PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

The impact of ibuprofen on renal clearance in preterm infants is independent of the gestational age.

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate whether the relative change in renal clearance due to ibuprofen administration depends on the gestational age (GA). Clearance of amikacin was used as a surrogate marker for renal clearance in preterm infants (GA 24-34 weeks, day 1) on respiratory support. Clearance in infants co-treated with ibuprofen was compared to that of infants not co-treated with ibuprofen. Absolute change of clearance in four consecutive cohorts of increasing (<27, 27-28, 29-31, 32-34 weeks) GA and linear correlations of clearance on GA were calculated in both groups. Data were collected from 204 infants, of whom 93 were co-treated with ibuprofen. Mean amikacin clearance was lower (0.48 to 0.59 ml/kg/min, P <0.001) in infants co-treated with ibuprofen. Absolute decrease in mean amikacin clearance (0.10 to 0.14 ml/kg/min) was similar in all four cohorts. Linear correlations of clearance with GA were documented in infants co-treated (y =0.21+0.011x) or not co-treated (y =0.44+0.009x) with ibuprofen. Renal clearance, reflected by amikacin clearance, is decreased by ibuprofen in preterm infants of 24 to 34 weeks GA on respiratory support on the 1st day of life, independent of the GA.

Amikacin↗
PubMed2004

Acute emesis: moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

This paper is a review of the recommendations for the prophylaxis of acute emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy as concluded at the Perugia Consensus Conference, which took place at the end of March 2004. The review focuses on new studies appearing since the last consensus conference in 1997. The following issues are addressed: dose and schedule of antiemetics, different groups of antiemetics such as corticosteroids, serotonin (5-HT(3))-receptor antagonists, dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists, and neurokinin (NK(1)) receptor antagonists. Antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy is also reviewed. Consensus statements are given, including optimal dose and schedule of 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists and of dexamethasone. The new 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonist, palonosetron, is a reasonable alternative to the well-established agents of this class--ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron and dolasetron. It is concluded that the best prophylaxis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy is still the combination of one of the 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists and dexamethasone. The results of studies adding a NK(1)-receptor antagonist to this combination are awaited and might change future recommendations.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Antiemetics in children receiving chemotherapy.

Only a few studies have been carried out in children on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced acute emesis. 5-HT3 antagonists have been shown to be more efficacious and less toxic than metoclopramide, phenothiazines and cannabinoids. The optimal dose and scheduling of the 5-HT3 antagonists has not been identified. Combinations of a 5-HT3 antagonist and dexamethasone show increased efficacy with respect to 5-HT3 antagonists alone. All pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy of high or moderate emetogenic potential should receive a combination of a 5-HT3 antagonist and dexamethasone to prevent acute emesis. No studies have specifically evaluated antiemetic drugs in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced delayed and anticipatory emesis in children.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2006

Therapeutic effects of vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy and implications for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a non-pharmacological therapy approved by the FDA for treatment of patients with partial-onset epilepsy. The most frequently encountered adverse effects typically occur during stimulation, are usually mild to moderate in severity, and resolve with reduction in current intensity or spontaneously over time. There are no apparent effects of VNS on vagally mediated visceral function. Though the precise mechanism of action of VNS remains unknown, available evidence suggests that central autonomic nervous system pathways are involved, which have also been implicated in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Studies to date of VNS and SUDEP are limited and do not conclusively show an association between VNS and SUDEP rates independent of other epilepsy-specific variables.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2004

Antiretroviral therapy: when and what to start-- an American perspective.

The major US treatment guidelines now recommend starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) later in the course of HIV infection because of an increasing awareness of the difficulties associated with these regimens. Most of the data to support this change come from observational cohort studies. When deciding to start ART, several patient-specific factors and other issues should be considered. Because of the many choices for initial ART, clinicians should individualize the choice, taking into account regimen antiretroviral potency, durability, side effects, toxicities, and convenience to ensure a sustained clinical benefit for the patient.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Latest advances in intracerebral hemorrhage.

Despite the fact that intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the deadliest and least treatable of all stroke subtypes, historically researchers have directed most of their efforts toward ischemic strokes. However in the past few years this tendency has been changing, and several studies are showing very interesting results that allow us to believe that in the following years ICH management will change dramatically, paralleling the recent revolution that ischemic stroke treatment experienced in the past decade. Studies offering a better understanding of risk factors, pathophysiology, and treatment will help in primary and secondary prevention and also in developing therapeutic strategies to reduce brain damage. This review comments on some of the most relevant publications during the past year in any field related to ICH.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

"Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century": discussion. A plea for a more balanced view of meta-analysis and systematic overviews of the effect of health care interventions.

The paper discusses some of the most common criticisms to meta-analysis presented by Professor Feinstein in this Conference. As many of the points raised in his contributions are not new, a critique to them is presented in the context of the type of contribution given by systematic reviews (meta-analysis) to the analysis of the effects of health care interventions. After discussing some terminological issues, the paper challenges Feinsteins' arguments indicating that meta-analysis is inherently faulted on four grounds: (a) reproducibility, (b) precision, (c) suitable extrapolation, (d) fair comparison. Each point is discussed providing examples drawn from the published literature with a view to indicate that--despite their current limitations--systematic reviews are a necessary step to synthesize information, orient clinical research and help produce practice guidelines.

Bias↗