PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Defecation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

[Surgically treatable chronic constipative defecation disorders. Indications, diagnosis and therapy].

Paediatric surgeons are engaged in different causes of chronic constipation. Aganglionosis usually needs surgical therapy, but in dysganglionosis a distinct differentiation is necessary between patients sufficiently treated by conservative methods and others requiring surgery. Sometimes the operation seems to be an "ultima ratio" in these patients. Otherwise surgery can be necessary early in enterocolitis, ileus or toxic megacolon. In the spectrum of anal malformations constipation may be a primary symptom (anal ectopia, anal stenosis, low anal atresia with anocutaneous fistula) or appears as a post-operative complication (intermediate or high anal atresia). In secondary megacolon, surgery is performed to remove the result of therapeutic negation over many years. The operation may be the supposition to follow up with conservative treatment. In the management of constipated patients an exact diagnostic clarification has a central position. This especially includes anorectal manometry, x-ray examination with contrast medium application and defaecography and as last rectal biopsy.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2001

[An epidemiologic study of bowel habit in adult non-patient population in Beijing area].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the bowel habit and its influencing factors in the adult non-patient population in Beijing area. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted among 2486 adult permanent residents in Beijing area by randomized stratified sampling. The bowel habit (defecation frequency, characters of feces, time of defecation, and abnormal defecation) of the 1 952 non-patients among them were further investigated. The non-patient subject should fulfil the following criteria: (1) without gastrointestinal and hepatic organic diseases; (2) without metabolic disease affecting the motility of the gastrointestinal tract, such as diabetes mellitus and thyroid hyperfunction; (3) without irritable bowel syndrome which fits in the Manning criteria; and (4) considering oneself as having normal bowel habits. RESULTS: 84.17% of the non-patient interviewees defecated once per day with the mean defecation frequency of 7.09 times per week. 89.86% of the interviewees had formed or soft stool. 93.08% of the non-patients defecated formed or soft stool 3 to 21 times per week. No evidence showed that the frequency of defecation and character of feces were related to age and sex. 77% of them defecated in the morning. The prevalence rates of constipation, diarrhea, and abdominal pain associated with defecation were 3.74%, 1.08%, and 7.38% respectively. CONCLUSION: The defecation frequency of adult nonpatient population in Beijing area is almost identical to that reported in the west. 93.08% of the non-patient subjects have normal defecation patterns. It is necessary to define the judgement criteria for constipation and diarrhea for Chinese based on their defecation patterns.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Adults born with high anorectal atresia--how do they manage?

PURPOSE: We are interested in the way patients, who underwent surgery for high anorectal atresia, control their defecation. Considering that some patients, despite newer operative techniques, always will suffer from minor or major soiling we attempted to find some guidelines for postoperative support for future patients. METHOD: Fifty-eight patients (median age, 26 (range, 18.1-56.9) years) were personally interviewed. RESULTS: Regulating defecation is done in five different modes: 16 patients have stools after urge, 15 control their stools mainly by going to the toilet at regular times, 18 perform bowel-irrigations or use enemas, 2 have loss of feces continuously, and 7 patients have an ileostomy or colostomy. More than one-half of patients influence their defecation by diet. Of the patients with anal defecation, 6 never soil, 39 sometimes soil small amounts, and 6 often soil seriously. Eighteen patients occasionally suffer from constipation. There is no mode of defecation regulation outstanding in preventing soiling or constipation. However, patients who do not regulate defecation somehow suffer from serious soiling. Most patients are content with their level of cleanliness. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the mode of defecation regulation, many patients soil sometimes small amounts and a few often soil seriously. In view of the fact that most patients had to find the current control of defecation regulation by themselves rather late and lacked professional support, it is questionable whether the chosen mode of defecation regulation is the most optimal mode for each patient. We assume that a stepwise protocol under professional support, starting by the most natural mode of defecation, will improve defecation regulation in a more efficient way (earlier and better).

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2000

Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to analyze the prognostic value of clinical data and physiologic tests in patients undergoing rectocele repair for obstructed defecation. METHODS: Between 1988 and 1996, 89 consecutive female patients with obstructed defecation caused by a rectocele were enrolled in the study. Median age at time of presentation was 55 (range, 35-81) years. All patients underwent a combined transvaginal and transanal rectocele repair. End evaluation to assess long-term results was performed by an independent observer after a median duration of follow up of 52 (range, 12-92) months. The presence of the following five symptoms was evaluated: prolonged and unsuccessful straining at stool, feelings of incomplete evacuation, manual assistance during defecation, false urge to defecate, and a stool frequency of less than three times per week. When none or just one of these symptoms was present, outcome of rectocele repair was considered successful. The outcome was considered as a failure when two or more of these symptoms were recorded. Furthermore, all patients were asked to score the outcome of their operations as excellent, good, moderate, or poor. Clinical data and the results of physiologic tests obtained in patients with a poor outcome of surgery were compared with those obtained in patients with a successful outcome. RESULTS: Objective outcome of rectocele repair, based on the presence of symptoms, was found to be successful in 63 (71 percent) patients. Sixty-one patients considered outcome of surgery excellent or good (69 percent). Graded subjective outcomes between the two groups showed significantly better grades in cases of success. Duration of symptoms, number of symptoms, age, parity, and previous hysterectomy had no influence on the final outcome of surgery. Defecographic parameters, such as size of the rectocele, barium trapping in the rectocele, poor rectal evacuation, or intussusception, had no prognostic value. Signs of anismus based on defecography, electromyography, and balloon-expulsion studies did not influence outcome of surgery. The presence of symptoms such as defecation frequency, manual assistance, severe straining, false urge to defecate, or feelings of incomplete evacuation had no impact on the outcome. However, in patients without a daily urge to defecate or with a stool frequency of less than once per week, results of rectocele repair were significantly worse than in patients with a daily urge to defecate or a defecation frequency of more than once per week or both. In 14 of 26 patients with a poor outcome, colonic transit studies were performed. A delayed passage was observed throughout the entire colon in seven patients, in the left part of the colon and the rectosigmoid colon in four patients, and in the rectosigmoid colon in one patient. In two patients colonic transit was normal. CONCLUSIONS: Combined transvaginal and transanal rectocele repair is beneficial for the majority of patients with obstructed defecation. In patients without a daily urge to defecate or a stool frequency of less than once per week, indicating colonic malfunctioning, the outcome of rectocele repair seems to be poor.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Functional urinary and fecal incontinence in neurologically normal children: symptoms of one 'functional elimination disorder'?

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the relationship between disordered defecation and non-neuropathic bladder-sphincter dysfunction (NNBSD) by comparing the prevalence of symptoms of disordered defecation in children with NNBSD before and after treatment for urinary incontinence (UI), and assessing the effect of such symptoms on the cure rate for UI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the European Bladder Dysfunction Study, a prospective multicentre study comparing treatment plans for children with NNBSD, 202 children completed questionnaires on voiding and on defecation, at entry and after treatment for UI. Four symptoms of disordered defecation were evaluated; low defecation frequency, painful defecation, fecal soiling, and encopresis. RESULTS: At entry, 17 of the 179 children with complete data sets had low defecation frequency and/or painful defecation (9%), classified as functional constipation (FC). Of the 179 children, 57 had either isolated fecal soiling or soiling with encopresis (32%), classified as functional fecal incontinence (FFI). After treatment for UI, FFI decreased to 38/179 (21%) (statistically significant, P = 0.035); for FC there were too few children for analysis. After treatment for UI, 19 of the 179 children (11%) reported de novo FFI. Symptoms of disordered defecation did not influence the cure rate of treatment for UI. CONCLUSIONS: FFI improved significantly after treatment for UI only, but not in relation to the outcome of such treatment. FFI did not influence the cure rate for UI. There was little to support a causal relation between disordered defecation and NNBDS ('functional elimination syndrome').

Child↗
PubMed1993

Fecoflowmetry: a new parameter assessing rectal function in normal and constipated subjects.

Fecoflowmetry is a new technique by which the fecal flow rate is studied through recorded curves representing the changes that occur in the flow against time. Fecal flow rate is the product of rectal detrusor action against outlet resistance. The technique was performed on 36 normal volunteers and 88 chronically constipated patients. Simultaneous recording of the fecal flow rate and intra-abdominal and rectal neck pressures were performed. A water or paste enema was given to the individual. Upon feeling the desire to defecate, he or she was placed on a fecoflowmeter commode and was asked to defecate. Evaluation of the obtained defecation flow curve comprises the reporting on the defecated volume, flow time, mean and maximum flow rates, time to maximum flow, and shape of the curve. In the 88 constipated patients, two fecoflowmetric patterns were recognized: nonobstructive (inertia) and obstructive. They differ from each other in parameters and curve configuration. The defecated volume as well as mean and maximum flow rates were lower in outlet obstruction than in the inertia type, whereas flow time and time to maximum flow were longer. The ascending limb in the obstructive-type curve rose less steeply than in inertia; the curve had a long plateau, and the descending limb sloped more gradually. To conclude, fecoflowmetric studies could differentiate between defecation of normal and constipated subjects, and in the latter between the obstructive and inertia types of constipation. The technique was developed to simulate natural defecation. It provides quantitative and qualitative data concerning the defecation act. The technique is simple, easy, noninvasive, and nonradiologic. It can be used as a screening tool in defecation disorders.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1993

Are adults content or continent after repair for high anal atresia? A long-term follow-up study in patients 18 years of age and older.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the current state of fecal and urinary continence in an extensive group of adults after operative correction for high anorectal malformations and how they cope with their incontinence. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Normal fecal continence is hardly to be expected after correction for high anorectal malformation; despite this, it is commonly accepted that for most patients fecal continence improves with growing age and that most adult patients have no problems. Until now, however, few long-term follow-up studies in small groups of adults have been performed to assess continence after operative repair for high anorectal malformation. METHODS: Fifty-eight adult patients (median age, 26.0 years; range, 18.1 to 56.9 years) with an operatively corrected high anorectal malformation were evaluated by questionnaire with respect to their current state of fecal and urinary continence and mode of control of defecation. RESULTS: Seven patients have a permanent ileostoma or colostoma. Of the 51 patients with anal defecation, 61% control defecation by themselves, whereas 35% control defecation by using enemas or bowel irrigations, and 4% do not have any control at all. Besides medical therapy, 65% take dietary measures to influence defecation. According to existing scoring methods, 41% reached good and 49% fair control of defecation, whereas only 10% had poor control. Current control of defecation was reached from a median age of 15.0 years (range, 5 to 31 years). CONCLUSION: Conclusively, the authors can say that after correction for high anorectal malformation nobody reached normal fecal continence. Most patients with anal defecation reached good and fair control of defecation, however. Of all 58 patients, 84% are satisfied with their level of cleanliness.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Behavioral modification of colonic function. Can constipation be learned?

We challenged the two hypotheses: first, that defecation can be suppressed for an extended time, and second, if so, that this has an effect on upper colonic motility. Thus we studied 12 male volunteers with conditions of identical nutrition and patterns of physical activity over a two-week period, where one week with normal defecation and one week with voluntary prolonged suppression of defecation followed each other in randomized order. Frequencies of defecation, stool weights, total and segmental colonic transit times (using radiopaque markers) were compared. Frequency of defecations and stool weights were lower during suppressed defecation [8.9 +/- 0.66 vs 3.7 +/- 0.41 (mean +/- SE) bowel movements per week, P = 0.003, and 1.30 +/- 0.09 vs 0.98 +/- 0.13 kg/week, P = 0.01]. Total transit times were increased from 28.8 +/- 4.4 to 53.1 +/- 4.3 hr, P = 0.004. Segmental transit times were increased in the rectosigmoid (from 8.83 +/- 3.6 to 32.1 +/- 5.6 hr, P = 0.04) and right hemicolon (from 14.5 +/- 0.9 hr to 19.7 +/- 1.5 hr, P = 0.02) by suppression of defecation. We conclude that defecation habits may induce changes in colonic function such as those seen in constipation and that functional anorectal outlet obstruction may, probably by reflex mediation, affect the right colon.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1995

Paradoxical puborectalis contraction in patients after pelvic pouch construction.

UNLABELLED: Normal defecation is associated with relaxation of sphincters during the evacuation process. However, obstructive defecation is sometimes seen clinically manifested by abnormal contraction of the puborectalis during defecation rather than relaxing. This condition has not previously been described after pelvic pouch construction. PURPOSE: This study was done to evaluate patients for defecation difficulties caused by paradoxical puborectalis contraction after pelvic pouch procedures. METHODS: Prospectively, patients with defecation difficulties were questioned. They then underwent electromyography if they met particular criteria. Biofeedback was offered to all patients demonstrating paradox on electromyography. Follow-up was by clinic visits and interviews. RESULTS: After pelvic pouch construction, 13 patients were found to have paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Twelve of 13 patients elected to have biofeedback therapy. Eleven of these 12 were available for follow-up an average of eight (1-15) months after biofeedback. Nine improved, and two had no change in their defecation difficulty. Of the initial 13, 10 had an event, either pouchitis or abdominal trauma, directly before their defecation problems. CONCLUSION: Paradoxical puborectalis contraction can occur in patients after pelvic pouch surgery. It should be suspected in patients with defecation difficulties in the absence of an anatomic abnormality. Biofeedback is effective treatment.

Biofeedback, Psychology↗
PubMed1991

Constipation--some provocative thoughts.

Constipation is a collective term with different definitions and manifestations. In the present communication, I hope to shed light on the pathogenesis, investigation, and treatment of these manifestations. The levator ani is the principal muscle of defecation; together with anorectal reflex actions, it conducts the act of defecation. Strainodynia is the term I give to excessive and exhaustive straining at defecation. Band strainodynia has normal stool character but elevated rectal neck pressure due to the presence of a fibrous band in the rectal neck. Diet strainodynia presents with lower stool weight and frequency than normal; the internal anal sphincter is fibrous. The stools in levator strainodynia have been repeatedly obstructed at defecation due to levator dysfunction. Idiopathic oligofecorrhea or infrequent defecation was studied in 146 patients. Three stages could be identified: the deep and the everted intersphincteric groove and the cone anus. Fecoflowmetry is introduced as a new method for investigating anorectal disorders. It measures the defecated volume per time unit, and provides quantitative as well as qualitative data concerning the act of defecation. Changes in the fecal flow parameters or curve configuration from normal point to a defecation disorder.

Adult↗