PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “POU Domain Factors”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34Linked to original sources

The different inhibitory domains of the Oct-2 transcription factor have distinct functional activities.

The Oct-2 POU family transcription factor contains three distinct regions whose deletion reduces its ability to inhibit transcription via its octamer binding site. Here we show that only one of these inhibitory domains is capable of also inhibiting the activity of activating molecules bound at adjacent sites upstream of a TATA box-containing promoter whereas the other two regions are inactive in this assay. None of the three regions is able to achieve this effect when located upstream of the same promoter containing an initiator motif. The mechanisms of action of these domains and their role in the functioning of the Oct-2 factor are discussed.

Animals↗

N-Oct 5 is generated by in vitro proteolysis of the neural POU-domain protein N-Oct 3.

The neural POU-domain proteins N-Oct 3 and N-Oct 5 were first identified in electrophoretic mobility retardation assays through their ability to bind to the octamer sequence ATGCAAAT. These two N-Oct factors are detected in extracts from tumor-derived and normal neural cells. They are present differentially, however, in extracts from melanocytes and melanoma cells: N-Oct 3 is present in extracts from both melanocytes and melanoma cells, whereas N-Oct 5 is more evident in extracts from metastatic melanoma cells. We show here that a cDNA encoding N-Oct 3 directs synthesis of both the N-Oct 3 and N-Oct 5 proteins and that the N-Oct 5 protein in neural and melanoma-cell extracts is also related to N-Oct 3. N-Oct 5, however, is apparently not expressed in vivo: It is not detected if cells are rapidly lysed in SDS or if extracts are prepared with a cocktail of protease inhibitors that includes the serine-protease inhibitor 4-(2-Aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride (AEBSF). These data suggest that N-Oct 5 is a specific in vitro proteolytic cleavage product of N-Oct 3 and is not directly related to melanocyte malignancy.

Animals↗

Characterization of platyhelminth POU domain genes: ubiquitous and specific anterior nerve cell expression of different epitopes of GtPOU-1.

POU domain proteins are a large family of transcription factors that have been identified in a variety of metazoans, from freshwater sponges, planarians and nematodes to arthropods, echinoderms and vertebrates. Many of these proteins are implicated in the development and establishment of the nervous system. In this paper we describe the identification of the planarian genes GtPOU-1, GtPOU-3 and GtPOU-4, which belong to the subclasses III and IV of POU-domain genes. Their similarity with other members of the POU family is restricted to the POU and homeo domains, plus some peptide sequences scattered in the linker and flanking regions. As with other subclass III POU genes, GtPOU-1 is devoid of introns. Axial transcript distribution by RT-PCR and immunohistochemical assays, performed with a polyclonal antibody raised against the GtPOU-1 fusion protein, indicate that both the GtPOU-1 transcript and protein are continuously expressed along the antero-posterior axis. A monoclonal antibody raised against the same fusion protein indicates that a GtPOU-1-specific epitope, probably obtained by post-translational modification, is present in neural cells from both the central and peripheral nerve systems of the adult planarian's anterior third. Moreover, the GtPOU-1-specific epitope shows a dynamic expression pattern during regeneration, always marking the most anterior region of the planarian nervous system. Both the rapid and general GtPOU-1-specific epitope modification, during posterior regeneration, indicate that regeneration is a global process involving all planarian regions, including those that are far from the wound, by a combination of morphallactic and epimorphic mechanisms.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The mouse homologue of the human transcription factor C1 (host cell factor). Conservation of forms and function.

The assembly of the herpes simplex virus (HSV) alpha/IE gene enhancer complex is determined by the interactions of the Oct-1 POU domain protein, the viral alphaTIF (alpha-trans-induction factor, VP16, ICP25, VMW65), and the C1 factor (host cell factor, HCF). A unique transcription factor, C1 consists of a family of polypeptides derived from a common precursor by site-specific proteolytic processing. To analyze the role of this factor in the determination of HSV lytic-latent infection, cDNAs and genomic DNAs encoding the mouse homologue have been isolated. This factor is nearly identical to the human protein, contains multiple consensus proteolytic processing sites, and functions efficiently in the assembly of a specific HSV enhancer complex. Interestingly, the differential expression of the C1 factors in both human and mouse tissues may be important for the determination of HSV tissue tropism in these two organisms.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A novel complex regulates cardiac actin gene expression through interaction of Emb, a class VI POU domain protein, MEF2D, and the histone transacetylase p300.

Expression of the mouse cardiac actin gene depends on a distal enhancer (-7 kbp) which has been shown, in transgenic mice, to direct expression to embryonic skeletal muscle. The presence of this distal sequence is also associated with reproducible expression of cardiac actin transgenes. In differentiated skeletal muscle cells, activity of the enhancer is driven by an E box, binding MyoD family members, and by a 3' AT-rich sequence which is in the location of a DNase I-hypersensitive site. This sequence does not bind MEF2 proteins, or other known muscle transcription factors, directly. Oct1 and Emb, a class VI POU domain protein, bind to consensus sites on the DNA, and it is the binding of Emb which is important for activity. Emb binds as a major complex with MEF2D and the histone transacetylase p300. The form of Emb present in this complex and as a major form in muscle cell extracts is longer (80 kDa) than that previously described. These results demonstrate the importance of this novel complex in the transcriptional regulation of the cardiac actin gene and suggest a potential role in chromatin remodeling associated with muscle gene activation.

Acetyltransferases↗

VP16-activation of the C. elegans neural specification transcription factor UNC-86 suppresses mutations in downstream genes and causes defects in neural migration and axon outgrowth.

The POU homeobox gene unc-86 specifies many neuroblast and neural fates in the developing C. elegans nervous system. Genes regulated by unc-86 are mostly unknown. Here we describe a genetic strategy for the identification of downstream pathways regulated by unc-86. We activate UNC-86 transcription activity by inserting the VP16 activation domain into an unc-86 genomic clone that bears all regulatory sequences necessary for normal expression in C. elegans. unc-86/VP16 complements unc-86 mutations in the specification of neuroblast and neural cell fates, but displays novel genetic activities: it can suppress non-null mutations in the downstream genes mec-3 and mec-7 that are necessary for mechanosensory neuron differentiation and function. These data suggest that UNC-86/VP16 increases the expression of mec-3 and mec-7 to compensate for the decreased activities of mutant MEC-3 or MEC-7 proteins. The suppression of mutations in downstream genes by an activated upstream transcription factor should be a general strategy for the identification of genes in transcriptional cascades. unc-86/VP16 also causes neural migration and pathfinding defects and novel behavioral defects. Thus, increased or unregulated expression of genes downstream of unc-86 can confer novel neural phenotypes suggestive of roles for unc-86-regulated genes in neural pathfinding and function. Genetic suppression of these unc-86/VP16 phenotypes may identify the unc-86 downstream genes that mediate these events in neurogenesis.

Animals↗

The POU factor Oct-25 regulates the Xvent-2B gene and counteracts terminal differentiation in Xenopus embryos.

The Xvent-2B promoter is regulated by a BMP-2/4-induced transcription complex comprising Smad signal transducers and specific transcription factors. Using a yeast one-hybrid screen we have found that Oct-25, a Xenopus POU domain protein related to mammalian Oct-3/4, binds as an additional factor to the Xvent-2B promoter. This interaction was further confirmed by both in vitro and in vivo analyses. The Oct-25 gene is mainly transcribed during blastula and gastrula stages in the newly forming ectodermal and mesodermal germ layers. Luciferase reporter gene assay demonstrated that Oct-25 stimulates transcription of the Xvent-2B gene. This stimulation depends on the Oct-25 binding site and the bone morphogenetic protein-responsive element. Furthermore, Oct-25 interacts in vitro with components of the Xvent-2B transcription complex, like Smad1/4 and Xvent-2. Overexpression of Oct-25 results in anterior/posterior truncations and lack of differentiation for neuroectoderm- and mesoderm-derived tissues including blood cells. This effect is consistent with an evolutionarily conserved role of class V POU factors in the maintenance of an undifferentiated cell state. In Xenopus, the molecular mechanism underlying this process might be coupled to the expression of Xvent proteins.

Animals↗

Mapping critical residues in eukaryotic DNA-binding proteins: a plasmid-based genetic selection strategy with application to the Oct-2 POU motif.

Discrimination between allowed and disallowed amino acid substitutions provides a powerful method for analysis of protein structure and function. Site-directed mutagenesis allows specific hypotheses to be tested, but its systematic application to entire structural motifs is inefficient. This limitation may be overcome by genetic selection, which allows rapid scoring of thousands of randomly (or pseudorandomly) generated mutants. To facilitate structural dissection of DNA-binding proteins, we have designed two generally applicable bacterial selection systems: pPLUS selects for the ability of a protein to bind to a user-defined DNA sequence, whereas pMINUS selects against such binding. Complementary positive and negative selections allow rapid mapping of critical residues. To test and calibrate the systems, we have investigated the bipartite POU domain of the human B-cell-specific transcription factor Oct-2. (i) An invariant residue (Asn347) in the DNA-recognition helix of the POU-specific homeodomain (POUHD) was substituted by each of the 19 other possible amino acids. The mutant proteins each exhibited decreased specific DNA binding as defined in vivo by genetic selection and in vitro by gel retardation; relative affinities correlate with phenotypes in the positive and negative selection systems. An essential role for Asn347 in wild-type POUHD-DNA recognition is consistent with homologous Asn-adenine interactions in cocrystal structures of canonical homeodomains. (ii) Extension of pPLUS/pMINUS selection to the POU-specific subdomain (POUs) is demonstrated by analysis of mutations in its putative helix-turn-helix (HTH) element.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Base Sequence↗

Association of PIT1 polymorphisms with growth and carcass traits in pigs.

PIT1, a member of the POU-domain family of genes, is a positive regulatory factor of growth hormone, prolactin, and thyrotroph-stimulating hormone beta in several mammals. Therefore, PIT1 was chosen as a candidate gene to investigate its association with growth and carcass traits in pigs. The five Iowa State University reference/resource three-generation families consisting of crosses of Meishan x Duroc, Meishan x Hampshire, Meishan x Landrace, Minzhu x Hampshire, and Minzhu x Landrace were used. The three PIT1 polymorphisms were based on two RFLP using a PIT1 POU-domain cDNA probe and the restriction enzymes BamHI and MspI and a PCR/RFLP using RsaI. Birth, 21-d, and 42-d weights, average daily gain, several backfat measurements, longissimus muscle area, muscle color, marbling, and firmness scores were evaluated for their association with the three PIT1 polymorphisms. Mixed-animal-model analyses were used with the informative family data in which the PIT1 polymorphisms were segregating. Results from mixed-model analyses revealed that pigs with the MspI CC genotype (P < .01) were associated with heavier birth weight (.12 kg) than DD genotype pigs. The MspI CC genotype pigs were also significantly associated with greater average backfat (.41 cm, P < .01), greater first-rib backfat (.45 cm, P < .01), greater last-rib backfat (.32 cm, P < .07), and greater last lumbar backfat (.46 cm, P < .10) than the DD genotype pigs. The CC genotype represents primarily Chinese alleles and may be useful for future genetic improvement in synthetic lines involving Chinese and American pigs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alleles↗

The epidermis: genes on - genes off.

The epidermal keratinocyte stem cell is distinguished by a relatively undifferentiated phenotype and an ability to proliferate. As part of a carefully orchestrated process, the offspring of these stem cells lose the ability to proliferate and begin a process of morphologic and biochemical transformation that results in their conversion into corneocytes. This process requires the coordinated expression of a host of cellular genes. The mechanisms responsible for regulation of these genes is an area of intense interest. In keratinocytes, as in other cell types, the expression of most genes is regulated at the transcriptional level by a class of proteins called transcription factors. Transcription factors are nuclear proteins that regulate transcription by mediating the final steps in the relay of information from the cell surface to the nucleus and the gene. These factors bind to specific DNA sequence elements located within the target gene. In this brief review we summarize evidence implicating activator protein 1 (AP1), AP2, Sp1, POU domain, CCAAT enhancer binding protein, and several other transcription factors as regulators of expression of keratinocyte genes.

Animals↗

Regulation of touch receptor differentiation by the Caenorhabditis elegans mec-3 and unc-86 genes.

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans possesses six morphologically similar neurons that are responsible for sensing gentle touch to the body. Previous genetic studies identified genes that are necessary for the production and differentiation of these touch cells. In particular, unc-86 encodes a POU-type homeodomain protein needed for the production of the touch cells, while mec-3 encodes a LIM-type homeodomain protein needed for the differentiation of the touch cells. Molecular studies showed that MEC-3 and UNC-86 bind cooperatively to sites in the mec-3 promoter and can synergistically activate transcription from it in vitro. Here we show that UNC-86::MEC-3 hetero-oligomer-binding sites are also found in the promoters of two presumed targets of mec-3, the mec-4 and mec-7 genes, that are necessary for the function of the touch cells. These sites, which are well-conserved in the related nematode C. briggsae, are required for promoter activity. When one of the binding sites is cloned into a heterologous promoter, expression is found in the touch cells and two to four other cells that express mec-3 and unc-86. These data support a model in which touch-cell differentiation is specified, in part, by the UNC-86::MEC-3 hetero-oligomer and not by MEC-3 alone. Ectopic expression of mec-3, driven by a heat-shock promoter, also supports this hypothesis: the acquisition of touch-cell characteristics by several additional cells under these conditions required unc-86. Since the touch-cell lineages express UNC-86 before MEC-3, MEC-3 appears to modify the activity of UNC-86, leading to touch-cell-specific gene expression. Because both UNC-86 and MEC-3 have activation domains, the formation of the hetero-oligomer may create a strong activator. In the modification of UNC-86 function by MEC-3 in the touch cells, these studies provide an example of how the sequential activation of transcription factors can determine cell fate within particular cell lineages.

Animals↗

XIPOU 2 is a potential regulator of Spemann's Organizer.

XIPOU 2, a member of the class III POU-domain family, is expressed initially at mid-blastula transition (MBT) and during gastrulation in the entire marginal zone mesoderm, including Spemann's Organizer (the Organizer). To identify potential targets of XIPOU 2, the interaction of XIPOU 2 with other genes co-expressed in the Organizer was examined by microinjecting XIPOU 2's mRNA into the lineage of cells that contributes to the Organizer, head mesenchyme and prechordal plate. XIPOU 2 suppresses the expression of a number of dorsal mesoderm-specific genes, including gsc, Xlim-1, Xotx2, noggin and chordin, but not Xnot. As a consequence of the suppression of dorsal mesoderm gene expression, bone morphogenetic factor-4 (Bmp-4), a potent inducer of ventral mesoderm, is activated in the Organizer. Gsc is a potential target of XIPOU 2. XIPOU 2 is capable of binding a class III POU protein binding site (CATTAAT) that is located within the gsc promoter, in the activin-inducible (distal) element. Furthermore, XIPOU 2 suppresses the activation of the gsc promoter by activin signaling. At the neurula and tailbud stages, dorsoanterior structures are affected: embryos displayed micropthalmia and the loss of the first branchial arch, as detected by the expression of pax-6, Xotx2 and en-2. By examining events downstream from the Wnt and chordin pathways, we determined that XIPOU 2, when overexpressed, acts specifically in the Organizer, downstream from GSK-3beta of the Wnt pathway and upstream from chordin. The interference in dorsalizing events caused by XIPOU 2 was rescued by chordin. Thus, in addition to its direct neuralizing ability, in a different context, XIPOU 2 has the potential to antagonize dorsalizing events in the Organizer.

Activins↗

The inhibitory domain in the Oct-2 transcription factor represses gene activity in a cell type-specific and promoter-independent manner.

The Oct-2 transcription factor contains an N-terminal inhibitory domain which can act to inhibit promoter activity when linked to either its corresponding DNA-binding POU domain or the heterologous DNA binding domain of the yeast transcription factor GAL4. This inhibitory effect is independent of the number of DNA binding sites or their context in the target promoter. In contrast the effect is cell type-specific and can be relieved by over-expression of the isolated inhibitory domain in the absence of a DNA binding domain. These results suggest that the inhibitory domain acts by decreasing the activity of the basal transcriptional complex but that it operates indirectly by recruiting a second cell type-specific factor to the promoter which then interacts with the basal complex decreasing its activity.

Animals↗

NMR studies of the POU-specific DNA-binding domain of Oct-1: sequential 1H and 15N assignments and secondary structure.

The 1H and 15N resonances of the POU-specific DNA-binding domain of transcription factor Oct-1 have been assigned sequentially using two-dimensional homo- and heteronuclear NMR techniques, as well as three-dimensional heteronuclear NMR techniques, including TOCSY, 2D NOE, and NOESY-HMQC experiments. A number of typical short- and medium-range NOE contacts, as well as amide proton exchange data, gave evidence for the presence of four alpha-helices, in the peptide segments 1-19, 23-34, 40-49, and 54-71, which are connected by short loops of irregular structure. Interestingly, the second helix contains three glycine residues and the fourth helix a proline in the middle of the helix. Although the regular pattern of hydrogen bonds in the fourth helix is interrupted, due to the absence of an amide proton in proline, the helix is remarkably stable. All four helices are amphipathic, which suggests a packing of the apolar sides of the helices in the folded structure of the protein.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The herpesvirus transactivator VP16 mimics a human basic domain leucine zipper protein, luman, in its interaction with HCF.

In human cells infected with herpes simplex virus (HSV), viral gene expression is initiated by the virion protein VP16. VP16 does not bind DNA directly but forms a multiprotein complex on the viral immediate-early gene promoters with two cellular proteins: the POU domain protein Oct-1 and host cell factor (HCF; also called C1, VCAF, and CFF). Despite its apparent role in stabilizing the VP16-induced transcription complex, the natural biological role of HCF is unclear. Only recently HCF has been implicated in control of the cell cycle. To determine the role of HCF in cells and answer why HSV has evolved an HCF-dependent mechanism for the initiation of the lytic cycle, we identified the first human ligand for HCF (R. Lu et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5117-5126, 1997). This protein, Luman, is a member of the CREB/ATF family of transcription factors that can activate transcription from promoters containing cyclic AMP response elements (CRE). Here we provide evidence that Luman and VP16 share two important structural features: an acidic activation domain and a common mechanism for binding HCF. We found that Luman, its homolog in Drosophila, dCREB-A (also known as BBF-2), and VP16 bind to HCF by a motif, (D/E)HXY(S/A), present in all three proteins. In addition, a mutation (P134S) in HCF that prevents VP16 binding also abolishes its binding to Luman and dCREB-A. We also show that while interaction with HCF is not required for the ability of Luman to activate transcription when tethered to the GAL4 promoter, it appears to be essential for Luman to activate transcription through CRE sites. These data suggest that the HCF-Luman interaction may represent a conserved mechanism for transcriptional regulation in metazoans, and HSV mimics this interaction with HCF to monitor the physiological state of the host cell.

Animals↗

[oct-genes and oct-proteins].

The review considers the functions and properties of Oct proteins, which belong to the POU family of transcription factors, and the roles of the POU and other domains in DNA recognition and interaction with other proteins of the transcription initiation complex. The structure and expression regulation of the oct genes are described with special emphasis on alternative transcription initiation from different promoters and alternative splicing, which result in several protein subforms.

Base Sequence↗

[Alternative promoters and oct-1 gene tissue-specific regulation].

Murine oct-1 gene contains exons IU and 1L at 5'-end, which are alternatively presented in oct-1 mRNA. 1U exon is presented in oct-1 mRNA expressed in all tissues whereas lymphoid cells of mouse and human express mRNA containing alternatively IU or 1L exon. Upstream of these exons there are U and L promoters, respectively, which are separated by 67 kb in mice otf-1 locus. Nucleotide sequences located upstream 1U and 1L exons are very different: IU region contains a number of Sp1 sites and 1L region contains many homeo-specific sites and two octamers ATGCAAAT recognized by transcription factors Oct-1, Oct-2 and other POU-domain containing proteins. Oct-1 sites may participate in oct-1 gene autoregulation. The role of U- and L-promoter fragments in oct-1 gene regulation was studied by transfection of luc-containing constructs in lymphoid (NS/0) and non-lymphoid cells. It was shown that L-promoter efficiency is much higher in lymphoid cells than in fibroblast cell line 10/1. U-promoter is active in both types of the cells. Upstream of IL-exon there is the inhibitory nucleotide sequence which elimination increases the expression level by many times. This silencing element is located between initiation starts of transcription and translation. The obtained data suggest that oct-1 gene contains at least two alternative promoters. It seems that U-promoter promises the constitutive synthesis of Oct-1 protein whereas L-promoter is tissue-specific and putatively is inducible and autoregulated.

Animals↗

The regulation of the Oct-1 gene transcription is mediated by two promoters.

The ubiquitous transcription factor Oct-1 is a member of the POU domain family of regulatory proteins. Target genes controlled by Oct-1 include housekeeping genes, e.g. the genes encoding histon H2B or snRNAs, as well as tissue-specific genes, e.g. the genes encoding the light and heavy chains of immunoglobulines, some interleukins, and others. Oct-1 pre-mRNA may be spliced in several ways, resulting in production of several protein isoforms that may differ functionally. The 5'-end of the Oct-1 gene contains two exons-exon 1U and exon 1L that alternatively present in Oct-1 mRNA. We studied regulation of transcription of the Oct-1 gene using reporter gene assays of promoter-luciferase gene-constructs. It was shown that transcription of the Oct-1 gene is regulated by two promoters located upstream of the exon 1U and upstream of the exon 1L. The promoter located upstream of the exon 1U contains G/C-rich sequences and multiple Sp1 sites, while the promoter located upstream of the exon 1L contains A/T-rich motifs and autoregulation-related cis-elements: two octamer sites ATGCAAAT, two octamer related sites and multiple TAAT-core sites. Exons 1U and 1L in the human OTF-1 locus encoding the Oct-1 gene are located at the distance of 108 kbp. In the murine locus otf-1 the distance between exons 1U and 1L is 67 kbp. We suggest that the two promoters can differ functionally.

5' Flanking Region↗