PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “OBSTETRICAL FORCEPS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

[Surgical delivery: comparison of two 5-year periods].

Operative delivery prevalence is considered in two periods: 1980-1985 and 1986-1990. Reduced prevalence of repeated cesarean section is reported for the second period as opposed to the first one. A larger prevalence of cesarean sections for anomalous presentation (breech presentation included), fetal distress. EPH gestosis, abruptio placentae is reported in the second half of '80's. Vacuum Extractor applications are reduced in the second period compared to the first one for with concern secondary uterine hypokinesia; larger V.E. applications are reported in the second period for fetal distress in the second stage of labor. Relatively rare forceps applications in both periods.

Breech Presentation↗
PubMed1990

Silastic cup vacuum extractor or forceps: a comparative study.

A retrospective analysis over a 2-year period was carried out to compare the limitations in the use of the Silastic Cup vacuum extractor and forceps as the preferred instrument for operative vaginal delivery. Whilst the use of the vacuum extractor was associated with less maternal morbidity (54.9% episiotomy rate; 20.9% nil analgesia) and comparable neonatal problems, an increased failure rate (6.5%) was demonstrated in comparison to forceps delivery (0.7% failed vaginal delivery rate). A comparison of their use for rotational vaginal delivery failed to reveal any significant difference in maternal or neonatal outcome apart from an increased failure rate (30%) to complete vaginal delivery after application of the vacuum extractor. It is concluded that the vacuum extractor is a comparable instrument for midcavity or lift-out instrumental delivery but Kielland's forceps may still be a more appropriate instrument for rotational vaginal delivery.

Delivery, Obstetric↗
PubMed1975

[Some considerations on forceps delivery with excenter handle (author's transl)].

The introduction of electronic monitoring techniques in delivery increasingly has lead to the use of vaginal surgery in delivery. Vacuum and forceps extraction, in our view, do not compete with each other. Years ago forceps extraction was decisively improved by introducing the axial traction forceps. However, we believe that this technique has not been given due attention and is not applied widely enough. In vacuum extraction and in forceps deliveries without axial traction considerable part of the force is exerted in the direction of the symphysis. When using the excentric handle forceps, it is necessary in addition to the traction and pressure components to include the lever action. This is a so-called couple of forces. The additional torque involved in the use of an axial traction forceps shifts the fetal head during extraction in the direction of the hollow of the sacrum. The force needed for this shift and the progression of the head is many times less than that required for conventional forceps extraction. This is due to the absence of the component directed at the symphysis which impedes delivery. The axial traction forceps may also be used in case of the infant's abnormal positioning of the head. In case of a transverse position of the fetal head, a special fastener on the forceps makes it possible to use an excentric handle on the traction hook of the Kielland forceps and thus render possible rotation of the fetal head from the transverse position. The extentric handle in forceps extraction is optimal in order to overcome increased mechanical resistance to delivery. Adjustment of the handles to all types of forceps being used today is possible. From the results mentioned it is clear that the use of the axial traction forceps constitutes a valuable contribution toward declining perinatal mortality rates.

Apgar Score↗
PubMed2006

Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the decision-to-delivery interval for forceps delivery and vacuum extraction. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of all instrumental deliveries over a 1-year period in a delivery ward of a university tertiary health care facility was performed. The decision-to-delivery interval was compared between forceps delivery and vacuum extraction. RESULTS: The decision-to-delivery interval was 8.6+/-5.4 and 13.8+/-6.2 min for forceps and vacuum deliveries, respectively (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: It appears that it is quicker to accomplish forceps delivery than vacuum extraction.

Decision Making↗
PubMed1989

North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trial.

In a trial conducted at the North Staffordshire and Billinge Maternity Hospitals (NSMH and BMH) a total of 264 women who required an assisted delivery in the second stage of labour were randomly assigned to be delivered either by Kobayashi silicone cup ventouse or by forceps. A larger proportion (90%) of those assigned to the forceps group were actually delivered by the allocated instrument compared to those in the silicone cup group (73%). However, there was a significantly higher rate of maternal morbidity in terms of perineal trauma and discomfort in the forceps group. No differences in neonatal morbidity were detected.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Factors that are associated with clinically overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of clinically overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery and to examine what maternal, fetal, and obstetric factors are associated with this problem. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective case-controlled study of women who had overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery from August 1992 through April 2000. RESULTS: Fifty-one of 11,332 (0.45%) vaginal deliveries were complicated by clinically overt postpartum urinary retention. In most cases (80.4%), the problem had resolved before hospital dismissal. Persons with urinary retention were more likely than control subjects to be primiparous (66.7% vs 40.0%; P <.001), to have had an instrument-assisted delivery (47.1% vs 12.4%; P <.001), to have received regional analgesia (98.0% vs 68.8%; P <.001), and to have had a mediolateral episiotomy (39.2% vs 12.5%; P <.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, of these 4 variables, only instrument-assisted delivery and regional analgesia were significant independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: Clinically overt postpartum urinary retention complicates approximately 1 in 200 vaginal deliveries, with most resolving before hospital dismissal. Factors that are independently associated with its occurrence include instrument-assisted delivery and regional analgesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

[Experiences with centralized care for pregnant diabetic women--results of the 1976 treatment period].

73 diabetic pregnant were controled and treated in our clinic 1976, there was a perinatale mortality of 2,7%. The great part of EPH--gestosis and infections of the urinary system and more operative deliveries show of a higher risk already in the stage of latent diabetes. By screening methodes for diabetics during pregnancy and by intensive control in the first trimester it will be possible to obtain better results in the future.

Dexamethasone↗
PubMed1987

Mid-cavity occipitoanterior forceps delivery--Laufe and Barnes forceps compared.

Laufe forceps are divergent forceps designed to reduce compressive forces upon the fetal skull during delivery from the pelvic outlet. Here we have undertaken a retrospective matched analysis in which Laufe (N = 75) and Barnes (N = 75) forceps were used for occipitoanterior mid-cavity forceps delivery. Our aim was to compare fetal and maternal outcome following use of these 2 types of forceps in the mid-pelvis. Fetal morbidity, categorized by trauma, low Apgar score or jaundice, was present in 31 of 75 infants delivered by Laufe forceps and in 47 of 75 infants delivered by Barnes forceps (p less than 0.01). Overall, maternal morbidity was statistically similar between the 2 groups although perineal trauma was more frequent in the Laufe group (p less than 0.05). We concluded that there appeared to be an improved fetal outcome following occipitoanterior mid-cavity delivery using Laufe forceps compared with Barnes forceps. These initial findings imply that in situations of fetal compromise, where forceps delivery from an occipitoanterior position in the mid-cavity is indicated, that Laufe forceps might be chosen.

Apgar Score↗