PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34Linked to original sources

APC activators caught by their tails?

The complexity of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex (APC), the major ubiquitin ligase in mitotic control, has been puzzling investigators ever since its discovery. Recent biochemical and genetic studies have now provided insights not only into the architecture of the complex, but also into how activators are recruited to the APC. In this article, we discuss the implications of these findings on our current understanding of APC activation.

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome↗

The acidic tail domain of human Cdc34 is required for p27Kip1 ubiquitination and complementation of a cdc34 temperature sensitive yeast strain.

Human Cdc34 is an ubiquitin conjugating enzyme or E2 that ubiquitinates substrates including p27(Kip1), IkappaBalpha, Wee1, and MyoD. Cdc34 possesses a core catalytic domain encoding the active site cysteine and an acidic tail domain within the carboxyl terminal 36 amino acids. Studies suggest that Cdc34 is phosphorylated in mammalian cells at 5 potential residues within the tail domain. In order to study the biological significance of the Cdc34 acidic tail domain and the possible significance of phosphorylation within this region, we tested the ability of human Cdc34 mutants to complement the cdc34-2 temperature sensitive (ts) strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Our studies indicated that complementation of the cdc34-2 ts strain was critically dependent upon the carboxyl-terminal 36 amino acids of human Cdc34, but did not require phosphorylation of human Cdc34 residues S203, S222, S231, T233, and S236. Further studies demonstrated that although a Cdc34 mutant bearing a deletion of the C-terminal 36 amino acids (Cdc34 1-200) was efficiently charged with ubiquitin by E1, it was severely reduced for the ability to ubiquitinate p27(Kip1) in vitro compared to wildtype Cdc34. Both in vivo and in vitro binding studies indicated that Cdc34 1-200 bound to the E3-SCF components, Cul1 and Roc1, at levels comparable to the wildtype Cdc34. These studies suggest that the 36 amino acid acidic tail domain of human Cdc34 is critical for its ability to transfer ubiquitin to a substrate and is dispensable for the association of Cdc34 with Cul1 and Roc1. We postulate that the tail domain of Cdc34 may be important for its efficient dissociation from Cul1 and Roc1, an essential requirement for ubiquitination by the budding yeast Cdc34p, or it may be required more directly for ubiquitin transfer to the substrate.

Acids↗

Human cytomegalovirus inactivates the G0/G1-APC/C ubiquitin ligase by Cdh1 dissociation.

The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets regulators of the cell division cycle for degradation by the 26S proteasome. Discovered as a key regulator of mitosis, the APC/C has more recently been recognized to also play a limiting role in the control of G(0) maintenance, G(1)/S-transition and DNA-replication. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has been shown to interfere with cell cycle regulation at different levels. It can induce an S phase-prone proliferation program in quiescent cells but at the same time this virus directly inhibits competitive cellular DNA replication. Here we show, that human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) inactivates the G(0)/G(1) APC/C rapidly after infection of quiescent fibroblasts, resulting in the untimely stabilization of APC/C substrates. APC/C inactivation is caused by the dissociation of its positive regulator, Cdh1. Surprisingly, this dissociation is independent from known Cdh1 inhibitors, Emi1 and Cyclin A, suggesting that APC/C-Cdh1 inhibition by HCMV is directly caused by a viral protein or an intermediate cellular factor distinct from Emi1 and Cyclin A. Thus, upon infection of quiescent cells HCMV not only activates the E2F-dependent G(1)/S transcription program but also facilitates protein accumulation of APC/C substrates by rapid Cdh1 dissociation.

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome↗

High-risk but not low-risk HPV E2 proteins bind to the APC activators Cdh1 and Cdc20 and cause genomic instability.

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) from the high-risk group are associated with cervical cancer, in contrast to HPVs from the low-risk group which are associated with benign lesions of the genital tract. Here, we show that high-risk, but not low-risk HPV E2 proteins, promote a mitotic block, often followed by metaphase-specific apoptosis, and which is independent of the viral oncogenes E6 and E7. High-risk HPV E2-expressing cells also show polyploidy, chromosomal mis-segregation and centrosome amplification leading to genomic instability. We link these defects to a specific and unusually strong interaction between high-risk E2 and both Cdc20 and Cdh1, two activators of the Anaphase Promoting Complex (APC), abnormal localization of Cdh1, and accumulation of APC substrates like cyclin B, in vivo. The finding that high-risk, but not low-risk HPV E2 proteins, induce genomic instability, raises the intriguing possibility that E2 proteins play a role in the oncogenic potential of high-risk papillomaviruses.

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome↗

Anaphase promoting complex or cyclosome?

The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) was initially described as a multi-subunit protein complex that ubiquitinates anaphase inhibitors thus targeting them for destruction by proteasomes to initiate loss of sister chromatid cohesion. However, recent studies have identified important new functions of the APC/C. Moreover, sister centromere separation can occur in the absence of APC/C activity in mammals, indicating that anaphase onset might be triggered by multiple factors. Here we discuss whether the APC/C functions primarily as the anaphase trigger, or whether it has more general properties, relevant for cell cycle control at multiple developmental and cell cycle stages. Additionally, we discuss the validity of the APC-dependent model for sister segregation in mammals.

Anaphase↗

Evidence that the yeast spindle assembly checkpoint has a target other than the anaphase promoting complex.

The spindle assembly checkpoint monitors biorientation of chromosomes on the metaphase spindle and inhibits the Anaphase Promoting Complex (APC) specificity factor Cdc20. If APC-Cdc20 is the sole target of the spindle checkpoint, then cells lacking APC and its targets, B-type cyclin and securin, would lack spindle checkpoint function. We tested this hypothesis in yeast cells that are APC-null. Surprisingly, we find that such yeast cells are able to activate the spindle assembly checkpoint, delaying cell cycle progression in G2/M phase. These data suggest that the spindle checkpoint has a non-APC target that can restrain anaphase onset.

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome↗

Regulated separation of sister centromeres depends on the spindle assembly checkpoint but not on the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome.

Key to faithful genetic inheritance is the cohesion between sister centromeres that physically links replicated sister chromatids and is then abruptly lost at the onset of anaphase. Misregulated cohesion causes aneuploidy, birth defects and perhaps initiates cancers. Loss of centromere cohesion is controlled by the spindle checkpoint and is thought to depend on a ubiquitin ligase, the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC). But here we present evidence that the APC pathway is dispensable for centromere separation at anaphase in mammals, and that anaphase proceeds in the presence of cyclin B and securin. Arm separation is perturbed in the absence of APC, compromising the fidelity of segregation, but full sister chromatid separation is achieved after a delayed anaphase. Thereafter, cells arrest terminally in telophase with high levels of cyclin B. Extending these findings we provide evidence that the spindle checkpoint regulates centromere cohesion through an APC-independent pathway. We propose that this Centromere Linkage Pathway (CLiP) is a second branch that stems from the spindle checkpoint to regulate cohesion preferentially at the centromeres and that Sgo1 is one of its components.

Anaphase↗

Emi1 class of proteins regulate entry into meiosis and the meiosis I to meiosis II transition in Xenopus oocytes.

Xenopus oocytes are arrested at the G2/prophase boundary of meiosis I and enter meiosis in response to progesterone. A hallmark of meiosis is the absence of DNA replication between the successive cell division phases meiosis I (MI) and meiosis II (MII). After the MI-MII transition, Xenopus eggs are locked in metaphase II by the cytostatic factor (CSF) arrest to prevent parthenogenesis. Early Mitotic Inhibitor 1 (Emi1) maintains CSF arrest by inhibiting the ability of the Anaphase Promoting Complex (APC) to direct the destruction of cyclin B. To investigate whether Emi1 has an earlier role in meiosis, we injected Xenopus oocytes with neutralizing antibodies against Emi1 at G2/prophase and during the MI-MII transition. Progesterone-treated G2/prophase oocytes injected with anti-Emi1 antibody fail to activate Maturation Promoting Factor (MPF), a complex of cdc2/cyclin B, and the MAPK pathway, and do not undergo germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD). Injection of purified Delta90 cyclin B protein or blocking anti-Emi1 antibody with purified Emi1 protein rescues these meiotic processes in Emi1-neutralized oocytes. Acute inhibition of Emi1 in progesterone treated oocytes immediately after GVBD causes rapid loss of cdc2 activity with simultaneous loss of cyclin B levels and inactivation of the MAPK pathway. These oocytes decondense their chromosomes and enter a DNA replication phase instead of progressing to MII. Prior ablation of Cdc20, addition of methyl-ubiquitin, or addition of nondestructible Delta90 cyclin B rescues the MI-MII transition in Emi1-inhibited oocytes.

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome↗

Restaging the spindle assembly checkpoint in female mammalian meiosis I.

In mammalian somatic cells, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is indispensable for ensuring the fidelity of chromosome segregation by delaying cell-cycle progression in the face of even a single misaligned chromosome. In contrast, the role of the SAC in unperturbed mammalian oocytes is less well defined as progression through meiosis I is unaltered in mouse oocytes in the presence of one or a few misaligned chromosomes. Furthermore, attempts to disable the function of the SAC protein, Mad2, in mouse oocytes have produced conflicting results. To gain further insight into SAC function during female mammalian meiosis I, we recently utilised a morpholino-based antisense approach to deplete the majority of Mad2 in mouse oocytes. Our results define a clear role for Mad2 in ensuring the proper timing of meiosis I events and ultimately, in ensuring the fidelity of homologue disjunction. We discuss the implications of these results for the regulation of meiosis I in mammalian oocytes and for the genesis of human aneuploidy.

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome↗

Sororin, the cell cycle and sister chromatid cohesion.

Sister chromatid cohesion is essential for the maintenance of genome integrity. Errors in regulation of cohesion result in increased sensitivity to DNA damage, mis-segregation of chromosomes, and loss of genetic information. We recently showed that sororin is an essential regulator of sister chromatid cohesion in vertebrates. Interestingly, we identified sororin in a screen for proteins whose levels are controlled by the Anaphase Promoting Complex (APC), a cell cycle-regulated ubiquitin ligase. Ubiquitination by the APC and the resulting degradation ensure that sororin levels are low throughout G1 and only rise during S phase. We speculate that this regulation is an essential part of the mechanism that ensures that cohesion is established only after there are in fact two sister chromatids to tie together. Cohesion thus established can then be used both to mediate recombinational DNA repair, as well as to ensure accurate sister chromatid segregation in anaphase. Both of these roles are essential to genome stability.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Involvement of the SCF complex in the control of Cdh1 degradation in S-phase.

The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is a multisubunit ubiquitin ligase that acts as a key regulator in the progression through mitosis (when mostly in complex with Cdc20) and as a stabilizer of the G1 phase (when in complex with Cdh1). Cdh1 is an activator of APC/C, and it has previously been reported that it is capable of mediating its own degradation during Go and G1. Herein, we show that the SCF complex (Skp1/Cul1/F-box protein/Roc1) intervenes in the surveillance of Cdh1 cellular abundance in S-phase.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

Overexpression of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome inhibitor Emi1 leads to tetraploidy and genomic instability of p53-deficient cells.

The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that controls the cell cycle by directing the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of S-phase and mitosis promoting factors. Emi1 is an E2F transcriptional target that drives cell cycle progression from G1/S through early mitosis by inhibiting the APC/C's ubiquitin ligase activity, and thus facilitates accumulation of APC/C substrates. Using cell culture model systems, we found that Emi1 overexpression leads to proliferation, tetraploidy and genome instability of cells deficient for p53. We propose that loss of pRb repression of E2F-mediated transcription causing misregulation of Emi1 and APC/C substrates results in the generation of tetraploidy and proliferation of genomically unstable cells in the absence of normal p53 function. This represents a potentially important mechanism by which pRb and p53 dysfunction may contribute to tumorigenesis through the generation of genomic instability.

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome↗

APC/C-mediated degradation in early mitosis: how to avoid spindle assembly checkpoint inhibition.

The APC/C is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that, by targeting substrates for proteasomal degradation, plays a major role in cell cycle control. In complex with one of two WD40 activator proteins, Cdc20 or Cdh1, the APC/C is active from early mitosis through to late G1 and during this time targets many critical regulators of the cell cycle for degradation. However, this destruction is carefully ordered to ensure that cell cycle events are executed in a timely fashion. Recent studies have begun to shed light on how the APC/C selects different substrates at different times in the cell cycle. One particular problem is how the APC/C recognizes its first set of substrates, Nek2A and cyclin A, in early mitosis when, at this time, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) inhibits most APC/C-dependent degradation. The answer may lie in how substrates are recruited to the APC/C. While checkpoint-dependent substrates appear to require Cdc20 for recruitment, experiments on the early mitotic substrate Nek2A demonstrate that it can bind the APC/C in the absence of Cdc20. The direct interaction of substrates with core subunits of the APC/C could allow their degradation to proceed unhindered even when the SAC is active.

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome↗

The Arabidopsis anaphase promoting complex (APC): regulation through subunit availability in plant tissues.

Sister-chromatid separation and exit from mitosis require ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of cell cycle regulators such as cyclin B and securin. The specificity of the reaction is controlled by an ubiquitin-ligase multiprotein complex known as APC (Anaphase Promoting Complex). Comparison of the coding sequences of Arabidopsis genes with the Genbank database reveals extensive homology of the predicted ORFs with the corresponding proteins of other eukaryotes, indicating that the APC is well conserved in plants. However, different from other eukaryotes, the Arabidopsis genes have some particular characteristics, such as the presence of two copies of the CDC27 gene. Furthermore, expression analyses of the AtAPC genes disclose complex profiles that differ, depending on the tissue examined. In actively dividing cell suspensions there is a direct correspondence between the rates of proliferation and mRNA levels from the AtAPC components. On the other hand, in plant organs, dark-grown seedlings and during leaf growth, this correlation is lost and the AtAPC genes are highly expressed in tissues with low overall cell division. Moreover, expression patterns diverge between the subunit genes, raising the possibility that there could be more than one form of the APC, which would execute distinct functions during plant development. The results suggest that an important layer of regulation of APC/C in plants could operate through subunit availability in specific tissues and/or cellular compartments.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Before and after the spindle assembly checkpoint--an APC/C point of view.

On May 17-21, 2006 the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory meeting on the cell cycle reunited over 350 researchers to discuss new findings in the cell cycle field. A common thread that connected numerous presentations was the regulation of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). This was also the main theme of the lecture given by the keynote speaker, Marc Kirschner (Harvard), who talked about "The unexpected importance of UbcH10 in both the G(1)/S transition and the initiation of anaphase", and it is also the main focus in this summary.

Anaphase↗

Human PIF helicase is cell cycle regulated and associates with telomerase.

The evolutionarily conserved PIF1 DNA helicase family is important for the maintenance of genome stability in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. There are two PIF1 family helicases in S. cerevisiae, Pif1p and Rrm3p that both possess 5'-->3' DNA helicase activity but maintain unique functions in telomerase regulation and semi-conservative DNA replication. Database analysis shows that the PIF1 helicase family is represented by a single homologue in higher eukaryotes. To analyze the function of PIF1 homologues in mammals, we cloned the full length human PIF (hPIF) cDNA. Comparison of hPIF with its S. cerevisiae homologues showed that human PIF is equally similar to Pif1p and Rrm3p. Human PIF was expressed at low levels in a variety of tissues and immunofluorescence analysis showed that ectopic hPIF was localized to nuclear foci. hPIF was expressed in late S/G2 phase of the cell cycle and this cell cycle regulated abundance was conferred by both cell cycle regulated mRNA accumulation and ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Furthermore, hPIF is likely a target of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome as its abundance was decreased when an activator of the APC/C was overexpressed. Finally, antibodies against hPIF immunoprecipitated telomerase activity from human cell lines, and we have observed a physical interaction between hPIF and the catalytic subunit of telomerase, hTERT. Our data suggest that human PIF, like S. cerevisiae Pif1p, plays a role in telomerase regulation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Preventing fatal destruction: inhibitors of the anaphase-promoting complex in meiosis.

The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is a multi-subunit ubiquitin-ligase whose major functions in the cell cycle are the initiation of sister chromatid separation and the inactivation of cyclin-dependent kinases. This complex is also essential for meiosis, a specialized form of the cell cycle characterized by two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation. To ensure a proper meiotic cell cycle, the activity of APC/C needs to be tightly controlled. It is now evident that inhibitors of APC/C play pivotal roles to avert its untimely activation. During prophase I, this ubiquitin-ligase must be kept inactive to prevent precocious sister chromatid separation. Studies in yeast showed that this inhibition is mediated by a specific subunit of the complex. Accurate chromosome segregation in meiosis I depends on spindle checkpoint proteins such as Mad2 which delay APC/C activation in response to an erroneous spindle attachment of chromosomes. Additional APC/C antagonists are known to block complete cyclin destruction between meiosis I and II, thereby ensuring that cyclin dependent kinases remain active and that DNA replication does not occur. Inhibitors of APC/C also mediate the cytostatic factor induced metaphase II arrest of oocytes. This review highlights the current knowledge about the role and relevance of these diverse regulators of the meiotic APC/C.

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome↗

Securin associates with APCCdh1 in prometaphase but its destruction is delayed by Rae1 and Nup98 until the metaphase/anaphase transition.

Precisely timed ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of mitotic regulators by the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) governs the orderly passage of cells through mitosis. The established view is that Cdc20-activated APC (APC(Cdc20)) mediates the destruction of cyclin B and securin at the metaphase/anaphase transition, and that Cdh1-activated APC (APC(Cdh1)) has no role in this process. We recently reported that securin, but not cyclin B, is prematurely targeted for destruction by the APC in mutant mice that have low levels of the nuclear transport factors Rae1 and Nup98. We found that Rae1 and Nup98 assemble into a complex with APC(Cdh1) in prometaphase and act to delay APC(Cdh1)-mediated ubiquitination of securin until the metaphase/anaphase transition. Here we show that Rae1 and Nup98 not only form a complex with APC(Cdh1) in prometaphase but also with securin. This finding suggests that the Rae1-Nup98 complex does not inhibit early destruction of securin by preventing APC(Cdh1) from binding to securin, but by preventing ubiquitination of APC(Cdh1)-bound securin. We propose that the formation of APC(Cdh1)-securin complexes in prometaphase primes the cell for rapid securin degradation after release of the inhibitory Rae1-Nup98 complex at the metaphase/anaphase transition. We further report here that mutant mice with low levels of the Rae1-Nup98 complex are not prone to develop spontaneous tumors, despite massive aneuploidy. However, Rae1/Nup98 mutant mice are significantly more susceptible to DMBA-induced lung tumors than wild-type mice, indicating that combined Rae1/ Nup98 haplo-insufficiency does promote tumorigenesis when certain cancer-critical genes are also mutated.

Anaphase↗