SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Neoadjuvant therapy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources

PubMed2007

Kinetics of serum HER-2/neu changes in patients with HER-2-positive primary breast cancer after initiation of primary chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to determine the utility of quantitation of the extracellular domain (ECD) of the HER-2/neu receptor in the serum for predicting response to treatment in patients with primary breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: HER-2/neu ECD was measured in sera obtained from 39 patients with HER-2-amplified stage II-III primary breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to either 4 cycles of paclitaxel followed by 4 cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) (n = 10) or to the same chemotherapy with simultaneous weekly trastuzumab for 24 weeks (n = 29). Changes in HER-2 ECD were monitored with the Bayer HER-2/neu assay over 6 months and correlated with pathological response to treatment. RESULTS: Before initiation of chemotherapy, 28.2% of patients had elevated concentration of the HER-2 ECD (>15 ng/mL). The median baseline serum HER-2 ECD concentration was 13.6 ng/mL (mean +/- SD, 20.3 +/- 35.5 ng/mL). A decrease in the median HER-2 ECD levels from baseline to Week 3 and from baseline to Week 6 of chemotherapy was seen regardless of treatment regimen. No significant difference in baseline HER-2 ECD levels was observed between the groups who achieved pathological complete response (pCR) and the group with residual disease (P = .41). However, a 9% drop from Week 3 to Week 6 after initial chemotherapy was predictive of pCR (P = .04). CONCLUSION: A decrease in serum HER-2 ECD levels early during treatment was associated with pathological response in patients receiving primary chemotherapy, particularly trastuzumab-based regimens. Serum HER-2 ECD levels may serve to monitor neoadjuvant therapy in HER-2-positive primary breast cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Antimetastatic intraoperative chemotherapy of human colon tumors in the livers of nude mice.

We have developed a new antimetastatic chemotherapeutic strategy for combination with hepatic resection of human colon cancers in a high-metastasis nude mouse model. The new procedure involves i.p. administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 2 h before hepatic resection of the human colon tumors, with therapy continued postoperatively for 4 consecutive days. We termed this strategy neo-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The regime significantly prolonged animal survival compared with preoperative 5-FU neoadjuvant therapy, 5-FU postoperative adjuvant therapy, surgery alone, 5-FU without surgery, or the untreated control. The median survival of neo-neoadjuvant i.p. 5-FU-treated group was 81 days, compared with 27 days for the control group (P < 0.009). The median survival of animals in the neoadjuvant group was 37 days (P < 0.021 compared with the control group). There was also a significant difference between the median survival of neo-neoadjuvant, and the neoadjuvant group (P < 0.031). When all animals in the control group had died, 70% of animals with neo-neoadjuvant and 60% of animals with neoadjuvant 5-FU were still alive (P < 0.003 and P < 0.011, respectively). When all animals with neoadjuvant 5-FU treatment had died, 70% of animals with neo-neoadjuvant treatment were still alive (P < 0.003). Survival of all other treatment groups, including 5-FU without surgery, surgery alone, and adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy, was not significantly different from the untreated control group. Two animals in the neo-neoadjuvant group were free of tumors when sacrificed at days 154 and 165 post surgery. Whereas 100% of animals in the control, 90% in the 5-FU alone, 70% in the surgery alone, 60% in the 5-FU adjuvant, and 40% in the neoadjuvant groups had metastases in the lymph nodes draining the liver, only 10% of animals in the neo-neoadjuvant group had metastases. These data suggest that the neo-neoadjuvant therapy increased survival by preventing metastasis of cancer cells not removed in the liver resection procedure. The results of this study indicate that the neo-neoadjuvant treatment strategy for resection of colon cancer liver metastasis should be explored clinically.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Considerations on 988 breast cancers].

AIM: Therapy schedule improvement. MATERIAL & METHOD: The study includes 988 patients (which 16 men) with breast cancer who underwent surgery between 1984-1998. Out of them 63.2% were in advanced stages. The patients were divided in 2 homogenous groups: trial A = 520 patients treated between 1984-1991 (in stade: I = 2, II = 240, III = 246, IV = 32) studied retrospectively, and trial B = 468 patients treated between 1992-1998 (in stade I = 3, II = 212, III = 235, IV = 18) studied prospectively. In trial B the complex therapy schedule was improved according to disease's stade, local breast aspect and patient's biological status, straining on neoadjuvant therapy. To the entire group 945 radical mastectomies (95.6%) were performed. Only 628 (63.5%) could be properly followed up. RESULTS: Global 5 years survival rate was 72% (improved from 69% in trial A to 72% in trial B). The survival rate varied according the stage from 100% (stade I), 88% (stade II), to 22% (stade III) and 2% (stade IV). In the advanced states, the local recurrencies at 5 years were of 22% and the methastases of 17%. CONCLUSIONS: The neoadjuvant therapy, selectively applied upon stade and patient improves the 5 year survival rate. Every patient with an advanced breast cancer can benefit of a complex, differentiated and well guided treatment. The adequate operation earn the important role in powering the neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. Further results improvement requires restarting the collectivities and high risk persons screening.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2004

Evaluation of quality of life of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Comparison of two treatment protocols in a prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In recent years, various therapeutic concepts have been developed for treating oral cancer, these include preoperative simultaneous "neoadjuvant" radio-chemotherapy and one-stage-surgery with tumour ablation and reconstruction. When considering long-term survival, there is substantial evidence that the neoadjuvant therapy is superior to the primary surgical approach with postoperative radiation. Both treatment concepts, however, have a strong impact on the quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study prospectively evaluates and compares quality of life in 53 patients with oral cancer treated according to a neoadjuvant concept or primarily surgically, using the questionnaires QLQ C-30 and H and N35 by the EORTC. RESULTS: Initially both groups showed a marked reduction in the quality of life. Despite a clear improvement in the first postoperative year baseline values were not reached in most of the scores. Specific long-lasting impairments in the symptom scales concerning oral functions were found in both treatment arms. In the neoadjuvant therapy group, however, especially global health and the emotional status were reduced to a higher degree than in the other group. This was particularly noticeable in the early treatment phase. CONCLUSIONS: Following an initial deterioration of quality-of-life after 3 months a gradual improvement of physical and psychological function was observed in the course of the first post-treatment year in both groups. Severe side effects can be observed. These side effects vary strongly in their individual expression. Limitations in the quality of life can be justified, if the more aggressive therapy resulted in a better disease free survival.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

HER2DX genomic assay in HER2-positive early breast cancer treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab: A correlative analysis from a real-world cohort.

BACKGROUND: HER2DX genomic assay is a genomic tool developed for personalizing care in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. This real-world analysis examines its associations with pathological complete response (pCR) and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) following trastuzumab- and pertuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational, single-center study of 156 patients with stage I-III HER2-positive breast cancer treated with dual HER2 blockade-based neoadjuvant therapy between February 2015 and May 2022 at University Hospital A Coruña. HER2DX and clinicopathological variables were assessed in pretreatment tumor biopsies. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test, logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: HER2DX was performed in 111 tumors (71.2%). Overall pCR rate was 51.3%. Hormone receptor-positive disease was significantly associated with lower pCR (odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.50; p < 0.001), whereas HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ showed a non-significant trend toward higher pCR (OR 2.95, 95% CI 0.96-11.08; p = 0.075). Median IDFS was not reached, but hormone receptor-positive tumors showed better outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] 3.67, 95% CI 1.02-13.32; p = 0.004 by log-rank). The association between HER2DX pCR score and pCR appeared heterogeneous. The continuous score was significantly associated with pCR in univariable analysis, not in multivariable model. In contrast, medium-high HER2DX pCR category showed significantly higher pCR rates than low category (OR 4.83, 95% CI 1.72-14.65; p = 0.004). The continuous HER2DX risk score was independently associated with IDFS (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.24-6.48; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, HER2DX scores were associated with pCR and IDFS, supporting previous evidence and highlighting potential role in treatment stratification.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Imaging in evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment.

The role of imaging for patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer is not only to evaluate the therapeutic response in terms of tumour shrinkage, but also to predict the histological response to chemotherapy, which is correlated to survival. Surgery and histopathological analysis after neoadjuvant therapy allow for an objective assessment of the accuracy of imaging techniques in evaluating response. The aim of this study is to compare the value of the different conventional and functional imaging techniques for determining response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer treatment.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed1990

Progress in the recognition and treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.

Over the past 10 years there has been significant progress made in the recognition and treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. With the advent of CAT scans and MRI, preoperative delineation of soft tissue tumors has become readily available. The diagnostic use of these modalities in patients presenting with an ill-defined asymptomatic mass has been extremely helpful in terms of screening patients to decide whether or not a biopsy is indicated. These techniques have also provided a much clearer delineation of the anatomic extent of the primary tumor, which has been of great assistance both in radiation therapy treatment calculations as well as in preoperative surgical planning. The recognition that tumor grade is the dominant prognostic variable has resulted in the more common use of a grading system, and a more uniform reporting and stratification of end results. Recent studies with immunohistochemical staining have proven of value in determining the histogenesis of many tumors that in the past were difficult to classify accurately. Most recently the use of flow cytometry suggests that this will also be a valuable adjunct in determining tumor grade and thereby prognosis. The most recent investigations of molecular biologic evaluation of genetic DNA and RNA sequences, as well as of oncogenes are extremely interesting from a diagnostic standpoint and in demonstrating the potential of molecular biologic evaluation for understanding the origin of these tumors. Multimodality therapy with surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or all three has resulted in a marked improvement in local tumor control for patients with soft tissue sarcomas. The combination of modalities has allowed smaller surgical excisions of the tumor and thereby preservation of the extremity and much of its function. There are currently several different methods of multimodality therapy used including neoadjuvant therapy and postoperative therapy, both of which have been proven efficacious. Chemotherapy is now playing an increased role in clinical investigation and treatment. The availability of Adriamycin, DTIC, cisplatin, and most recently ifosfamide has added several chemotherapeutic agents for use by the clinician. Combination chemotherapy and radiation is of value in the neoadjuvant setting, and several studies are now underway to determine whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is of similar value in reducing systemic spread of disease. Finally, surgical resection of pulmonary metastases has been proven of value in 20% to 25% of patients who subsequently develop metastatic disease. As a result of these advances in several different treatment disciplines, the overall survival rate and quality of life of patients with soft tissue sarcoma have improved markedly over the past 10 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2004

Neoadjuvant treatment of unresectable liver disease with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid in colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to observe the effects of neoadjuvant therapy with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) on the resection rate and survival of colorectal cancer patients with initially unresectable hepatic metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) administered intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, FA 200 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 2, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1 and 2, and 5-FU 1200 mg/m(2) as a continuous 48-h i.v. infusion on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 2 weeks and response was assessed every 12 weeks (six cycles). RESULTS: The objective response rate to chemotherapy was 47.5% (n = 19), with two complete responses and disease stabilization in 11 (27.5.%) patients. Responses were unconfirmed for 11 patients undergoing surgery within 2 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated and adverse events were typical of the chemotherapy agents used. Twenty-seven (67.5%) patients reported hematological toxicity (35.0% grade 3/4) and 14 (35.0%) reported gastrointestinal toxicity (12.5% grade 3/4). Thirteen patients (32.5%) underwent potentially curative liver resection following chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was particularly effective in patients with large metastases on entry to the study. The median time to progression is 14.3 months and, at a median follow-up of 19 months, all patients are alive. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy with irinotecan combined with 5-FU/FA enabled a significant proportion of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to undergo surgical resection. The effects of treatment on survival have yet to be determined.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

HYPOTHESIS: Neoadjuvant therapy has the potential to induce regression of high-risk, locally advanced cancers and render them resectable. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is proposed as a testable treatment concept for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. DESIGN: Fourteen patients (8 men, 6 women) with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were surgically explored to exclude distant spread of disease, to perform bypass of biliary and/or gastric obstruction, and to provide a jejunostomy feeding tube for long-term nutritional support. A course of chemotherapy with fluorouracil and cisplatin plus radiotherapy was then initiated. Reexploration and resection were planned subsequent to neoadjuvant therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor regression and survival. INTERVENTIONS: Surgically staged patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated by preoperative chemotherapy with bolus fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2, on days 1 through 3 and 28 through 30 accompanied by a 3-day infusion of cisplatin, 25 mg m2, on days 1 through 3 and 28 through 30 and concurrent radiotherapy, 45 Gy. Enteral nutritional support was maintained via jejunostomy tube. RESULTS: Of 14 patients who enrolled in the protocol and were initially surgically explored, 3 refused the second operation and 11 were reexplored; 2 showed progressive disease and were unresectable and 9 (81%) had definitive resection. Surgical pathologic stages of the resected patients were: Ib (2 patients), II (2 patients), and III (5 patients). Pancreatic resection included standard Whipple resection in 1 patient, resection of body and neck in 1 patient, and extended resection in 6 patients (portal vein resection in 6, arterial resection in 4). One patient who was considered too frail for resection had core biopsies of the pancreatic head, node dissection, and an interstitial implant of the tumorous head. Pathologic response: 2 patients had apparent complete pathologic response; 1 patient had no residual cancer in the pancreatectomy specimen, the other patient who had an iridium 192 interstitial implant had normal core biopsies of the pancreatic head. Five patients had minimal residual cancer in the resected pancreas or microscopic foci only with extensive fibrosis, and 2 patients had fully viable residual cancer. Lymph node downstaging occurred in 2 of 4 patients who had positive peripancreatic nodes at the initial surgical staging. There was 1 postoperative death at 10 days. Sepsis, prolonged ileus, and failure to thrive were major complications. In the definitive surgery group the median survival was 19 months after beginning chemoradiotherapy and 16 months after definitive surgery. The absolute 5-year survival was 11% of 9 patients, 1 is surviving 96 months (with no evidence of disease) after chemoradiotherapy and extended pancreatic resection including resection of the superior mesenteric artery and the portal vein for stage III cancer. In the nonresected group the mean survival was 9 months (survival range, 7-12 months) after initiation of chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSION: A pilot study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with infusional cisplatin and radiation induced a high rate of clinical pathologic response in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and merits further study in these high-risk patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to examine the feasibility of developing a multigene predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR) to sequential weekly paclitaxel and fluorouracil + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (T/FAC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients underwent one-time pretreatment fine-needle aspiration to obtain RNA from the cancer for transcriptional profiling using cDNA arrays containing 30721 human sequence clones. Analysis was performed after profiling, and 42 patients' clinical results were available, 24 of which were used for predictive marker discovery; 18 patients' results were used as an independent validation set. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of patients had pCR (six discovery and seven validation), defined as disappearance of all invasive cancer in the breast after completion of chemotherapy. We could identify no single marker that was sufficiently associated with pCR to be used as an individual predictor. A multigene model with 74 markers (P <or=.09) was built using data from the discovery samples and tested on the validation samples. Overall, a 78% (14 of 18) predictive accuracy was observed, with a 100% (three of three) positive predictive value for pCR, a 73% (11 of 15) negative predictive value, a sensitivity of 43% (three of seven), and a specificity of 100% (11 of 11). The expected response rate to T/FAC neoadjuvant therapy in unselected patients is 28%. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that transcriptional profiling has the potential to identify a gene expression pattern in breast cancer that may lead to clinically useful predictors of pCR to T/FAC neoadjuvant therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Women with pathologic stage I, II, and III non-small cell lung cancer have better survival than men.

OBJECTIVE: Bronchogenic malignancy is the number one cause of cancer deaths in both men and women worldwide. National registry-based studies have shown gender disparity in clinicopathologic characteristics and in survival. This study evaluates the risk factors and trends of lung cancer between genders. METHODS: A prospective cohort of consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were carefully clinically (all underwent dedicated positron emission tomography scans) and pathologically staged with stage I, II, or III disease underwent homogenous treatment algorithms and were followed up over a period of 7 years. Primary outcomes were 5-year survival and response to neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: There were 1,085 patients (671 men and 414 women). Groups were similar for race, pulmonary function, smoking history, comorbidities, neoadjuvant therapy, histology, and resection rates. Women were younger (p = 0.014), had a higher incidence of adenocarcinoma (p = 0.01), and presented at an earlier pathologic stage (p = 0.01) than men. The overall age-adjusted and stage-adjusted 5-year survival rate favored women (60% vs 50%, respectively; p < 0.001). Women had better stage-specific 5-year survival rates (stage I disease, 69% vs 64%, respectively [p = 0.034]; stage II disease, 60% vs 50%, respectively [p = 0.042]; and stage III disease, 46% vs 37%, respectively [p = 0.024]). Women who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (n = 76) were more likely to be a complete or partial responder than men (n = 142; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Despite uniform staging and treatment, the 5-year survival rate of women with stage I to III NSCLC was better than men overall and at each stage. Women are more likely to have adenocarcinoma, to present with earlier stage disease, and to be younger. Interestingly, women respond better to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a developing alternative to axillary dissection and may prove to be accurate in the detection of micrometastases in lymph nodes of breast cancer patients. Limited studies exist in the use of SLNB after neoadjuvant therapy. This study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with stage I or II breast cancer underwent SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Lymphatic mapping was performed by radioisotope, blue dye, or both techniques. Sentinel nodes (SN) were identified in 29 patients (93.5%). The SN was positive in 11 patients (38.0%), and was the only positive node in 5 patients (45.5%). There were no false negative SN by hematoxyin and eosin stain or immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node identification rate is similar to that in nonneoadjuvant studies. The sentinel node accurately predicted metastatic disease in the axilla. IHC studies failed to detect any additional micrometastases. This diagnostic technique may provide treatment guidance for patients after neoadjuvant therapy.

Axilla↗

PubMed1995

Paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: a trial of two doses by a 3-hour infusion in patients with disease recurrence after prior therapy with anthracyclines.

BACKGROUND: To date, anthracyclines are the most active drugs against breast tumors, and the taxane paclitaxel (Taxol) looks very promising. Both classes of drugs are affected by cellular multidrug-resistance mechanisms, and therefore their sequential use raises the possibility of clinical cross-resistance. It is therefore important to assess the activity of paclitaxel in patients with clinical resistance to anthracyclines. PURPOSE: We assessed the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel administered by the logistically convenient 3-hour infusion to breast cancer patients who had disease progression within 12 months since prior therapy with anthracyclines. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with metastatic breast cancer who had all relapsed or whose disease had progressed within 12 months from completion of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy protocol (six receiving adjuvant therapy, 19 receiving neoadjuvant therapy, and 26 receiving treatment for metastatic disease) were enrolled in this phase II trial from June 1992 to May 1994. After medication to prevent type I acute hypersensitivity reactions, paclitaxel was given intravenously over 3 hours at 175 mg/m2 to the first 15 patients and at 225 mg/m2 to the next 36 patients. The median age was 50 years (range, 31-62 years), and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 (range, 0-2). RESULTS: Patients received a median of five cycles (range, one to 11 cycles). After initial doses of 175 and 225 mg/m2, paclitaxel could be increased by 25 mg/m2 in 73% and 58% of cycles, respectively. Among 50 assessable patients, seven achieved a complete response and 12 achieved a partial response (response rate, 38% [95% confidence interval = 25%-53%]). The median duration of response was 7 months (range, 4-16 months), and the median time to disease progression for all patients was 5 months. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 3% of the cycles and in 12% of the patients and was never associated with fever and infection. Common toxic effects were myalgia and arthralgia (94% of the patients; 4% grade 3), peripheral neuropathy (92% of the patients; 8% grade 3), and alopecia (all patients). Pruritus and neuropathy were significantly more frequent and severe, respectively, with the higher dose (P < .01 by chi 2 test). Frequency and severity of other toxic effects were similar at either starting dose. Ten patients had symptoms of neuro-optic toxicity. Only one patient had a grade 2 hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at starting doses of 175 and 225 mg/m2 given as a 3-hour infusion can safely be administered to, and is active in women whose disease has progressed after prior treatment with anthracyclines. There was evidence of increased toxicity at the higher dose but no suggestion of better efficacy. IMPLICATION: Paclitaxel by a 3-hour infusion in combination with doxorubicin should be investigated in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Unless randomized trials demonstrate greater efficacy of the more toxic higher dose, it is suggested that a dose of 175-200 mg/m2 be administered with the 3-hour infusion schedule.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Proliferation and apoptosis as markers of benefit in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer.

The study of changes in proliferation as a marker of treatment benefit during presurgical endocrine treatment of breast cancer has become increasingly popular, particularly using the nuclear marker Ki67, and holds the potential for prioritizing new treatments for full clinical development. There are weakly significant relationships between Ki67 change and clinical response that differ according to data handling. In the neoadjuvant Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined with Tamoxifen trial, suppression of Ki67 at both 2 and 12 weeks was greater with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole than with either tamoxifen or the combination of anastrozole and tamoxifen. We report here that absolute values of Ki67 after 2 weeks were also significantly lower with anastrozole than with tamoxifen and the combination. This indicates that it may be possible to make such comparisons using surgical samples only. We argue that these changes in proliferation and concurrent changes in apoptosis may be expected to be more predictive of adjuvant benefit from endocrine therapy than clinical response.

Anastrozole↗

PubMed2003

[Evaluation of quality of life of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Comparison of two treatment protocols in a prospective study-first results].

BACKGROUND: The treatment of oral cancer has a strong impact on the quality of life. In recent years different therapeutic concepts have been developed, these include preoperative simultaneous "neoadjuvant" radiochemotherapy (RCT) and one-stage surgery with tumor ablation and reconstruction. When considering long-term survival, there is substantial evidence that evidenced modality treatment including neoadjuvant RCT is superior to the primary surgical approach with postoperative radiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This longitudinal study prospectively evaluates quality of life in two groups consisting of 53 neoadjuvant and primarily surgically treated patients with oral cancer, using the quality-of-life core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the head and neck cancer module (H and N 35) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). RESULTS: Postoperatively both groups showed a marked reduction in quality of life. 1 year later quality of life had equalized between the two groups to such an extent that the quality of life scores had almost reached the preoperative level. Both groups showed specific impairments in the symptom scales. In the neoadjuvant therapy group however, global health and the emotional status were reduced to a greater degree than in the other group. CONCLUSION: Temporary limitations in quality of life can be expected after tumor treatment of oral cancer as presented here. Neoadjuvant therapy concept is more aggressive and might result in a longer disease-free survival, but the restriction in quality of life is more severe. Primary goal is the eradication of the tumor. Nevertheless preservation or reconstruction of a maximum of function is essential for a high level of quality of life.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

A phase II single-institution study of neoadjuvant stage IIIA/B chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The relevance of a trimodal strategy in the treatment of lung cancer, consisting of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery, is a subject of ongoing clinical trials. We tested whether improvement of long-term survival can be achieved for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer by this therapeutic approach. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a single-institution phase II study. Of 33 patients enrolled in the protocol between 1992 and 1995, we reviewed the clinical outcomes of 26 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIA and IIIB), which had been resected after combined chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: After neoadjuvant therapy, resection of the tumor was accomplished in all patients, and R0 resection was achieved in 92%. Histologic remission was found in 76% of these patients. Involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes was crucially important for the outcome. First, histologic clearance of the mediastinal compartment by neoadjuvant therapy resulted in a 27% 5-year survival rate. Second, patients with viable tumor in any of the mediastinal lymph nodes removed had a poor outcome (median survival 11.4 and 34.7 months in patients with and without viable tumor cells in the specimens, respectively; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Histopathologic regression after neoadjuvant multimodal therapy including chemotherapy and radiotherapy was an important prognostic factor in a selected group of patients with locally advanced lung cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Expression of ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 (epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2/neu) in breast cancer may cause tamoxifen resistance, but not all studies concur. Additionally, the relationship between ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 expression and response to selective aromatase inhibitors is unknown. A neoadjuvant study for primary breast cancer that randomized treatment between letrozole and tamoxifen provided a context within which these issues could be addressed prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with estrogen- and/or progesterone receptor-positive (ER+ and/or PgR+) primary breast cancer ineligible for breast-conserving surgery were randomly assigned to 4 months of neoadjuvant letrozole 2.5 mg daily or tamoxifen 20 mg daily in a double-blinded study. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ER and PgR was conducted on pretreatment biopsies and assessed by the Allred score. ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 IHC were assessed by intensity and completeness of membranous staining according to published criteria. RESULTS: For study biopsy-confirmed ER+ and/or PgR+ cases that received letrozole, 60% responded and 48% underwent successful breast-conserving surgery. The response to tamoxifen was inferior (41%, P =.004), and fewer patients underwent breast conservation (36%, P =.036). Differences in response rates between letrozole and tamoxifen were most marked for tumors that were positive for ErbB-1 and/or ErbB-2 and ER (88% v 21%, P =.0004). CONCLUSION: ER+, ErbB-1+, and/or ErbB-2+ primary breast cancer responded well to letrozole, but responses to tamoxifen were infrequent. This suggests that ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 signaling through ER is ligand-dependent and that the growth-promoting effects of these receptor tyrosine kinases on ER+ breast cancer can be inhibited by potent estrogen deprivation therapy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2005

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the management of gastric cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer remains a major challenge. After decades of investigation that have yielded little improvement in survival rates, several important studies have recently emerged that provide renewed optimism for future research endeavors. This article reviews the important advances over the past several years in the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for gastric cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: As a result of the Intergroup trial, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after operation has emerged as a new standard of care for patients who have undergone resection for carcinoma of the stomach. Strategies currently being tested to build on the Intergroup results include the use of new chemotherapy combinations with radiotherapy and the development of modern conformal techniques to deliver radiation therapy. The preliminary results of a large neoadjuvant chemotherapy study have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach with tumor downstaging and increase in the curative R0 resection rate. For patients with metastatic gastric cancer, newer generation cytotoxic agents such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and taxanes show promising activity. In the near future, these agents will likely be evaluated for their role as adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. SUMMARY: Major advances in the treatment of gastric cancer have occurred during the past several years and have improved the care of patients with this form of tumor.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗