SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “Reimbursement, Incentive”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Verification of self-reported asthma and allergy in subjects and their family members volunteering for gene mapping studies.
Studies which aim at mapping genes contributing to the development of asthma and atopy demand that hundreds of patients and their family members be assessed. In Finland, the Social Insurance Institution (SII) grants substantial reimbursement for medication to all patients who meet diagnostic criteria of asthma, which include a history of asthmatic symptoms and a measured reversibility of bronchial obstruction. To recruit a large number of asthma patients efficiently in a short period of time, we took advantage of the national reimbursement procedure and retrospectively collective data on patients' medical history and lung function test results at the time of diagnosis. First, we wanted to investigate if the reimbursements could be regarded as objective verification for self-reported asthma. Altogether 335 adult self-reported asthma patients were evaluated, 87% of them were verified as having chronic asthma. Reimbursement for medication showed a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 76% for verified asthma. Second, we were interested to see if self-reported nasal allergic symptoms or self-reported physician diagnosed allergic rhinitis were sensitive and specific measures of allergy. The self-reported allergic nasal symptoms had a poor specificity (31% in the proband group and 59% in the family members group) when compared to the allergy screening test (Phadiatop). The best verification for self-reported asthma was achieved by combining the information on self-reported disease, granted reimbursement by the SII and the medical records. For allergies, the specificity of self-reporting was far too low to be used alone, and a positive allergy screening test together with relevant symptoms was chosen as a marker of allergy.
Are hospital quality improvement and public accountability compatible?
BACKGROUND: The goals of public accountability and quality improvement are compatible in theory but not necessarily in practice. Both concepts emphasize the customer. However, those working toward these two goals design systems with quite different roles and relationships between the providers and consumers of health care. Superficial interactions obstruct meaningful dialogue about how to build a better system meeting both sets of goals. ISSUES: Current practices of public accountability and quality improvement have fundamentally different paradigms concerning the roles and responsibilities of those who provide and those who consume health care. CONCLUSIONS: There are at least three ways to improve the current relationship between public accountability and quality improvement. First, optimizing the design and performance of each effort would be an improvement since the goals are highly compatible. Neither ideal currently meets its own expectations, creating distrust among the proponents of each when reality falls short. Second, the two efforts could be coordinated through joint community-level planning and sharing. Finally and optimally, the two concepts could be made part of the same community-level cooperative system, an approach that offers the greatest opportunity for achieving shared goals.
Costs and reimbursement of long-term ventilation.
Patients receiving long-term mechanical ventilation present a serious financial challenge to hospitals. Depending on the case mix in a particular hospital of Medicare, Medicaid, managed-care contract, and fully insured patients, the financial picture in most hospitals is bleak. Depending on the level of state Medicaid reimbursement, Medicaid losses on these patients vary. Because acute care hospitals cannot be reimbursed for chronic ventilator units, hospitals have resorted to leasing space to separate entities, which, when separately incorporated, accredited, and staffed, can secure waivered status from the PPS and can be paid at a per diem rate based on their costs. Hospital patients who are ventilator dependent can be transferred to these PPS-waived units. There are states where no chronic ventilator facilities exist and where nursing homes do not accept ventilator-dependent patients. This situation is serious for the hospital if the patient does not have caregivers at home who are capable of caring for a ventilator-dependent patient. The problem of the large numbers of patients who are ventilated mechanically with endotracheal tubes but who do not fall into MDC 4 needs to be addressed by Medicare. Medicare needs to evaluate the cost and use of NIV in ICU practice and develop a system to reimburse for this modality at a reasonable level under Part A.
Subsidized in-vitro fertilization treatment and the effect on the number of egg sharers.
Egg sharing remains a controversial practice, mainly because of the presumed element of payment. In order to find out to what extent financial considerations motivated the women to share their oocytes, the data on egg sharing in Belgium are analysed. Belgium began providing full reimbursement for six in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles on 1 July 2003. Since this date, the numbers of egg sharers dropped approximately 70%. Although these data show that a large number of the donors were mainly motivated by the reduced cost of IVF, it cannot be concluded that money was the only motive to share. Nevertheless, to increase voluntary consent by egg sharers, public funding for infertility treatment should be provided.
Using a market model to track advances in patient safety.
The author proposes a four-stage model that may help hospitals and other health care providers recognize and anticipate market drivers of patient safety.
Compensatory payments and vasectomy acceptance in urban Sri Lanka.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The importance of trust for ethics, law, and public policy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Healthcare ethics: a patient-centered decision model.
A common financial model used in business decisions is the cost/benefit comparison. The costs of a proposed project are compared with the benefits, and if the benefits outweigh the costs, the project is accepted; if the costs exceed the benefits, the project is rejected. This model is applicable when tangible costs and benefits can be reasonably measured in monetary units. However, it is difficult to consider intangible factors in this model because intangible factors cannot be readily quantified in money. While some might argue that the financial model should not apply to healthcare decisions, the fact is that costs do enter into the picture. People may decide to forego needed healthcare because they cannot afford it. Healthcare providers may make choices based in part on the costs of diagnosis and treatment, rather than solely on medical information and what is best for the patient. Should financial issues enter into healthcare decisions--decisions about human health and well being? If so, how should the costs and benefits be measured and evaluated? What are some ethical issues and dilemmas involved in such decisions. This paper addresses ethical dilemmas and financial issues in healthcare. A healthcare decision model, which considers medical information, financial information, as well as ethical and other intangible factors, is proposed.
Improving organ retrieval rates: various proposals and their ethical validity.
The current global shortage of organs has prompted a series of proposals for improving organ retrieval rates. They include preferred recipient status for registered organ donors, payment for organs, presumed consent and required response. This paper examines the tenability of these proposals and points out their shortcomings. Taking the Canadian situation as an example, it argues further that the shortage is exacerbated by unethical and essentially illegal retrieval protocols that flout the law of informed consent. It is suggested that before any redrafting of laws and regulations is undertaken, these protocols should be revised.
Using auctions for contracting with hospitals when quality matters.
This paper analyzes the problem of contracting with hospitals with hidden information when the number of patients wanting treatment depends on the quality of health care services offered. The optimal policy is characterized in the case of a single hospital. It is demonstrated that the regulator can reduce the information rent by decreasing the quality. When the regulator is assumed to be able to organize an auction for awarding the right to provide the service, we characterize the optimal auction and the first score tendering procedure implementing it. The regulator can reimburse a unit price per treated patient and let the hospital choose the level of quality. It is proved that the expected quality of health care services is greater and the expected payment is lower than in the monopoly case.
Payment of research subjects involved in clinical trials is unethical.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Financing results and value in behavioral health services.
Current changes require that behavioral health care leaders understand how public and private financing mechanisms interact and how, now more than ever, behavioral health care leadership must span multiple systems and financing streams. Understanding how financing mechanisms work, what they create, and what they cause is essential if we are to make the most of increasingly limited and increasingly complex resource streams in today's health care market. This article explores a different paradigm of what adds value to publicly funded behavioral health care systems, and provides the framework for the American College of Mental Health Administration's call to behavioral health care administrators to take a new approach to the considerations behind funding decisions and payment mechanisms.
Rewarding results: Improving the quality of treatment for people with alcohol and drug problems.
Substance use disorders are the nation's number one health problem, and lie at the root of many public safety and workplace issues. Improving quality of treatment is as important as improving access to treatment. Leadership for improvement must come from many sources: Congress, SAMHSA, state legislatures, state and local treatment agencies, criminal justice, welfare and other public agencies, employers and managed care organizations, providers, and community leaders. We hope that our report helps leaders see ways to improve treatment quality. Our recommendations can be summed up in a single phrase: reward results. We recognize that there are many avenues for treatment quality improvement, including training, credentialing, best practice dissemination, work force development, facility licensing standards, improvement and implementation of new models for treatment of dual diagnosis patients. We believe, however, that rewarding results is essential to motivating action for improvement. We also believe that if providers receive rewards for improved results, they will creatively open new avenues for improvement--a focus on results gives greater freedom than more detailed mandates for change. Finally, we believe that rewards for result may lead to a restructured treatment system with greater stability and correspondingly greater capacity to improve. While we have placed central emphasis on the role of institutional buyers and managers of care, we believe that the voices of patients and families must be heard. People who have progressed to the stage of recovery, and their families, often have essential insight into what did and did not work for them--their personal stories are frequently compelling and persuasive. We also believe that providers of treatment for substance use disorders are profoundly committed to serving their patients, and often have great understanding of what works. Wise managers will listen very carefully and systematically to the voices of consumers, their families, and their providers. We have advocated that buyers reward results as a central strategy for improving quality. We believe that this is the best long-term strategy, not only to effect quality improvement, but also to end stigmatization and increase resources. We wish, in closing, to reemphasize our shared beliefs that adequate resources are essential, that treating persons with substance use disorders is always emotionally challenging and often profoundly frustrating and alienating, and that those on the front line deserve our unequivocal support and our profound gratitude for their service. Legislators should adequately fund public treatment and mandate parity in insurance reimbursement for treatment of substance use disorders.
General dental practitioners' beliefs on the perceived effects of and their preferences for remuneration mechanisms.
OBJECTIVE: To identify GDPs preferences for differing remuneration mechanisms and their beliefs on the effect of the mechanisms in care provision. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey of 300 GDPs holding an NHS contract with a London Health Authority. RESULTS: GDPs perceive that remuneration mechanisms are important in determining the provision of care but not overall disease levels. There were differences in the preferred remuneration mechanisms when working under the NHS compared with the non-NHS sector. When providing care under the NHS, either the current remuneration system or a salaried plus bonus would be the preferred choice, while for non-NHS care a fee-per-item mechanism is preferred. Fee-per-item arrangement was the preferred choice of younger general practitioners compared with older practitioners. Females showed a greater preference for a salaried with bonus arrangement compared with males. CONCLUSIONS: If policy makers are to use remuneration mechanisms to influence the provision of care effectively, the beliefs that care providers hold about various mechanisms are important to understand how they would respond to changes in the system.
Long-term care reform in Alberta, Canada. Alberta's resident classification system: fact, fiction and future prospects.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Remuneration for blood donation and attitudes towards blood donation and receipt in Leeds.
In a survey of attitudes towards remuneration for blood donation in Leeds, the following questions were completed by 489 adults (N), of whom 89 were regular donors, 105 were lapsed donors and 295 had never donated: 'If you needed blood, would you be content if the donor had been paid: yes/no'. 'If I were paid enough I would be less/equally/more likely to donate blood '. The majority (67.7%) of potential recipients would be content if the donor had been paid. The prospect of remuneration made 16.4% of respondents more likely and 14.5% less likely to donate. As the difference is less than 2% of N, offering remuneration may not lead to a significant increase in the number of donations. A statistical comparison (chi2 = 45, d.f. = 2, P << 0.001) showed associations between the responses 'more likely to donate if paid' and 'content to receive blood from a paid donor', and between the responses 'less likely to donate if paid' and 'not content to receive blood from a paid donor'. Age distributions are presented for the donor status categories and the responses to the main questions. Of 129 people who stated a minimum, nonzero payment that would persuade them to donate, 103 (80%) suggested pound sterling 10 or less.
Where have all the donors gone? A personal reflection on the crisis in America's volunteer blood program.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.