PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cochlear Implants”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33Linked to original sources

Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol.

The performance of children who receive a cochlear implant may be dependent on both age of the child at implantation and the amount of experience with the implant. In the present study, changes in auditory perception and speech identification were investigated with experience of 71 children who had received a cochlear implant. The children were divided into three groups, those above and those below the age of 7 years at the time of implantation, and those aged 3 years or younger deafened by meningitis. The children received either the Nucleus 22, the Nucleus 24 or the Med El C40+ implant. The test material was a reduced form of the EARS evaluation protocol developed by Med El into a multi-language format. Tests were performed pre-operatively, within 2-5 days of first fitting of the speech processor, then at 1, 3 and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter, for a total period of 24 months. The results indicated that all children showed improvement after 6-12 months. The rate of improvement differed between age groups. Children over 7 years of age had pre-operatively higher test scores than younger children, presumably because of their previous experience with hearing aids. These children showed an immediate post-operative drop in performance that recovered 1-3 months later. The children aged under 7 years started at lower performance levels but approached those of the older children after 12 months' cochlear implant use because their post-operative drop was less significant and their performance improved faster. Children who had been deafened by meningitis and implanted at the age of 3 or less made little progress over the first 6 months but approached test levels of the under-7-year-olds by 18 months or later. All three components of the evaluation protocol employed the Listening Progress Profile (LiP), the Monosyllabic-Trochee-Polysyllabic Test (MTP) and the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) and proved to be valuable in demonstrating improvement in performance of cochlear implant children in all age groups once the immediate post-operative drop had been overcome.

Child↗

[Auditory capability evaluation for children after cochlear implantation using meaningful auditory integration scale].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the auditory capability of preschool children before and after cochlear implantation using meaningful auditory integration scale (MAIS) questionnaire. METHODS: Eighty-two prelingually deaf patients participated in this study. They received a cochlear implant at the age of 3 to 6 years and 11 months. The audiologists who were trained for the research used the MAIS questionnaire. Audiologists asked for the parents' answers and recorded all the information about the device using (Q1,2) and the patient's spontaneous auditory behavioural responses including spontaneous alerting to sound Q3 approximately 6 and deriving meaning from sound (Q7 approximately 10). The evaluation was performed before operation and 1 , 3, 6 months, 1, 1.5, 2 years after switch-on. RESULTS: The scores of question 1a and 1b were not significantly different among the different periods after switch-on. The scores of question 2 to 10 were significantly different among the different periods after switch-on. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variability across subjects' auditory ability after cochlear implantation was noted. Most of the patients showed no consistent response to sound in everyday life before implantation. After cochlear implantation, a significant increase in auditory capability occurred. The children demonstrated faster development of device using relative to spontaneous alerting to sound and deriving meaning from sound.

Auditory Perception↗

Performance as a function of time: a study of three cochlear implant devices.

This study examines the relationship of time to cochlear implant patient performance and the effect of device design on patient performance over time. Data were collected for patients who were implanted with Nucleus 22, Smith & Nephew Richards Ineraid, or 3M/Vienna cochlear implants as part of the Veterans Administration study on cochlear implants. Patients were administered a comprehensive audiological test battery prior to implantation, at stimulation, and 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years poststimulation. Results show that patient performance improved over the course of the study, with performance levels with each multichannel implant being similar at the study end point. The Nucleus device produced maximum performance sooner than the Ineraid device did, and performance of the single-channel 3M was consistently below that of the multichannel devices.

Cochlear Implants↗

An advanced multiple channel cochlear implant.

An advanced multiple channel cochlear implant hearing prosthesis is described. Stimulation is presented through an array of 20 electrodes located in the scala tympani. Any two electrodes can be configured as a bipolar pair to conduct a symmetrical, biphasic, constant-current pulsatile stimulus. Up to three stimuli can be presented in rapid succession or effectively simultaneously. For simultaneous stimulation, a novel time-division current multiplexing technique has been developed to obviate electrode interactions that may compromise safety. The stimuli are independently controllable in current amplitude, duration, and onset time. Groups of three stimuli can be generated at a rate of typically 500 Hz. Stimulus control data and power are conveyed to the implant through a single transcutaneous inductive link. The device also incorporates a telemetry system that enables electrode voltage waveforms to be monitored externally in real time. The electronics of the implant are contained almost entirely on a custom designed integrated circuit. Preliminary results obtained with the first patient to receive the advanced implant are included.

Cochlear Implants↗

Successful cochlear implantation in a patient with MELAS syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe methods of assessing cochlear implant candidacy in patients with potentially significant peripheral and central nervous system (CNS) degeneration. STUDY DESIGN: A patient with a degenerative CNS disease (MELAS syndrome) undergoing evaluation for cochlear implantation is described. SETTING: This study took place at a tertiary care center. PATIENT: A patient with mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) who had cortical blindness and profound sensorineural hearing loss was evaluated and rehabilitated with cochlear implantation. INTERVENTIONS: Pure-tone audiogram, behavioral responses to promontory stimulation electrical auditory brainstem response, and electrically evoked middle-latency responses (MLRs) were used to assess eighth nerve, auditory brainstem, and cortical auditory pathways. Cochlear implantation with Cochlear Corporation mini 22 implant was performed. RESULTS: Repeatable electrically evoked MLRs and behavioral responses to promontory stimulation documented the presence of auditory cortical responses. Successful implantation resulted in open set speech recognition and communication using the auditory/oral mode. CONCLUSION: This report describes successful implantation in a patient with MELAS syndrome and demonstrates the ability to preoperatively confirm the integrity of brainstem and cortical auditory pathways despite significant CNS degeneration.

Adult↗

Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate sound localization with bilateral and unilateral cochlear implants. DESIGN: Sound localization tests were performed on 20 bilaterally implanted MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ users. All subjects were bilaterally implanted during adolescence or later. Sound localization was tested in the frontal horizontal plane by using 9 equally spaced loudspeakers and speech-shaped noise bursts at randomized levels. RESULTS: The group of subjects who were bilaterally deafened after 5 to 6 yr of age (18 subjects) showed a statistically significant improvement in sound localization when using both implants, compared with when using only one. The mean deviation between the presentation azimuth and the response azimuth was 16.6 degrees when using both implants, which was on average 37.1 degrees smaller than when using one implant only. When adjusted for the localization error that was constant across loudspeakers, the mean deviation was 15.9 degrees for bilateral implant use, representing an improvement of 30.1 degrees over unilateral implant use. Statistical analysis showed that in this group, performance measures were not correlated with subject details such as age at onset of deafness or duration of unilateral implant use. In contrast, subjects who were bilaterally deafened before 6 yr of age (2 subjects) did not show a benefit in sound localization from bilateral implants. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral cochlear implants offer a substantial benefit in sound localization to late-deafened, late-implanted subjects. The very limited data from early-deafened subjects implanted at a later age could suggest that these subjects may not benefit in sound localization from bilateral cochlear implants. It is possible that early implantation for early deafened subjects might allow better acquisition of spatial hearing, thus leading to improved localization performance.

Adolescent↗

The effect of loudness imbalance between electrodes in cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the effect of loudness imbalance between electrodes in patients using the 22-electrode cochlear implant (Cochlear Pty Ltd). It was hypothesized that speech perception scores would be greater when the loudness of electrodes was balanced at the comfort (C) levels than when the C levels were unbalanced. DESIGN: Ten adult patients received a monosyllabic word test (CNC) words) in quiet and a sentence test (CUNY sentences) in noise under two conditions: with C levels balanced for equal loudness and with unbalanced C levels. RESULTS: When the C levels across electrodes were pseudo-randomly unbalanced by 0 to +/- 20% of the electrodes' dynamic ranges (20% unbalancing), 6 of the 10 subjects showed a significant drop in sentence perception scores. Of these patients, none had a significant decrease in perception when the degree of unbalancing was halved. Of the four patients who showed no change with 20% unbalancing, three revealed a significant decline in sentence perception when the degree of unbalancing was doubled. There also were significant group effects for phonemes on the word test as well as for sentences in noise for the 20% unbalancing. CONCLUSIONS: The implications for clinical practice are that it is important to balance the C levels and that clinicians should be encouraged to refine methods for setting C levels in very young children, who may be using unbalanced MAPs. Nevertheless, although most patients revealed a statistically significant drop in sentence perception with 20% imbalance of the C levels, the changes in percentage scores often were only small.

Adolescent↗

Social and emotional characteristics of adults seeking a cochlear implant and their spouses.

OBJECTIVES: Because past research has shown that benefits of cochlear implantation may include a significant decrease in psychological and emotional difficulties, this study examined whether persons seeking cochlear implants in recent years differed psychologically from those referred in the early 1980s. A second objective was to explore mechanisms by which profound deafness could contribute to psychological and emotional difficulties for implant candidates and their spouses. METHODS: 178 cochlear implant candidates referred from 1981 to 1998 at the University of Iowa Hospitals completed a standard battery of psychological tests and questionnaires. The sample was divided into six 3-year cohorts and compared on standardized measures of psychological and emotional adjustment, and in participation in social and non-social activities. Spouses of implant candidates completed a similar assessment. RESULTS: The sample was characterized by elevations in depression, social introversion, suspiciousness, and social anxiety and loneliness. There were no significant differences among cohorts across time except for an increase in expectations for implant success. Spouses also evidenced elevated levels of psychological distress. Hearing status was associated with significant differences in social activity participation. A paradoxical interaction was found between marital status and deafness. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that the psychological status of implant candidates is changing across time, suggesting continued psychological benefit for persons receiving cochlear implants. Both candidates and their spouses participated in fewer social activities than normal controls. Findings underscore the complex relation between marital status, deafness, and engagement and participation in positive activities.

Adult↗

Chronic Pseudomonas infections of cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss chronic, refractory Pseudomonas infections of cochlear implants and their management. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Two university-based cochlear implant programs. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight-year-old (Case 1) and 4-year-old (Case 2), different devices. INTERVENTIONS: Medical and surgical management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical course. RESULTS: Both patients had delayed presentations, 4 months and 3 years postimplantation, respectively, with fluctuating scalp edema and pain resistant to multiple courses of oral antibiotics. Infections began as localized granulation and progressed to complete encasement of both devices with rubbery, poorly vascularized tissue. In each case, two different strains of multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa were cultured. Infections progressed despite local debridement and targeted antipseudomonal antibiotic coverage, and sensitive organisms continued to appear in cultures of refractory granulation tissue. Both patients underwent partial explantation, with the electrode array left in the cochlea, then received 2 to 3 more months of further medical therapy and observation and then were reimplanted successfully with new devices. Both have shown excellent performance and no sign of recurrent infection. CONCLUSIONS: Infections of cochlear implants are uncommon, and cases of successful conservative management without device explantation have been reported. However, our experience and the implanted device literature suggest that chronic Pseudomonas infections may represent a distinct clinical entity, likely to fail protracted therapy and ultimately require device removal. Fortunately, successful reimplantation is possible.

Adult↗

Second oral language capabilities in children with cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE: The development of oral language in children with a cochlear implant is dependent on numerous factors. Although baseline achievements have been established, ceiling attainment levels have yet to be explored. One indicator of a higher capability level is the ability of children with implants to learn to communicate orally using a second language. The purpose of this research was to explore 1) the feasibility of children with cochlear implants developing oral fluency in a second language and 2) the factors that affect the development. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of children fulfilling the criteria. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: Eighteen profoundly hearing-impaired children who were reported to be bilingual. INTERVENTION: Cochlear implantation at age 5 or younger. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The subjects were evaluated using standard speech perception and receptive and expressive language measures. RESULTS: The data revealed the ability of some pediatric cochlear implant recipients to develop competency in a second spoken language in addition to their primary language. Equally as important is the fact that the majority showed age-appropriate receptive and/or expressive language abilities in their primary language commensurate with normal-hearing children. CONCLUSION: High levels of achievement including the learning of a second spoken language are possible after implantation in the pediatric population. Variables include speech perception postimplantation, the linguistic environment, type of intervention, and educational placement.

Child↗

Otopathological findings in a patient with bilateral cochlear implants.

The death in 1976 of a patient who had a multiple-electrode cochlear implant in one cochlea and a single-electrode cochlear implant in the other provided a unique opportunity for both clinical and histological study of the effects of such implants in a human an subject. The patient was 68 years old at the time of his death. In 1969, at the age of 61, and after 11 years of profound deafness, apparently as a result of lues, the patient was implanted on the left side with a hard-wired 5-wire multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Five years later, his right side was implanted with a single-electrode induction coil cochlear implant. Audiological and psychoacoustic studies were performed by a number of investigators. The results are reviewed. Following the patient's death, his temporal bones were obtained and examined using microdissection techniques followed by serial sectioning. The histological findings are described.

Aged↗

Cochlear implantation and Cogan syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes and issues pertaining to cochlear implantation in a group of subjects affected by Cogan syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, University of Parma. PATIENTS: Five postlingually deafened adults suffering from a typical form of Cogan syndrome who underwent cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Benefit from cochlear implantation as measured by word and everyday sentence recognition tests. Surgical issues and postoperative complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: In two cases, intracochlear electrodes were inserted into the scala vestibuli because of the ossification of the scala tympani. Two patients experienced a recurrence of keratitis the day after surgery. To date, with a follow-up of 1 to 4 years, no patient has experienced flap complications or other local or systemic complications. At the 12-month postoperative evaluation, all patients had gained useful open-set speech perception, achieving a mean score of 91% and 95% on word and everyday sentence recognition tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients deafened by Cogan syndrome demonstrated high levels of speech understanding after undergoing cochlear implantation. Obliteration of the cochlea may complicate electrode implantation, requiring modifications of the surgical technique. Stress consequent to the surgical procedure may instigate an acute phase of the basic illness.

Adult↗

The additional hospital costs of the LAURA cochlear implant in the department of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery of the university hospital of Leuven.

From the start of 1994 until 1996 ten patients (eight adults and two children) received cochlear implants after careful preoperative selection in our department. Only the deaf adults implanted with the LAURA cochlear implant were included in this retrospective analysis. In this study, the additional hospital costs associated with cochlear implantations were estimated. In doing this, a differentiation was made between 'fixed' costs and 'variable' costs. In general, the average cost of cochlear implantation was 1,186,741 BF (29,418.54 EUR) per implanted adult and a direct fixed cost of 262,880 BF (6,516.62 EUR) was needed for the computer requisites. In general, the cochlear implant enhance speech-perception scores in the postlingually deafened patients as well as in the prelingually deafened adults. After intensive training, all implanted adults of the University Hospital Leuven could recognize the segmental aspects of speech with scores above the level of significance.

Adult↗

Suppression of tinnitus by cochlear implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Transcutaneous and transpromontory electrical stimulation has been described for the treatment of tinnitus. Based on these observations, we postulate that cochlear implantation may relieve tinnitus. METHOD: Twenty patients who underwent cochlear implantation since 1987 were studied. Preimplantation tinnitus was documented and quantified. The change in tinnitus after implantation was investigated. RESULT: Before cochlear implantation, 90% of the patients experienced tinnitus. Electrical stimulation of the promontory resulted in relief of tinnitus in 72% of the patients. After cochlear implantation, tinnitus was abolished in 44% and decreased in 39%, for an overall improvement in 83%. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation has the added benefit of tinnitus suppression in the majority of patients. The mechanism of this suppression remains uncertain. However, this information may be valuable in structuring subsequent treatment programs for patients with tinnitus.

Adolescent↗

Longitudinal improvements in communication and socialization of deaf children with cochlear implants and hearing aids: evidence from parental reports.

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that the cochlear implant may improve deaf children's speech and communication skills. However, little is known about its effect on children's ability to socialize with hearing peers. METHODS: Using a standardized psychological measure completed by parents and a longitudinal design, this study examined the development of communication, socialization, and daily living skills of children who used hearing aids or cochlear implants for an average of 11 and 6 years, respectively. RESULTS: Results show that children with cochlear implants, who were more delayed than children with hearing aids at the outset, made significant progress over time. Children with both devices achieved age-appropriate development after years of hearing aid or cochlear implant use. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of results suggests that cochlear implants may be effective in improving deaf children's communication and social skills.

Activities of Daily Living↗

A postoperative audiometric evaluation of cochlear implant patients.

As the benefits of the cochlear implantation become more defined, many investigators hope that these devices can be offered to patients with a lesser degree of hearing loss. Accordingly, it is necessary to investigate the audiometric thresholds in the implanted ear after surgery. Preservation of the residual hearing after implantation would support the claims that surgery and the presence of a cochlear implant do not adversely affect the implanted ear.

Audiometry↗

Effects of central nervous system residua on cochlear implant results in children deafened by meningitis.

BACKGROUND: This study explored factors associated with speech recognition outcomes in postmeningitic deafness (PMD). The results of cochlear implantation may vary in children with PMD because of sequelae that extend beyond the auditory periphery. OBJECTIVE: To determine which factors might be most determinative of outcome of cochlear implantation in children with PMD. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A referral center for pediatric cochlear implantation and rehabilitation. SUBJECTS: Thirty children with cochlear implants who were deafened by meningitis were matched with subjects who were deafened by other causes based on the age at diagnosis, age at cochlear implantation, age at which hearing aids were first used, and method of communication used at home or in the classroom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Speech perception performance within the first 2 years after cochlear implantation and its relationship with presurgical cognitive measures and medical history. RESULTS: There was no difference in the overall cognitive or postoperative speech perception performance between the children with PMD and those deafened by other causes. The presence of postmeningitic hydrocephalus, however, posed greater challenges to the rehabilitation process, as indicated by significantly smaller gains in speech perception and a predilection for behavioral problems. By comparison, cochlear scarring and incomplete electrode insertion had no impact on speech perception results. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results demonstrated no significant delay in cognitive or speech perception performance in the PMD group, central nervous system residua, when present, can impede the acquisition of speech perception with a cochlear implant. Central effects associated with PMD may thus impact language learning potential; cognitive and behavioral therapy should be considered in rehabilitative planning and in establishing expectations of outcome.

Child↗

Shaw scalpel in revision cochlear implant surgery.

The use of traditional electrocautery is prohibited in revision or replacement cochlear implant surgery because of the concern for end organ tissue damage. Additionally, electrical current spread to the malfunctioning device could interfere with an accurate cause-of-failure analysis. Clinical reports have confirmed the utility of the Shaw scalpel for dermatologic, ophthalmic, and head and neck surgery. The Shaw scalpel is a thermally activated cutting blade that provides a bloodless field through immediate capillary and small vessel hemostasis. Avoidance of wound and flap complications is of primary concern in cochlear implant surgery. The long-term wound healing compared favorably to that of other surgical cutting instruments in several experimental reports. We have routinely used the Shaw scalpel in revision cochlear implant surgery and in primary surgery whenever electrocautery was contraindicated. We have retrospectively evaluated 22 cases in which the Shaw scalpel was used for cochlear implant revision and primary surgery. The chart review included patient demographics, the indication for surgery, the contraindication for electrocautery, intraoperative surgical notes, the wound healing evaluation, the evaluation for alopecia, and postoperative speech understanding. No significant complications occurred intraoperatively, and the long-term wound healing results were no different from those obtained with conventional surgical techniques. The explanted devices were undamaged, and valuable diagnostic information could be obtained. All patients performed at or better than their preoperative levels on speech recognition testing. Our results indicate that the Shaw scalpel is a relatively safe, easy-to-use, and effective instrument.

Adult↗