SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “HALOPERIDOL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

Behavioural effects of chronic haloperidol and risperidone treatment in rats.

The therapeutic properties of typical antipsychotic drugs (APDs) such as haloperidol in schizophrenia treatment are mainly associated with their ability to block dopamine D2 receptors. This blockade is accompanied by side effects such as extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Atypical APDs such as risperidone have superior therapeutic efficacy possibly due to their activity at multiple receptors (in particular 5-HT2A receptors). Although the risk of EPS is significantly lower in atypical than in typical APDs, it is not negligible. To investigate and compare the behavioural profile and EPS-asssociated side effects of haloperidol and risperidone APD treatment we applied a multi-tiered, comprehensive behavioural phenotyping approach. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated chronically (28 days) with supratherapeutic EPS-inducing doses of haloperidol and risperidone using osmotic minipumps. Domains such as motor activity, exploration, memory, and anxiety were analysed together with EPS assessment ("early onset" vacuous chewing movements and catalepsy). Both APDs produced diminished motor activity and exploration, impaired working memory performances, and increased anxiety levels. These effects were more pronounced in haloperidol-treated animals. Chronic APD treatment also caused a time-course dependent elevation of EPS-like symptoms. Risperidone-treated animals showed a catalepsy-like phenotype, which differed to that of haloperidol-treated rats, indicating that processes other than the anticipated dopaminergic mechanisms are underlying this phenomenon. These EPS-related phenotypes are consistent with reported EPS-inducing D2 receptor occupancies of around 80%. Differences in the behavioural profile of haloperidol and risperidone, which were revealed by a comprehensive phenotyping strategy, are likely due to the unique receptor activation profiles of these APDs.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Differential effects of antipsychotics on haloperidol-induced vacuous chewing movements and subcortical gene expression in the rat.

The behavioral and neurochemical effects of switching from typical to atypical medications have not been evaluated in the rodent models of tardive dyskinesia. Thus, we treated rats with haloperidol-decanoate for 12 weeks, and assessed the effects of additional treatment with olanzapine, haloperidol, clozapine, or vehicle on vacuous chewing movements and expression of transcripts for dopamine receptors, tyrosine hydroxylase, delta-opioid receptor, prodynorphin, preproenkephalin, glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 (glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)-65) and GAD-67 and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunits in the striatum and its efferent pathways. Haloperidol-decanoate induced vacuous chewing movements extinguished following an additional 4 weeks of treatment with vehicle, olanzapine or haloperidol, but not clozapine. Post-treatment, vacuous chewing movements in the clozapine group were significantly higher than the vehicle, olanzapine and haloperidol groups. GAD-67 mRNA expression in the globus pallidus was decreased following additional treatment with olanzapine or haloperidol, but not clozapine. Changes in expression of other transcripts were not detected. These findings demonstrate important differences in the effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics on chronic vacuous chewing movements.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Ritanserin counteracts both rat vacuous chewing movements and nigro-striatal tyrosine hydroxylase-immunostaining alterations induced by haloperidol.

The effect of subchronic co-administration of ritanserin (1.5 mg/kg, i.p., twice a day) and haloperidol (1 mg/kg, i.p., twice a day) on rat vacuous chewing movements and on tyrosine hydroxylase-immunostaining was investigated. Ritanserin significantly reduced rat vacuous chewing movements observed following 2, 3 and 4 weeks of haloperidol administration and after 5 days of haloperidol withdrawal. Furthermore, ritanserin prevented the reduction of striatal tyrosine hydroxylase-immunostaining and the shrinkage of nigral dopaminergic cell bodies induced by haloperidol. The present results indicate that ritanserin may possess protective properties on both dopaminergic nigro-striatal neuron alterations and vacuous chewing movements induced by haloperidol, and provide further evidence indicating a possible association between these two haloperidol-induced effects.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Effect of haloperidol on transient outward potassium current in rat ventricular myocytes.

Although sigma ligand haloperidol is known to affect repolarization in heart, its effect on potassium currents in cardiomyocytes has not yet been studied. We analyzed the effect of 1 micromol/l haloperidol on transient outward K(+) current (I(to)) in enzymatically isolated rat right ventricular cardiomyocytes using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique at room temperature. Haloperidol induced a decrease of amplitude and an acceleration of apparent inactivation of I(to), both in a voltage-independent manner. The averaged inhibition of I(to), evaluated as a change of its time integral, was 23.0+/-3.2% at stimulation frequency of 0.1 Hz. As a consequence of slow recovery of I(to) from the haloperidol-induced block (time constant 1482+/-783 ms), a cumulation of the block up to about 40% appeared at 3.3 Hz. We conclude that haloperidol causes a voltage-independent block of I(to) that cumulates at higher stimulation frequencies. Based on the computer reconstruction of experimental data, a block of I(to)-channels in both open and open-inactivated states appears to be likely mechanism of haloperidol-induced inhibition of I(to).

Animals↗

PubMed2004

The KCNQ channel activator retigabine blocks haloperidol-induced c-Fos expression in the striatum of the rat.

Retigabine activates inward potassium rectifying KCNQ channels. This stabilizes the membrane potential via hyperpolarization in vitro and retigabine has also been shown to inhibit convulsions in vivo. This study was carried out to determine whether retigabine inhibited haloperidol-dependent activation of neurons in the striatum as measured by expression of c-Fos. Groups of male rats were treated with retigabine (10 mg/kg i.p.), haloperidol (1 mg/kg i.p.), or the two in combination (at 15 min interval) and fixed 60 min after haloperidol treatment. Haloperidol produced a large increase in the number of c-Fos-positive nuclei in different degrees in all parts of the striatum. Pretreatment with retigabine completely blocked haloperidol-induced c-Fos in both the ventral and dorsal striatum suggesting that retigabine via activation of the KCNQ channel interacts with haloperidol and inhibits neuronal excitation in the striatum.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Striatal dopaminergic D2 receptor occupancy and clinical efficacy in psychosis exacerbation: a 123I-IBZM study with ziprasidone and haloperidol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare striatal dopaminergic D2 receptor occupancy (D2 RO) induced by ziprasidone and haloperidol and its relationship with clinical response and extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) in patients with acute psychosis exacerbation. METHOD: Twenty patients hospitalized with an acute psychosis exacerbation were randomised in a single-blind study to receive either ziprasidone (80-120 mg/day) or haloperidol (5-20 mg/day) for more than 2 weeks. When stable doses were achieved, data on 123I-IBZM single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), as well as data on clinical efficacy (positive and negative symptoms scale [PANSS]) and EPS (Simpson Angus scale [SAS]), were compared between the two groups of patients. Clinical response was defined as a percentage of change of >30% in PANSS. Striatal D2 RO and clinical data were also compared between responders and nonresponders on each treatment group. RESULTS: All patients on haloperidol and four patients on ziprasidone showed EPS. Mean D2 RO was significantly higher in the haloperidol (74.7+/-3.5) than in the ziprasidone (60.2+/-14.4) group (Mann Whitney U-test [M-W U-test] 8.50; p=0.002). Five patients were responders, and five were nonresponders on each group of treatment. Haloperidol responders and nonresponders did not differ in D2 RO, duration of treatment, doses or EPS. Ziprasidone responders were on higher doses than nonresponders and showed higher D2 RO although below 74%. A positive correlation of ziprasidone D2 RO was found with dose (r Spearman 0.87; p=0.001) and with SAS scores (r Spearman 0.88; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ziprasidone induces lower D2 RO and EPS than haloperidol, which is consistent with an atypical antipsychotic profile. A direct relationship of ziprasidone D2 RO with dose, clinical efficacy and EPS has been found in this study. These data suggest that high ziprasidone doses might be more beneficial in patients with psychosis exacerbation and claim for caution regarding EPS appearance with such high dosages.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

One-year double-blind study of the neurocognitive efficacy of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in schizophrenia.

Neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia can reach 1 to 2 standard deviations below healthy controls. The comparative effect of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications on neurocognition is controversial, and based primarily on studies with small samples and large doses of typical comparator medications. The present study assessed neurocognitive efficacy. It was hypothesized that olanzapine treatment would improve neurocognitive deficits to a greater degree than either risperidone or haloperidol treatment. This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel study with neurocognition assessed at baseline, and 8, 24, and 52 weeks. Per protocol, the haloperidol arm was discontinued. Four hundred and fourteen inpatients or outpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were treated with oral olanzapine (n = 159), risperidone (n = 158), or haloperidol (n = 97). Individual domains (executive function, learning and memory, processing speed, attention/vigilance, verbal working memory, verbal fluency, motor function, and visuospatial ability) were transformed into composite scores and compared between treatment groups. At the 52-week endpoint, neurocognition significantly improved in each group (p < 0.01 for olanzapine and risperidone, p = 0.04 for haloperidol), with no significant differences between groups. Olanzapine- and risperidone-treated patients significantly (p < 0.05) improved on domains of executive function, learning/memory, processing speed, attention/vigilance, verbal working memory, and motor functions. Additionally, risperidone-treated patients improved on domains of visuospatial memory. Haloperidol-treated patients improved only on domains of learning/memory. However, patients able to remain in treatment for the entire 52 weeks benefited more from olanzapine or risperidone treatment than haloperidol treatment.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Comparison of the effects of risperidone and haloperidol on regional cerebral blood flow in schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Atypical antipsychotics, such as risperidone, have been shown to be more effective for the treatment of the symptoms of schizophrenia and have a greater beneficial effect on neurocognition compared to the conventional antipsychotics. The present study used [(15)O]H(2)O positron emission tomography imaging of regional cerebral blood flow to examine and compare the effects of haloperidol and risperidone on brain function. METHODS: Thirty-two subjects with schizophrenia participated in the study. Each subject was scanned in a medication-free state, and after being on a stable clinically assigned dose of either risperidone or haloperidol for 3 weeks. The off-medication scan was subtracted from the on-medication scan, using a within-subjects design. A randomization analysis was used to determine differences between the effects of haloperidol and risperidone on regional cerebral blood flow. RESULTS: Haloperidol was associated with a significantly greater increase in regional cerebral blood flow in the left putamen and posterior cingulate, and a significantly greater decrease in regional cerebral blood flow in frontal regions compared to risperidone. Risperidone was associated with a significantly greater decrease in regional cerebral blood flow in the cerebellum bilaterally compared to haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that risperidone and haloperidol have significantly different effects on brain function, which may be related to their differences in efficacy and side effects. Further work is required to more precisely determine the mechanisms by which different antipsychotic medications exert their therapeutic effects on the clinical symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia. These findings emphasize the importance of controlling for both medication status and the individual antipsychotic in neuroimaging studies.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Functional effects of antipsychotic drugs: comparing clozapine with haloperidol.

BACKGROUND: Using positron emission tomography (PET) with (15)O water, we compared regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) patterns induced by clozapine or haloperidol in individuals with schizophrenia. Based on the known clinical characteristics of each drug, we hypothesized that brain regions where the drugs show similar rCBF patterns are among those mediating their antipsychotic actions; whereas, regions where the drugs produce different rCBF patterns are among those mediating their different drug actions, namely, haloperidol's motor side effects or clozapine's unique therapeutic action. METHODS: Persons with schizophrenia were scanned using PET with (15)O water, first after withdrawal of all psychotropic medication (n = 6), then again after treatment with therapeutic doses of haloperidol (n = 5) or clozapine (n = 5). RESULTS: Both drugs increased rCBF in the ventral striatum and decreased rCBF in hippocampus and ventrolateral frontal cortex. The rCBF increase associated with haloperidol was greater than that with clozapine in the dorsal and ventral striatum; the rCBF increase with clozapine was greater than that with haloperidol in cortical regions, including anterior cingulate and dorsolateral frontal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the rCBF increase in ventral striatum and/or the decrease in hippocampus and/or ventrolateral frontal cortex mediate a common component of antipsychotic action of these drugs. The increased rCBF in dorsal striatum by haloperidol could well be associated with its prominent motor side effects, whereas the increased rCBF in the anterior cingulate or dorsolateral frontal cortex may mediate the superior antipsychotic action of clozapine. The proposals based on these preliminary observations require further study.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

MK-801 potentiates antidystonic effects of clozapine but not of haloperidol in mutant dystonic hamsters.

The interaction of nigrostriatal dopamine and corticostriatal glutamate plays a critical role in motor output. Recent studies in mutant dystonic hamsters (dt[sz]), an animal model of idiopathic generalized dystonia, revealed antidystonic effects of both N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, such as dizocilpine (MK-801), and of neuroleptics, such as haloperidol and clozapine. Whereas the neuroleptics reduced spontaneous locomotion at antidystonic effective doses, MK-801 caused hyperactivity in mutant hamsters. Therefore, the combination of neuroleptics and MK-801 may exhibit synergistic antidystonic effects, while the side effects may be counteracted. In order to prove this assumption, the neuroleptics haloperidol and clozapine were coadministered with MK-801 in dt(sz) hamsters in the present study. The antidystonic effects were potentiated by coadministration of MK-801 and clozapine, but not by the combination of MK-801 and haloperidol. The coadministration of MK-801 and clozapine did not cause severe side effects, such as catalepsy in dystonic hamsters. In contrast to the well-documented reverse of haloperidol-induced catalepsy by MK-801 in rats, in mutant hamsters, catalepsy was increased by coadministration of haloperidol and MK-801. This unexpected finding could be due to pathophysiological brain alterations in dt(sz) hamsters, because in non-dystonic control hamsters, combined treatment with MK-801 and haloperidol did not cause cataleptogenic effects.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Possible involvement of prostaglandins in haloperidol-induced orofacial dyskinesia in rats.

Dopaminergic abnormality is one of the pathological mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of tardive dyskinesia, a late complication of neuroleptic treatment. Prostaglandins modulate the dopamine release in the striatum, the principle area involved in the pathophysiology of tardive dyskinesia. Rats were chronically treated with haloperidol (HPD) (1.5 mg/kg) for a period of 21 days, to induce orofacial dyskinesia. Behavioural assessment of orofacial dyskinesia was done 24 h after the last dose of haloperidol. Catalepsy was induced in rats by acute treatment with haloperidol (1 mg/kg), and catalepsy was scored for the next 4 h. Chronic haloperidol treatment induced profound vacuous chewing movements in rats. Indomethacin, a nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitor dose-dependently (5-20 mg/kg) suppressed the vacuous chewing movements count in haloperidol-treated animals. In conclusion, the results of the present study infer that prostaglandins might play a significant role in the haloperidol-induced vacuous chewing movements, and prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors can serve as novel drug candidates for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Differential effect of haloperidol on release of neurotensin in extrapyramidal and limbic systems.

The effect of the antipsychotic drug haloperidol on extracellular neurotensin-like immunoreactivity was investigated by microdialysis and compared with the time-dependent response of tissue neurotensin-like immunoreactivity content in brain structures containing dopamine nerve cell bodies and terminals. A single administration of haloperidol (1 mg/kg) increased the extracellular neurotensin-like immunoreactivity levels in nucleus accumbens as measured by microdialysis, but decreased its extracellular concentration in the caudate regions surrounding the probe. The same treatment increased the tissue content of neurotensin-like immunoreactivity in both the nucleus accumbens core and all caudate regions examined within 24 h after the injection. Interestingly, although the neurotensin-like immunoreactivity concentration in the substantia nigra was not altered by the haloperidol treatment, neurotensin-like immunoreactivity levels decreased significantly in the ventral tegmental area. These findings suggest that varied neurotensin systems are associated with nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopamine pathways and these systems have different responses to haloperidol. The changes in the release of neurotensin may contribute to altered caudate and accumbens neurotensin-like immunoreactivity tissue content induced by haloperidol treatment, but other factors, such as variation in synthesis also likely influence these effects. Differential actions of haloperidol on neurotensin release might be due to regional differences in dopamine or sigma receptor subtypes associated with the neurotensin-containing neurons.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Haloperidol-induced changes in glutathione and energy metabolism: effect of nicergoline.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible effects of nicergoline, a semisynthetic ergot derivative, on the biochemical changes observed during chronic treatment with haloperidol in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Chronic treatment with haloperidol induced a significant decrease in the cellular glutathione (GSH) content in selected areas of the brain (cerebellum, striatum and cortex) and in the liver. Prolonged nicergoline administration was able to antagonize the haloperidol-induced GSH decrease, maintaining the GSH concentration at levels comparable to those observed in the control group. Analysis of the energy charge revealed changes similar to those observed for GSH: haloperidol induced a significant decrease in ATP and energy charge that was completely reversed by repeated nicergoline administration. In conclusion, chronic treatment with the classical antipsychotic haloperidol induces profound biochemical changes in the brain and in the liver. Nicergoline treatment is able to counteract the haloperidol-induced decrease in GSH levels and energy charge, suggesting a potential role of the drug in the treatment of neuroleptic-induced side effects.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Risperidone versus haloperidol: II. Cost-effectiveness.

Australia and Canada are currently the only Western nations with government guidelines for analyzing the cost-effectiveness of drugs. We used guidelines issued by the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee to construct a model for comparing the cost-effectiveness of risperidone and haloperidol over a 2-year period in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Use of clozapine was also included in the analysis as an alternative treatment given to patients who proved unresponsive to therapy with haloperidol or risperidone. Results are expressed in Australian dollars. Cost-effectiveness was determined by using decision-analytic modeling to compare clinical outcomes and costs. The analytic model contained a decision tree for each of the compared agents that tracked the distribution of patients between treatment outcome pathways (i.e., scenarios). Distributions were based on probabilities derived from our meta-analysis results reported elsewhere and from other sources. Each scenario had an associated monetary cost that included all significant direct costs (i.e., hospital costs; outpatient costs; and the cost of drugs, the services of health care professionals, and government-subsidized hostel accommodation). The cost for a given outcome was the sum of costs for all scenarios leading to that outcome. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the total cost per favorable outcome. The definition of a favorable outcome was one in which the patient was in a response phase at the end of the 2-year period. The probability of a patient experiencing a favorable outcome at the end of 2 years was 78.9% for risperidone versus 58.9% for haloperidol. The total cost of treatment for 2 years was $15,549.00 for risperidone versus $18,332.00 for haloperidol. The expected cost per favorable outcome was $19,709.00 for risperidone and $31,104.00 for haloperidol. Risperidone was more cost-effective than haloperidol and therefore was "dominant" in pharmacoeconomic terms because it produced a higher proportion of favorable outcomes at lower cost. Sensitivity analysis showed that the difference in clinical response rate was a key determinant of cost-effectiveness.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed2004

The adenosine A2A antagonist KF17837 reverses the locomotor suppression and tremulous jaw movements induced by haloperidol in rats: possible relevance to parkinsonism.

Recent evidence indicates that adenosine A2A receptors modulate the activity of striatal neurons, and that antagonists of this receptor may have actions in various animal models related to motor function. Four experiments were conducted to study the effects of systemic injections of the adenosine A2A antagonist KF17837 on the behavioral effects produced by repeated administration of the dopamine (DA) antagonist haloperidol. In the first two experiments, it was shown that repeated 0.5 mg/kg haloperidol severely suppressed open-field locomotor activity, and that KF17837 (0.0-20.0 mg/kg) did not significantly increase open-field locomotor activity. The third experiment demonstrated that injections of KF17837 (0.0-20.0 mg/kg) completely reversed the suppression of locomotion induced by haloperidol, and also increased rearing behavior in haloperidol-treated rats. Previous research has reported that haloperidol induces tremulous jaw movements that have many of the characteristics of parkinsonian tremor. The fourth experiment demonstrated that i.p. injections of KF17837 (0.0-20.0 mg/kg) also suppressed haloperidol-induced tremulous jaw movements. Taken together, the results of these experiments indicate that adenosine A2A antagonism can reverse the locomotor suppression and tremulous movements induced by DA antagonism. This profile of activity is consistent with the hypothesis that antagonism of adenosine A2A receptors can result in an antiparkinsonian effect in animal models.

Adenosine A2 Receptor Antagonists↗

PubMed1996

Effect of haloperidol on the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca-dependent adenosine triphosphatase.

Several effects of the neuroleptic agent haloperidol on the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca-dependent adenosine triphosphatase (Ca-ATPase) and Ca transport are described. Haloperidol inhibits the Ca-ATPase activity in the presence of calcimycin. The effect depends on the conditions of preexposure of the membranes to the drug: the inhibition increases with the preincubation time; Ca and Mg protect the enzyme against the effect of the drug. The inhibitory effect of haloperidol decreases upon increasing [Ca2+], at constant [Mg], and disappears at 20 mM [Mg] for any [Ca2+], and at 0.5 mM [Ca2+] for any [Mg2+]. Haloperidol also inhibits phosphorylation of the enzyme by Pi, and ATP-dependent Ca2+ uptake, in both cases with apparent Ki = 0.10-0.15 mM, and increases the rate of Ca efflux from preloaded vesicles in this concentration range. The results suggest that haloperidol interacts with the catalytic site, interfering with the effect of the divalent catalytic cation, but not at other steps of the enzymatic cycle, where Mg2+ and Ca2+ are also activators. They are consistent with a reaction model where haloperidol interacts with the E2 conformers of the enzyme, with lower affinity for the phosphoenzyme than for the dephospho species. The inhibition of Ca uptake by SR vesicles is ascribed to an increased Ca2+ permeability rather than to the inhibition of the Ca-ATPase, which requires higher concentrations of the drug.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

L-prolyl-l-leucyl-glycinamide and its peptidomimetic analog 3(R)-[(2(S)-pyrrolidylcarbonyl)amino]-2-oxo-1-pyrrolidineacetamide (PAOPA) attenuate haloperidol-induced c-fos expression in the striatum.

Acute treatment of rats with haloperidol results in a rapid and transient increase in striatal c-fos mRNA and Fos immunoreactivity. The induction of immediate early genes by haloperidol may be involved in the development of extrapyramidal side effects. L-Prolyl-L-leucyl-glycinamide (PLG, or MIF-1) has been observed to antagonize the development of haloperidol-induced D(2) receptor supersensitivity in rats. We investigated the modulatory effects of PLG on haloperidol-induced c-fos and Fos protein expression in the rat striatum. We report that coadministration of either PLG or the potent analog of PLG, 3(R)-[(2(S)-pyrrolidylcarbonyl)amino]-2-oxo-1-pyrrolidineacetam ide (PAOPA), attenuated haloperidol-induced c-fos and Fos expression. Haloperidol induced [2 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)] c-fos and Fos expression by 500% and 100%, respectively. These responses were attenuated by 170% and 75%, respectively, when coadministered with PLG (20 mg/kg, i.p.) or by 79% by PAOPA (10 microg/kg, i.p.).

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Olanzapine vs. haloperidol in the treatment of elderly chronic schizophrenia patients.

OBJECTIVE: Most of the data supporting the use of atypical antipsychotics (AA) is based on studies in young adult patients. The present study is an open-label naturalistic follow-up study of olanzapine treatment vs. haloperidol for elderly chronic schizophrenia patients. MEHTOD: 20 patients (mean age 72.7+/-5.9 years, mean disease duration 33.1+/-12.0 years) who met the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia were randomly assigned to olanzapine (n=10) or haloperidol (n=10) treatment during acute exacerbation. Primary outcome measure was rating on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale and the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS). RESULTS: Between-group differences were computed using analysis of covariance. PANSS Total score decreased from 84 at baseline to 65 after treatment with olanzapine while decreased only from 79 to 74 with haloperidol treatment (F= 6.66, P=.02). PANSS Negative subscale decreased from 19 at baseline to 15 with olanzapine treatment while increased (deteriorated) from 18 to 20 with haloperidol treatment (F=23.37, P=.0003). CGI decreased from baseline with both olanzapine and haloperidol treatments (1.1 vs. 0.4) but the decrease in the olanzapine group was significantly greater (F=4.63, P=.05). Mean weight increased in both groups but without statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly chronic schizophrenia patients, olanzapine treatment is superior to haloperidol in reducing negative symptoms as well as less induction of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS).

Aged↗