PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DENTAL CAVITY LINING”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30Linked to original sources

Artificial recurrent caries in glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.

The purpose of this study was to examine artificial recurrent caries when a conventional glass ionomer liner was placed under amalgam restorations. An additional aim was to evaluate the effect of using an unfilled resin with or without etching on the margins of the amalgam restoration. Class V preparations in extracted third molars were used with gingival margins on root surfaces. Ten restorations were used for each of the following groups: 1) Amalgam alone; 2) Two layers of copal varnish and amalgam; 3) Glass ionomer, amalgam; 4) Glass ionomer, amalgam, unfilled resin; 5) Glass ionomer, amalgam, acid-etching, unfilled resin. The teeth were thermocycled and artificial caries were created using a liquid system acidified to pH 4.10 and saturated with HAP but without fluoride. The teeth were sectioned, polished and photographed using polarized light. Areas of recurrent caries were measured using a sonic digitizing pad. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan's Multiple Range Test. Areas for enamel lesions for the different groups were: 1) 1.29 +/- 0.41; 2) 1.61 +/- 0.49; 3) 0.92 +/- 0.26; 4) 0.87 +/- 0.31; 5) 0.99 +/- 0.39. Root lesions areas were: 1) 2.17 +/- 0.35; 2) 1.90 +/- 0.40; 3) 1.40 +/- 0.27; 4) 0.82 +/- 0.25; 5) 1.34 +/- 0.31. Duncan's groups for root lesions were A = B/ C = D/ and E separately. This study indicates that artificial recurrent caries under amalgam can be reduced with a conventional glass ionomer. An additional benefit was observed when unfilled resin was placed on the cavosurface margins but not when it was acid-etched first.

Dental Amalgam↗

Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types.

Previous studies on amalgam bonded restorations indicated that amalgam bonding agents increased the bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure. This in vitro study was designed to compare how the mode of curing and the presence of filler in the resin would affect the bond strength of amalgam. The five test groups of lining agents for amalgam restorations included Chemical-cured, Unfilled resin (CU-Clearfil New Bond); Light-cured, Unfilled resin with a delayed chemical-cure property (LU*-Clearfil Photo Bond); Light-cured, Filled resin with a delayed chemical-cure property (LF*-Clearfil Photo Bond + Protect Liner); Dual-cured, Unfilled resin (DU-All-Bond 2); and Varnish (V-Copalite). For each group, 20 class 5 cavity preparations were cut on the facial, lingual, or proximal surfaces of human molars, which were embedded in acrylic resin. The preparations were 2.5 mm deep and 3 mm wide at the pulpal floor with a slightly divergent taper. After treating the preparation with the bonding agent, a 3/4-inch, 18-gauge flat-headed wire nail was placed into the cavity with the head at the pulpal floor of the preparation, and Tytin amalgam was then condensed into the preparation around the nail. The restorations were stored for 24 hours in distilled water at 37 degrees C and then subjected to 2500 thermal cycles (8 degrees C to 48 degrees C). After 1 week, specimens were tested to failure in tension using an Instron Universal Testing Machine (crosshead speed = 2 mm/min) and peak load (kg) was recorded. The mean loads at failure (+/- SD) were LF* 26.4 (+/- 7.0), DU 23.9 (+/- 6.4), LU* 16.0 (+/- 3.1), CU 14.3 (+/- 8.0), and V 9.5 (+/- 5.6). Significant differences were found using a one-way ANOVA and the Games and Howell post hoc test at a significance level of alpha = 0.05. The LF* and DU groups were not significantly different from each other, but they were significantly higher in peak load than all other groups. LU* was significantly higher than the varnish (V) but not significantly higher than CU. CU was not significantly higher than the varnish (V). The adhesives forming a thicker resin interface (the light-cured resin with filled resin liner and the dual-cured unfilled resin) demonstrated significantly greater retention than the light-cured unfilled resin, chemical-cured unfilled resin, and the varnish control.

Adhesiveness↗

Biocompatibility of resin-based dental materials applied as liners in deep cavities prepared in human teeth.

BACKGROUND: Since only a few data have been published concerning the effects of resinous dental materials on the pulp-dentin complex, the aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of resin-based materials applied as liners in deep cavities prepared in human teeth. METHODS: After preparing class V cavities, the following dental materials were applied on the axial walls: group 1, Vitrebond (VIT; 3M ESPE); group 2, Ultra-Blend Plus (UBP; Untradent); and group 3, Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB; Kuraray). In group 4 (control), the hard-setting calcium hydroxide cement Dycal (CH; Caulk/Dentsply) was used. The teeth extracted at 7 days or between 30 and 85 days after the clinical procedures were processed for histological evaluation. RESULTS: For all the experimental and control groups, most of specimens exhibited no pulpal response or slight inflammatory reaction associated with slight tissue disorganization at 7-day period. Moderate inflammatory pulpal response occurred only in one tooth (RDT = 262 microm) of group 3 in which transdentinal diffusion of resin components was observed. CONCLUSION: The resin-based dental cements VIT and UBP as well as the bonding agent CSEB presented acceptable biocompatibility when applied in deep cavities prepared in sound human teeth.

Adolescent↗

Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a packable fine hybrid dental composite (Prodigy Condensable) and the influence of the additional application of a flowable resin composite (Revolution, SDS Kerr) layer on marginal integrity after 2 years in stress-bearing posterior cavities according to the Ryge criteria. In 50 patients (40.5+/-17.5 years of age), 116 class II fillings (metal matrix system, glass ionomer-cement-base in 36%, rubberdam isolation in 70%) were placed, with at least two restorations per patient. The adhesive Optibond Solo Plus was used for all the restorations. In one of the two fillings in each patient, an additional layer of the flowable composite Revolution was applied in the entire cavity and separately light-cured. Baseline scores have been rated Alfa in > or =95% and Bravo in <5%. After 2 years, the results [%] of the Ryge evaluation for the two groups with/without the additional use of Revolution were: (1) Marginal Adaptation: Alfa:78/70, Bravo:16/27, Charlie:0/0, Delta:6/4; (2) Anatomic Form: Alfa:89/95, Bravo:6/2, Charlie:6/4; (3) Secondary Caries: Alfa:98/100, Bravo:2/0; (4) Marginal Discoloration: Alfa:76/68, Bravo:24/32, Charlie:0/0; (5) Surface: Alfa:90/91, Bravo:4/5, Charlie:0/0, Delta:6/4; (6) Color Match: Oscar:56/57, Alfa:44/39, Bravo:0/4, Charlie:0/0. Within the observation period (recall rate: 95%), three restorations out of 116 at baseline fractured, one restoration showed a secondary caries, one tooth received endodontic treatment, and all other restored teeth remained vital. After 2 years, no statistically significant difference (Chi-square test) in the overall survival rate between the group with the additional use of Revolution (92.8%) and that without Revolution (94.6%) was found. The combined survival rate for both groups together was 93.7% of clinically acceptable restorations.

Adult↗

Radiodensity of base, liner and luting dental materials.

The aim of this study was to determine the radiodensity of base, liner and luting dental materials and to compare them with human enamel and dentin. Four classes of materials were examined: conventional glass ionomers (CG)-Vitro Cem, Ketac Bond, Vidrion F, Vidrion C; resin-modified glass ionomers (RMGI)-Fuji II LC, Vitrebond; resinous cement (RC)-Rely-X ARC; and zinc phosphate cement (ZP)-Cimento LS. Five 2-mm-thick standard samples of each material and five 2-mm-thick enamel and dentin samples were produced. An aluminum step wedge served as control. Samples were positioned over a phosphor plate of Digora digital system, exposed to X-ray, and the radiodensity obtained in the software Digora for Windows 2.0. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis and Dunnett multiple comparisons test (alpha=0.05). According to statistical analysis, the following sequence in degree of radiodensity could be seen among the groups: Cimento LS (ZP) > Vitro Cem (CG) = Fuji II LC (RMGI) = Rely-X ARC (RC) = Vitrebond (RMGI) > Ketac Bond (CG) > enamel = Vidrion F (CG) > Vidrion C (CG) = dentin. The presence of radiopaque fillers such as zinc, strontium, zirconium, barium, and lanthanium rather than material type seems to be the most important factor when analyzing material radiodensity. Almost all investigated materials presented an accepted radiodensity.

Acrylic Resins↗

Clinical evaluation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic inlays in vivo: 2-year results.

In the present study, the 2-year clinical and scanning electron microscope (SEM) results for heat-pressed ceramic inlays are reported. In a selected patient population, 51 cavities were restored with all-ceramic inlays. All margins were located within the enamel. The inlays were luted to the cavities with a high-viscosity, dual-cure luting composite. After 2 days, 1 year, and 2 years, the restorations were evaluated clinically, using the modified USPHS criteria. Quantitative margin analysis was performed in the SEM on the replicas fabricated at the recall times. The data were tested for significant differences, using the chi-square test for the clinical evaluation and the Mann-Whitney U-test for the margin analysis. After 2 years, the clinical evaluation of the margin adaptation revealed Bravo ratings for 14 restorations (27.5%); 37 restorations (72.5%) were rated Alfa. Compared to the baseline data, this difference was statistically significant (p < or = 0.5). SEM analysis revealed that the ceramic-composite interface exhibited significantly (p < or = 0.01) more gap formation than the enamel-composite interface at all times of evaluation. Wear of the luting composite could be determined along 50% of the restoration interface during the first year, 53% during the second year. The inlay restorations controlled in this study perform well after a period of 2 years.

Adult↗

Short-term assessment of leakage of Class V composite restorations placed in vivo.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of two dentin bonding systems, one of which was also in combination with a self-curing resin, when applied in V-shaped circular cavities cut in anterior teeth crossing the cementum-enamel junction. Twenty-seven teeth scheduled for extraction for periodontal reasons were treated in vivo. The sample teeth were divided at random into three groups. Group 1 was treated with All Bond 2 (AB2) + Z-100 composite, group 2 with Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SMPP) + Z-100, and group 3 with AB2 in conjunction with Bisfil 2B as liner and Z-100. The in vivo restored teeth were extracted after 2-3 months of clinical service. They were then immersed in a dye solution for 24 h, sectioned, and scored for marginal leakage. Analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between the three groups both at cervical and incisal sites. The enamel sites were free from any leakage. Only two cervical sites of groups 1 and 2 and one of group 3 showed a score 1 for leakage. The results of the short-term clinical performance of the three systems were promising.

Analysis of Variance↗