PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Mastectomy, Simple”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources

Combined sequential approach in locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The interaction between primary and adjuvant chemotherapy is a crucial point in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of a sequential treatment with primary anthracyclines and adjuvant CMF in this patient subset. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Eighty-eight breast cancer patients, stage T3b-T4 abc, N0-2, M0. RESULTS: From February 1991 to July 1994, 88 consecutive patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, with full-dose doxorubicin (75 mg/m2) or epirubicin (120 mg/m2) for three cycles followed by surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy with i.v. CMF for six cycles and local radiotherapy +/- Tamoxifen. A high rate of objective responses (70%), but a low incidence of pathologic complete remission (2%), were observed following primary treatment with single-agent anthracyclines. Frequency of responses was not associated with tumor estrogen or progesterone receptors status, Mib-1 or grading. In 28 patients (32%) conservative surgery could be performed. At a median follow-up of 52 months, relapse free survival and overall survival are 52% and 62%, respectively. A multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant favorable prognosis in patients with limited nodal involvement at surgery and negative Mib-1 values. This drug sequence failed to significantly ameliorate the long term results in this unfavorable patient subset and more effective drug regimens and innovative therapeutic strategies are needed.

Adult↗

The long term prognostic significance of oestrogen receptor analysis in early carcinoma of the breast.

The long term prognostic significance of oestrogen receptors was assessed in a prospective study of 767 patients presenting between the years 1975 and 1981 with stage 1 and 2 breast cancer treated by mastectomy with either full axillary dissection or nodal sampling. Oestrogen receptor binding was determined by a dextran coated charcoal method and median follow up was 11 years. Oestrogen receptors were present in 396 (54%) of tumours. Absence of oestrogen receptors was associated with tumours of high histological grade, but there was no relationship between nodal status or tumour size. Oestrogen receptor status did not predict survival for the group as a whole or when stratified by nodal status. In multivariate analysis both nodal status and tumour size were powerful independent prognostic factors, but oestrogen receptors failed to achieve statistical significance.

Analysis of Variance↗

Induction of tumour cell shedding into effluent venous blood breast cancer surgery.

Surgeons have long been concerned that cancer may be disseminated by shedding of tumour cells into the bloodstream during surgery. Early claims that cancer operations induced an increase in the number of tumour cells shed into the circulation were subsequently discredited, and the issue has remained unresolved. We used immunocytochemistry for cytokeratins to detect tumour cells in effluent blood from breast carcinomas in 18 patients undergoing surgery. Tumour cells were detectable in 6/18 patients during surgery, in only one patient before operation and in none post-operatively (P = 0.025). Circulating cells were associated with vascular invasion within the primary tumour (P = 0.032). No cytokeratin-positive cells were found in blood from ten normal volunteers or four patients undergoing surgery for other breast conditions. These results confirm that cancer surgery in humans results in an increase in the shedding of tumour cells into the circulation. The implications for prognosis and practice should be determined by larger prospective studies.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Mucinous carcinoma of the breast with neuroendocrine differentiation.

A case of mucinous carcinoma of the breast with neuroendocrine differentiation in an 89-year-old woman is presented. The patient presented with a rapidly growing right breast mass, which she had had for 2-3 years. The tumor, 15 x 8 x 5 cm, was located mainly in the upper outer quadrant. Light microscopy revealed a pure mucinous carcinoma of type B. Neuroendocrine differentiation was demonstrated by Grimelius stain and chromogranin A, as well as the presence of neurosecretory granules. The breast cancer cells were of luminal origin and had dedifferentiated to attain neuroendocrine properties.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗

Predictive value of extent and grade of ductal carcinoma in situ in radiologically guided core biopsy for the status of margins in lumpectomy specimens.

AIMS: The correlation between the extent and grade of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in a core needle biopsy of breast, and the presence of an extensive intraductal carcinoma component (EIC) or positive resection margins in a subsequent mastectomy, has not been adequately addressed in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight core needle biopsies with mammography and mastectomy correlation (27 total mastectomies, 51 lumpectomies) were reviewed. The extent and grade of DCIS in the biopsies were determined and compared with the mammographic findings and the status of the EIC and margins in subsequent mastectomy specimens. RESULTS: Twenty-four cases of core biopsies with at least three foci of low-grade DCIS or at least two foci of high grade DCIS (group I) corresponded in large part to cases of mastectomy with a positive EIC (20/23 cases, or predictive value of 87%). Nine of 15 cases of lumpectomy in this group were associated with margins positive for or close to (less than 0.1 cm from) carcinoma. Thirty-three cases of core biopsies with one or two foci of low-grade DCIS or one focus of high-grade DCIS (group II) were associated with mastectomies with a limited extent of DCIS. Only four of 22 lumpectomy specimens in this group had margins positive for or close to carcinoma. Twenty-one cases of core biopsies without DCIS (group III) represented all five mastectomy specimens without DCIS, and 16 mastectomies with DCIS and negative EIC. None of the 14 cases of lumpectomy in this group had margins positive for carcinoma. The predictive value for EIC status may be even higher if mammographic findings are used in cases with a low number of foci (two foci of low-grade DCIS or one focus of high-grade DCIS in short biopsy cores). CONCLUSIONS: There was a good correlation between the extent and grade of DCIS in core biopsies and the status of EIC in subsequent mastectomy specimens. Core needle biopsies with at least three foci of low-grade DCIS or at least two foci of high-grade DCIS are associated with a greater likelihood of positive or close margins in subsequent lumpectomies. Core biopsies without DCIS are associated with a greater likelihood of negative margins in subsequent lumpectomies.

Biopsy, Needle↗

[Prognostic and therapeutic significance of steroid receptors in invasive breast cancer].

It is generally accepted that breast cancer with positive steroid receptors has a better prognosis than with negative receptors. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors regarding disease-free interval (DFI) and overall (oa) survival of 441 patients operated on in the Department of Gynaecology of the University Hospital of Zürich. Analysis of the subgroups separated according to menopausal status showed the following results: Premenopausal patients (n = 135): Only PR have a significant influence on the oa-survival (p = 0.0370), not the ER. The DFI was independent of ER and PR positive findings. Postmenopausal patients (n = 306): In this group only the ER has a significant influence (p = 0.0296) on the oa-survival, not the PR. Both steroid receptors did not have any influence regarding DFI. Metastases and local recurrence occur pre- and postmenopausaly approximately at the same time, independent of the quality of the steroid receptors. The better oa-survival despite the same DFI can be explained by a better response to the therapy by patients in the premenopause with positive PR status and patients in the postmenopause with positive ER status.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

[Transposition and myocutaneous island flaps in primary or secondary locoregional surgical therapy of breast cancer].

New plastic surgical reconstruction techniques can today make a major contribution to locoregional therapy in breast cancer cases. The present paper reports on indications for and experience gathered in primary and secondary therapy with transposition (medial-pedicled thoracoepigastric) and myocutaneous island flaps (lower transversal rectus and latissimus dorsi) at the University Gynecological Clinic of Heidelberg between October 1981 and June 1987. Thirty-nine patients were treated using these techniques. Altogether nine rectus, 13 latissimus dorsi, and 21 thoracoepigastric flaps were used; in 16 cases for primary treatment with T4 tumors and in 27 cases for secondary treatment. In view of the rate of complications and recurrences seen, the indication must be established strictly and individually according to the location of the defect, the anatomic situation, and the prognosis for the patient. Today, the use of these plastic surgery techniques should lie in the hands of experienced surgeons and be an integral part of the treatment of primary advanced breast carcinomas or large locoregional recurrences.

Adult↗

Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

In 1985 we presented results of a randomized trial involving 1843 women followed for five years that indicated that segmental breast resection (lumpectomy) followed by breast irradiation is appropriate therapy for patients with Stage I or II breast cancer (tumor size, less than or equal to 4 cm), provided that the margins of the resected specimens are free of tumor. Women with positive axillary nodes received adjuvant chemotherapy. Lumpectomy followed by irradiation resulted in a five-year survival rate of 85 percent, as compared with 76 percent for total mastectomy, a rate of survival free of distant disease of 76 percent, as compared with 72 percent, and a disease-free survival rate of 72 percent, as compared with 66 percent. In the current study, we have extended our observations through eight years of follow-up. Ninety percent of the women treated with breast irradiation after lumpectomy remained free of ipsilateral breast tumor, as compared with 61 percent of those not treated with irradiation after lumpectomy (P less than 0.001). Among patients with positive axillary nodes, only 6 percent of those treated with radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy had a recurrence of tumor in the ipsilateral breast. Lumpectomy with or without irradiation of the breast resulted in rates of disease-free survival (58 +/- 2.6 percent), distant-disease-free survival (65 +/- 2.6 percent), and overall survival (71 +/- 2.6 percent) that were not significantly different from those observed after total mastectomy (54 +/- 2.4 percent, 62 +/- 2.3 percent, and 71 +/- 2.4 percent, respectively). There was no significant difference in the rates of distant-disease-free survival (P = 0.2) or survival (P = 0.3) among the women who underwent lumpectomy (with or without irradiation), despite the greater incidence of recurrence of tumor in the ipsilateral breast in those who received no radiation. We conclude that our observations through eight years are consistent with the findings at five years and that these new findings continue to support the use of lumpectomy in patients with Stage I or II breast cancer. We also conclude that irradiation reduces the probability of local recurrence of tumor in patients treated with lumpectomy.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous findings from a clinical trial (Protocol B-06) conducted by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) indicated the worth of lumpectomy and breast irradiation for treating breast cancer. After the discovery by NSABP staff members of falsified information on patients enrolled in the study by St. Luc Hospital in Montreal, separate audits were conducted at St. Luc Hospital and other participating institutions. We report the results of both audits and update the study findings through an average of 12 years of follow-up. METHODS: Patients with either negative or positive axillary nodes and tumors 4 cm or less in diameter were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: total mastectomy, lumpectomy followed by breast irradiation, or lumpectomy without irradiation. Three cohorts of patients were analyzed. The first cohort included all 2105 randomized patients, who were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The second cohort consisted of 1851 eligible patients in the first cohort with known nodal status who agreed to be followed and who accepted their assigned therapy (among those excluded were 6 patients from St. Luc Hospital who were declared ineligible because of falsified biopsy dates). The third cohort consisted of the patients in the second cohort minus the 322 eligible patients from St. Luc Hospital (total, 1529 patients). RESULTS: Regardless of the cohort, no significant differences were found in overall survival, disease-free survival, or survival free of disease at distant sites between the patients who underwent total mastectomy and those treated by lumpectomy alone or by lumpectomy plus breast irradiation. After 12 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of a recurrence of tumor in the ipsilateral breast was 35 percent in the group treated with lumpectomy alone and 10 percent in the group treated with lumpectomy and breast irradiation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings continue to indicate that lumpectomy followed by breast irradiation is appropriate therapy for women with either negative or positive axillary nodes and breast tumors 4 cm or less in diameter.

Breast Neoplasms↗

The National Cancer Institute audit of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-06.

BACKGROUND: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-06, a clinical trial sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), has provided evidence of the value of lumpectomy and breast irradiation for treating women with breast cancer in an early stage. Publicity generated by the discovery that the study included fraudulent data on patients enrolled by St. Luc Hospital in Montreal aroused concern about the overall accuracy of the data and conclusions. To address this concern, the NCI conducted an audit of other participating institutions. METHODS: In 1994, data on 1554 of the 1809 randomized patients (85.9 percent) enrolled by centers other than St. Luc Hospital were audited at 37 clinical sites in North America. The audit included data on eligibility, survival, disease-free survival, the length of time to a recurrence of cancer in the ipsilateral breast, and documentation of signed informed consent. RESULTS: End points were assessed for all 1554 patients, and eligibility was assessed for 1507 patients; 47 patients were excluded because their forms were not complete or not returned. A total of 1429 patients had their eligibility status verified. Of a total of 7770 data points examined with respect to the number of positive nodes at base line, treatment characteristics, first events (excluding death), recurrence of cancer in the ipsilateral breast, and survival, 7577 (97.5 percent) were verified, 123 (1.6 percent) could not be verified, and 70 (0.9 percent) were discrepant with the NSABP file. Of the 1554 patients, 1340 (86.2 percent) had all audited items (including eligibility) verified, 69 (4.4 percent) had at least one discrepant item, and 113 (7.3 percent) had at least one unverified item (as a result of missing or incomplete data); 32 (2.1 percent) were not assessed for eligibility but had no other discrepant or unverifiable items. Written informed consent was documented for 1098 patients before surgery and 210 after surgery; no date appeared on the signed form for 137. The informed-consent status was not verified for 71 patients and could not be determined for 38. The rates of verification of end-point data and documentation of written informed consent were similar among the total-mastectomy group, the lumpectomy group, and the group treated by lumpectomy and breast irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: The audit confirms the adequacy of the data on which the reanalysis of Protocol B-06 and the results after 12 years of follow-up are based.

Breast Neoplasms↗