PubMed2000
We reviewed retrospectively the management of 47 infants with subdural collections at the Birmingham Children's Hospital. Of those patients who had needle aspiration as their initial treatment 42% required some form of further treatment and 25% were complicated by infection of the subdural collection. Of those patients treated with burr hole evacuation or with observation alone, 78 and 73%, respectively, required no further procedures. However, 17% of those who had burr holes as their initial treatment developed post-operative infected collections. Of those who had subdural-peritoneal shunt as initial or subsequent treatment, none required further procedures to treat the subdural collections. No infections were noted following shunting. There was no statistically significant difference in overall clinical outcome at last follow-up between the different treatment groups. We conclude that needle aspirations should be avoided due to high infection risk, and that observation alone can be sufficient in the absence of intracranial hypertension, as the condition may be self-limiting. In cases requiring surgery, it should be borne in mind that burr hole evacuation has a higher infection risk, whereas subdural shunting has the additional need for removal of the device if the parents and surgeon decide accordingly.
Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts↗