically designating the populations at risk for colonic neoplasia.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Intraoperative colonoscopy.

From 1987 to 1991, we performed intraoperative colonoscopy on 66 patients as a result of the following indications: the air leakage test (53%), detection of a previous malignant polypectomy site (20%), inability to complete preoperative colonoscopy (17%), detection of the source of intestinal bleeding (4%), and detection of impalpable colonic lesions (4%). Intraoperative colonoscopy was successful in 61/66 patients and provided information that altered the planned operation in 10 of 61 completely examined patients. The air leakage test proved useful in detecting subclinical anastomotic leaks. The indications for intraoperative colonoscopy have been expanded, and this procedure is often useful when one is attempting to decide on the appropriate surgical strategy for patients.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Six-year results of annual colonoscopy after resection of colorectal cancer.

Colonoscopy is an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool that may also be useful in the surveillance of patients after curative resection of colorectal cancer. The yield of colonoscopy and the frequency with which it should be performed after operation, however, have not been clearly defined. Over the past 10 years, we have examined these patients annually with colonoscopy or barium enema. This study evaluates the results of a specifically designed protocol that followed 174 patients. Counting all sites, colorectal cancer recurred in 57 of 174 patients, three-quarters within the first 24 months. Nine anastomotic recurrences were detected in the 12-30 month interval; none was reoperated for cure; however, 4 metachronous colon cancers were found and resected for cure. In addition, 30 polyps larger than 1 cm in size and 7 villous adenomas were removed in 30 patients. Combined, these findings represent an interval yield of 3-5% per year. Based on these results and other reports, we recommend that patients undergo colonoscopy annually at least for the first 6 years postresection of colorectal cancer. The detection of new primary tumors and possibly predisposing lesions becomes more important in these patients than detection and cure of recurrent disease.

Colonoscopy↗

PubMed1984

The extent of successful colonoscopy: a second assessment using modern equipment.

Records of 200 consecutive and unselected colonoscopies were reviewed to determine both the success in viewing the entire colon and the average extent of colon visualized, using the most modern equipment. Colonoscopy was completed to the cecum or ileum in 82.5% of studies, and an average of 93.8% of the colon was viewed. These data show considerable improvement compared to those previously reported by us. However, the significant number of incomplete colonoscopies still suggests that colonoscopy and barium enema examination must remain complementary for maximum detection of colonic lesions.

Barium Sulfate↗

PubMed2001

Inadequacy of colonoscopy revealed by three-dimensional electromagnetic imaging.

INTRODUCTION: It is generally accepted that clinicians performing colonoscopy should reach the cecum in at least 90 percent of examinations. However, little attention has been paid to whether the endoscopist correctly estimates the amount of colon actually seen. METHODS: During colonoscopy, endoscopists were asked to state how far they had reached. This was compared with the amount of colon actually seen, as assessed by a novel electromagnetic imaging device that recorded a three-dimensional position of the scope within a magnetic field pervading the patient's abdomen. If electromagnetic imaging showed that the cecum had not been reached, the endoscopist was asked to use the electromagnetic imaging system to determine whether it helped advance the colonoscope further. RESULTS: In 119 patients undergoing colonoscopy, clinical assessment of position reached was correct in only 92 (77.3 percent). When the endoscopists stated that cecal landmarks had been seen (n = 85), the scope was distal to the cecum in seven cases (8.2 percent). When cecal landmarks had not been seen (n = 34), the endoscopist's assessment of the position of the scope was accurate in only 14 (41.2 percent). The use of electromagnetic imaging in this latter group assisted passage to the cecum in 26 cases (76.5 percent). CONCLUSION: Despite assumed visualization of the cecum, inadequate colonoscopy highlights the potential for missing significant pathology in the right colon.

Adult↗

PubMed1986

Correlation of double-contrast high-density barium enema, colonoscopy, and histology in children with special attention to disparities.

Colonoscopic and double-contrast high-density barium enema (DCBE) findings were correlated in 68 patients (39 boys and 29 girls) aged 6 months to 18 years (mean 11.6 years) evaluated over a 24-month period. There was excellent correlation in 53 patients (78.0%) and good correlation in another 3 (4.4%) who had identical diagnoses and only slightly differing extent of disease reported. In 2 of these, DCBE showed more extensive disease, confirmed histologically in 1. Distal colitis seen on colonoscopy as reddening and neovascularity was missed on DCBE in 6 patients. Colonoscopy and DCBE failed to show a polyp in 1 patient each. One patient who had a normal DCBE and colonoscopy demonstrated a histological abnormality, and 1 patient with an abnormality on histology and DCBE was normal on colonoscopy. A disparity resulted from the time between procedures in 1 patient and observer error in another. This high correlation is far better than any previously reported in children, supporting the use of high-density barium sulfate and double-contrast barium enemas in pediatric patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1987

The role of preoperative colonoscopy in colorectal cancer.

Routine preoperative colonoscopy has been recommended for those patients with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer to identify synchronous polyps and/or cancers which might otherwise be undetected on barium enema or at the time of operation. It has been suggested that this approach may alter surgical therapy or follow-up. The charts of 98 patients who underwent preoperative colonoscopy solely for the purpose of detecting additional polyps or cancers prior to open surgical resection for colorectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had biopsy or barium-enema evidence of colorectal cancer. Patients with familial polyposis or chronic ulcerative colitis were excluded. Synchronous cancers were detected in 7.1 percent of patients, and synchronous neoplastic polyps in 29 percent. Forty-three percent of synchronous cancers and 73 percent of synchronous neoplastic polyps would not have been included in the standard surgical resection for the index cancer if the additional information provided by colonoscopy had not been available. Surgical treatment and/or follow-up were altered in 33 percent of patients as a consequence of the colonoscopic evaluation. Colonoscopy prior to surgery for colorectal carcinoma is highly desirable and may potentially improve long-term survival.

Adult↗

PubMed1985

Colonoscopy. First experience in Nigeria.

Colonoscopy is the only major advancement in the diagnosis of colonic diseases since the first barium-enema examination was performed in 1905. The indications are many and contraindications few. If colonoscopy is performed with care, it is safe and the results are rewarding. Patient comfort, integrity, and dignity are essential for the success of the procedure. Five hundred sixty-two colonoscopies were performed during a four-year period in Ife, Nigeria (1978 to 1982). The indications for colonoscopy are discussed and the results presented.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Pediatric colonoscopy.

With the improvement of instruments, colonoscopy has become applicable also for children. During the past 10 years, pediatric colonoscopies were performed 83 times on 45 infants and children. The value and indications in pediatric colonoscopy are described here. Pediatric colonoscopy is a very significant complement to the conventional clinical and radiologic examinations.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

(99m)Tc antigranulocyte monoclonal antibody imaging for the detection and assessment of inflammatory bowel disease newly diagnosed by colonoscopy in children.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective study evaluated a (99m)Tc antigranulocyte monoclonal antibody Fab' imaging agent (Sulesomab) in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) newly diagnosed by colonoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten children (4 boys, 6 girls; mean age 14 years) with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease (n = 6) or ulcerative colitis (n = 4) were studied. Colonoscopy was performed in all of these patients. Within 24 h after colonoscopy, they underwent scintigraphy with (99m)Tc-Sulesomab. Abdominal/pelvic images were acquired at 30 min (planar) and 2-4 h (planar and SPECT) after injection of Sulesomab. Eighty bowel segments were evaluated semi-quantitatively by the investigators, using these three sets of images. The Pediatric Disease Activity (PDA) was correlated with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cell (WBC) count, albumin, Kirschner's score, the Sulesomab bowel segment with maximum uptake, and the sum of Sulesomab score in each segment. RESULTS: The median PDA score was 26 (range 12.5-40). Three children had normal ESR and six normal WBC counts. All patients had at least one positive mucosal biopsy for IBD. While using the Kirschner's scale, the maximal severity of colonoscopy findings was graded as none (n = 2), mild (n = 4), moderate (n = 3), or severe (n = 1). Of the 59 segments evaluated with endoscopy, 35 were found to be endoscopically abnormal. The planar images identified 17 of these abnormal segments and the SPECT images 20. Nine of these ten children had abnormal bowel uptake by scintigraphy. Thus, the sensitivity of Sulesomab per patient was 90 % and per bowel segment 57 %. The correlation coefficient between the scintigraphic score for the segment with the Sulesomab maximum activity and the PDA was 0.3 (P = 0.41). CONCLUSION: In pediatric IBD assessment, planar imaging with Sulesomab did not prove very sensitive in detecting inflammation in each bowel segment. However, SPECT detected the presence of inflammation in the majority of patients. A trial comparing (99m)Tc-HmPAO-WBC with Sulesomab in a large number of patients is required.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Barium enema and colonoscopy: appropriateness of utilization in a Medicaid population.

BACKGROUND: To assess the appropriateness of utilization patterns for the barium enema and colonoscopy in a Medicaid population. METHODS: From 1987 to 1991, a Medicaid managed-care database in Philadelphia revealed claims for a total of 2357 outpatient barium enemas and 896 outpatient colonoscopic examinations. The database was reviewed to determine the primary diagnostic (ICD-9-CM) codes assigned to patients who underwent these procedures. These codes were used as a proxy for indications. Each of the diagnostic codes for barium enema and colonoscopy was then classified either as appropriate, inappropriate, equivocal, or miscoded based on current guidelines in the medical literature. RESULTS: A total of 1962 claims (83%) for barium enema were classified as appropriate, 126 (5%) as inappropriate, 84 (4%) as equivocal, and 185 (8%) as miscoded, whereas 645 claims (72%) for colonoscopy were classified as appropriate, 176 (20%) as inappropriate, 65 (7%) as equivocal, and 10 (1%) as miscoded. Thus, significantly more colonoscopic examinations were rated as inappropriate (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that more stringent criteria need to be used by physicians in ordering diagnostic examinations of the colon, particularly colonoscopy. Further investigation of the appropriateness of these procedures and the development and dissemination of guidelines seems warranted.

Barium Sulfate↗

PubMed2006

Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus contrast medium vs PEG alone preparation for CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in preoperative colorectal cancer staging.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the usefulness of combined polyethylene glycol solution plus contrast medium bowel preparation (PEG-C preparation) followed by dual-contrast computed tomography enema (DCCTE) and conventional colonoscopy. The main purpose of these examinations is the preoperative staging of already known tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with colorectal tumors were alternately allocated to either a polyethylene glycol solution preparation (PEG preparation) group (n=50) or a PEG-C preparation group (n=50) before undergoing conventional colonoscopy and computed tomographic (CT) colonography. After conventional colonoscopy, multidetector row CT scans were performed. Air images were reconstructed for both groups; contrast medium images were additionally reconstructed for the PEG-C preparation group. DCCTE images were a composite of air images and contrast medium images without use of dedicated electronic cleansing software. Quality scores (the presence or absence of blind spots of the colon) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Complete tumor images were obtained by DCCTE for all 50 (100%) lesions in the PEG-C preparation group, as compared with only nine of the 50 lesions (18%) in the PEG preparation group (air-contrast CT enema). The overall quality score in the PEG-C preparation group was significantly better than that in the PEG preparation group (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: DCCTE showed the entire colon without blind spots in nearly all patients in the PEG-C preparation group because the areas under residual fluid were reconstructed as contrast medium images. DCCTE and conventional colonoscopy after PEG-C preparation are feasible and safe procedures that can be used for preoperative evaluation in patients with colorectal cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Efficiency of combined colonoscopy and computed tomography for diagnosis of colonic actinomycosis: a retrospective evaluation of eight consecutive patients.

The preoperative diagnosis of colonic actinomycosis is accurate in fewer than 20% of patients. Colonoscopy and computed tomography (CT) findings were analyzed to ascertain their diagnostic value and their role in determining therapeutic modality and outcome. Before and after treatment we retrospectively evaluated eight consecutive patients with colonic actinomycosis, all of whom were women with a previous history of intrauterine contraceptive device use. Median follow-up period was 20 months (7-57). Localized nodules were found in all cases by colonoscopy; half of these nodules included umbilication at the apex. The colonic mucosa demonstrated normal to moderate inflammation as well as hyperemia and edema. Mucosal ulceration was found in only one case. All cases showed some degree of stenosis. These findings differ from those in other inflammatory or neoplastic diseases of the colon. Abdominopelvic CT revealed extramural involvement of heterogeneous lesions all cases. Contrast enhancement also indicated severe thickening of the colonic wall (7-20 mm) with focal and dense enhancement in six cases. Seven of eight patients required surgery for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Complete resolution was determined using both colonoscopy and CT. As more than half of these cases could have been safely managed using an adequate antibiotic treatment, diagnostic studies indicating a high likelihood of colonic actinomycosis should be evaluated to avoid unnecessary surgeries carried out for diagnostic purposes. A combination of colonoscopy and CT appears to be important for both diagnosis and management because of their compensatory findings of mucosal and extramucosal lesions, respectively.

Actinomycosis↗

PubMed2003

Screening colonoscopy in the asymptomatic 50- to 59-year-old population.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to decrease the death rate from colorectal cancer, a multitude of medical societies and task forces recommend routine screening for colorectal cancer beginning at age 50. Yet, there is no consensus as to the best and most cost-effective screening method. Medicare now pays for screening colonoscopies for its average risk beneficiaries [3]. Many insurance companies, however, will not cover this test in younger patients. We therefore reviewed our institution's colonoscopy experience with asymptomatic 50- to 59-year-olds, with negative fecal occult blood tests and negative family histories. METHODS: Between January 1999 and January 2002, 4779 colonoscopies were performed at our institution. The charts for 619 persons 50-59 years of age were retrospectively reviewed, with 91 patients meeting the strict requirements of this study. We defined polyps with high-grade neoplasias as those with villous or tubulovillous components, and cancerous lesions included those with carcinoma in situ. The distal colon was defined as the rectum and sigmoid colon. RESULTS: There was a 58% incidence of neoplastic polyps in this younger asymptomatic population. More than 4% of our subjects had high-grade neoplasias or cancerous lesions. In the absence of any distal findings, flexible sigmoidoscopy would have missed up to 38% of these polyps. CONCLUSIONS: The findings generally support the recommendations by the American College of Gastroenterology for average-risk patients to preferentially undergo a screening colonoscopy at age 50 in lieu of other methods.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2004

Hematogenous tumor cell dissemination during colonoscopy for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: It has long been suspected that mechanical influences may enhance the release of viable colorectal cancer cells into the circulation. The objective of this study was to determine the extent of hematogenous tumor cell spread in colorectal cancer patients during colonoscopy. METHODS: Peripheral venous blood samples were taken before and after colonoscopy from 44 patients with colorectal cancer. Blood samples were examined using a reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay to amplify cytokeratin 20 transcripts. RESULTS: Eleven patients with colorectal cancer displayed circulating tumor cells before and after colonoscopy (25%), whereas tumor cells were detected in six of 44 patients (14%) only after the procedure (p = 0.03, McNemar's test: tumor cell detection before after colonoscopy). All control samples consistently tested negative. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical forces may result in enhanced release of viable colorectal cancer cells into the circulation; however, the clinical significance of these results needs to be clarified.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

Surgeon-initiated screening colonoscopy program based on SAGES and ASCRS recommendations in a general surgery practice.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the utility of a screening colonoscopy program initiated by general surgeons in an academic center. METHODS: New patients presenting to three general surgeons who met screening colonoscopy indications were asked whether they had undergone colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The patients who had not undergone CRC screening were offered screening colonoscopies or referred to their gastroenterologists. RESULTS: In the first 9-month period of the program, 200 patients who met the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons/American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons indications for CRC screening were asked whether they had undergone screenings. Only 46% (n = 92) reported any prior appropriate screenings. Of the patients who elected CRC screening by the surgeons, 55 underwent full colonoscopies (2 concurrently with hemorrhoidectomies), and 2 had flexible sigmoidoscopies. As a result of screening, 10 patients (18%) required treatment: 7 had polypectomies, 2 had partial colectomies, and 1 with an indication for surgery deferred treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the patients presenting to the general surgeon likely have not had CRC screening, and diligence in making appropriate recommendations should be routine. Colonoscopic findings requiring intervention are not insignificant.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed2007

Guiding navigation in colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Nonrigid environments such as the human colon present unique challenges for the navigator in maintaining spatial orientation. Conventional wisdom suggests that a navigational aid, similar to a map, that provides critical shape information would be useful. This article presents a design concept for a colonoscopy navigational aid and the results of an experiment conducted to evaluate the display for supporting navigation and spatial orientation in simulated colonoscopy. METHODS: A navigational aid was designed to present shape information in an augmented reality display. A total of 14 untrained subjects performed a colonoscopy procedure in rigid and nonrigid colon models, with and without the navigational aid display, in a Latin square design. Performance measures such as time, distance or efficiency of travel, and location and direction error were recorded, together with subjective measures of confidence and workload. RESULTS: The results showed that, unlike navigating in rigid environments, the subjects spent more time navigating in the nonrigid environment (p < 0.01) and traveled a longer total distance (p = 0.01). The navigational aid had no effect on performance, as compared with the no aid condition. However, subjective measures showed that the subjects were more confident about their determination of location and direction (p < 0.01). They also preferred having the aid during navigation. CONCLUSION: A navigational aid or map that provides shape information does not seem to improve performance in colonoscopy. In fact, it may lead to a false sense of security about location and orientation in the colon. The value of a map for training purposes remains to be examined.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2006

Tension pneumothorax secondary to colonic perforation during diagnostic colonoscopy: report of a case.

We report a case of tension pneumothorax, which occurred secondary to colonic perforation during a colonoscopy. The patient was a 77-year-old woman in whom acute respiratory decompensation developed suddenly during a diagnostic colonoscopy for iron deficiency anemia. We diagnosed bilateral pneumothoraces, tension pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumoperitoneum, and emphysema of the face, neck, and chest. At laparotomy, a posterior colonic perforation was identified at the site of an ileocolic anastomosis performed 3 years earlier. We performed a primary repair and the patient was discharged from hospital 12 days later. Although diagnostic colonoscopy-induced intestinal perforation is rare, it is the most common and serious complication associated with this procedure. Occasionally, air spreads from the retroperitoneum into continuous tissue planes and decompresses into the adjacent structures. To our knowledge, this is the first report of two unique manifestations of diagnostic colonoscopy-induced intestinal perforation: tension pneumothorax and perforation at the site of a previous anastomosis. Both of these conditions should be considered in the event of acute respiratory failure in the endoscopy suite.

Aged↗