PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Bacteriophage lambda”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources

A fragile lattice: replacing bacteriophage lambda's head stability gene D with the shp gene of phage 21 generates the Mg2+-dependent virus, lambda shp.

Phage lambda DNA packaging is accompanied by prohead expansion, due to structural changes in gpE, the major capsid protein. Rearrangement of the gpE lattice creates binding sites for trimers of gpD, the head stabilization protein. lambda-Like phage 21's shp gene is homologous to lambda's D gene. gpD and gpShp share 49% amino acid identity. To ask whether gpShp could stabilize the lambda head shell, we replaced lambda's D gene with shp, creating lambda shp. Unlike lambda or 21, lambda shp was strictly dependent on the presence of 10(-2) M Mg2+, and lambda shp virions were very sensitive to chelating agents. Density gradient studies indicated that the lambda gpE lattice was underpopulated with gpShp. gpD's N-terminus has been proposed to contact gpE, and we found that lambda D/shp, which produces a chimeric protein with the N-terminus of gpD and the C-terminus of gpShp, was Mg2+-independent and more stable than lambda shp.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

[Characteristics of bacteriophage lambda and P1 modification-restriction in Escherichia coli strains controlled by factor R124].

The specifities of restriction of bacteriophages P1 and lambda controlled by R plasmids in Escherichia coli have been investigated. The isogenic strains harbouring the plasmids pAS26 coding for restriction endonuclease R.EcoRI, R245 coding for restriction endonuclease R.EcoRII and and R124 have been investigated in the present work. Modification-restriction controlled by R124 has been found to differ in specificity from those controlled by R245 and pAS26. Frequencies of restriction of bacteriophages P1vir and lambdavir specified by R124 pasmid differ from the frequencies in the strains harbouring pAS26 and R245 plasmids as well. The difference is due to the specifity of restriction-modification controlled by R124 plasmid. The data obtained are consistent with the determination of R124 specified restriction-modification activity as a novel one designated R.EcoRIII.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks--II. Immunity control in bacteriophage lambda.

A number of bacterial and viral genes take part in the decision between lysis and lysogenization in temperate bacteriophages. In the lambda case, at least five viral genes (cI, cro, cII, N and cIII) and several bacterial genes are involved. Several attempts have been made to model this complex regulatory network. Our approach is based on a logical method described in the first paper of the series which formalizes the interactions between the elements of a regulatory network in terms of discrete variables, functions and parameters. In this paper two models are described and discussed, the first (two-variable model) focused on cI and cro interactions, the second (four-variable model) considering, in addition, genes cII and N. The treatment presented emphasizes the roles of positive and negative feedback loops and their interactions in the development of the phage. The role of the loops between cI and cro, and of cI on itself (which both have to be positive loops) was discovered earlier; this group's contribution to this aspect mainly deals with the possibility of treating these loops as parts of a more extended network. In contrast, the role of the negative loop of cro on itself had apparently remained unexplained. We realized that this loop buffers the expression of genes cro itself. cII, O and P against the inflation due to the rapid replication of the phage. More generally, negative auto-control of a gene appears an efficient way to render its expression insensitive (or less sensitive) to gene dosage, whereas a simple negative control would not provide this result.

Bacteria↗