SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ANESTHESIA, SPINAL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Influence of baricity on the outcome of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine for lumbar spine surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the majority of elective lumbar spine surgical procedures are performed under general anesthesia, successful use of spinal and epidural anesthesia has been reported. This study was designed to evaluate the influence of baricity on the performance of spinal anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: The study was performed on 53 demographically similar American Society of Anesthesiologists status 1 and 2 patients who were randomly assigned to receive spinal anesthesia with 15 mg of bupivacaine along with 0.2 mg of epinephrine as either 3 ml 0.5% plain bupivacaine (I group) or 2 ml 0.75% bupivacaine (Sensorcaine Spinal, Astra, Westborough, MA) premixed in 8.25% glucose (H group). All blocks were placed with a 22-gauge Quincke needle (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) at the L3-L4 interspace with the patient in the sitting position. Subsequent data, collected by a blinded observer, included onset of motor and sensory anesthesia, highest sensory level achieved, maximum changes in heart rate and blood pressure, need for treatment of heart rate or blood pressure decreases, failed blocks, and need for supplemental local anesthetic injection to complete incision or wound closure. RESULTS: The time to onset for complete motor and sensory block was significantly longer in the I group. The maximum sensory level achieved was higher in the H group, and the maximum drop in blood pressure and number of interventions to treat heart rate and blood pressure were greater in the H group. There were two failed blocks, which were repeated successfully, in the H group. The need for local anesthetic infiltration of the wound with incision and closure was greater in the H group. CONCLUSIONS: Plain bupivacaine is superior to hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery.

Adult↗

PubMed1987

Fourth cranial nerve palsy following spinal anesthesia. A case report.

Fourth nerve palsy has been rarely seen following lumbar puncture, myelogram, or spinal anesthesia. We report a case of 4th nerve and 6th nerve palsies following spinal anesthesia. The 4th nerve palsy was best detected by using a Maddox rod. If all 6th nerve palsies occurring after spinal anesthesia were examined with a Maddox rod, more cyclovertical palsies might be discovered.

Abducens Nerve↗

PubMed2002

[Spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine for a patient with a history of severe leg pain after intrathecal dibucaine].

An 87-year-old man was scheduled for the 11th transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT). He had a history of non-active syphilis for 21 years, diabetes mellitus for 7 years, and severe emphysema. Preoperative physical examination of the lower extremities, revealed loss of knee-jerk reflex, and loss of vibratory and proprioceptive perception. Four years previously, he underwent TURBT twice under spinal anesthesia with dibucaine, which caused severe leg pain during anesthesia. Therefore, subsequent TURBTs (eight times) were performed under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation, which frequently caused postoperative respiratory distress. Recently, bupivacaine, less neurotoxic than dibucaine, was on the market in Japan for use in spinal anesthesia. Therefore we planned spinal anesthesia using 0.5% bupivacaine, 2.0 ml. This time, he did not complain of leg pain during anesthesia, and postoperative conditions were satisfactory. We can conclude that bupivacaine is very useful for spinal anesthesia especially in patients with a history of leg pain by spinal anesthesia with dibucaine.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Postdural puncture headache after continuous spinal anesthesia with 18-gauge and 20-gauge needles.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) associated with continuous spinal anesthesia, 200 male patients (mean age 65 years) were randomly assigned to receive spinal anesthesia in one of three ways: group 1, 50 patients with an 18-gauge Tuohy-Schliff needle/20-gauge catheter combination; group 2, 50 patients with a newly developed 20-gauge Quincke point needle/24-gauge catheter combination; and group 3, 100 patients (control group, single injection spinal anesthesia) with a 22-gauge Quincke point needle. METHODS: Every patient was followed up for 7 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The incidence of PDPH was 6% with each continuous technique and 2% in the control group (difference not statistically significant). One group 1 patient who required an initial dose of 35 mg of tetracaine and 100 mg of lidocaine has a persistent, incomplete S4-5 sensory nerve deficit. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PDPH associated with continuous spinal anesthesia is acceptable in appropriate clinical circumstances, but large initial doses of local anesthetic should not be administered.

Aged↗

PubMed1986

Lidocaine disposition in mother, fetus, and neonate after spinal anesthesia.

Although it is generally believed that concentrations of local anesthetic in maternal plasma do not reach levels that affect the fetus after spinal anesthesia, there are few studies that have measured drug levels in either maternal or neonatal plasma after spinal anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to document the disposition of lidocaine in mother, fetus, and neonate after spinal anesthesia using gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric measurement of lidocaine and two metabolites of lidocaine. Plasma concentration time curves, fetal/maternal ratios, cord artery/cord vein ratios, and neonatal urine levels were determined in ten patients. The results document that lidocaine is present in maternal and neonatal plasma. Mean (+/- SD) maternal plasma levels (0.65 +/- 0.52 micrograms/ml) were significantly lower than those previously reported after epidural anesthesia (2.09 +/- 1.31 micrograms/ml). Fetal/maternal plasma concentration ratios averaged 0.37 +/- 0.2 and mean cord arterial/cord venous ratios 0.5 +/- 6.7. Lidocaine and its metabolites were present in neonatal urine for longer than 36 hr. This study demonstrates that spinal anesthesia with lidocaine results in neonatal exposure to lidocaine.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Chest wall motion of infants during spinal anesthesia.

To test the extent to which diaphragmatic contraction moves the rib cage in awake supine infants during quiet breathing, we studied chest wall motion in seven prematurely born infants before and during spinal anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. Infants were studied at or around term (postconceptional age 43 +/- 8 wk). Spinal anesthesia produced a sensory block at the T2-T4 level, with concomitant motor block at a slightly lower level. This resulted in the loss of most intercostal muscle activity, whereas diaphragmatic function was preserved. Rib cage and abdominal displacements were measured with respiratory inductance plethysmography before and during spinal anesthesia. During the anesthetic, outward inspiratory rib cage motion decreased in six infants (P less than 0.02, paired t test); four of these developed paradoxical inward movement of the rib cage during inspiration. One infant, the most immature in the group, had inward movement of the rib cage both before and during the anesthetic. Abdominal displacements increased during spinal anesthesia in six of seven infants (P less than 0.05), suggesting an increase in diaphragmatic motion. We conclude that, in the group of infants studied, outward rib cage movement during awake tidal breathing requires active, coordinated intercostal muscle activity that is suppressed by spinal anesthesia.

Anesthesia, Spinal↗

PubMed2002

Comparative effect of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (containing 1% dextrose) and lactated Ringer's solution for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare low-molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch containing 1% dextrose (HES) infusion and lactated Ringer's solution (LR) in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either LR ( n= 35) or HES ( n= 32) infusion before cesarean delivery. Infusion of the fluid was started immediately after arrival at the operating room, through two fully open i.v. routes of 18 or 16 gauge. The two groups were compared in terms of the incidence of hypotension; ephedrine dose; cord and maternal blood gas, hemoglobin, and glucose; and Apgar scores. RESULTS: Intravenous fluid volume until delivery in the LR group was significantly greater than that in the HES group (1298 +/- 503 and 973 +/- 339 ml, respectively) in spite of the similar periods of intravenous infusion (18.1 +/- 3.9 and 18.2 +/- 4.1 min). The incidence of hypotension, and the ephedrine dose, blood gas analyses, and Apgar scores were not significantly different between the groups. The ephedrine dose correlated with the anesthesia level by spinal anesthesia (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study did not show an advantage of HES compared with LR in the prevention of hypotension or in the reduction of ephedrine dose during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The anesthesia level, rather than the choice of intravenous fluid solution, might be related to the ephedrine dose.

Clinical Trial↗

PubMed1990

Cranial nerve paresis following epidural and spinal anesthesia.

Three cases of cranial nerve paresis following epidural and spinal anesthesia are presented. One patient had combined oculomotor and abducens nerve paresis, while the other two patients had solitary abducens nerve pareses. The authors postulate that mechanical traction is the cause of cranial nerve paresis following epidural and spinal anesthesia.

Abducens Nerve↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Paraplegia following spinal anesthesia in a patient with chronic renal failure.

Paraplegia after spinal anesthesia secondary to hematoma formation has been described. Many such reports have involved patients with a variety of coagulation disorders. This article describes a patient with clotting abnormalities, apparently due to chronic renal failure, who developed paraplegia after spinal anesthesia secondary to subarachnoid hematoma formation.

Anesthesia, Spinal↗

PubMed1995

[Effects of oral alpha 2 adrenergic agonists, clonidine and tizanidine, on tetracaine spinal anesthesia].

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of oral clonidine and tizanidine, alpha 2 adrenergic agonists, as premedication for tetracaine spinal anesthesia in 63 gynecological patients. The patients were randomly allocated to one of six groups. Group 1 (n = 7), group 2 (n = 8) and group 3 (n = 7) received 13 mg of tetracaine intrathecally in 10 % glucose solution 2.6 ml. Group 4 (n = 13), group 5 (n = 14) and group 6 (n = 13) received 13 mg of tetracaine intrathecally in a volume of 2.6 ml of 10 % glucose solution which contained 0.65 mg of phenylephrine. As premedication, group 1 and 4 received 0.25 mg of oral triazolam; group 2 and 5 received 3 mg of oral tizanidine; group 3 and 6 received 0.15 mg of oral clonidine. Group 2 and 3, or group 5 and 6 (clonidine or tizanidine group, respectively) needed significant longer time for regression of Th10 sensory blockade than group 1 or 4 (triazolam). The time for appearance of postoperative pain and the time to require postoperative analgesics were longer in the groups which had received either clonidine or tizanidine than in the groups which had received triazolam. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure in group 6 (clonidine-tetracaine-phenylephrine group) showed significant decreases (P < 0.05) after the spinal anesthesia. We concluded that oral premedication of clonidine and tizanidine prolonged tetracaine spinal anesthesia. From the view point of the prolongation of spinal anesthesia and the hemodynamic stability, oral premedication with tizanidine seems to be useful.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Combined lumbar and sacral plexus block compared with plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for hip fractures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This prospective randomized study was designed to determine the hemodynamic effects and quality of combined lumbar and sacral plexus block compared with plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in the elderly for repair of proximal femoral fractures. METHODS: Twenty-nine elderly patients ranging in age from 68 to 97 years were randomly assigned to 2 groups: a spinal anesthesia group with single-shot 3 mL 0.5% plain bupivacaine, and a combined block group with 30 mL lidocaine 1.33% with epinephrine for the posterior lumbar plexus block and 10 mL same mixture for the parasacral block and an iliac crest block with 5 mL lidocaine 1%. RESULTS: No need for general anesthesia was encountered in either group. Anesthesia was judged unsatisfactory in 1 of 15 patients in the combined block group. The initial decrease of mean arterial pressure was 38% in the spinal group and 27% in the block group and was not significantly different. A more prolonged hemodynamic effect was found in the spinal group, indicated by the more frequent use of ephedrine to stabilize blood pressure (P<.05). Patients over 85 years had a significantly larger decrease in blood pressure than younger patients (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia and combined lumbar/sacral plexus block provided adequate anesthesia for repair of hip fracture in the elderly. Hypotension was induced by both the combined peripheral nerve block and plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in aged patients; hypotension was found to be longer lasting after spinal anesthesia and of a larger magnitude in patients over 85 years of age.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1990

[Investigation of 121 cases of spinal anesthesia with plain 0.5% bupivacaine].

Bupivacaine has been used for spinal anesthesia since 1982 in our department. We performed a retrograde investigation of 121 cases who had lower limb surgery and anesthetized with plain 0.5% bupivacaine solution during the year of 1987. Doses of bupivacaine, maximum spread of analgesia and spinal tap level were analyzed. We chose the bupivacaine doses from 2.5 ml to 4.0 ml depending on the condition of the patient and the specificity of the surgery. The patients were divided into 3 groups by the dose of bupivacaine: i.e. 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 ml of plain 0.5% bupivacaine. Seventy percent of all patients had a spinal tap on L3/4 interspace. The average upper level of analgesia was T7 in each group and no patient had analgesia above T2 level. There was no correlation between the site of injection and volume of local anesthetics. However patient's physical status and surgical procedure are more important to obtain the good analgesic level. There was no significant respiratory depression nor hypotension during and after the surgery. It is concluded that 3-4 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine provided satisfactory spinal anesthesia for the lower limb surgery.

Anesthesia, Spinal↗

PubMed1998

Procaine spinal anesthesia: a pilot study of the incidence of transient neurologic symptoms.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the approximate incidence of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) [formerly known as transient radicular irritation (TRI)] associated with procaine spinal anesthesia, and whether fentanyl prolongs the duration of procaine spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Unrandomized pilot study. SETTING: Community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 106 consecutive patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia for procedures anticipated to last less than 90 minutes. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received 5% procaine for spinal anesthesia. Fentanyl 20 micrograms was added for procedures anticipated to last longer than 45 minutes (but less than 90 min). Intraoperatively the adequacy of duration, level, and intensity of anesthesia were observed. Time from injection of local anesthetic until knee-bending was recorded. Three days postoperatively, patients were questioned intensively in an effort to determine whether back pain and/or symptoms consistent with TNS had occurred. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Duration of anesthesia was adequate in all but one instance. The intensity and the sensory level of anesthesia were satisfactory with one exception, a woman who had an unexpectedly low sensory level (L1) after 60 mg of procaine for cerclage, and who was also was the only patients to develop TNS. The incidence of TNS (0.9%) was markedly less than that reported after lidocaine and similar to the incidence observed after bupivacaine. Mild back pain without radiation occurred in 11 patients (10%), an incidence that is similar to that seen after bupivacaine and lidocaine. Compared with procaine alone, the addition of fentanyl significantly (p = 0.0001) prolonged the time to bending knees from 72 minutes to 97 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Procaine may be a useful alternative to lidocaine for short procedures, and it is less likely to produce TNS. Fentanyl prolongs motor block when added to procaine.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Knee-chest position improves pulmonary oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing lower spinal surgery with spinal anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To define the effect of the knee-chest position on pulmonary oxygenation in patients who underwent lower spinal operations under spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Clinical, prospective study. SETTING: Inpatient anesthesia and orthopedic surgery clinic at a municipal hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-six patients (30 males and 26 females) who underwent lower spinal surgery under spinal anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: After administering hyperbaric tetracaine solution and fixing the anesthesia level in the supine position for 15 minutes, patients were turned to the knee-chest position. They breathed room air normally. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Arterial blood gas tensions were measured in the supine position 15 minutes after administration of the tetracaine solution and 15 minutes after turning patients to the knee-chest position. Patients were classified into six groups according to their age: patients in their teens and 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s. In the supine position, the mean values of the alveolar arterial oxygen tension difference (A-aDO2) of patients in their 50s, 60s, and 70s were significantly higher than those of patients in their teens and 20s, 30s, and 40s. In the knee-chest position, these high values of A-aDO2 in the older patient groups decreased significantly, thereby eliminating any significant difference in A-aDO2 among all age groups. To determine the mechanism of the improvement of pulmonary oxygenation in the elderly patients, the effect of the knee-chest position on lung volumes was studied in eight young volunteers. CONCLUSION: A significant improvement of pulmonary oxygenation was seen in elderly patients who underwent lower spinal operation with spinal anesthesia when they were turned to the knee-chest position. The knee-chest position has a beneficial effect on pulmonary oxygenation in elderly patients who are given spinal anesthesia.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Etiology and incidence of endotracheal intubation following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of spinal failure necessitating general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is extremely low. Aspiration prophylaxis prior to spinal anesthesia is often recommended in case of spinal failure or excessive spinal block requiring the emergency administration of general anesthesia. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of endotracheal intubation following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the peri-operative course of parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia at our institution from February 1991 to December 1993. If spinal failure occurred, 10 ml of sodium bicarbonate was administered by mouth prior to induction of general anesthesia. RESULTS: Among the 743 cases that we reviewed, spinal failure occurred in 15 patients (2%) because of inadequate analgesia in 14 patients (1.9%) and unexpected prolonged surgery for hysterectomy in one patient (0.1%). No patient required intubation due to excessive spinal block. In none of the patients was a record of pulmonary aspiration identified. CONCLUSIONS: The extremely low incidence of spinal failure or excessive block necessitating endotracheal intubation suggests that routine aspiration prophylaxis may not be necessary prior to spinal anesthesia. However, these results should be confirmed by a prospective, controlled study on larger populations. An antacid should be readily available and administered whenever general anesthesia is required.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

[Isobaric and hyperbaric local anesthetic used in spinal anesthesia].

OBJECTIVE: To reveal the advantages and disadvantages of the application of isobaric and hyperbaric local anesthetic in spinal anesthesia so as to provide reference for clinical practice. METHODS: One hundred and sixty ASA patients (physical status I - II) undergoing lower abdominal surgery within 3 hours under spinal anesthesia (using CSEA technique via spinal needle in epidural needle) were allocated to 2 groups with 80 cases each. In lateral decubitus, patients randomly received a subarachnoid injection of 3.0 mL (15 mg) isobaric (Group I) or hyperbaric (Group H) bupivacaine and then turned supine. Hemodynamic changes and patients' responses were perioperatively observed. After subarachnoid injection, we recorded the time of onset and motor block, the peak sensory blocked level, the time of regression of 2 dermatomes, the time of the first administration of analgesics for a significant pain of the incision, the time of the regression of motor block to modified Bromage scale 2, and the time of recuperating the function of urination. RESULTS: Both isobaric and hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine solutions in a volume of 3.0 mL provided effective sensory and motor block for the operations. The time of onset and complete motor block were similar in the two groups. Compared with Group I, the time of peak sensory block in Group H was shorter, the peak sensory block level was higher (more maximal dermatomes of blocked sensory nerves), the time of regression of sensory and motor block were shorter, the time of recuperating the function of urination was longer, and the incidence of feeling sick, nausea, vomiting and hypotension was higher. CONCLUSION: Isobaric solution is superior to hyperbaric solution in spinal anesthesia.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Dose-finding study of intravenous midazolam for sedation and amnesia during spinal anesthesia in patients premedicated with intramuscular midazolam.

PURPOSE: We investigated the effective and safe dose of intravenous midazolam for sedation and amnesia during spinal anesthesia in patients premedicated with intramuscular midazolam. METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients aged 20-50 years scheduled for spinal anesthesia received midazolam 0.06 mg.kg(-1) and atropine 0.01 mg.kg(-1) intramuscularly 15 min before entering the operating room. Spinal anesthesia was performed with 0.5% hyperbaric tetracaine. Five minutes after starting surgery, midazolam 0 (control group), 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, or 0.05 mg.kg(-1) was intravenously administered (30 patients each). Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, percutaneous oxygen saturation (S(p)(O)(2)), verbal response, eyelash reflex, and involuntary body movement were measured every 5 min for 30 min. Memory during surgery was also investigated. RESULTS: The number of the patients with loss of verbal response, with loss of eyelash reflex, and with no memory during surgery were significantly larger in the groups receiving midazolam >or=0.03 mg.kg(-1), >or=0.04 mg.kg(-1), and >or=0.02 mg.kg(-1), respectively. The decrease in blood pressure or increase in respiratory rate with decrease in S(p)(O)(2) was significantly larger in the groups receiving midazolam >or=0.03 mg.kg(-1) or 0.05 mg.kg(-1), respectively. CONCLUSION: For sedation and amnesia of the patients aged 20-50 years in spinal anesthesia with about 1 h duration receiving intramuscular midazolam 0.06 mg.kg(-1) as a premedication, intravenous midazolam 0.02 mg.kg(-1) might be effective and safe.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

[The changes of peripheral skin temperature in elderly patients under spinal anesthesia].

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes of body temperature in elderly compared with younger patients during spinal anesthesia. Twenty six patients, ASA I-II were divided into two groups, (13; under 30 years of age, 13; above 60 years) who received spinal anesthesia with 0.3% dibucaine at the interspace between L 3 and L 4. All patients were anesthetized below T 8 level. Central temperature was measured at the forehead, and peripheral skin temperature was measured at the finger tip and the toe tip for 25 minutes at every 5 minutes. In both groups, forehead temperature and finger tip skin temperature were unchanged, but toe tip skin temperature increased 5 minutes after spinal anesthesia. The degree of toe tip skin temperature change was significantly lower (P < 0.01) in elderly patients and the speed was also slower. We recognized that the change in peripheral skin temperature during spinal anesthesia is not different between elderly and younger patients, but the speed of temperature change is slower in elderly patients.

Adult↗