PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND THROMBOSIS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources
PubMed1981

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Frequency in a respiratory intensive care unit.

Radiofibrinogen leg scans were performed in 34 patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit (ICU) for treatment of acute respiratory failure. In 23 patients, the leg scans were performed during the first ICU week, and abnormal leg scans developed in three (13%). In 11 patients, leg scans were done beyond the first week; all were normal. Autopsy incidence of embolism was 20%. No patient died of embolism. The low frequency of fatal embolism had led us to discontinue the routine use of low-dose heparin prophylaxis in these patients in our respiratory ICU. In its place, we have substituted an ongoing investigation of noninvasive monitoring with both radioactive fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography. From such investigations should emerge more definitive strategies for dealing with venous thromboembolism in this complex patient population.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

A randomized trial comparing activated thromboplastin time with heparin assay in patients with acute venous thromboembolism requiring large daily doses of heparin.

BACKGROUND: The management of heparin therapy in patients who have a subtherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) despite high doses of heparin is problematic because the risk of heparin-associated bleeding increases with dose. Results of experimental studies in animals indicate that when the APTT response to heparin is blunted by infusion of procoagulants, dose escalation can be avoided without compromising efficacy, by monitoring treatment with a heparin assay. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in which patients with acute deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or axillary vein thrombosis who required 35,000 U or more of intravenous heparin by continuous infusion during the previous 24 hours were allocated to have their heparin therapy monitored either by anti-factor Xa levels (targeted range, 0.35 to 0.67 U/mL) or by the APTT (targeted range, 60 to 85 seconds). Both ranges were equivalent to a heparin level of 0.2 to 0.4 U/mL by protamine titration. RESULTS: Three (4.6%) of 65 patients in the anti-factor Xa group experienced recurrent venous thromboembolism compared with four (6.1%) of 66 patients in the APTT group (difference, 1.5%; confidence interval, -6.7% to 8.4%) (P = .7). There were four bleeding events (6.1%) in the APTT group compared with one (1.5%) in the anti-factor Xa group (difference, 4.6%; confidence interval, -3.3% to 7.5%) (P = .4). During the period of heparin therapy before warfarin treatment was begun, the patients in the APTT group required a statistically significantly greater amount of heparin compared with the patients in the anti-factor Xa group. The daily mean APTT was subtherapeutic in patients in the anti-factor Xa group, and it was within the therapeutic range in the APTT group. The daily mean anti-factor Xa levels for both groups were within the therapeutic range. CONCLUSION: The heparin assay is a safe and effective method for monitoring heparin treatment in patients with acute venous thromboembolism whose APTT remains subtherapeutic despite large daily doses of heparin. In such patients, dosage escalation can be avoided if the heparin level is therapeutic.

Acute Disease↗