PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33Linked to original sources

Bungled bite mark evidence collection: a proposed protocol for the prevention thereof.

In recent years, several bite mark cases referred to our department could not be adequately analysed due to poor evidence collection. This has highlighted the fact that police officers, forensic pathologists and dental practitioners do not have access to the information required to collect, record, duplicate, store and transport the relevant evidence correctly. This article highlights several case studies in which evidence collection was bungled. A protocol is proposed that should eliminate this problem.

Aged↗

The influence of sequence of impressions on children's anxiety and discomfort.

PURPOSE: Laboratory studies with adults and children have found lower pain reports when pain proceeds from high to low rather than from low to high. However, pediatric dentists often ease children into difficult procedures (from easiest to most difficult). This study investigated the influence of order during a clinical procedure that involved taking maxillary and mandibular alginate impressions. METHODS: Subjects were 24 children aged 5 to 6 years (preoperational stage) and 24 children aged 9 to 10 years (concrete operational stage). Children were randomly assigned to either start with the mandibular (presumed to be easier) or start with the maxillary (presumed to be harder) impressions. Discomfort during the sequence of impressions was measured using the "Affective Facial Scale." A telephone interview was conducted 2 weeks later to evaluate the memory of discomfort. RESULTS: The results indicated that the older children who started with the mandibular (easier) impression and ended with the maxillary (more uncomfortable) impression reported significantly lower discomfort than older children who started with the maxillary impression and ended with the mandibular (Mann-Whitney U, Z = -2.08; P < .037). The same tendency was noted 2 weeks later on a telephone interview. By phone, 92% of the older children who started with the mandibular impression rated the sequence of impressions as "not at all bad," while only 58% of the older children who started with the maxillary impression rated the overall experience as "not at all bad" (chi2 = 3.56, P < .059). The younger children did not show any significant difference in their ratings of discomfort at either of the assessment periods. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with clinical practice, this study observed that older children benefit from beginning an appointment with an easier procedure and working up to a more difficult one.

Alginates↗

Cast impression coping technique.

A laboratory cast impression coping has been designed to capture accurate crown and bridge impressions, even in the most challenging circumstances. The designed technique is similar to copper band techniques and likewise does not require gingival retraction. The design includes a flat, nail-shaped head for proper finger pressure during the wash impression phase. Beads enhance the nail head design, allowing the impression-filled coping to be captured properly in the master tray or over-impression.

Crowns↗

Identification and correction of common impression concerns: protocol and considerations.

Precise impression-making techniques are critical to indirect restorative success. By ensuring that a concise protocol is implemented during the impression capture phase, clinicians can predictably deliver optimal results. Common complications that may arise during impression making include inaccurate marginal detail, bubbles, tears, pits, and voids. Proceeding with impression making when such damage is evident will reduce the accuracy of restorative fit and integrity. This article discusses potential concerns during impression capture and addresses approaches to improve the overall quality of impressions taken.

Chemical Phenomena↗

The use of sectional impressions and a transfer index for extensive fixed prosthodontic treatment.

The philosophy of positioning the margins of crowns supragingivally may not be applicable with the presence of caries, erosion, abfraction (noncarious cervical lesion), short clinical crown length, or esthetic concerns. In such situations, it is essential not only to record precise subgingival details of all of the prepared teeth but also to accurately transfer them to a working master cast. If a patient presents with oral and/or gingival conditions that compromise the clinician's ability to obtain a single full-arch impression for extensive fixed restorations, a technique using sectional impressions, an intraoral transfer index, and a transfer impression for transfer dies will play a vital role in the patient's treatment.

Crowns↗