SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “HALOPERIDOL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30Linked to original sources

PubMed1981

Enhancement of haloperidol-induced increase in rat striatal or mesolimbic 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid by pretreatment with chronic methamphetamine.

After a drug-free period of 1 week following 2 weeks of haloperidol treatment, the increased response of striatal 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) to a challenge dose of haloperidol was significantly reduced. Tolerance to this effect was not, however, seen in the mesolimbic system. Pretreatment of the rats with methamphetamine (MAP) for 8 days prior to chronic haloperidol significantly enhanced the DOPAC and HVA increase produced by the challenge with haloperidol in both brain areas. The reduced response of striatal DOPAC or HVA after chronic haloperidol was prevented by pretreatment with MAP. The data suggest that the long-term dopamine receptor stimulation induced by MAP may antagonize the tolerance produced by chronic haloperidol treatment.

3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid↗

PubMed1982

Behavioral and biochemical aspects of neuroleptic-induced dopaminergic supersensitivity: studies with chronic clozapine and haloperidol.

Rats were chronically injected with saline, clozapine, or haloperidol and tested for alterations in dopamine (DA)-mediated behavior, DA receptor binding, and both acetylcholine (ACH) concentration and choline acetylase activity. Behaviorally, chronic haloperidol significantly enhanced apomorphine-induced chewing and sniffing stereotypies, associated with DA nigrostriatal activation, while clozapine selectively enhanced apomorphine locomotor activity and cage-floor crossing, behavior associated with DA mesolimbic activation. Biochemically, chronic haloperidol significantly enhanced 3H-spiroperidol binding in striatum and in mesolimbic loci (nucleus accumbens/olfactory tubercle) while chronic clozapine failed to produce such enhancement. Acute haloperidol induced an initial decrease in striatal ACH concentration followed by a return of ACH to normal levels within 1 week. There was no change in choline acetylase activity during the same time interval. These findings suggest that haloperidol may inhibit DA mechanisms in both the nigrostriatal may inhibit DA mechanisms in both the nigrostriatal and mesolimbic systems, but that the effect of clozapine on DA mechanisms may be specific to mesolimbic rather than striatal structures. At the same time, the lack of effect of clozapine on 3H-spiroperidol binding may indicate that behaviorally important changes in DA sensitivity can develop independent of changes in post-synaptic DA receptors. The pattern of cholinergic changes with chronic haloperidol suggests that the increase in striatal DA receptor number seen with chronic treatment re-establishes DA inhibition of cholinergic firing within the striatum.

Acetylcholine↗

PubMed1978

Cataleptic and anticataleptic effects of muscimol and gabaculine injected into globus pallidus and substantia nigra, and interactions with haloperidol or benzodiazepines.

Intranigral injection of muscimol induced hyperactivity in rats and antagonized haloperidol-induced catalepsy. Intranigral injection of gabaculine, an inhibitor of GABA transaminase, induced similar effects 5h after injection, when the nigral GABA content was increased 7-fold. On the other hand, injections of muscimol (30 ng) into the globus pallidus potentiated the cataleptic effect of haloperidol, and muscimol alone in high doses (100 and 200 ng) induced catalepsy. Gabaculine also induced catalepsy of medium intensity and potentiated the effect of haloperidol 24h after injection, when GABA was increased in the globus pallidus as well as in the substantia nigra. Injections of muscimol into either the globus pallidus or substantia nigra increased striatal HVA and enhanced haloperidol-induced elevation of HVA. Three benzodiazepines, nitrazepam, diazepam and chlordiazepoxide administered orally, potentiated the effect of muscimol (30 ng) injected into the globus pallidus and induced catalepsy. A similar effect was not obtained with phenobarbital. It is suggested that stimulation of GABA receptor or increase of GABA content in the sustantia nigra antagonize haloperidol-induced catalepsy by activation of nigral dopaminergic system, and that enhancement of pallidal GABA function induces catalepsy by non-dopaminergic mechanisms. Potentiation of haloperidol-induced catalepsy by benzodiazepines may be due to enhancement of GABA-ergic transmission within the globus pallidus.

4-Aminobutyrate Transaminase↗

PubMed1979

Effect of haloperidol on reflex activation of rat alpha-motoneurones. A possible explanation for akinesia and catalepsy?

Effects of haloperidol on rat flexor and extensor alpha-motoneurones were studied in ventral roots of laminectomized rats under halothane anesthesia. The alpha-motoneurones were activated by tetanic stimulation of low-threshold afferents (group I and II), either of the ipsilateral peroneal nerve ("flexor alpha-motoneurones") or gastrocnemius-soleus nerve ("extensor alpha-motoneurones"). Haloperidol, given in the doses of 0.075, 0.15 and 0.30 mg/kg i.p. inhibited the reflex activation of flexor alpha-motoneurones; higher doses seemed to be more effective than lower ones. Apomorphine (2 mg/kg s.c.) partially antagonized the inhibitory action of haloperidol with some latency. Higher doses of haloperidol (0.15-0.60 mg/kg i.p.) also inhibited the reflex activation of extensor alpha-motoneurones; this inhibitory effect was, at least for a short time, antagonized by apomorphine (2 mg/kg s.c.). The threshold for reflex activation both of flexor and extensor alpha-motoneurones was raised by haloperidol and lowered by a subsequent administration of apomorphine. Our results suggest that akinesia and catalepsy, induced in rats by haloperidol might be, at least in part, due to a decrease in sensitivity of alpha-motoneurones to proprioceptive stimuli.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Prolactin responses to haloperidol in drug-free and treated schizophrenic patients.

The prolactin response to 5 mg haloperidol i.m. was studied in 12 schizophrenic patients in a drug-free state and after a month treatment with haloperidol, as a possible index of dopamine receptor sensitivity and occupancy. Blood samples were taken at times 0, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. The increase in PRL observed in the drug-free state disappeared after drug treatment. The PRL plasma levels after treatment with 60 mg haloperidol per os were higher than the maximal PRL responses after 5 mg i.m. The increases in baseline PRL caused by the treatment correlated positively to the reduction in the BPRS score. The test was also performed in a group of 11 patients chronically treated with haloperidol during a daily dose of 60 mg, and 15 days after reduction of the dose to 30 mg. PRL increases after 5 mg haloperidol i.m. were observed only after reduction of the dose. It is suggested that the prolactin response to haloperidol is an index of the occupancy of receptors that are involved in the PRL releasing mechanisms, and could be used to verify their blockade by the neuroleptics, especially in patients that do not respond positively to drug treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed1979

Long-term haloperidol-treatment of mice: a change in beta-adrenergic receptor responsiveness.

Mice administered haloperidol 3 mg/kg/day in their drinking water for 21 days were tested for their locomotor responsiveness to saline or acid vehicle, dl-, l- or d-propranolol, metoprolol, butoxamine or practolol. Haloperidol-treated animals administered saline or acid-vehicle were, in five of six experiments, more active than animals withdrawn from vehicle-treatment. Haloperidol- and vehicle-treated animals responded differently to the non-selective beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists (dl-propranolol and l-propranolol) and selective beta1-adrenoreceptor antagonists (practolol and metoprolol), but not to a selective beta2-adrenoreceptor antagonist (butoxamine). With dl-propranolol (4 mg/kg) the locomotor activity of haloperidol-treated animals was significantly (0.01 less than P less than 0.02) greater than that of the vehicle-treated animals. Similar effects in the same direction were seen with l-propranolol (1 mg/kg, 0.005 less than P less than 0.01), practolol (10 and 100 mg/kg, 0.025 less than P less than 0.05 and 0.01 less than P less than 0.025 respectively) and metoprolol 8 mg/kg, 0.005 less than P less than 0.01). The d-isomer of propranolol which is about 50 times less active as a beta-adrenoreceptor antagonist than the l-isomer, although having equal membrane stabilizing effects, did not differentially affect haloperidol- or vehicle-treated groups. The results suggest that there has been a change in beta 1-adrenoreceptor responsiveness in animals withdrawn from long-term haloperidol treatment.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed1997

The dose-response characteristics of rat oral dyskinesias with chronic haloperidol or clozapine administration.

Whether the pathophysiology and treatment of neuroleptic-induced oral dyskinesias in rats parallel that for tardive dyskinesia in humans remains a question. To address the issue further, Sprague Dawley rats were treated for 6 months with multiple oral doses of haloperidol (1.5 and 3.0 mg/ kg/day) or clozapine (10, 20, and 30 mg/kg/day) and compared with water treated animals. The rate of oral dyskinesias was monitored at study start and monthly by trained raters who were blind to treatment group. All haloperidol-treated rats developed oral dyskinesias at a significantly higher rate than rats treated with water (p = 0.0007) or those treated with clozapine (p = 0.0017). Each dose of haloperidol produced significantly higher rates of oral dyskinesias than did any dose of clozapine and did so in an apparent dose-sensitive manner. Clozapine lacked a dose-sensitive relationship with the oral dyskinesias, and failed to show a significant difference in rate from control rats at any dose. Plasma levels of haloperidol with these doses were in the human therapeutic range; with clozapine only the highest dose produced plasma levels in the human therapeutic range. These data show little association between rat oral dyskinesias and clozapine treatment, whereas a strong association is present with haloperidol. The data are, thereby, consistent with the clinical association of tardive dyskinesia with typical neuroleptics like haloperidol but not with the atypical neuroleptic clozapine.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1994

Dopaminergic function in rat brain after oral administration of calcium-channel blockers or haloperidol. A microdialysis study.

Microdialysis technique was used to study the effects of both acute and repeated oral administration of calcium-channel blockers (flunarizine, cinnarizine, verapamil, nifedipine and nicardipine) in dopaminergic function in rat brain and to compare them to the effects of haloperidol. Acute flunarizine, nicardipine or haloperidol increased extracellular levels of dopamine (DA) or metabolites. After repeated (18 days) administration, nicardipine, nifedipine, verapamil or haloperidol increased and flunarizine decreased extracellular striatal levels of dopamine or metabolites. Chronic treatment with calcium-channel blockers or haloperidol failed to block K(+)-evoked release of dopamine. This suggests that the calcium-channel blockers used in this study do not influence calcium entry necessary for DA release. An acute challenge with haloperidol caused either no change or a decrease in extracellular levels of DA or metabolites after repeated administration of calcium-channel blockers or haloperidol. This is considered to be due to the lesser response of dopaminergic neurons because of treatment. A neuroleptic-like mechanism of action together with a decrease in firing activity and/or a reduced dopamine re-uptake of dopaminergic neurons are considered.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed1977

The demonstration of a change in responsiveness of mice to physostigmine and atropine after withdrawal from long-term haloperidol pretreatment.

Mice, administered haloperidol 3 mg/kg/day, in their drinking water for 21 days, were tested for their responsiveness to cholinergic and anticholinergic drugs 4 days after withdrawal from haloperidol (or vehicle). Haloperidol-treated animals administered methylhyoscine (1 mg/kg i.p.) and various doses of physostigmine (5 to 1215 microgram/kg) displayed significantly less depression of locomotor activity than vehicle-treated animals. Atropine, 5 mg/kg, whilst ineffective in producing locomotor stimulation in vehicle-treated animals, produced marked stimulation in haloperidol-treated animals. Methylatropine (5 mg/kg) did not produce significant stimulation in either group. Dopamine receptor supersensitivity was present in these animals as haloperidol-treated mice, pretreated with alpha-methyltyrosine and reserpine, displayed a significantly greater locomotor response to apomorphine than did vehicle-treated animals. The data support the hypothesis that long-term administration of haloperidol produces an apparent hyposensitivity of central muscarinic receptors.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Interactions between chronic haloperidol treatment and cocaine in rats: an animal model of intermittent cocaine use in neuroleptic treated populations.

This experiment investigated the possibility that rats maintained on chronic haloperidol treatment would show increased behavioral responsiveness to cocaine, similar to that observed in human stimulant abusers who are chronically treated with neuroleptics. Thus, the effects on locomotion and stereotyped behavior of intermittent injections of cocaine were investigated in female rats receiving chronic haloperidol treatment. Daily injections of haloperidol (0.2 mg/kg, IP) or vehicle were administered for 6, 12 or 18 days prior to the start of testing with cocaine and were then continued throughout cocaine testing. All rats received four doses of cocaine (0.0, 3.0, 7.5, or 15.0 mg/kg, IP) in random order with an intervening vehicle day between successive drug days. The four dose sequence of cocaine was repeated a total of four times. Initial cocaine administration produced dose dependent increases in locomotion and stereotyped behavior. When the sequence of cocaine doses was repeated, differences among treatment groups emerged. Groups treated with haloperidol exhibited heightened locomotion in response to cocaine and with repeated injections, showed a higher rate of behavioral sensitization than control animals. These differences in the behavioral response to cocaine were maintained for at least 2 months following termination of daily haloperidol treatment. In order to examine the mechanisms underlying this heightened responsiveness to cocaine, apomorphine-induced locomotion (dose range, 0-250 micrograms/kg, SC) was determined. Regardless of dose, rats treated with haloperidol showed different temporal patterns of locomotion in response to apomorphine suggesting that the increased response to cocaine was related to changes in dopaminergic receptor sensitivity.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Unlike haloperidol, clozapine slows and dampens rats' forelimb force oscillations and decreases force output in a press-while-licking behavioral task.

In order to detect putative differences in the behavioral effects of clozapine and haloperidol, rats were trained to use a single forelimb to exert continuous pressure on a force-sensing operandum. Behavior was maintained by presenting a water-filled dipper for consumption only as long as the force remained above a specified level (the water fountain task). Effects of clozapine (2.0, 4.0, 8.0 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.12 mg/kg) on the forelimb force oscillations manifested during the operandum pressing episodes were analyzed with power spectral analysis and other quantitative methods. All rats exhibited force oscillations with a fundamental frequency near 7 Hz. Clozapine shifted the frequency to lower values (i.e., oscillation slowing), while haloperidol shifted oscilations to slightly higher frequencies. Moreover, clozapine reduced power in the region of the spectrum above 5 Hz. In contrast, haloperidol tended to increase power in these regions. Time domain analyses of the force-time waveforms indicated that haloperidol increased force emission during the hold phase of the forelimb response, and clozapine decreased this measure. The results are congruent with the high extrapyramidal side effects of haloperidol and the lack of such effects of clozapine in the clinic. In addition, clozapine may have antitremor effects in rats as it does in humans.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

GM1 ganglioside attenuates the development of vacuous chewing movements induced by long-term haloperidol treatment of rats.

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a serious side-effect of long-term treatment with neuroleptics. To investigate if TD may be a result of neuroleptic-induced excessive stimulation of striatal glutamate receptors, the effect of the anti-excitotoxic GM1 ganglioside was studied in a rat model of TD. In an acute experiment each of four groups of rats was treated with GM1 20 mg/kg SC+saline IP, saline SC+haloperidol 1.2 mg/kg IP, GM1 SC+haloperidol IP, or saline SC+saline IP. In a subsequent long-term experiment lasting 16 weeks, each of the four groups was treated as in the acute experiment, with the exception that haloperidol was injected IM as decanoate 38 mg/kg every 4 weeks, and the controls received vehicle injections. The behavior was videotaped and scored at intervals during both experiments, including 16 weeks after cessation of the long-term treatment. Haloperidol induced a significant increase in vacuous chewing movements (VCM) and immobility both in the acute and in the long-term experiment. Other categories of behaviour (rearing, moving, sitting) were significantly affected only in the acute experiment. GM1 did not affect any of the acute behavioural effects of haloperidol, but significantly reduced VCM in the long-term experiment. The effects on VCM of haloperidol and GM1 persisted for at least 8 weeks after cessation of the long-term treatment. These results suggest that long-lasting changes in striatal function induced by excessive glutamate receptor stimulation may be a mechanism for the development of VCM in rats and perhaps also for TD in humans.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

Effect of haloperidol on expression of dopamine D2 receptor mRNAs in rat brain.

Chronic administration of the neuroleptic drug haloperidol previously has been shown to increase the density of striatal dopamine D2 receptor, which is believed to be the underlying factor in neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia. To search for the mechanism of receptor upregulation, the expression of the isoforms of dopamine D2 receptor mRNA in rat striatum was analyzed by Northern, solution, and in situ hybridizations in haloperidol-treated rats (1-35 days). Northern blot analysis of poly(A)+ RNA hybridized with a probe common for both isoforms as well as an insert-specific probe for the long isoform of the receptor revealed no significant difference in hybridization signal between the control and any of the haloperidol-treated groups of rats. The receptor density, however, was increased by 30-40% in animals receiving haloperidol for 7-35 days. Solution hybridization with an antisense riboprobe specific for a consensus sequence as well as in situ hybridization with a consensus oligonucleotide probe similarly failed to detect any increase in the expression of receptor mRNA following haloperidol treatment. The results suggest that post-transcriptional mechanisms may be responsible for regulating the haloperidol-induced increase in dopamine D2 receptors.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of haloperidol tablet by liquid chromatographic mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the bioequivalence of two haloperidol 5 mg tablets, Myung In haloperidol (Myung In Pharm. Co., Ltd., test drug) and Peridol (Whanin Pharm. Co., Ltd., reference drug), and also to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters of haloperidol in Korean volunteers. The bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of haloperidol tablets were examined on 24 healthy volunteers who received a single oral dose of each preparation in the fasting state in a randomized balanced 2 way crossover design. After an oral dosing, blood samples were collected for a period of 60 h. Plasma concentrations of haloperidol were determined using a liquid chromatographic electrospray mass spectrometric (LC-MS) method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. The geometric means of AUC0-60h and Cmax between test and reference formulations were 17.21 +/- 8.26 ng x h/mL vs 17.31 +/- 13.24 ng x h/mL and 0.87 +/- 0.74 ng/mL vs 0.85 +/- 0.62 ng/mL, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals of mean difference of logarithmic transformed AUC0-60h and Cmax were log0.9677 - log1.1201 and log0.8208-log1.1981, respectively. It shows that the bioavailability of test drug is equivalent with that of reference drug. The geometric means of other pharmacokinetic parameters (AUCinf, t1/2, Vd/F, and CL/F) between test drug and reference drug were 21.75 +/- 8.50 ng x h/mL vs 21.77 +/- 15.63 ng x h/mL, 29.87 +/- 8.25 h vs 29.60 +/- 7.56 h, 11.51 +/- 5.45 L vs 12.90 +/- 6.12 L and 0.26 +/- 0.09 L/h vs 0.31 +/- 0.17 L/h, respectively. These observations indicate that the two formulation for haloperidol was bioequivalent and, thus, may be clinically interchangeable.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1978

Haloperidol, a dopaminergic antagonist: somatostatin-like inhibition of glucagon and insulin release from the isolated, perfused canine pancreas.

The effect of haloperidol, a dopaminergic antagonist, on insulin and glucagon secretion was investigated using the isolated, perfused canine pancreas. Haloperidol at 4 X 10(-7) to 10(-5) mol/l caused a dose-dependent inhibition of glucagon release both at low (25 mg/100 ml) and high glucose concentrations (150 mg/100 ml). At the low glucose concentration insulin release was already maximally suppressed. At the high glucose concentration haloperidol (4 X 10(-7) to 10(-5) mol/1) also caused a dose-dependent inhibition of insulin release. Haloperidol (10(-5) mol/1) inhibited dramatically pancreatic A and B cell responses to isoproterenol (2 ng/ml), acetylcholine (1 mumol/1) and arginine (5 mmol/1). The inhibitory effect of haloperidol on both glucagon and insulin release could be eliminated by increasing perfusate calcium concentration from 1.3 to 8.8 mmol/1. These findings suggested that haloperidol blocks glucagon and insulin release in a somatostatin-like manner by affecting a fundamental step of the stimulus-secretion coupling, probably by interfering with calcium handling of the pancreatic A and B cells.

Acetylcholine↗

PubMed2003

Reversal of haloperidol-induced orofacial dyskinesia by quercetin, a bioflavonoid.

RATIONALE: Tardive dyskinesia is a serious neurological syndrome associate with long-term administration of neuroleptics to humans and experimental animals. It may be caused by loss of dopaminergic cells, due to free radicals as a product of high synaptic dopamine levels. Quercetin is a bioflavonoid with strong antioxidant properties. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of chronic quercetin treatment on haloperidol-induced orofacial dyskinesia. METHODS: Vacuous chewing movements (VCM) in rats, a widely accepted animal model of tardive dyskinesia was employed in the present study. VCM were induced in rats by daily administration of haloperidol (1.0 mg/kg) for a period of 21 days. Animals with established dyskinesia were given quercetin for a period of 4 weeks and behavioral scoring was recorded every week before administration of quercetin. Animals were killed after the last behavioral recordings and biochemical estimations were carried out. RESULTS: Chronic haloperidol (1.0 mg/kg for 21 days) treatment significantly induced VCM and tongue protrusions in rats and quercetin (25-100 mg/kg for 4 weeks) significantly reversed haloperidol-induced VCM and tongue protrusions. Biochemical analysis revealed that chronic haloperidol treatment significantly induced lipid peroxidation, decreased glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase levels in the brains of rats. Quercetin (25-100 mg/kg for 4 weeks) significantly reduced lipid peroxidation and restored GSH, SOD and catalase levels. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study clearly indicate that quercetin has a protective role against haloperidol-induced orofacial dyskinesia. Consequently, the use of quercetin as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia should be considered.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Intramuscular aripiprazole for the treatment of acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with intramuscular haloperidol.

INTRODUCTION: This double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and safety of intramuscular (IM) aripiprazole and IM haloperidol for the treatment of acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four-hundred and forty-eight patients were randomized (2:2:1 ratio) to IM aripiprazole 9.75 mg, IM haloperidol 6.5 mg, or IM placebo. Patients could receive up to three injections over the first 24 h, with second and third injections administered > or =2 and > or =4 h, respectively, after the first if deemed clinically necessary. Primary efficacy measure was mean change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component (PEC) score from baseline to 2 h. RESULTS: Mean improvement in PEC at 2 h was significantly greater for IM aripiprazole (-7.27) vs placebo (-4.78; p<0.001); IM aripiprazole was noninferior to IM haloperidol (-7.75) on PEC. All secondary efficacy measures showed significantly greater improvements at 2 h for IM aripiprazole and IM haloperidol over placebo. Mean number of injections/patient and percentage of patients requiring benzodiazepines were significantly lower for IM aripiprazole vs placebo (p<0.01). IM aripiprazole was well tolerated. Extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse events were similar for aripiprazole (1.7%) and placebo (2.3%) and lower than with haloperidol (12.6%). CONCLUSION: These results show that IM aripiprazole is an effective treatment, comparable to IM haloperidol, and well-tolerated for acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Comparison of the effects of clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on performance on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule and on locomotor behaviour in the rat.

Performance on progressive ratio schedules has been proposed as a means of assessing the effects of drugs on "reinforcer efficacy". It has been proposed that the effects of neuroleptic drugs on operant behaviour are mediated by a reduction of "reinforcer efficacy". We examined the effects of two "conventional" neuroleptics (haloperidol and chlorpromazine) and an "atypical" neuroleptic (clozapine) on progressive ratio schedule performance; d-amphetamine was used as a comparison compound. In experiment 1, rats responded for a sucrose reinforcer on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule (75-min sessions). After 66 preliminary training sessions, the rats received single doses (IP) of haloperidol (0.05, 0.1 mg kg(-1)). chlorpromazine (2, 4 mg kg(-1)), clozapine (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 mg kg(-1)), and d-amphetamine (0.2, 0.4, 0.8 mg kg(-1)), and the corresponding vehicle solutions. The highest ratio completed was reduced by haloperidol and chlorpromazine, and increased by clozapine. All three neuroleptics reduced the peak response rate, at least at the highest doses administered. Response rates on the lower and intermediate ratios could be described by a three-parameter equation proposed to account for fixed ratio schedule performance. Haloperidol reduced, and clozapine dose-dependently increased the "motivational" parameter (a); d-amphetamine reduced it at low doses and increased it at high doses. The three neuroleptics increased the "response time" parameter (delta). Un-reinforced locomotor behaviour, measured in experiment 2, was not significantly altered by haloperidol, chlorpromazine or clozapine, but was increased by d-amphetamine. These results are consistent with a reduction of reinforcer efficacy produced by haloperidol and an increase produced by clozapine; clozapine's effect is unlikely to reflect a general increase in locomotion. All three neuroleptics induced some degree of motor debilitation. The quantitative analysis of progressive ratio schedule performance may provide a useful adjunct to existing methods for separating effects of drugs on motivational and motor processes.

Animals↗