PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Reinforcement Schedule”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30Linked to original sources

The effects of dietary lead on ethanol-reinforced responding.

Sixteen adult male rats were presented with a diet containing no added lead (Group Control) or a diet containing 500 ppm inorganic lead (Group Lead) for 60 days. Subsequently, all animals were trained to lever press on an FR 1 reinforcement schedule for an ethanol reinforcer using a food-induction procedure where 20 g of food were presented to deprived animals 1 hr prior to the training session. Gradually, the daily food allotment was shifted to 15 min post-session and the ethanol concentration maintained at 6% (v/v). On a subsequent dose/response test, serial presentations of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32% ethanol reinforcement (v/v) were presented to both groups of animals. The results from the initial self-administration test using 6% ethanol as the reward outcome showed that Group Lead lever pressed at a significantly lower rate than Group Control. In addition, on the dose/response test control animals increased responding at a lower concentration, and then as dose levels continued to increase, began to decrease responding earlier than lead-treated animals. Apparently, sensitivity to ethanol effects is decreased by lead toxicity. The importance of these data for understanding other metal/alcohol interactions is discussed.

Animals↗

Decreasing classroom misbehavior through the use of DRL schedules of reinforcement.

In three studies, reinforcing low rates of responding reduced inappropriate behaviors. In the first study, the talking-out behavior of one TMR student was reduced when the teacher allowed 5 min of free time for a talk-out rate less than 0.06 per minute. In a second study, the talking-out behavior of an entire TMR class was reduced when reinforcement was delivered for a response rate less than 0.10 per minute. In a third study, successively decreasing DRL limits were used to reduce off-task verbalizations of an entire high school business class. In each case, the DRL procedure proved manageable for the teacher and successful in reducing misbehavior.

Journal Article↗