SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Postoperative follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer: a combined evaluation of CT scan, colonoscopy and tumour markers.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to present the experience of our department regarding the importance of the systematic postoperative follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer, early diagnosis and treatment of the recurrence of the disease or a metachronous cancer. METHODS: In a study that took place between October 2001 and February 2004 amongst 67 patients that were operated upon for colorectal cancer, 41 were systematically being followed up through CT scan, colonoscopy and tumour markers. RESULTS: In the 14th and 18th months postoperatively for 2 of the patients the CT scan showed hepatic metastasis, while the colonoscopy was negative. Regarding the tumour markers, one (CEA) was elevated in one patient while three were elevated in the others. For 2 out of the 41 patients the colonoscopy showed recurrence of the disease within one and two years respectively. The CT scan proved to be free of metastasis and the tumour markers were falling within the normal range for one of the patients while for the other CEA was elevated. Both patients underwent additional colectomy. Postoperative increase of the tumour markers was observed in 9 patients. The above patients had normal markers in the immediate postoperative period. For 4 out of the 9 patients recurrence or spread of the disease was observed while the rest of them are still being followed up. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we believe that the systematic postoperative follow-up of the patients with colorectal cancer through CT, colonoscopy and the use of tumour markers contributes decisively to the early diagnosis and treatment of any possible recurrence of the cancer or a metachronous cancer or misdiagnosed concomitant cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Picoprep-3 is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations.

PURPOSE: Bowel preparations for colonoscopy have to balance the demand for adequate cleansing action of the bowel and patient acceptability. There has been no study comparing Picoprep-3 (sodium picosulfate), a relatively new product, to Fleet (sodium phosphate), a well-studied and widely used preparation. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and patient tolerance of these two bowel preparations for colonoscopy. METHODS: A randomized, single-blinded, prospective trial was conducted. A total of 400 consecutive patients presenting for elective colonoscopy at St George Private Hospital during a 20-week period were randomly assigned to receive Picoprep-3 or Fleet. Patients were asked to record the effects of the preparation, noting tolerability, taste, and side effects. Two hundred patients were assigned to the Picoprep-3 group and 200 to the Fleet group. Surgeons were blinded to the preparation used and rated the quality of the bowel preparation on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being the optimal score). RESULTS: Picoprep-3 was found to be better tolerated (P < 0.0001) and better tasting (P < 0.0001) than Fleet. Patients in the Picoprep-3 group reported significantly less nausea (P < 0.001), vomiting (P < 0.004), dizziness (P < 0.01), abdominal pains (P = 0.0005), and thirst (P < 0.0001) associated with the preparation. There was no significant difference in visualization of the colon between the two groups as judged by the two colonoscopists (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy preparation with Picoprep-3 has similar efficacy but superior taste and tolerability compared with Fleet. Picoprep-3 caused less adverse side effects in the study population.

Cathartics↗

PubMed2002

CT and 99mTc-WBC vs colonoscopy in the evaluation of inflammation and complications of inflammatory bowel diseases.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computerized tomography (CT) and 99mTc-white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy versus colonoscopy in assessing inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in a large population of children. METHODS: In a patient population of 313 consecutive children who had a 99mTc-WBC scan, 106 colonoscopies were done within a median time interval of 8 days of the 99mTc-WBC scan. One hundred and three CT scans were performed on 84 patients. RESULTS: Of the 42 CT scans obtained within a short time interval after the 99mTc-WBC scan, 21 (50%) were normal. In the 21 children with a positive 99mTc-WBC scan, 62% (13/21) of the CT scans underestimated the bowel wall inflammation in at least one segment. In the children with a negative 99mTc-WBC study, there were 17 negative CT examinations and 4 examinations showing an abnormal terminal ileum. When CT was compared with colonoscopy in assessing inflammation, there were five true-negative CT, two true-positive CT, no false-positive, and seven false-negative CT examinations. When 99mTc-WBC scintigraphy was compared with colonoscopy in assessing inflammation, there were seven true-positive, two false-negative, five true-negative, and no false-positive 99mTc-WBC studies. The 99mTc-WBC scan was positive in five patients with a false-negative CT examination. Of the total 103 CT scans obtained, 53 (51%) were normal. Four abscesses (3.8%) were demonstrated by CT. CONCLUSIONS: 99mTc-WBC scintigraphy is more sensitive than CT for detecting inflammation of the bowel wall. The incidence of complications from IBD in this retrospective study was much lower than had been previously reported.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

A randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare the diagnostic yields and cost-effectiveness of two strategies for the evaluation of nonemergent lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Three hundred eighty patients aged greater than or equal to 40 yr were randomized to undergo initial flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air contrast barium enema or colonoscopy; 332 completed the initial studies. Initial colonoscopy detected more cases of polyps less than 9 mm in size, adenomas, and arteriovenous malformations but fewer cases of diverticulosis. No significant difference was found between strategies in the number of patients detected with cancers or polyps greater than or equal to 9 mm in size. In both strategies, cancers were more common in subjects aged greater than or equal to 55 yr (8% overall) than in those aged less than 55 yr (1%). Among patients aged less than 55 yr with suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding, initial flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air contrast barium enema is a more cost-effective strategy for the detection of colonic neoplasms than initial colonoscopy. However, initial colonoscopy is more cost effective for those aged greater than or equal to 55 yr.

Barium Sulfate↗

PubMed2005

Is colonoscopy a suitable investigation in the preoperative staging of ovarian cancer patients?

BACKGROUND: During ovarian cancer surgery, colorectal resection may be required. In our institution, preoperative colonoscopy is performed in order to assess visceral involvement. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of preoperative colonoscopy in ovarian cancer patients and the prevalence of adenomas in this population. PATIENTS: This retrospective study involved 144 consecutive patients with a supposed primary ovarian cancer. METHODS: Mucosal infiltration, bowel wall elasticity and bowel fixation were used to predict colorectal infiltration. Endoscopic and pathological findings were compared. All the polyps observed were removed. RESULTS: Six patients (4.2%) were excluded because of a misdiagnosed colorectal cancer metastatic to the ovary. Eight (6%) patients were considered, at endoscopy, to have a bowel infiltration and eight (6%), an uncertain infiltration. In 116 (88%), no signs of bowel infiltration were observed. The pathological analysis showed that colonoscopy had a low sensitivity (44%) in identifying bowel infiltration. Specificity was 100%, positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 92%. The overall accuracy was about 90%. Thirty-six adenomas were removed in 26 (20%) women. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy identifies a not insignificant number of ovarian cancer patients requiring colorectal surgery. An increased prevalence of adenomas was not observed in this population.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2005

Is the variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope more effective than a standard adult colonoscope for outpatient adult colonoscopy? A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Trials with variable-stiffness colonoscopes have yielded conflicting results regarding efficacy and patient tolerance. AIM: We compared a variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope with a standard adult colonoscope. METHODS: Two hundred and forty consecutive adult outpatients presenting for colonoscopy were randomised to either a variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope or an adult colonoscope. If there was difficulty in performing colonoscopy with the assigned scope, the endoscopist was given the option of switching to the alternative instrument. In the condition of a severely fixed, angulated sigmoid colon, a final 'salvage' (backup) option was that of switching to an even thinner diameter paediatric colonoscope. RESULTS: The initial frequency of total colonoscopy was similar with the variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope and adult colonoscope (95.8% versus 96.6%, p=1.0). Factoring in scope changes, the final frequency was 98.3% versus 99.2% (p=1.0). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of insertion time, doses of sedative medications, scales of procedure difficulty, or patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Adult colonoscope and variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope are both effective instruments for routine colonoscopy. In cases when the use of the initial scope is unsuccessful, switching to the alternative scope may permit passage to the caecum. There are occasional patients with fixed, angulated sigmoid colons in whom use of an even thinner diameter paediatric colonoscope can be helpful.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Visuospatial abilities correlate with performance of senior endoscopy specialist in simulated colonoscopy.

Visuospatial abilities have been demonstrated to predict the performance of medical students in simulated endoscopy. However, little has been reported whether differences in visuospatial abilities influence the performance of senior endoscopists or whether their vast endoscopy experience reduces the importance of these abilities. Eleven senior endoscopists were included in our study. Before the simulated endoscopies in GI Mentor II (gastroscopy: case 3, module 1 and colonoscopy: case 3, module 1), the endoscopists performed three visuospatial tests: (1) pictorial surface orientation (PicSOr), (2) card rotation, and (3) cube comparison tests that monitor the ability of the tested person to re-create a three-dimensional image from a two-dimensional presentation as well as mentally manipulate that re-created image. The results of the visuospatial tests were correlated to the performance parameters of the virtual-reality endoscopy simulator. The percent of time spent with clear view in the simulated colonoscopy correlated well with the performance in the visuospatial PicSOr (r = -0.75, P = 0.01), card rotation (r = 0.75, P = 0.01), and cube comparison (r = 0.79, P = 0.004) tests. The endoscopists who performed better in the visuospatial tests also were better at maintaining visualization of the colon lumen. Those who performed better in the PicSOr test formed fewer loops during colonoscopy (r = 0.60, P = 0.05). In the technically less demanding simulated gastroscopy, there were no such correlations. The visuospatial tests performed better in endoscopists not playing computer games. Good visuospatial ability correlates significantly with the performance of experienced endoscopists in a technically demanding simulated colonoscopy, but not in the less demanding simulated gastroscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Colon cleaning during colonoscopy: a new mechanical cleaning device tested in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Poor colon cleaning frequently impairs colonoscopy. The aim of the study was to develop a method of cleaning the colon during colonoscopy. METHODS: A soft-tipped catheter with a water jet spray at its tip was designed to break up and propel stool contents in the direction of the anus. Stool contents were collected in a container attached to an endoscopy trolley. OBSERVATIONS: In bench tests, colon models filled with porridge were rapidly cleaned. Unprepared colons (n = 15) of anesthetized pigs were cleared in a few minutes by using this device at colonoscopy, by advancing the catheter under direct vision into concretions, which were rapidly broken down. There was minimal trauma to mucosa in these survival studies. CONCLUSIONS: A colon cleaning method for use at colonoscopy was highly effective in cleaning colon models and in unprepared pig colon. This device may have a role in cleaning the colon in unprepared or poorly prepared patients.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Diphenhydramine as an adjunct to sedation for colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous benzodiazepines in combination with opiates are used to achieve moderate sedation for colonoscopy. Although effective, these agents have potential adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and hypotension. Diphenhydramine hydrochloride possesses central nervous system depressant effects that theoretically could provide a synergistic effect for sedating patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the efficacy of adding diphenhydramine hydrochloride as an adjunct to improve sedation and to reduce the amount of standard sedatives used during colonoscopy. DESIGN: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: The study was conducted in a university hospital with an active GI fellowship training program. PATIENTS: The study group comprised 270 patients undergoing screening/diagnostic/therapeutic colonoscopy were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either 50 mg of diphenhydramine or placebo, given intravenously 3 minutes before starting conscious sedation with intravenous midazolam and meperidine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measure was anesthetic effect as assessed by the endoscopy team and by the patient; quantity of adjunctive sedatives to achieve adequate sedation. RESULTS: Of 270 patients, data were analyzed for 258 patients, with 130 patients in the diphenhydramine group and 128 patients in the placebo group. There was a 10.1% reduction in meperidine usage and 13.7% reduction in midazolam usage in favor of the diphenhydramine group. The mean evaluation scores as judged by the faculty, the fellows, and the nurses were statistically significant in favor of the diphenhydramine group. In addition, patient scores for overall sedation and pain level favored the group that received diphenhydramine. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous diphenhydramine given before initiation of standard sedation offers a significant benefit to conscious sedation for patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Colonoscopy↗

PubMed2005

Sedation and the technical performance of colonoscopy.

The use of sedation for routine endoscopic procedures, including colonoscopy, varies widely across cultures. This variation in sedation practice is greater than any other culturally based variation in the technical performance of endoscopy. This article sequentially reviews the technical performance of colonoscopy in patients who undergo unsedated colonoscopy, sedation with narcotics and benzodiazepines, and deep sedation with propofol. For each of these approaches to colonoscopy, the advantages and disadvantages also are listed and discussed.

Benzodiazepines↗

PubMed2001

Endotoxin release and endotoxin neutralizing capacity during colonoscopy.

In 38 patients who underwent elective colonoscopy, endotoxin and endotoxin neutralizing capacity (ENC) were determined by use of the limulus--amebocyte--lysate test. A control group of 10 patients, prepared for colonoscopy, were sampled in the same manner as the study group prior to endoscopy. Elevated endotoxin plasma levels were only found when comparing the plasma levels before endoscopy with the highest levels available during endoscopy. The timed endotoxin plasma levels did not change significantly by use of the conventional limulus amebocyte test. However, ENC was found to decrease significantly 5 min after the onset of endoscopy. Maximal values were reached at the end of colonoscopy which recovered completely 24 h later. These results, obtained in a population which did not receive any infusions, demonstrate that the half life of endotoxin in the circulation seems to be very short and therefore endotoxin cannot itself be detected. On the other hand, small amounts of endotoxin reaching the blood stream are able to reduce ENC which can be analyzed by a modified limulus--amebocyte--lysate test. With the use of ENC and plasma endotoxin determinations, we are able to show significant endotoxemia during a minimal invasive procedure such as colonoscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Small adenomas may be missed during colonoscopy, but chromoscopy has been reported to enhance detection. The aim of this randomized-controlled trial was to determine the effect of total colonic dye spray on adenoma detection during routine colonoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive outpatients undergoing routine colonoscopy were randomized to a dye-spray group (0.1% indigo carmine used to coat the entire colon during withdrawal from the cecum) or control group (no dye). RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-nine patients were randomized, 124 to the dye-spray and 135 to the control group; demographics, indication for colonoscopy, and quality of the preparation were similar between the groups. Extubation from the cecum took a median of 9:05 minutes (range: 2:48-24:44 min) in the dye-spray group versus 4:52 minutes (range: 1:42-15:21 min) in the control group (p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with at least 1 adenoma and the total number of adenomas were not different between groups. However, in the dye-spray group significantly more diminutive adenomas (<5 mm) were detected proximal to the sigmoid colon (p = 0.026) and more patients were identified with 3 or more adenomas (p = 0.002). More non-neoplastic polyps were detected throughout the colon in the dye-spray group (p = 0.003). There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Dye-spray increases the detection of small adenomas in the proximal colon and patients with multiple adenomas, but long-term outcomes should be studied to determine the clinical value of these findings.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2002

The role of colonoscopy in the diagnosis of appendicitis in patients with atypical presentations.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen. Despite recent advances in radiologic imaging, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis may be difficult on occasion. The aims of this study were to describe the colonoscopic features of appendicitis and to determine whether colonoscopy can be used as an adjunct for the diagnosis of appendicitis in patients with atypical presentations. METHODS: The colonoscopic findings in 21 patients (14 men, 7 women; average age 55 years) with a colonoscopic or histopathologic diagnosis of appendicitis were analyzed retrospectively. Colonoscopy was performed because diagnoses suggested by CT were other than acute appendicitis (11 patients), and/or the presenting clinical features were atypical for acute appendicitis with the duration of symptoms being 10 days or longer (17 patients). RESULTS: The colonoscopic diagnosis was acute appendicitis for all 21 patients. Seventeen underwent appendectomy, the diagnosis being verified in all cases. Of the 4 patients whose symptoms improved without appendectomy, 3 were considered to have acute appendicitis because pus was seen to drain from the appendiceal orifice at colonoscopy. A definite diagnosis could not be made in the remaining 1 patient. Therefore, the diagnosis of appendicitis was considered confirmed in 20 of 21 patients. Colonoscopic findings in these 20 patients included hyperemia (15) and bulging (18) at the appendiceal orifice area with surrounding mucosal edema (19), and drainage of pus from the appendiceal orifice (7). CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy may be useful in the diagnosis of appendicitis when the clinical presentation is atypical for appendicitis and/or imaging studies are nondiagnostic.

Abdomen, Acute↗

PubMed2004

Most dysplasia in ulcerative colitis is visible at colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with long-standing extensive ulcerative colitis are at increased risk for colorectal carcinoma. Because most dysplasia is believed to be macroscopically invisible, recommended surveillance protocols include multiple non-targeted colonic biopsies. It was hypothesized by us that most dysplasia is actually colonoscopically visible. This study assessed the proportion of dysplasia that has been detected macroscopically in patients who underwent colonoscopy surveillance at our center. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of colonoscopically detected neoplasia (dysplasia or cancer) in patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent surveillance from 1988 through 2002. An established surveillance protocol was used in all cases that included random segmental biopsies every 10 cm throughout the length of the colon, in addition to targeted biopsies of macroscopic lesions. Neoplasia detection was categorized as resulting from either targeted or non-targeted ("random") biopsies. Follow-up information was obtained to the study end. RESULTS: A total of 525 patients underwent 2204 surveillance colonoscopies. A total of 110 neoplastic areas were detected in 56 patients: 85 (77.3%) were macroscopically visible at colonoscopy, and 25 (22.7%) were macroscopically invisible. Fifty patients (89.3%) had macroscopically detectable neoplasia, and 6 (10.7%) had macroscopically invisible lesions. The frequency of cancer in patients who had endoscopic resection of neoplasia did not differ from that for the surveillance population as a whole (1/40 vs. 18/525; p=1.0, Fisher exact test), irrespective of whether the lesion was thought to be an adenoma or a dysplasia-associated lesion/mass. Conversely, a high proportion of unresectable lesions harbored cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Most dysplastic lesions in ulcerative colitis are visible at colonoscopy. From a clinical perspective, the endoscopic resectability of a lesion is more important than whether it is thought to be a sporadic adenoma or a dysplasia-associated lesion/mass.

Adenoma, Villous↗

PubMed2004

Digital video for the documentation of colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether digital video is suitable for the documentation of colonoscopy. Standards are required for the visual documentation of endoscopic findings and to optimize image quality while limiting file size and bandwidth requirements. METHODS: Video recordings of colonoscopy procedures were encoded using a common video compression method at selected data rates and resolutions. Twelve reviewers were selected, each of whom was assigned 8 video review sessions, each consisting of 5 colonoscopy procedures. The reviewers rated the following: level of confidence that the cecum was demonstrated, subjective quality of the video compared with actual videocolonoscopy, and whether the video was of "diagnostic quality." RESULTS: Reviewers were confident that the cecum was demonstrated in all cases except at the lowest data rate. The 1.0 Mbps standard interchange format video provided an optimal balance between quality and file size. CONCLUSIONS: For the documentation of colonoscopy, 1.0 Mbps is acceptable and results in a file size of 7.5 Mbytes/min, which is manageable for most modern hospital and telehealth networks.

Colonoscopy↗

PubMed2005

A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: For outpatient colonoscopy, the time required to intubate the cecum is variable. The aim of this study was to determine factors associated with cecal intubation time. METHODS: A total of 693 consecutive outpatient colonoscopies performed from January to October 2002 at a tertiary care medical center were studied prospectively. Data gathered included time required to reach the cecum; patient age, gender, and body mass index; history of abdominal surgery; quality of bowel preparation; presence/absence of diverticula; and endoscopist experience. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 587 patients. Mean age was 59 years, 48% were men, and mean body mass index was 28. Median cecal intubation time was 9 minutes. Linear regression analysis was performed. Cecal intubation time is prolonged by the following factors: older patient age, female gender, lower body mass index, poor bowel preparation, and lower endoscopist annual case volume. CONCLUSIONS: This large, prospective study identified 5 factors that prolong the time required for cecal intubation at colonoscopy. These factors may be used to individualize scheduling of colonoscopy according to the time required.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Randomized trial of a video headset vs. a conventional video monitor during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Head-mounted video displays recently became available for endoscopy. This study compared a video headset with a conventional monitor during colonoscopy. METHODS: Five endoscopists were randomized to headset or to monitor use during colonoscopy. They completed a questionnaire that assessed image quality, procedure characteristics, and comfort. Medication use and length of procedure were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 96 colonoscopies were performed. Image quality and comfort were rated as poorer during headset use (p < 0.05). However, neck strain was significantly reduced with the headset. Medication use and total procedure time were similar. There was a trend toward increased time to cecum with the headset (9.8 vs. 8.0 minutes, p = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized study, comparing a video headset and a conventional monitor for colonoscopy, image quality and comfort were inferior with the headset, although neck strain was improved. Further improvements in technology are needed before headsets can be considered an acceptable alternative to the conventional video monitor for GI endoscopy.

Colonoscopy↗

PubMed1995

Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation.

BACKGROUND: Several recent trials have shown that colonoscopy preparation with sodium phosphate solution is as effective and at least as well tolerated as conventional PEG-ES lavage. These trials utilized two 1.5-fluid oz doses, one given on the evening before colonoscopy and the other early the next morning. METHODS: We devised a new sodium phosphate regimen in which the entire dose was given on the evening before examination (1.5 fl oz at 4 PM, 1.5-fl oz at 7 PM and 10 mg of bisacodyl at 10 PM) and performed a prospective, randomized trial that compared it with conventional PEG-ES lavage in terms of quality of colon cleansing, patient tolerance, and safety in an outpatient colonoscopy population with normal renal function. Seventy-two patients received sodium phosphate-bisacodyl and 75 PEG-ES lavage. RESULTS: The overall quality of colon cleansing and frequency of unsatisfactory preparations were similar with both methods. Patients found preparation with sodium phosphate-bisacodyl to be easier than PEG-ES lavage (p = 0.005). No clinically important adverse effects were seen with either method of preparation. The average cost of sodium phosphate-bisacodyl was $4.32 per patient compared with $18.15 for PEG-ES lavage preparation. CONCLUSION: Preparation with sodium phosphate-bisacodyl, given on the evening before colonoscopy, is a well-tolerated, efficacious, and cost-effective alternative to conventional PEG-ES lavage.

Adolescent↗