SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “resectability”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Factors that influence the method of mandibular resection in the management of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

The method of conservative (rim) resection of the mandible is now well established and provides good control of disease in the primary site. There are few audits of this technique in terms of margins of resection for both rim and segmental resection of the mandible. Consecutive previously untreated patients managed with resection of the mandible as part of their treatment for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were recruited for the study. The presence and extent of tumour invasion of the mandible was recorded and a retrospective analysis made to establish the incidence of unnecessary segmental resections. The invasion rate was 33% (8/35) for rims and 83% (54/65) in segmental resections of the mandible, which compares favourably with previous studies and indicates a reasonable accuracy of resection. In between 6 and 11 of the 62 cases (10-17%) a rim resection could have achieved a satisfactory resection margin and retained a functioning lower border of the mandible. The accuracy of resection in terms of margins was greater for mandibular resections (94% clear margins) than soft tissues (62% clear margins). The number of compromised margins was significantly greater in the invaded rim resection group (P=0.018). This study indicates that a more conservative mandibular resection was possible in a few cases. This is unlikely to have an adverse effect on the close or involved margin rate, which depends mainly on the accuracy of the soft tissue resection. Angling the horizontal rim resection to take into account tumour entry at the point of contact will help to ensure a clear bone margin if a conservative approach to mandibular resection is an option.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Segment-oriented hepatic resection in the management of malignant neoplasms of the liver.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in the understanding of intrahepatic anatomy and radiographic technology have facilitated a segment-oriented approach to liver resection. This approach involves the resection of isolated anatomic segments or sectors of the liver as dictated by the extent of the intrahepatic pathology. Segment-oriented resection allows maximal conservation of normal liver parenchyma while clearing tumor. This report describes the technical features and the results of a prospective evaluation of segmental and sectoral resections in the treatment of malignant hepatic neoplasms. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with malignant hepatic neoplasms that were treated with a segment-oriented hepatic resection were identified from a prospective clinical data base. After undergoing segment-oriented liver resection, the patients were followed at regular intervals. Recurrent disease was the end point of the study. Followup is reported at a median of 12 months. This review outlines the technique of resection, intraoperative events, operating time, blood loss, and the ability to obtain negative resection margins. RESULTS: During the 5-year period between July 1992 and July 1997, 400 patients underwent liver resection for metastatic neoplasms and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). During this period, 79 patients (20%) were treated with a segment-oriented resection. These patients represent the study group for this report. The overall mortality rate was 2.5%; all postoperative deaths occurred in patients with HCC and cirrhosis. Overall morbidity was 26%. The median hospital stay was 8 days. Mean transfusion requirements were 1.0 +/- 0.3 U of packed red blood cells. Patients with HCC showed a greater transfusion requirement than did patients without HCC: 2.7 +/- 1.2 U versus 0.6 +/- 0.2 U (p < 0.05). Of the patients without HCC, 17% required transfusion. During the 12-month median followup period, the overall disease recurrence rate was 23%. Disease recurred at the hepatic-resection margin in 2.5% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Segmental resection is a safe technique that allows complete resection of liver tumors with preservation of normal liver parenchyma. Segmental resection is particularly useful for patients with HCC and patients undergoing repeat liver resections or bilobar resections.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Proximal bile duct cancer: high resectability rate and 5-year survival.

OBJECTIVE: To review and update the authors' experience with resectional surgery for proximal bile duct carcinoma (Klatskin tumor) and assess the role of liver resection over the past 25 years. BACKGROUND: Until recently, resection of proximal bile duct carcinoma was uncommon, with most patients undergoing palliative procedures. The authors adopted a radical surgical approach aimed at definitive cure in 1974. Recent reports suggest that resection improves outcome. METHODS: The records of 40 of 94 patients (23 men, 17 women, age range 34-81 years) diagnosed with proximal bile duct carcinoma who underwent resection between 1968 and 1993 were reviewed. According to the Bismuth classification, there were five type I, four type II, 25 type III, and six type IV lesions; 11 patients underwent tumor resection alone, and 25 patients had combined tumor and liver resection (seven of these also underwent an associated regional vascular resection). In 3 patients, venous allografts were harvested from cadaveric donors and used to reconstruct the portal vein. Four patients underwent liver transplantation; in two, organ cluster-type resections including the liver with porta hepatitis and pancreas were performed. RESULTS: The resectability rate in the more recent period of the study was 49.4%. Most type I, three (of four) type II, T in situ, T1a, T1b, and all stage 0 tumors were resected without hepatectomy. In the other subgroups of tumors, the main surgical procedure was hepatectomy. Thirty-day mortality was 12.5%. After tumor resection alone, survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 81.8%, 45.5%, and 27.3%, respectively. After tumor resection and hepatectomy without vascular resection, 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 66.7%, 16.7%, and 6%, respectively. With vascular resection, survival rates were similar: 64%, 20%, and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The type of surgery required to achieve cure is closely related to tumor location, TNM classification, and staging. Increasing resectability through the use of hepatectomy improves survival and offers a chance of cure in patients with more advanced disease.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Increased use of low anterior resection for veterans with rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Two surgical procedures with curative intent are available to patients with rectal cancer: lower anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection; however, lower anterior resection may improve quality of life and functional status. AIM: To examine temporal changes in after lower anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection between 1989 and 2000. Potential factors associated with the use of lower anterior resection were evaluated. METHODS: Using national administrative data, we identified patients who received lower anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection. Logistic regression models examined the association between use of lower anterior resection and time period of surgical resection. RESULTS: A total of 5201 rectal cancer patients underwent resection. The use of lower anterior resection increased from 40.0% (1989-91) to 50.1% (1998-2000) paralleled by a corresponding decline in abdominoperineal resection (60.1 to 49.9%; P < 0.001). Patients who received surgery during 1992-94, 1995-97 and 1998-2000 were 6, 7 and 28% more likely to receive lower anterior resection, when compared with 1989-1991 after adjusting for demographic characteristics, co-morbidity and hospital surgical volume. Older age, lower co-morbidity score and lower hospital surgical volume were predictive of lower anterior resection. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in the use of lower anterior resection for rectal cancer was observed over time. This observed increase in use is not confined to high-volume hospitals.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Current neurosurgical management and the impact of the extent of resection in the treatment of malignant gliomas of childhood: a report of the Children's Cancer Group trial no. CCG-945.

OBJECT: One hundred seventy-two children with high-grade astrocytomas were treated by members of the Children's Cancer Group in a prospective randomized trial designed to evaluate the role of two chemotherapy regimens. Seventy-six percent of the patients (131 children) in whom a diagnosis of either anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme was confirmed by central pathological review are the subject of this report. METHODS: Patients were stratified according to the extent of tumor resection (biopsy [< 10%], partial resection [10-50%], subtotal resection [51-90%], near-total resection [> 90%], and total resection) as determined by surgical observation and postoperative computerized tomography scanning. Information on contemporary neurosurgical management was obtained from the patient's operative records and standardized neurosurgical report forms. The vast majority of tumors were supratentorial: 63% (83 tumors) in the superficial cerebral hemisphere, 28% (37 tumors) in the deep or midline cerebrum, and only 8% (11 tumors) in the posterior fossa. A significant association was detected between the primary tumor site and the extent of resection (p < 0.0001). A radical resection (> 90%) was performed in 37% of the children: 49% of the tumors in the superficial hemisphere and 45% of tumors in the posterior fossa compared with 8% of midline tumors. Tumor location could also be used to predict the need for both temporary and permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. Half of the deep tumors and 8% of the hemispheric astrocytomas ultimately required a permanent CSF shunt. Improvement in preoperative neurological deficits and level of consciousness was seen in 36% and 34% of the children, respectively. New or increased deficits were present in 14% of the children, with 6% experiencing a diminished sensorium after surgery. Postoperative nonneurological complications were rare: infection, hematoma, and CSF fistula each occurred in 1.7% of the children. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that radical tumor resection (> 90%) was the only therapeutic variable that significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) rates. For all patients with malignant astrocytomas, the distributions of PFS rates were significantly different (p = 0.006) following radical resection compared with less extensive (< or = 90%) resection. The 5-year PFS rates were 35 +/- 7% and 17 +/- 4%, respectively. The differences in the distribution of PFS rate were significant for the subsets of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (p = 0.055) and glioblastoma multiforme (p = 0.046). The 5-year PFS rates for anaplastic astrocytoma were 44 +/- 11% and 22 +/- 6% for cases in which the tumor was radically resected and less than radically resected, respectively; whereas the 5-year PFS rates for glioblastoma multiforme were 26 +/- 9% and 4 +/- 3% for cases in which the tumor was radically resected and less than radically resected, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The demonstration of a survival advantage provided by radical resection should prompt neurosurgeons to treat malignant pediatric astrocytomas with aggressive surgical resection prior to initiation of radiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Results of laparoscopic versus open resections for non-early rectal cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of four years.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic rectal resection for malignancy is still debated. Concern has been expressed regarding the lack of significant data from larger patient series with longer periods of follow-up. The aims of this study were to compare long-term outcome with a minimum follow-up of four years in unselected patients undergoing either laparoscopic rectal resection or open rectal resection for cancer. METHODOLOGY: From May 1992 to August 1997 all electively admitted patients with rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomized study. Written information was submitted to each patient and the location in each group (laparoscopic or open) was related to the patient's choice. The inclusion protocol criteria excluded T1 tumors. All 68 T2-T4 patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy (5.040 cGy), completed with chemotherapy in selected cases (patients below 70 years of age). Long-term results were compared between the two groups. Follow-up time of both groups ranged between 48 and 96 months (mean, 49.4 months). RESULTS: Excluding patients who underwent a palliative resection or conversion to open surgery and deaths not related to cancer, 53 pts (29 laparoscopic rectal resection, 24 open rectal resection) out of 68 are available and are the object of this study. No patient was lost to follow-up. No wound recurrence was observed. The local recurrence rate after laparoscopic rectal resection was 24.1% vs. 25% after open rectal resection (P = 0.799). Distant metastases occurred in 20.7% of patients in the LLR group (laparoscopic rectal resection) vs. 25% in the ORR group (open rectal resection) (P = 0.980). Cumulative survival probability after laparoscopic rectal resection and open rectal resection was 0.690 and 0.625 (P = 0.492), respectively. Cumulative survival probability for Duke's stage A, B and C in the LRR group vs. the ORR group was 1.000 vs. 0.900 (P = 0.585), 0.667 vs. 0.636 (P = 0.496) and 0.429 vs. 0.445 (P = 0.501), respectively. Sixteen laparoscopic rectal resection patients (55.2%) and 12 open rectal resection patients (50%) are presently disease free (P = 0.979). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer were comparable to those after conventional resection, with a trend in favor of the laparoscopic approach that does not reach a statistically significant difference, possibly due to the limited size of the sample.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

[What are indications for hepatic resection in metastases?].

INTRODUCTION: In the last 20 years the resection of liver metastases became the method of choice in the therapy of malignant tumors, particularly of colorectal cancer. The study was aimed at evaluating indication criteria and operation tactics in liver metastases resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed a group of 154 patients subjected to liver resection for metastases, having been operated on since 1980 to May 2003. The preoperative indication procedure included a) imaging examination of the liver (CT, NMR, DSA--radiological staging), b) evaluation of tolerance to liver resection to liver resection (ASA, hem-coagulation tests, liver tests, nutritional state), c) examination to exclude the occurrence of extrahepatic tumor (imaging and endoscopic methods). In addition to peroperative examination (surgical staging) and selective vascular exclusion in anatomical resection, the standard operation procedure was supplemented in the last five years with transaction of the liver by means of the harmonic scalpel. From the total number, metastases of colorectal cancer were resected in 116 patients, in 20 gall bladder cancers, in 6 stomach cancers, in 4 breast cancers, in three carcinoids of colon and intestine and in two kidney cancers. Individual patients suffering from metastases of adrenal cancer, pancreas cancer and melanoma, respectively, were also operated on. More extensive anatomical resections were performed in 44 patients, segmentectomy was made in 43 subjects and non-anatomical wedge-shaped resections in 67 individuals. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 15 (9.8%) patients (subphrenic hematoma, abscess, cholascos, fluidothorax, pulmonary or early infection). Two patients died within 30 days (1.3%) for hemorrhagic shock due to bleeding from duodenal ulcer and from hepatorenal failure). CONCLUSION: 1. Liver resection is indicated is resectable metastases of colorectal cancer. 2. The resection exerts a therapeutic effect in non-colorectal metastases in neuroendocrine tumors, tumor of uropoetic and genital system, breast cancer, sarcoma and melanoma. 3. The preoperative diagnosis should include: a) imaging examination of the liver and the site of primary tumor and possible occurrence of other metastases, b) determination of tolerance to liver resection. 4. The operation tactics includes the peroperative evaluation of operability, radical resection of metastases with 1 cm border of unaffected liver tissue and procedures leading to diminished blood loss and biliary stasis. 5. Anatomical resection is indicated in larger metastases affecting segments of one lobe. Non-anatomical wedge-shaped resection is aimed at removal of peripheral foci.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Long-term outcome after ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease.

The decision to operate on ileocecal Crohn's disease is usually tempered by concern for early recurrence and the potential for multiple small bowel resections that will render the patients a gastroenterological cripple. However, delays in surgical management may unnecessarily prolong the patient's disease state and risk complications from both medications and unchecked disease. The aim of this study was to report the long-term clinical outcome of patients undergoing ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease between 1970 and 1993. One hundred eighty-one patients underwent ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease during the study period, with a median follow-up of 14.3 years. The mean age at the first resection was 32.7 +/- 0.9 years, and the male female ratio was 79:102. The indications for the initial resection were intractability in 119 (68.4%), obstruction in 45 (25.9%), enteric fistula in 27 (15.5%), perforation in 16 (9.2%), intra-abdominal abscess in 7 (4.0%), and hemorrhage in 5 (2.9%). Postoperative complications included prolonged ileus in 13 (7.5%), pneumonia/atelectasis in 15 (8.6%), wound infection in 11 (6.3%), urinary tract infection in 10 (5.7%), intra-abdominal abscess in 7 (4.0%), and wound dehiscence in 1 (0.6%). There were no operative mortalities. Fifty-six (30.9%) developed a recurrence requiring further surgery, with the mean time interval between initial ileocecal resection and operation for recurrence being 72.3 +/- 7.6 months. A second recurrence developed in 19 patients (10.5%) with a mean time interval of 52.3 +/- 8.3 months. The most frequent sites of first recurrence were the preanastomotic ileum in 49 (87.3%), the postanastomotic colon in 10 (17.9%), other colonic sites in 16 (28.6%), and other small bowel sites in 2 (3.6%) and other sites in 4 (7.1%). The types of resection for first recurrence were ileal resection in 28 (50%), right hemicolectomy in 17 (30.4%), segmental colectomy in 6 (10.7%), total proctocolectomy in 3 (5.4%), and proximal small bowel resection in 2 (3.6%). The long-term follow-up of this patient cohort indicated that 125 (69.1%) had only one resection, 37 (20.4%) required two resections, 15 (8.3%) required three resections, 4 (2.2%) required four resections. The results indicate that ileocecal resection of Crohn's disease had a high rate of disease control obtained with low morbidity, and a low frequency of three or more bowel resections (2.2%). Therefore, surgical resection of ileocecal Crohn's disease should not be unduly delayed for fear of risking short bowel syndrome. This approach should minimize overall disease-related patient morbidity by avoiding long periods of chronic illness.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Mortality rates associated with pancreatic resection for cancer have steadily decreased with time, but improvements in long-term survival are less clear. This prospective study evaluated risk factors for survival after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Data from 366 consecutive patients recorded prospectively between November 1993 and September 2001 were analysed using univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (15.8 per cent) underwent surgical exploration only, 97 patients (26.5 per cent) underwent palliative bypass surgery and 211 patients (57.7 per cent) resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Stage I disease was present in 9.0 per cent, stage II in 18.0 per cent, stage III in 68.7 per cent and stage IV in 4.3 per cent of patients who underwent resection. Resection was curative (R0) in 75.8 per cent of patients. Procedures included pylorus-preserving Whipple resection (41.2 per cent), classical Whipple resection (37.0 per cent), left pancreatic resection (13.7 per cent) and total pancreatectomy (8.1 per cent). The in-hospital mortality and cumulative morbidity rates were 2.8 and 44.1 per cent respectively. The overall actuarial 5-year survival rate was 19.8 per cent after resection. Survival was better after curative resection (R0) (24.2 per cent) and in lymph-node negative patients (31.6 per cent). A Cox proportional hazards survival analysis indicated that curative resection was the most powerful independent predictor of long-term survival. CONCLUSION: Resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be performed safely. The overall survival rate is determined by the radicality of resection. Patients deemed fit for surgery who have no radiological signs of distant metastasis should undergo surgical exploration. Resection should follow if there is a reasonable likelihood that an R0 resection can be obtained.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

Abdominoperineal resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

To evaluate whether surgical resection confers survival advantages in selected patients with resectable locally recurrent rectal cancer, data on 430 patients who underwent R0 resection for primary rectal cancer were prospectively collected over a 14-year period. Resection of recurrent disease was considered R0 when all cancer tissue was resected with microscopically tumor-free surgical margins. Microscopic evidence of disease at resection margins was considered an R1 resection. Recurrent disease was detected in 158 of 430 patients. Local recurrence was found in 91 patients, including (79%) with resection-site relapse only. These patients were considered for surgery unless defined unresectability criteria were met. A total of 35 patients who had abdominoperineal excision following anterior resection were studied retrospectively. Mortality associated with the procedure was 3% and morbidity was 20%. The resection was R0 in 12 patients, while microscopic margins were involved in 23 patients. 10 patients had extended resection of one or several adjacent organs Median operating time and blood loss were 250 min and 500 ml respectively. Median hospital stay was 25 days. 21/23 R1 patients received postoperative radiotherapy. Return to normal activity occurred at 8.2 (SD 4.2) weeks. No patients were lost to follow-up. Overall median survival was 26.4 months; 5-year survival was 25.4%. In spite of several survival predictors at univariate analysis, R0 or R1 resection was the only independent predictor of survival at multivariate analysis (add ratio 112.7, 95% CI 3.6-3500, p=0.007). Median survival rate was not reached at the 146-month follow-up in patients with R0 resection. Median survival rate was 16.6 months in patients with R1 resection. In conclusion, uninvolved microscopic margins produce long-term survivors after surgical resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed1998

Surgery for local pelvic recurrence after resection of rectal cancer.

This retrospective study evaluated outcome with regard to procedure, local control, and survival after curative surgical resection with and without preoperative radiotherapy for local pelvic recurrence. A total of 58 consecutive patients with local pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer after previous curative resection for primary tumors were reviewed. Of these, 36 underwent both initial resection and follow-up in our department; the remaining 22 had initial surgery and follow-up elsewhere. Of the 58 patients 27 underwent curative re-resection, 9 had palliative resection, and 22 were treated by conservative therapy. Among the 27 patients with curative resection 17 received preoperative radiotherapy (40 Gy) plus surgery and 10 surgery only. No patients were lost to follow-up; median follow-up time was 36.3 months. The overall rate of curative resection was 46.6%: 55.6% in our own follow-up group and 31.8% in the others. With regard to surgical procedure, abdominoperineal resection (APR) with or without sacral resection was standard following previous low anterior resection, and total pelvic exenteration (TPE) with or without sacral resection was common following APR. There was a high incidence of morbidity (71.4%) after TPE. Re-recurrence was observed in 12 (44.4%) after curative re-resection. There was local re-recurrence in 6 (22.2%). The local re-recurrence rate was 11.8% (n = 2) with radiotherapy plus surgery, and 40.0% (n = 4) with surgery alone. The estimated 5-year survival following curative re-resection was 45.6% (61.2% with radiotherapy plus surgery, 29.6% with surgery alone). Both survival and local control with radiotherapy plus surgery tended to be better than with surgery alone. Thus, in selected patients pelvic local recurrence of rectal cancer can be re-resected curably by APR or TPE (with or without sacral resection) combined with preoperative radiotherapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2007

Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess factors affecting rates of circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision, the association between circumferential resection margin involvement rates for patients undergoing anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision within the same unit, and trends in outcomes between units. METHODS: Data about patients undergoing rectal cancer excision between 2000 and 2003 were extracted from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland database. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of circumferential resection margin involvement. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association between circumferential resection margin involvement for anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision. RESULTS: A total of 1,430 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. The circumferential resection margin involvement rate for anterior resection (n=794) was 6.7 percent, between hospital variability was 0 to 40 percent, and for abdominoperineal excision (n=521) was 17.6 percent, between hospital variability 0 to 100 percent. Independent predictors of circumferential resection margin involvement were T stage (P<0.001), nodal involvement (P=0.007), and operative procedure (P<0.001). Units with a high circumferential resection margin involvement rate for anterior resection also had a high circumferential resection margin involvement rate for abdominoperineal excision (Pearson correlation=0.349; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Circumferential resection margin involvement is more common in lymph-node-positive tumors and is more common after abdominoperineal excision compared with anterior resection. This relationship was consistent across units irrespective of their individual circumferential resection margin involvement rates.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Differences in survival for patients with resectable versus unresectable metastases from pancreatic islet cell cancer.

Well-differentiated islet cell tumors can be associated with aggressive biology, resulting in early metastases to the liver. This study was carried out to determine whether survival for patients with malignant islet cell tumors and synchronous liver metastases is affected by complete surgical resection. Thirty-one patients with synchronous liver metastases from islet cell cancer underwent surgical exploration with the intent for complete tumor resection, and all patients underwent resection of the pancreatic primary. The patients were divided into two groups, those with resectable versus unresectable liver metastases. Twenty-six of 31 (84%) patients underwent complete resection of both the primary tumor and all liver metastases, and 5 (16%) patients underwent only complete resection of the pancreatic primary without liver resection. To extirpate the primary tumor, a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 11 of the 26 (42%) completely resected patients and in 4 of the 5 (80%) incompletely resected patients, P = NS. The remainder of the patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. There were no statistical differences in primary tumor size, lymph node metastases, or adjuvant treatments between patients with resected and unresected liver metastases. The median overall survival for the completely resected group was 78 months, longer than the 17 months for the group with unresectable liver metastases (P = 0.06). Complete tumor resection (or the tumor biology that allows such complete resection) affords a survival advantage to patients with metastatic islet cell tumors of the pancreas. Patterns of liver metastases from islet cell tumors, specifically multiple bilobar metastases that are not amenable to resection and/or ablation, predict a poor outcome despite resection of the primary pancreatic tumor.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Lobar and sublobar resection with and without brachytherapy for small stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomographic screening is detecting ever smaller peripheral non-small cell lung cancers. These smaller cancers are amenable to sublobar resection, but sublobar resection is not currently the treatment of choice. This study compared sublobar resection with lobar resection for stage IA non-small cell lung cancers to assess whether sublobar resection is appropriate treatment for certain lesions. The use of adjuvant brachytherapy was also evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study of 291 patients with T1 N0 disease was done. Outcomes after sublobar resection (n = 124) were compared with those after lobar resection (n = 167). Brachytherapy was used in conjunction with 60 (48%) sublobar resection operations. Analysis based on tumor diameter was performed. RESULTS: There were 137 cancers smaller than 2 cm and 154 cancers ranging from 2 to 3 cm. Patients undergoing sublobar resection were older (68.4 vs 66.1 years, P = .018) with poorer pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 53.1% vs 78.2%, P = .001). Mean follow-up was 34.5 months. Brachytherapy decreased local recurrence rate significantly among patients undergoing sublobar resection, from 11 (17.2%) to 2 (3.3%). For tumors smaller than 2 cm, there was no difference in survival between sublobar resection and lobar resection groups. For the larger tumors (2-3 cm), median survival was significantly better in the lobar resection group, at 70 versus 44.7 months ( P = .003). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative brachytherapy may reduce the local recurrence that is usually reported with sublobar resection. Our experience supports the further investigation of the use of sublobar resection with brachytherapy for peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancers smaller than 2 cm.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2000

Identification of prognostic factors determining risk groups for lung resection.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary resection belongs to a group of surgical procedures with significant morbidity and mortality. The aims of this study were to classify postoperative complications and to identify prognostic factors determining risk group. METHODS: In a prospective study 500 patients undergoing lung resection (wedge resection, n = 141; lobectomies, n = 245; bilobectomies, n = 12; and pneumonectomies, n = 102) were included. In 178 patients (36%) pulmonary resections were extended to structures or thoracic organs. Sleeve resection of the bronchus to preserve lung parenchyma was performed in 22 patients. RESULTS: Classification of postoperative complications fell into four categories: patients without postoperative complications; patients with moderate complications (n = 137); patients with severe complications (n = 38); and death (n = 33). Factors adversely affecting postoperative complications by multivariate analysis included pulmonary pathology, bronchoplastic technique, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), extended resection, type of lung resection, comorbidity indices, and preoperative chemotherapy. Four risk groups were determined. Risk group I (n = 60) with the best prognosis included patients with FEV1 greater than or equal to 80% undergoing wedge resection for a benign lesion or metastasis. Risk group II (n = 161) included patients with FEV1 greater than or equal to 80% undergoing major pulmonary resection for a benign lesion or metastasis or lung cancer, or patients with FEV1 less than 80% undergoing wedge resection for benign lesion or metastasis. Risk group III (n = 233) with a fair prognosis included patients with comorbidity indices less than 4 and FEV1 greater than or equal to 80% undergoing extended pulmonary resection for a benign lesion or metastasis or lung cancer, or patients with FEV1 less than 80% and emphysema. Risk group IV (n = 46) with the worst prognosis included patients with FEV1 less than 80% undergoing an extended lung resection or bronchoplastic procedures for a benign lesion or metastasis or lung cancer, or patients with comorbidity indices greater than or equal to 4 undergoing extended lung resection for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, based on these prognostic factors, a practical, easy-to-use risk group system of lung resection is proposed as a tool to aid the decision to perform lung resection.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Clinical experience with carinal resection.

OBJECTIVE: Pathologic processes that involve the carina pose a tremendous challenge to thoracic surgeons. Although techniques have been developed to allow primary resection and reconstruction, few institutions have accumulated sufficient experience to allow meaningful conclusions about the indications and the morbidity and mortality rates for this type of surgery. METHODS: Since 1962, 135 patients have undergone 143 carinal resections (134 primary resection, 9 re-resection) at our institution. Indications for carinal resection included bronchogenic cancer (58 patients), other airway neoplasms (60 patients), and benign or inflammatory strictures (16 patients). Thirty-seven patients (28%) had a history of prior lung or airway surgery not involving the carina. Carinal resection without pulmonary resection was accomplished in 52 patients; 57 patients had carinal pneumonectomy (44 right, 13 left); 14 patients had carinal plus lobar resection, and 11 patients had carinal resection after pneumonectomy (9 left, 2 right). There were 15 different modes of reconstruction, based on the type and extent of resection. Techniques were used to reduce anastomotic tension. RESULTS: The operative mortality rate in the 134 patients after primary carinal resection was 12.7%. Adult respiratory distress syndrome was responsible for 9 early deaths. Predominant predictors of operative death included postoperative mechanical ventilation (P =.001), length of resected airway (P =.03), and development of anastomotic complications (P =.04). Mortality rates varied by the type of procedure and the indication for resection. Left carinal pneumonectomy was associated with a high operative mortality rate (31%). Complications were noted in 52 patients (39%), including atrial arrhythmias (20 patients) and pneumonia (11 patients). Anastomotic complications, both early and late, were seen in a total of 23 patients (17%) and resulted in death or surgical reintervention in 21 patients (91%). The operative mortality rate for carinal re-resection was 11.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Carinal resection with primary reconstruction may be accomplished with acceptable mortality rates, but the underlying pathologic process and chance for long-term survival must be carefully considered before the operation is recommended, especially in the case of left carinal pneumonectomy. Anastomotic complications exact a heavy toll on involved patients. Careful patient selection and meticulous anesthetic and surgical technique remain the key to minimizing morbidity and mortality rates.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Current perspectives on repeat hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma: a review.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence occurs in 65% to 85% of patients after initial hepatectomy for metastases from colorectal cancer. Approximately one half of these have liver metastases, and in 20% to 30% only the liver is involved. Opportunity for resection is frequently limited because of diffuse liver disease or extrahepatic extension, and only 10% to 25% of these patients have conditions amenable to resection. This current review is focused on the rationale, indications, and results of resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: The major series of liver resection were reviewed, and the cases of repeat resections were culled out. In addition to standard clinical parameters, the indications and timing after initial resection and the survival and subsequent recurrence after repeat resection were recorded. RESULTS: A comprehensive review of the 28 series showed that the mean interval between the first and second liver varied from 9 to 33 months and was about 17.5 months in the two largest series. The median survival in series reporting 10 or more patients was 19 months (mean, 24 months), which is comparable to data in single resection series. In the large French Association series containing 1626 patients with single resections and 144 patients with two resections, the 5-year survival was 25% and 16%, respectively. The recurrence rate after repeat resection is high (greater than 60%), and one half are in the liver. The prognostic factors favoring repeat resection are variable, but they include absence of extrahepatic extension of tumor and a complete resection of the liver metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat hepatic liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer in carefully selected patients appears warranted in view of reasonable survival expectations, which approach that of single liver resection. Risk of recurrence is high, however, suggesting the need for rigorous preoperative and intraoperative assessment and postoperative adjuvant therapy

Colorectal Neoplasms↗

PubMed1999

Liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: assessing the risk of occult irresectable disease.

BACKGROUND: Liver resection is standard therapy for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Extrahepatic metastases and inability to remove all hepatic disease usually preclude curative resection and are the most common contraindications. This study analyzes irresectability in patients considered to have resectable disease taken to operation for potentially curative hepatic resection. We describe preoperative factors associated with irresectability and propose a preoperative scoring system that identifies patients at particularly high risk for occult irresectable disease. STUDY DESIGN: Patients considered to have resectable hepatic colorectal metastases were identified from a prospective database. Intraoperative findings that precluded liver resection were recorded. Demographic data, characteristics of the primary tumor, and characteristics of the hepatic metastases were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: From April 1992 through July 1997, 416 patients were explored with the intention of performing a potentially curative liver resection; 329 (79%) were resected. Eighty-seven patients (21%) had apparently resectable tumors on preoperative imaging but irresectable disease at laparotomy. Forty-four patients (51%) had irresectable disease limited to the liver; 32 had extensive bilobar disease not appreciated before surgery, and 12 were not resected for technical or other reasons unrelated to disease extent. Forty-three patients (49%) had extrahepatic disease, 31 of whom had resectable hepatic tumors. Of the several preoperative factors analyzed, only the estimated number of hepatic tumors was an independent predictor of irresectable findings at operation. This held true for patients with extrahepatic metastases and those with extensive hepatic disease. From these data, we devised a preoperative scoring system that estimates the probability of finding occult irresectable disease. Resectability ranged from 95% in patients with a score of 0 (solitary, unilobar) to 62% in those with a score of 3 (multiple, bilobar; p = 0.0001). The predictive value of this scoring system was then validated by applying it prospectively to an additional group of 118 patients taken to surgery for resection; the results were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Standard preoperative investigations predicted resectability in 79% of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases. Unresectable disease limited to the liver and extrahepatic disease were seen with nearly equal frequency. The majority of patients with extrahepatic metastases had resectable hepatic disease (31 of 43, 72%). A preoperative scoring system is proposed that identifies patients at high risk for unrecognized irresectable disease and may help focus the use of additional diagnostic modalities such as laparoscopy and positron emission tomography (PET).

Colorectal Neoplasms↗