PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Complement C4b”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources

Acute humoral rejection in renal allograft recipients: I. Incidence, serology and clinical characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection (AR) associated with de novo production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is a clinicopathological entity that carries a poor prognosis (acute humoral rejection, AHR). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of AHR in renal allograft recipients, and to further analyze the antibodies involved. METHODS: During a 4-year period, 232 renal transplants (Tx) were performed at our institution. Assays for DSA included T and B cell cytotoxic and/or flow cytometric cross-matches and cytotoxic antibody screens (PRA). C4d complement staining was performed on frozen biopsy tissue. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients (35%) suffered at least one episode of AR within the first 3 months: 51 had steroid-insensitive AR whereas the remaining 30 had steroid-sensitive AR. No DSA were found in patients with steroid-sensitive AR. In contrast, circulating DSA were found in 19/51 patients (37%) with steroid-insensitive AR, and widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries were present in 18 of these 19 (95%). In at least three cases, antibodies were against donor HLA class II antigens. DSA were not found in the remaining 32 patients but C4d staining was positive in 2 of 32. The DSA/C4d positive (n=18) and DSA/C4d negative (n=30) groups differed in pre-Tx PRA levels, percentage of re-Tx patients, refractoriness to antilymphocyte therapy, and outcome. Plasmapheresis and tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil rescue reversed rejection in 9 of 10 recipients with refractory AHR. CONCLUSION: More than one-third of the patients with steroid-insensitive AR had evidence of AHR, often resistant to antilymphocyte therapy. Most cases (95%) with DSA at the time of rejection had widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries, suggesting a pathogenic role of the circulating alloantibody. Combined DSA testing and C4d staining provides a useful approach for the early diagnosis of AHR, a condition that often necessitates a more intensive therapeutic rescue regimen.

Acute Disease↗

C4d staining of perioperative renal transplant biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Deposition of C4d in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) has been shown to be a sensitive marker for antibody-mediated (humoral) rejection in renal transplant biopsies. Some studies also suggest that C4d in PTCs is specific for humoral rejection or, at least, for the presence of donor-specific antibodies. However, in other studies, PTC C4d deposits were noted in more than 40% of renal transplant biopsies performed for graft dysfunction and capillary C4d deposition in heart transplants may result from ischemic injury. METHODS: To test the specificity of C4d staining as a marker for acute humoral rejection ACR in renal allografts, indirect immunofluorescence using a monoclonal anti-C4d antibody and a fluorescein-isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody was performed on cryostat sections of 90 renal transplant biopsies, including 35 pairs of preimplantation and 1-hr postreperfusion biopsies of the same graft, postreperfusion biopsies of 12 additional grafts, and 8 positive controls (biopsies with known C4d-positive AHR). Eighteen grafts were cadaveric, 17 grafts were liviing-related, and 12 grafts were living-unrelated (excluding controls). Included in these grafts were 13 grafts that developed AHR 3 to 34 days posttransplantation. RESULTS: Only 2 of 82 perioperative biopsies showed C4d staining in PTCs. Both perioperative biopsies were postreperfusion biopsies of grafts diagnosed with AHR 5 and 34 days posttransplantation, respectively, and, in each case, the recipient had been treated with plasmapheresis before transplantation because of a positive crossmatch (cytotoxic and flow cytometric) and continued to have a weakly positive flow crossmatch at the time of transplantation. In one biopsy, C4d staining was focal, and in the other biopsy, it was diffuse; in both biopsies, C4d staining was relatively mild (1+ on a 0-4+ scale). No C4d staining was noted on preimplantation biopsies of each graft. All biopsies that contained glomeruli showed linear capillary loop or blotchy mesangial staining, or both, which was similar in prereperfusion and postreperfusion biopsies. All positive controls showed diffuse C4d staining in PTCs. CONCLUSIONS: C4d staining in PTCs may be seen as early as 1 hr posttransplantation in some recipients with low levels of antidonor antibodies. However, this was not observed as a feature of ischemic or ischemia-reperfusion injury in perioperative renal transplant biopsies, including those of cadaveric grafts with cold ischemia times of as long as 41 hr.

Biomarkers↗

Acute humoral renal allograft rejection.

In kidney transplantation, it is well established that donor-specific antibodies can cause substantial graft injury. Hyperacute rejection, now virtually eliminated by routine pretransplant cytotoxic crossmatch testing, represents the prototype of humoral rejection. However, there is now increasing evidence that alloantibody-mediated immune reactions may also cause acute rejection. Acute humoral rejection, which is frequently associated with severe graft dysfunction and immunologic graft loss, represents a particular diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Reliable detection of antibody-mediated graft injury is required to govern the application of antihumoral therapeutic strategies. This review focuses on new approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of acute humoral rejection. Special attention is given to a novel diagnostic marker, the complement split product C4d.

Antibody Formation↗

Immunoperoxidase staining for C4d on paraffin-embedded tissue in cardiac allograft endomyocardial biopsies: comparison to frozen tissue immunofluorescence.

C4d deposition in microvasculature is a marker for humoral rejection. The authors compared a recently developed C4d immunoperoxidase (IP) method for paraffin-embedded tissue to immunofluorescence (IF) of frozen tissue. Of 315 frozen endomyocardial biopsies with IF staining for C4d, 280 were negative and 35 were positive. Negative controls were 17 negative biopsies and 11 biopsies with myocyte necrosis. The extent of IP and IF staining was graded as 0 to 3+. Staining intensity and the number and type of positive vessels were recorded. Staining patterns in Quilty lesions (QL) and foci of acute cellular rejection (ACR) were also evaluated. In 34 biopsies with sufficient tissue, IP criteria of 2+/3+, or more than 10 to 20 positive vessels per 10 high-power fields detected 25.0% (1/4), 18.2% (2/11), and 84.2% (16/19) of 1+, 2+, and 3+ IF-positive biopsies, respectively, without false positives. Considering C4d IF 3+ as positive resulted in 84.2% (16/19) sensitivity and 93.0% specificity (40/43). Intensely stained capillaries predominated in six of seven biopsies when more than 100 capillaries per 10 high-power fields were positive. Seventy percent (7/10) of IP 2+ and 3+ biopsies showed positive capillaries in QLs, while 36.4% (4/11) of IP 1+ and negative biopsies did. All eight IP 2+/3+ biopsies showed positive capillaries in ACR foci, while 25.0% (1/4) of IP-negative biopsies did. Capillary staining in QLs and areas of ACR reflects overall C4d deposition. In conclusion, IP staining of 2+/3+ is highly sensitive and specific for C4d positivity. The authors recommend considering 2+ and 3+ as positive staining when using the IP technique.

Adolescent↗

Capillary deposition of complement split product C4d in renal allografts is associated with basement membrane injury in peritubular and glomerular capillaries: a contribution of humoral immunity to chronic allograft rejection.

Endothelial deposition of the complement split product C4d is an established marker of antibody-mediated acute renal allograft rejection. A contribution of alloantibody-dependent immune reactions to chronic rejection is under discussion. In this study, the association of immunohistochemically detected endothelial C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC) with morphologic features of chronic renal allograft injury was investigated in a large study cohort. C4d deposits in PTC were detected in 73 (34%) of 213 late allograft biopsies performed in 213 patients more than 12 mo after transplantation (median, 4.9 yr) because of chronic allograft dysfunction. Endothelial C4d deposition was found to be associated with chronic transplant glomerulopathy (CG) (P < 0.0001), with basement membrane multilayering in PTC (P = 0.01), and with an accumulation of mononuclear inflammatory cells in PTC (P < 0,001). Furthermore, C4d deposits in PTC (in biopsies with normal glomerular morphology) were associated with development of CG in follow-up biopsies. Other morphologic features of chronic allograft nephropathy (with exception of tubular atrophy) were not associated with C4d deposits in PTC. Analyses of previous and follow-up biopsies revealed that C4d deposits may occur de novo and may also disappear at any time after transplantation. In conclusion, the data suggest that complement activation in renal microvasculature, indicating humoral alloreactivity, contributes to chronic rejection characterized by chronic transplant glomerulopathy and basement membrane multilayering in PTC.

Adult↗

Diagnostic value of C4d in renal biopsies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Capillary C4d is now an established marker of antibody-mediated rejection in graft biopsies. The technique is widely used to further define the clinical relevance of humoral alloreactivity in various patient subgroups. These include highly sensitized patients, recipients with late graft failure and also some with 'stable' graft function. RECENT FINDINGS: The C4d technique compares favourably with other techniques that are explored, for example detection of C3d. Capillary C4d can be associated with any graft pathology, including transplant glomerulopathy. C4d is related to circulating alloantibodies but not autoantibodies, and is probably not derived from local sources. Presensitization and de-novo sensitization are important scenarios of humoral alloreactivity that require refined analysis and treatment. SUMMARY: Detection of C4d in graft biopsies has emerged as an important tool that could substantiate the clinical significance of antibody-mediated rejections. The comprehensive analysis of humoral alloreactivity in the posttransplantation period is still ongoing and will hopefully result in improved patient care and better long-term graft survival.

Autoantibodies↗

Complement fragment C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries in acute humoral rejection after ABO blood group-incompatible human kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is the most important risk factor for early graft loss in ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) kidney transplantation (RTx). The pathogenesis and diagnostic criteria for AHR after ABO-i RTx remain unclear. Complement fragment C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC), which is a sensitive indicator for activation of the classical complement pathway, was studied to establish the pathologic diagnostic indicator of AHR. METHODS: Forty-four graft biopsy specimens from 19 patients with ABO-i living donors were analyzed within 90 days after RTx. Nineteen biopsy specimens with acute rejection after ABO-compatible (ABO-c) living-related RTx were used as controls. Diffuse and bright C4d deposition in PTC was considered significantly positive. RESULTS: All of 8 recipients with AHR showed significantly positive C4d in PTC in the ABO-i group, but 9 of 11 recipients without AHR were negative. In the ABO-c RTx group, 16 of 19 recipients were negative for C4d in PTC. The prevalence of C4d in PTC was significantly higher in ABO-i RTx (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: C4d deposition is valuable as a specific and sensitive indicator for AHR, even of mild severity, in ABO-i RTx.

ABO Blood-Group System↗

When renal allografts turn DARC.

BACKGROUND: The Duffy antigen-receptor for chemokines (DARC) is a chemokine-binding protein that is up-regulated on peritubular capillaries (PTC) during cellular renal allograft rejection. C4d deposition and accumulation of inflammatory cells in PTC are indicators of humoral renal allograft rejection. Because DARC is expressed at the site of C4d deposition and might be involved in inflammatory cell recruitment, the authors evaluated the expression of DARC in different forms of human renal allograft rejection. METHODS: Deposition of C4d and DARC expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 42 renal transplant biopsy specimens. Biopsy specimens were subdivided according to histologic and immunohistochemical results, that is, C4d-negative biopsy specimens with (Banff 1, n=8) or without signs of cellular rejection (n=16), and C4d-positive biopsies (humoral rejection) with (Banff 1 rejection, n=7) or without cellular rejection (n=11). RESULTS: DARC expression was found on a small number of PTC and veins in patients without rejection. Cellular and humoral rejection led to a comparable increase in the number of DARC-positive PTC (9.7 and 8.7 vs. 2.6 vessels per high-power field [HPF], respectively). The highest numbers were found in biopsy specimens with signs of both humoral and cellular rejection (17.5 vessels per HPF). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that demonstrates an induction of a chemokine-binding protein at the site of C4d deposition in humoral allograft rejection. The additive effect of humoral and cellular rejection on DARC expression might imply different pathways of DARC induction for different forms of allograft rejection.

Acute Disease↗

Complement activation in early protocol kidney graft biopsies after living-donor transplantation.

BACKGROUND: To gain insight into complement activation in kidney grafts, we studied the deposition of components from all complement pathways in protocol biopsies from living-donor recipients that were taken 1 week (median 7 days) after transplantation. METHODS: Graft protocol biopsies (n=37) were taken consecutively and stained for two-color immunofluorescence, with antibodies to C4d, C3, C1q, factor B, C6, terminal C5b-9 complement complex, mannose-binding lectin (MBL), and MBL-associated serine protease-1, combined with an endothelial marker. Light and electron microscopy were performed in all cases. Clinical acute rejection (AR), graft loss, and long-term kidney function were recorded. Baseline biopsies from 15 of the patients served as controls. RESULTS: Endothelial C4d deposition was demonstrated in peritubular capillaries in 11 of 37 cases (30%), of which 9 of 11 (82%) experienced clinical AR but only 6 of 11 (55%) experienced AR as defined by histopathologic criteria. Biopsies from three patients, two with early graft loss, showed diffuse global C4d in the glomerular endothelium with codeposition of C3 in all patients and MBL-associated serine protease-1 in one patient. Focal peritubular capillary C3 deposition was found in two additional C4d-positive cases with AR. No posttransplant deposition was demonstrated for the other components. CONCLUSIONS: Early diffuse C4d deposition in the kidney graft capillaries is closely related to acute humoral rejection, whereas focal staining may occur with mild AR or, rarely, without rejection. Codeposition of C3 indicates early AR with a higher risk of graft loss. In most cases, activation was limited to C4d, indicating efficient in situ regulation of complement activation.

Acute Disease↗

C3D deposition in peritubular capillaries indicates a variant of acute renal allograft rejection characterized by a worse clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) is a sign of humoral renal allograft rejection and an independent predictor of graft survival. Few investigators have focused on the meaning of capillary C3 deposition in rejecting grafts. Because C3 production can result from both classic and alternative pathway activation of the complement cascade, it is not clear whether C3 deposition indicates a distinct entity of acute rejection (AR) or merely represents a separate form of C4d-positive AR. METHODS: We examined the deposition of C3d in the PTCs of recipients with AR in the first year posttransplantation (n=30). Clinical outcome variables and histology were compared with C3d-negative control patients (n=82). RESULTS: C3d-positive patients demonstrated more frequent preexisting T-cell antibodies (57%) and more re-transplants (37%), and they received more blood transfusions (mean 10.3 units). C3d-positive patients experienced more frequent multiple AR episodes (57%) and delayed graft function (36.7%). All nine C3d-positive recipients screened for posttransplantation donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies demonstrated positive results. Graft failure occurred in 23% of C3d-positive recipients (7.3% in the control group) (P=0.03). C3d-positive biopsies showed significantly less tubulitis (P=0.03), whereas congestive PTCs with intraluminal accumulation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes were conspicuous. Thrombi, fibrinoid necrosis, and acute tubular necrosis were not more pronounced. In 19% of rejection biopsies, C3d deposition in PTCs was present without C4d deposition. In the remaining biopsies, C3d and C4d deposition was found simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: The deposition of complement factor C3d in PTCs indicates a variant type of AR characterized by a worse clinical outcome.

Acute Disease↗

Renal transplantation in patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome: high rate of recurrence and increased incidence of acute rejections.

BACKGROUND: The reported outcome of renal transplantation in patients with the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) varies greatly, probably related to the diverse causes of HUS. In this single-center retrospective study, we have analyzed the recurrence rate, the incidence of acute rejections, and graft survival in patients suffering from adult-onset and childhood-onset HUS. METHODS: The medical records of 35 patients with end-stage renal disease caused by HUS, who received 50 renal allografts, were reviewed. A definite recurrence of HUS was diagnosed if both clinical and histologic signs of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) were present in the absence of any endovasculitis. If there were signs of mild endovasculitis, a probable recurrence was diagnosed. RESULTS: After first renal transplantation, 0 definite and 1 (6%) probable recurrence occurred in 18 patients with childhood-onset HUS, as opposed to 7 (41%) definite and 3 (18%) probable recurrences in 17 adult-onset HUS patients (odds ratio [OR], 13.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-105.7). In the latter patients, early use of cyclosporine A increased the risk for recurrence. The incidence of acute rejections was increased compared with matched controls (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.05-2.19 for adult-onset HUS and OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.34-2.62 for childhood-onset HUS). One-year graft survival in adult-onset HUS was poor (29%), whereas 1-year graft survival in childhood-onset HUS was comparable to matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: In adult-onset HUS, the recurrence rate and the incidence of acute rejections are high, resulting in a detrimental graft survival. In childhood-onset HUS, the recurrence rate is low, but the posttransplantation course is complicated by an increased incidence of acute rejections.

Acute Disease↗

Treatment of C4d-positive acute humoral rejection with plasmapheresis and rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte globulin.

BACKGROUND: Alloantibody-mediated acute rejection is a major cause of renal allograft loss despite aggressive therapy. Patients with humoral rejection can be identified with high sensitivity and specificity by the presence of peritubular capillary C4d staining on renal biopsy and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Standard therapy for acute humoral rejection (AHR) has been removal of donor-specific antibodies by plasmapheresis (PPH) in conjunction with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. We describe a series of seven patients with C4d positive AHR who received combined therapy with PPH and polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG). METHODS: PPH (1.4 volume exchange) was initiated on diagnosis of AHR on an alternate day basis for a mean number of 6.8 treatments, in conjunction with rATG (0.75 mg/kg/day 5-10 days) until the serum creatinine returned to 120% of nadir. RESULTS: The nadir posttreatment creatinine was significantly lower than pretreatment creatinine (1.0+/-1.2 vs. 2+/-1.4, P <0.007) with only one episode of graft loss. On follow-up there was no difference in renal allograft survival between the AHR group and the 60 patients without AHR who underwent transplantation during the same period. We describe the ability of rATG to induce apoptosis in vitro peripheral blood and activated B cells. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy using PPH and rATG is an effective means of reversing AHR in renal allografts.

Acute Disease↗

C4d deposition in early renal allograft protocol biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Deposition of the complement protein C4d in renal allograft biopsies obtained during graft dysfunction and rejection has been proposed to be a sensitive marker of antibody-mediated acute rejection. To determine the diagnostic specificity of C4d deposition, it is important to study biopsies from allografts with no evidence of dysfunction. In this study, we examined C4d deposition in protocol biopsies obtained irrespective of clinical status. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for C4d was performed on routine protocol biopsies preimplantation and on day 7 posttransplantation from 48 unselected renal allografts. Serum samples obtained up to 1 month after transplantation were assayed for donor-reactive antibodies (DRA). Results were correlated with histopathology and clinical outcome measures. RESULTS: Diffuse C4d deposition was detected in the peritubular capillaries of 6 of 48 (13%) biopsies. C4d deposition was present in 5 of 15 (33%) biopsies that showed acute rejection (Banff 97, category 4) but only in 1 of 33 (3%) biopsies with no rejection (P=0.003, 97% specificity). Posttransplant DRAs were detected in 21 of 48 (44%) patients. All five recipients with C4d deposition and rejection had posttransplant DRA; the recipient whose biopsy showed C4d positivity, but not rejection, did not have detectable DRA. C4d deposition was not treated with plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin and was not associated with poor posttransplant graft outcome at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in early posttransplant protocol biopsies, C4d is a specific marker for the presence of humoral rejection, as indicated by its association with DRA and acute histologic rejection.

Adult↗

Risk factors for capillary C4d deposition in kidney allografts: evaluation of a large study cohort.

BACKGROUND: Capillary deposition of the complement split product C4d has turned out to be a valuable marker of antibody-mediated rejection. The impact of pre- and posttransplant variables including particular immunosuppressive regimens on the frequency of C4d deposition has not yet been systematically investigated in a large multivariate analysis. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the incidence of C4d deposition in 388 kidney transplant recipients subjected to diagnostic biopsy within the first 6 months and analyzed the influence of potential confounders on the rate of C4d-positive graft dysfunction by applying multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Sixty-six recipients (17%) developed linear C4d deposits in at least a quarter of peritubular capillaries, a finding associated with inferior 1-year allograft survival (73% vs. 88% in C4d-negative patients, P=0.0003). A 50% reduction in the odds of C4d-positive graft dysfunction was found if calcineurin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy was started 2 to 4 hr before transplantation when compared with initiation after surgery (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.5; P=0.03). No differences with respect to C4d staining results were found for the use of tacrolimus, MMF, or sirolimus, or for cyclosporine C2 monitoring. Retransplantation (OR, 3.6; P<0.001) and presensitization (OR, 3.1; P=0.002) turned out to be strong independent risk factors for C4d deposition. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results suggest a reduced risk of C4d-positive graft dysfunction for patients receiving immunosuppression before transplantation. Apart from first dose timing, no influence of particular immunosuppressive strategies on C4d staining results was found.

Adult↗

Description of B lymphocytes and plasma cells, complement, and chemokines/receptors in acute liver allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Although antibody mechanisms play a pathogenetic role in liver allograft rejection, no data exist on B lymphocytes, plasma cells, complement, and chemokines in rejected liver tissue. METHODS: Liver biopsy specimens from 25 patients with acute allograft rejection (AR) (rejection activity index, RAI score: 1-9) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IH) and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and compared with biopsy specimens taken prior to implantation (PI). The number of CD20 and CD138 cells was evaluated, and the presence and abundance of the chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-3alpha, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL12, and their receptors CCR-6, CXCR3, and CXCR4 were examined. Complement depositions were visualized by C4d IH. RESULTS: The numbers of B lymphocytes (P=0.002) and plasma cells (P=0.022) were significantly higher in AR biopsy specimens compared with PI biopsy specimens. MIP-3alpha and CCR-6 cells were detected in the portal fields of all AR biopsy specimens. IH double staining revealed a colocalization of MIP-3alpha/CD20 cells; C4d deposits could be demonstrated along the portal capillaries. All examined chemokines and receptors could be detected in normal liver tissue and in AR biopsy specimens by RT-PCR and semiquantitative RT-PCR, demonstrating an overexpression of CXCL10 and -11. CONCLUSIONS: The significant increase of B lymphocytes and plasma cells during acute rejection, together with the lack of a significant increase of proliferating cells, indicates that the migration of B lymphocytes and plasma cells-promoted by the expression of B-cell activating chemokines/receptors-plays a key role in acute liver rejection. The C4d deposits along the portal capillaries indicate a humorally mediated alloresponse caused by the accumulated B and plasma cells.

Acute Disease↗