PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Practice Patterns, Dentists'”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Surgical extraction of third molars is one of the most common oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures performed and may have a number of associated complications. One of these complications is inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) dysaesthesia or impairment of sensory perception (including paraesthesia and/or anaesthesia). Previous studies assume that most clinicians use various combinations of nine radiologic criteria on panoramic radiographs as indicators of the relationship and, therefore, predictors of the risk of postoperative dysaesthesia. Our study assessed both the current radiologic modalities and assessment criteria used by Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons when determining the proximity of mandibular canal to third molars. METHODS: A survey of all surgeon members of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (ANZOMS) practising in Australia was undertaken. RESULTS: Of the 105 questionnaires sent to surgeons, 72 responses (68 per cent) were returned. All surgeons reported using the panoramic radiograph but only 25 per cent considered it sufficiently accurate in determining the relationship between the mandibular canal (MC) and the third molar root, while 61 per cent of surgeons use CT for this purpose but the average frequency of use was very low (five per cent). This study also revealed that the nine radiologic criteria on a panoramic radiograph are used to varying extents by Australian surgeons. Nearly all surgeons use 'change in MC direction' and 'MC narrowing' to determine and close relationship. Thirty-one per cent used superimposition of the MC and the root of the third molar alone and 24 per cent used appearance of contact of the root with the MC alone in the absence of any other radiologic criteria to indicate close or intimate relationship. CONCLUSION: Further research is required to determine the accuracy and observer agreement or reliability of using the nine panoramic characteristics, to determine this relationship and whether the presurgical determination of proximity and position (buccal or lingual) of the canal utilizing CT has any usefulness in determining the surgical protocol or affect on postoperative morbidity.

Australia↗
PubMed2000

Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice.

OBJECTIVE: The analysis of reasons for the replacement of 9,805 amalgam, composite, glass ionomer, resin modified glass ionomer and 'other' restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. DESIGN: The data were subdivided on the bases of age and gender of the patients, the types of restorations and the clinicians' gender, experience and practice setting. RESULTS: The clinical diagnosis of secondary caries was the main reason for replacement of all types of restorations studied, followed by fracture of restorations, especially bulk fracture, irrespective of patient's age. Bulk discoloration was the third most common reason for replacement of resin based materials in adults, but it rarely occurred in adolescents 18 years and younger. The reasons for replacement of restorations were not associated with the gender of the patients. Subgroupings based on the clinicians' gender showed that female clinicians diagnosed secondary caries more often than male clinicians. Otherwise, the reasons for replacements were similar for both genders of clinicians. Subdivision of restorations based on the years since graduation of the clinicians resulted in small groups. The youngest group of clinicians diagnosed relatively more secondary caries both for amalgam and composite restorations than the most experienced group. CONCLUSION: The clinical diagnosis secondary caries was the main reason for replacement of all types of restorations studied.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Adult orthodontic therapy: extraction versus non-extraction.

This study addresses the problem of randomization of subjects with respect to an irreversible aspect of treatment strategy, namely, the extraction of teeth. The investigation includes both prospective and retrospective components. The data presented focus on clinician decision-making. Of the 1321 potential subjects for whom records were taken, 250 met the inclusion criteria. Of these subjects, 82 declined to participate and 20 were dropped because of difficulty in obtaining five independent evaluations of their records within a reasonable time frame. Thus, the final sample contained 148 subjects. Approximately one-third of the subjects in the sample are adult, somewhat more than half are female, and Class I malocclusions outnumber Class II malocclusions by a count of 95 to 53. Patterns of agreement and disagreement among five clinicians include: a) agreement/disagreement on the primary decision whether or not to extract: the data reveal a strong tendency towards consensus among the clinicians; b) agreement/disagreement on extraction pattern in patients in whom the clinician believes that extraction is indicated: the clinicians tended strongly to agree on extraction pattern; c) agreement/disagreement on the need for adjunctive orthognathic surgery: decisions favoring surgery were more common and more 'definite' than 'probable' in the adult cohort than in the adolescent cohort but this tendency was not as strong as had been anticipated; d) agreement/disagreement concerning Angle classification: disagreements were more common than had been anticipated; and e) differences among the individual clinicians as to their ratios of extraction/non-extraction decisions: overall, clinicians opted for extraction less frequently in the adolescent cohort than in the adult cohort (55 vs. 66%). Because the data are drawn from actual clinical experience, the conclusions involve a number of assumptions and their generalizability should be evaluated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Consistency of orthodontic treatment planning decisions.

OBJECTIVE: (i) To analyse the consistency of a group of orthodontists' treatment decisions and (ii) to identify factors that may influence this consistency. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SUBJECTS: Ten orthodontists. METHODS: The orthodontists examined 60 case vignettes and recorded their treatment decisions on two separate occasions. MAIN MEASURE: Inter- and intra-examiner agreement was evaluated with the Kappa statistic. RESULTS: The consistency within each orthodontist was moderate. However, between-orthodontist consistency was poor. CONCLUSION: It appears that there is marked variation between orthodontists in treatment planning decisions and this may reflect the lack of evidence for the effectiveness of competing treatments.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.

The purpose of the present investigation was to compare the accuracy of treatment decisions in proximal sites using three intra-oral radiographic systems. Additionally, the impact of an automated non-linear grey-level display was evaluated. Ten observers assessed 84 surfaces on bitewing radiographs for their requirement of restorative treatment using a 6-rank confidence scale. Radiographs were taken with conventional film images (Ultraspeed), a storage phosphor plate (Digora) and a CCD system (Dexis). Additionally, the Dexis software was expanded by a contrast enhancement routine (Dexis+). The restorative treatment threshold was defined as presence of macroscopic cavitation. Regarding the areas below mean ROC curves no significant differences were detected between the groups (p>0.05). Likelihood ratios for positive test results were: 5.29 (Ultraspeed), 8.14 (Digora), 9.67 (Dexis) and 11.37 (Dexis+). The accuracy of restorative treatment decisions based on digital and conventional radiographs is comparable. If a dichotomous treatment decision was requested, the digital systems demonstrated a notable tendency towards higher likelihood of true-positive decisions.

Confidence Intervals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Getting research into clinical practice - barriers and solutions.

The success of current efforts towards evidence-based health services in many countries depends on efficient transfer of research findings to health practitioners. However, there is a lag in research being adopted. In part this is due to difficulties in interpreting or generalising research findings, in part to inertia, organisational structures and information. Clinical guidelines are usually cited as being the most effective product of evidence assessment and means of getting research into practice. The processes by which they are prepared and disseminated are discussed. Current clinical practice requires that health professionals adapt to changing systems and adopt new techniques. Therefore, in future, practice research to evaluate (a) clinical interventions and (b) dissemination and implementation strategies will become increasingly important. Recognised barriers to such research include lack of interest, lack of involvement, lack of time and lack of remuneration. High-quality research in dental primary care requires academics and dental service providers working in partnership on topics that are relevant both to clinicians and policy makers. Good project management, education and training are essential.

Dental Research↗
PubMed2000

Use of radiology practice guidelines and compliance with accreditation standards in US and Canadian dental schools.

In 1992 and 1997, all US and Canadian dental schools were surveyed by mail regarding the preferred initial radiographic examination prescribed for non-emergency, comprehensive-care patients (dentulous adults, edentulous adults, and children). In both survey years, a minority of US and Canadian dental schools reported using selection criteria for dentulous adults and children, while nearly all schools reported doing so for edentulous adults. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to investigate the relationship between the use of radiology selection criteria (vs. predetermined routine examinations) in US and Canadian dental school clinics and three factors: (1) the credentials of the chief-of-service, (2) institutional funding, and (3) geographic region. "Credentials of the chief-of-service" is the single factor significantly related to the distributions of radiographic examinations prescribed for dentulous adults in both years (Fisher exact test, p < or = 0.02). There are no statistically significant relationships for edentulous adults or children in either year. Multivariate analyses (logistic regression) of the 1997 data reveal that institutions with a credentialed chief-of-service are 2.39 times more likely to report using selection criteria than institutions with a noncredentialed chief-of-service; private institutions are 1.13 times more likely than public institutions, and Canadian schools are 3.65 times more likely than US schools. A similar trend was identified for children. Analysis of the 1992 data revealed similar trends for the credentials of the chief-of-service and the geographic region, but showed no association between institutional funding source and the use of selection criteria. Contrary to accreditation standards, most US and Canadian dental schools obtained pre-determined routine radiographic examinations on most new patients. However, the presence of a credentialed chief-of-service had a positive effect on the use of selection criteria for dentulous adults and children.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2003

Dental informatics: a work in progress.

Dental informatics is a young scientific discipline that is undergoing continual maturation. Its literature is estimated to consist of approximately 600 papers published between 1975 and 2003, and it is currently growing at a rate of about 50 papers annually. While interest in the discipline is growing, the number of core contributors to dental informatics research remains relatively small. Two major questions for the discipline are: What are the research challenges that dental informatics faces today? and How can the discipline be strengthened and positioned to maximize its success in addressing those challenges? Progress toward research challenges formulated more than ten years ago has been varied. While many new technologies have become available for clinical dental practice, research, and education, many fundamental problems remain to be addressed with informatics research. Recommendations to augment the research capacity in dental informatics include creating a stronger worldwide dental informatics research community, drawing more biomedical informatics researchers to dental research areas, providing career opportunities for dental informatics researchers, addressing grand challenges together as a community, and recruiting subsequent generations of dental informaticians.

Dental Records↗
PubMed2004

Management of unerupted maxillary canines where no orthodontic treatment is planned; a survey of UK consultant opinion.

OBJECTIVE: To assess current consultant opinion on the management of impacted maxillary canines in patients for whom no orthodontic treatment is planned. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. METHOD: Questionnaires were sent to all UK consultant orthodontists identified from the Consultant Orthodontists Group database. Follow-up questionnaires were sent to those who had not replied within 6 weeks. An overall response rate of 76% was achieved. RESULTS: Most consultants were in favor of intervention, with removal of the unerupted canine, although a significant minority suggested a conservative approach. Of the latter group, nearly all recommended radiographic monitoring, but there was little agreement regarding the frequency and duration of this. The risk of root resorption was stated to be the most important factor justifying monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation was found amongst UK consultant orthodontists with regard to the management of impacted canines, where orthodontic treatment was not planned. The clinical and radiographic features, which the respondents stated would influence their decision to remove or leave the canine, were not those that existing research suggests as being the primary risk factors. It is suggested that, once the patient has passed the peak age for initiation of resorption, a more conservative approach may be appropriate.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2006

Psychological support for orthognathic patients -- what do orthodontists want?

AIMS: (1) To evaluate consultant orthodontist opinion on referral of orthognathic patients to a liaison psychiatrist or psychologist and (2) To investigate the value of training orthodontic specialists in recognition of patients with psychological profiles that might affect orthognathic outcome. DESIGN: Questionnaire-based study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A structured questionnaire was distributed to all consultant orthodontists in the UK. RESULTS: Approximately 40% of consultants thought that up to 10% of their orthognathic patients would benefit from psychological assessment by appropriately trained personnel. Twenty per cent of consultants were not certain what proportion of their patients would benefit from referral and over half the respondents said they do not refer any orthognathic patients for assessment. The most common reasons for referral were past/current psychiatric history (36%), unrealistic expectations (32%), 'gut instinct' (14%), no significant clinical problem (13%). Reasons not to refer were: nobody to refer to (30.5%), fear of patient reacting badly (15.8%), not sure who to refer to (14.7%), response from mental health team not useful (12.4%), waiting list too long (9.6%). The majority of clinicians felt they would benefit from training in this field (84.7%), as over 80% reported no teaching or training in psychological assessment/management. CONCLUSIONS: Although we have no evidence to prove that interdisciplinary care is better for patients, clinical experience and reports from clinicians working in large centres, tells us there are probable advantages. The development of a training programme for both orthodontists and mental health teams would seem to be beneficial for both clinicians and patients.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Pain management procedures used by dental and maxillofacial surgeons: an investigation with special regard to odontalgia.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the procedures used by German dental and maxillofacial surgeons treating patients suffering from chronic orofacial pain (COP). This study aimed to evaluate the ambulatory management of COP. METHODS: Using a standardized questionnaire we collected data of dental and maxillofacial surgeons treating patients with COP. Therapists described variables as patients' demographics, chronic pain disorders and their aetiologies, own diagnostic and treatment principles during a period of 3 months. RESULTS: Although only 13.5% of the 520 addressed therapists returned completely evaluable questionnaires, 985 patients with COP could be identified. An orofacial pain syndrome named atypical odontalgia (17.0 %) was frequent. Although those patients revealed signs of chronification, pain therapists were rarely involved (12.5%). For assessing pain the use of Analogue Scales (7%) or interventional diagnostics (4.6%) was uncommon. Despite the fact that surgical procedures are cofactors of COP therapists preferred further surgery (41.9%) and neglected the prescription of analgesics (15.7%). However, most therapists self-evaluated the efficacy of their pain management as good (69.7 %). CONCLUSION: Often ambulatory dental and maxillofacial surgeons do not follow guidelines for COP management despite a high prevalence of severe orofacial pain syndromes.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

An audit on periodontal assessment in general dental practice.

Thorough periodontal assessment is vital for diagnosis, treatment planning and monitoring the progression of periodontal disease. This is a report of a clinical audit that studied the periodontal assessment carried out at a large general dental practice in Shropshire, England. This audit was conducted over a 3-month period, analysing 700 patients for each audit cycle. A new protocol for periodontal assessment using the guidelines of the British Society of Periodontology was introduced. The results demonstrate a marked improvement in assessing the periodontal condition of patients in this general dental practice.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2004

Use of dental photography by general dental practitioners in Great Britain.

This study assesses, by means of a postal questionnaire, the numbers of general dental practitioners who use clinical photography, and the uses to which this is applied. The questionnaire was distributed to 1000 randomly selected GDPs in Great Britain. A response rate of 76% was achieved. Of the respondents, 36% used clinical photography, with 65% of those using an intra-oral 35 mm camera, 18% a digital camera and 12% an intra-oral digital video camera. Principal uses of clinical photography were patient instruction/motivation (72%), medico-legal reasons (68%), treatment planning (63%), and liaison with laboratory (43%).

Communication↗
PubMed2000

Sentinel practices in dentistry: a preliminary evaluation.

The objectives of this study were to compare the socioeconomic make-up and the dental caries and dental treatment patterns of a general dental practice (GDP) population of five-year-old children with those of the total resident population of five-year-old children in a specific locality, and, secondly, to examine the process of gathering information on oral healthcare needs in primary dental care. The study was set in Halton, North Cheshire. Data were collected retrospectively from the patient records of four GDP sentinel' practices using a common data abstraction form. The socioeconomic profiles of the GDP population and the 1995/6 NHS child dental health survey population were compared using the Super Profiles geodemographic classification by plotting frequency distributions. The dmft of each population was compared by calculating 95% confidence intervals. The GDP population showed a slight over-representation in the more affluent groupings of the Super Profiles Lifestyle categories and a more dramatic under-representation in two of the more deprived groupings. The confidence intervals for dt and dmft of the GDP data did not include the mean figures produced by the NHS survey, indicating a significant difference at the P < 0.05 level. These differences may be accounted for by the differences in the socioeconomic make-up of the two populations. Local practice policies on patient selection may also have a consequential effect on population disease estimates derived from primary dental care. Data on population disease experience from primary dental care could only be produced by hand-sorting through patient records, which was time-consuming and inefficient. Standardised electronic systems will need to be developed to make GDP data-collection a viable proposition. Information from primary dental care has the potential to make a major contribution to locality oral health needs assessment and it should be seen as being complementary to information gathered from epidemiological surveys.

Child, Preschool↗