PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Administration, Intranasal”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

[An intranasal method of administration of calcitrin to steroid-dependent patients with bronchial asthma].

The efficacy of endonasal calcitrin was studied against that of intramuscular. The drug was given endonasally in a dose of 3 units twice a day during 1--1.5 months. The effect on the calcium-regulating system (total calcium, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone), external respiration, its analgetic action were similar to such of the intramuscular mode. Endonasal calcitrin is recommended for outpatient use.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1997

Immunological cross reactivity between Schistosoma mansoni and cholera toxin.

Intranasal administration of schistosome antigens in combination with appropriate adjuvant may be an effective route for immunization against schistosomes, since the lungs represent an important site of elimination of schistosomulae. Our previous studies have shown that in mice intranasal administration of cholera toxin (CT) before infection with Schistosoma mansoni results in an enhancement of the worm burden in comparison to nontreated infected animals. In the present study, it was shown that mice treated intranasally with CT displayed high numbers of schistosome-reactive IgM-secreting cells in the spleen as well as high levels of schistosome-reactive serum IgM antibodies, whereas no significant immunological response against two other antigens, ovalbumin (OVA) or keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) was noted. Sera from mice treated intranasally with CT recognized a 22 kDA antigen on SWAP blots. This band was not demonstrable after absorption of the sera with SWAP. These findings indicate a possible cross reactivity between cholera toxin and schistosome antigens. Further analysis by Western blot revealed that a 22 kDa antigen was detected on CT blots by sera from mice and humans infected with S. mansoni. This band was not demonstrable after absorption of the mouse or the human sera with CT. The 22 kDa cross reactive antigen was heat-stable. The antibodies against the 22 kDa antigen were only found within the IgM class but not within other Ig isotypes. Our findings also indicate that the 22 kDa antigen detected by anti-S. mansoni antibodies represents the A1 fragment of the cholera toxin.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1996

Forensic drug testing for opiates. VII. Urinary excretion profile of intranasal (snorted) heroin.

The urinary excretion profile of free and conjugated morphine and 6-acetylmorphine was determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and immunoassay for six healthy male subjects after intranasal administration of 6 and 12 mg of heroin HCI. Results were compared with heroin administration (6 mg) by the intramuscular route. Heroin metabolites were rapidly excreted with peak concentrations appearing in the first or second specimen collection after drug administration. Concentrations of total morphine and 6-acetylmorphine after intranasal heroin were similar to those after intramuscular administration, but free morphine concentrations after the lower intranasal dose were significantly lower than the same dose given intramuscularly. Detection times for total morphine by GC-MS and immunoassay (300-ng/mL cutoff concentration) were generally 24-36 h, but were reduced to less than 12 h at the higher cutoff concentration of 2000 ng/mL. 6-Acetylmorphine concentrations were highly variable and short-lived; detection times (10 ng/mL) were approximately 2-3 h for most subjects, but some failed to produce positive specimens. Of 14 specimens with 6-acetylmorphine concentrations of 10 ng/mL or more, ten were associated with total morphine concentrations greater than 2000 ng/mL, and four specimens had total morphine concentrations less than 2000 ng/mL. Overall, intranasal administration of heroin produced a similar profile of excretion of heroin metabolites to intramuscular administration.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1999

Suppressive versus stimulatory effects of allergen/cholera toxoid (CTB) conjugates depending on the nature of the allergen in a murine model of type I allergy.

Recent reports have demonstrated that feeding small amounts of antigen conjugated to the B subunit of cholera toxin (CTB) suppress immune responses in experimental models of certain Th1-based autoimmune diseases. We have established a model of aerosol sensitization leading to Th2-mediated allergic immune responses in BALB/c mice. In the present study two different antigens, the dietary antigen ovalbumin (OVA) and the inhalant allergen Bet v 1 (the major birch pollen allergen), chemically coupled to recombinant CTB were tested for their potential to influence Th2-like immune responses. Intranasal administration of OVA-CTB prior to sensitization with OVA led to a significant decrease of antigen-specific IgE antibody levels, but a marked increase of OVA-specific IgG2a antibodies as compared to non-pretreated, sensitized animals. Antigen-specific lympho-proliferative responses in vitro were reduced by 65% in the pretreated group; IL-5 and IL-4, but not IFN-gamma, production were markedly decreased in responder cells of lungs and spleens of nasally pretreated mice. In contrast, mucosal administration of rBet v 1-CTB conjugates prior to sensitization led to an up-regulation of allergen-specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a, increased in vitro lympho-proliferative responses as well as augmented production of IL-5, IL-4, IL-10 and IFN-gamma. Intranasal administration prior to sensitization of unconjugated allergens showed also contrasting effects: OVA could not significantly influence antigen-specific antibody or cytokine production, whereas intranasal pretreatment with unconjugated Bet v 1 suppressed allergen-specific immune responses in vivo and in vitro. These results demonstrated that the two antigens--in conjugated as in unconjugated form--had different effects on the Th2 immune responses. We therefore conclude that the tolerogenic or immunogenic properties of CTB--and probably also other antigen-delivery systems--strongly depend on the nature of the coupled antigen-allergen.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1999

Suppressive versus stimulatory effects of allergen/cholera toxoid (CTB) conjugates depending on the nature of the allergen in a murine model of type I allergy.

Recent reports have demonstrated that feeding small amounts of antigen conjugated to the B subunit of cholera toxin (CTB) suppress immune responses in experimental models of certain T(h)1-based autoimmune diseases. We have established a model of aerosol sensitization leading to T(h)2-mediated allergic immune responses in BALB/c mice. In the present study two different antigens, the dietary antigen ovalbumin (OVA) and the inhalant allergen Bet v 1 (the major birch pollen allergen), chemically coupled to recombinant CTB were tested for their potential to influence T(h)2-like immune responses. Intranasal administration of OVA-CTB prior to sensitization with OVA led to a significant decrease of antigen-specific IgE antibody levels, but a marked increase of OVA-specific IgG2a antibodies as compared to non-pretreated, sensitized animals. Antigen-specific lympho-proliferative responses in vitro were reduced by 65% in the pretreated group; IL-5 and IL-4 production were decreased in responder cells of lungs and spleens of nasally pretreated mice. In contrast, mucosal administration of rBet v 1-CTB conjugates prior to sensitization led to an up-regulation of allergen-specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a, increased in vitro lympho-proliferative responses as well as augmented production of IL-5, IL-4, IL-10 and IFN-gamma. Intranasal administration prior to sensitization of unconjugated allergens showed also contrasting effects: OVA could not significantly influence antigen-specific antibody or cytokine production, whereas intranasal pretreatment with unconjugated Bet v 1 suppressed allergen-specific immune responses in vivo and in vitro. These results demonstrated that the two antigens-in conjugated as in unconjugated form-had different effects on the T(h)2 immune responses. We therefore conclude that the tolerogenic or immunogenic properties of CTB-and probably also other antigen-delivery systems-strongly depend on the nature of the coupled antigen-allergen.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1997

Evaluation of intranasal midazolam in children undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous midazolam and opioids are used to produce conscious sedation in children undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). However, children may experience significant fear and anxiety before receiving these medications, especially during separation from parents and during venipuncture. Intranasal administration of midazolam represents a noninvasive method of sedating children before anxiety-producing events. The objective of this study was to determine whether premedication with intranasal midazolam reduces stress and anxiety of separation from parents and of undergoing venipuncture, while maintaining adequate sedation during EGD. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study in 40 children, aged 2 to 12 years, who were undergoing EGD. Patients in group I were premedicated with intranasal placebo (0.9% NaCl) followed 10 minutes later by intravenous midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) and intravenous meperidine (1 mg/ kg). Patients in group II were premedicated with intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) followed by intravenous placebo (0.9% NaCl) and intravenous meperidine (1 mg/kg). Anxiolysis and sedation were scored by a blinded observer, who identified minor and major negative behaviors during four observation periods: intranasal drug administration, separation from parents, venipuncture, and EGD. RESULTS: Premedication with intranasal midazolam significantly reduced negative behaviors during separation from parents (p < 0.05); however, no difference between regimens was noted during venipuncture or EGD. Negative behaviors appeared to increase during administration of intranasal midazolam or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with intranasal midazolam is effective in reducing negative behaviors during separation from parents, while it maintains sedation during the endoscopic procedure. The benefits of intranasal administration may be negated, however, by irritation, and discomfort caused by intranasal drug delivery.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed2004

Intranasal medications for the treatment of migraine and cluster headache.

Intranasal medications for the treatment of headache have recently received increased attention. This paper reviews intranasal formulations of a variety of available medications (dihydroergotamine mesylate [dihydroergotamine mesilate], sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, butorphanol, capsaicin and lidocaine [lignocaine]) and one experimental medication (civamide, a cis-isomer of capsaicin) for the treatment of migraine and cluster headache. Although the efficacy of intranasal agents varies with the product used, intranasal delivery may be both convenient and more effective than other modes of drug delivery for a variety of reasons: (i) intranasal administration bypasses small bowel gastrointestinal tract absorption, which is often significantly delayed during the acute phase of a migraine attack; (ii) nauseated patients may prefer non-oral formulations as they decrease the chance of vomiting and are more rapidly effective; (iii) intranasal administration causes no pain or injection site reaction and is easier and more convenient to administer than injection or suppository and so may be used earlier in a migraine attack, resulting in better efficacy; (iv) intranasal medication produces the same number or fewer adverse events than injections; and (v) intranasal formulations offer a more rapid onset of action than oral medications, for some of the above reasons and, as such, may be more useful in patients with cluster headache, although this needs to be verified. However, it is important to emphasise that a preference study showed that most patients prefer oral tablets to an intranasal formulation. Also, some nasal preparations have significant adverse effects or are not well absorbed and therefore do not work consistently; others are more challenging to administer as a result of their delivery apparatus. Nevertheless, it is our opinion that nasal preparations increase therapeutic options and may result in faster response times and better efficacy than oral formulations and better patient satisfaction than injectable preparations.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1987

Assessment of the biological effectiveness of nasal synthetic salmon calcitonin (SSCT) by comparison with intramuscular (i.m.) or placebo injection in normal subjects.

For patients who require treatment over a period of some years, intranasal administration of synthetic salmon calcitonin (SSCT) obviates the discomfort associated with administration by injection. Moreover, this mode of administration is not associated with the side effects normally encountered when calcitonin is injected intramuscularly or subcutaneously. The aim of this study was to assess, in normal subjects, the biological activity of nasal SSCT by comparing the fluctuations of parameters reflecting calcium-phosphorus metabolism after nasal instillation, injection of SSCT and injection of placebo, respectively. In nine healthy subjects, this instillation of 200 IU of SSCT into the nasal cavity caused a fall in serum calcium, a fall in serum phosphorus and a transient rise in parathyroid hormone levels similar to that observed after the intramuscular (i.m.) injection of 80 IU of SSCT. SSCT whether administered by the nasal route or by injection, does not inhibit endogenous calcitonin secretion. There were no changes in serum beta-endorphin, magnesium or erythrocyte magnesium levels after administration of calcitonin by the intranasal route or by injection.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1997

Evidence for central nervous effects of corticotropin-releasing hormone on gastric acid secretion in humans.

In animals, corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) has been shown to decrease gastric acid secretion after intracerebral administration. Evidence exists that in man peptides have a direct access to the brain upon intranasal administration. This study aimed at assessing brain-mediated effects of CRH on gastric pH after intranasal administration in humans. Eleven healthy men were tested on 2 occasions in a double-blind within-subject cross-over comparison during treatment with CRH (versus placebo) administered intranasally at a dose of 20 micrograms every 10 min. Gastric pH values were measured continuously by a gastral pH tube. After 2 h of intranasal treatment, 6 micrograms/kg pentagastrin was injected subcutaneously. The subject's mood was assessed by an adjective list (EWL-N) at the end of each experimental condition. Intranasal CRH increased pH baseline values from (mean +/- SE) 1.70 +/- 0.31 to 2.62 +/- 0.53 (corresponding to 54%), whereas during intranasal treatment with placebo pH values remained unchanged (p < 0.05). After injection of pentagastrin, pH values decreased to 0.73 +/- 0.04 during placebo and to 0.93 +/- 0.14 during CRH treatment (n.s.). During treatment with CRH, subjects felt less tired (p < 0.05) and deactivated (p < 0.05). Plasma cortisol and CRH levels were not affected by intranasal CRH, excluding mediation of the CRH effects via resorption into the bloodstream, and TSH levels were slightly decreased by the end of the treatment. Results confirm the notion of a pathway for CRH from the nose to the brain, initiating, via central nervous mechanisms, inhibition of gastric acid secretion and a change of mood in humans.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Absorption of clonazepam after intranasal and buccal administration.

Serum concentrations of clonazepam after intranasal, buccal and intravenous administration were compared in a cross-over study in seven healthy male volunteers. Each subject received a 1.0 mg dose of clonazepam intranasally and buccally and 0.5 mg intravenously. A Cmax of 6.3 +/- 1.0 ng ml-1 (mean; +/- s.d.) was measured 17.5 min (median) (range 15-20 min) after intranasal administration. A second peak (4.6 +/- 1.3 ng ml-1) caused by oral absorption was seen after 1.7 h (range 0.7-3.0 h). After buccal administration a Cmax of 6.0 +/- 3.0 ng ml-1 was measured after 50 min (range 30-90 min) with a second peak of 6.5 +/- 2.5 ng ml-1 after 3.0 h (range 2.0-4.0 h). Two minutes after i.v. injection of 0.5 mg clonazepam the serum concentration was 27 +/- 18 ng ml-1. It is concluded that intranasal clonazepam is an alternative to buccal administration. However, the Cmax of clonazepam after intranasal administration is not high enough to recommend the intranasal route as an alternative to intravenous injection.

Absorption↗
PubMed1989

Macrophage activation and host augmentation against Sendai or herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections with synthetic polypeptides in mice.

Poly-L-Lys (mean mol. wt; 12,000), poly-L-Arg (5000) and poly-L-Orn were found to activate peritoneal macrophages effectively in vivo in 14 synthetic homo polypeptides. The ability of sequential poly(L-Arg-L-X) (5000) to activate macrophages was less than that of poly-L-Arg. Neither (L-Arg)12 nor (L-Arg)6 by themselves activated macrophages, but poly-D-Arg (5000) did, as also did poly-L-Arg; this suggests that the polycationic character of poly-L-Arg plays a role in the activation of macrophages. The intranasal administration of poly-L-Lys, -L-Arg, -L-Orn, -D-Arg, all of which activated macrophages, augmented host resistance against Sendai virus infection in mice. The protection afforded by poly-L-Arg seemed to depend on its mol. wt: the order of protection was poly-L-Arg greater than (L-Arg)12 greater than (L-Arg)6. The intranasal administration of poly-L-Arg 3 days before the infection was effective, while that 1 day before infection was not. There was no difference between the groups in the titer of interferon produced by the infection of Sendai virus given with poly-L-Arg either 3 days before or 1 day before the infection. The administration of poly-L-Arg 3 days before the infection caused a significant decrease of the virus titer in the lung 6 days after the infection when compared with the control or the mice given 1 day before. The intravenous administration of 2-chloroadenosine (2-Cl-Ade), which is a selective inhibitor of macrophages, into the mice which had received poly-L-Arg intranasally 3 days before the infection caused a significant decrease in the survival rate of the mice, indicating that the macrophages activated with poly-L-Arg are likely to be an important element in affording the protection. Subcutaneous administration of poly-L-Arg revealed protective activity against systematic infection with herpes virus-type 1.

2-Chloroadenosine↗
PubMed2005

Intranasal immunization of BALB/c mice with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli colonization factor CS6 encapsulated in biodegradable poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres.

Mice were intranasally administered enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli colonization factor CS6 encapsulated in poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres (CS6-PLG), with immune response measured and compared to that of similarly administered native CS6 and CS6 plus mutant heat-labile enterotoxin mucosal adjuvant (CS6+mLT). Native CS6 and the CS6-PLG microspheres administered intranasally to mice induced serum IgG responses, with the CS6-PLG microspheres inducing a significantly greater (P<0.001) response than native CS6. Following intranasal administration of native CS6, no fecal IgG and IgA responses were measured; however, the CS6-PLG microspheres induced significantly greater (P<0.001) fecal IgG and IgA responses than native CS6. The coadministration of the mLT mucosal adjuvant with CS6 induced significantly greater serum (P<0.001) and fecal (P<0.01) responses than the CS6-PLG microspheres. However, following intranasal administration of the mLT adjuvant, the mice showed definite signs of distress, indicating an adverse reaction to the mLT. Thus, this brings into question the safety of the mLT and its use as an intranasal adjuvant. In contrast, the PLG-microspheres administered intranasally caused no noticeable distress to the mice. The results obtained in this study indicate that the encapsulation of CS6 in PLG-microspheres administered intranasally to mice acted in an adjuvant capacity to enhance the CS6 immune response.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1982

Inhibition of serum androgen levels by chronic intranasal and subcutaneous administration of a potent luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist in adult men.

The effect of chronic treatment with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist Buserelin (Hoechst AG, Frankfurt/Main, West Germany) ([D-Ser(TBU)6,des-Gly-NH2(10)]LH-RH ethylamide) administrered by nasal spray (200 or 500 micrograms, twice daily) or subcutaneously (50 micrograms daily) for periods of 1 to 8 months was studied on serum sex steroids and LH levels in 18 patients with cancer of the prostate. Basal serum testosterone concentration decreases to 71.1 +/- 18.3 (NS) and 28.6 +/- 9.3%, (P less than 0.01) of control in patients receiving the 200-micrograms and 500-micrograms dose by nasal spray, respectively. In patients treated subcutaneously, a more rapid inhibition of serum testosterone levels to 19.6 +/- 6.4% of control (P less than 0.01) is observed. The finding of decreased levels of 17-OH-progesterone, testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone in the presence of unchanged pregnenolone concentration indicates that the decrease in androgen biosynthesis induced by Buserelin treatment is due to a blockage at the level of 17-hydroxylase and 17,20-desmolase activities. The present data indicate that chronic administration of Buserelin could be a safe and effective means of reducing serum androgens in patients with cancer of the prostate.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1999

Suppression of antigen-specific T- and B-cell responses by intranasal or oral administration of recombinant bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in a murine model of type I allergy.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal (nasal or oral) administration of soluble protein antigens induces a state of antigen-specific immunologic hyporesponsiveness. Several studies have shown that induction of mucosal tolerance can prevent the onset or reduce the severity of certain TH1 -mediated experimental autoimmune diseases. Only a few studies describe similar results for type I allergies, which are caused by excessive TH2 cell activities. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate whether mucosal tolerance induction would also be efficient in preventing an allergic type I immune response. METHODS: A murine model of inhalative type I allergy, leading to sensitization to birch pollen and its major allergen Bet v 1 in BALB/c mice, was used. Recombinant Bet v 1 was nasally or orally applied in low doses before sensitization. At the time of death, immediate-type skin tests were performed. Blood was taken, and serum was used for measurement of allergen-specific antibodies. Spleen cell cultures were performed to determine cytokine production (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IFN-gamma), as well as levels of TGF-beta mRNA. RESULTS: Both nasal and oral administration of minimal doses of recombinant Bet v 1 before aerosol sensitization with birch pollen suppressed the allergen-specific antibody production of all isotypes. Consequently, the in vivo type I skin test responses to the allergen were negative in the tolerized, in contrast to the sensitized, group. Moreover, allergen-specific lymphoproliferative responses and cytokine production in vitro (ie, IFN-gamma, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10) were markedly reduced. In contrast, expression of TGF-beta mRNA was markedly increased in spleen cells from nasally tolerized animals, indicating regulatory mechanisms for tolerance induction. CONCLUSION: We conclude from the present study that nasal, as well as oral, administration of recombinant allergen is an effective way to prevent allergen-specific T- and B-cell responses in a TH2 model.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1986

[Prevention of hypertensive attacks after carotid surgery. The value of nifedipine and diltiazem].

A randomized study was carried out to determine whether postoperative administration of either intranasal nifedipine or intravenous diltiazem was effective in preventing hypertensive episodes after carotid endarterectomy. Sixty-three consecutive patients undergoing this surgery were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 21): control (C), nifedipine (N) and diltiazem (D). Anaesthesia was induced with flunitrazepam (0.02 mg X kg-1), fentanyl 6 micrograms X kg-1 and pancuronium (0.1 mg X kg-1), and maintained by N2O/O2 (50%), additional fentanyl and halothane or enflurane when warranted. Postoperatively, patients were warned whilst under mechanical ventilation in a recovery room. Upon arrival in the recovery room, intranasal nifedipine (10 mg) was given to patients included in group N, while patients from group D received an intravenous dose of 0.3 mg X kg-1 of diltiazem, followed by a continuous infusion of 3 micrograms X kg-1 X min-1 until 15 min after extubation. No preventive treatment was given to patients in group C. If postoperative systolic blood pressure rose to more than 180 mmHg, 10 mg of nifedipine were administered intranasally. During the postoperative period, 13 patients from group C, 5 from group N and 4 from group D exhibited hypertensive episodes (systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mmHg). Intranasal administration of 10 mg nifedipine led to the normalization of blood pressure in 20 out of these 22 patients. This study confirmed the high incidence of hypertensive attacks after carotid endarterectomy, and showed that prophylactic administration of nifedipine or intravenous diltiazem was highly effective in preventing such hypertensive episodes.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Phase I trial of intranasal and endobronchial administration of a recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (rAAV2)-CFTR vector in adult cystic fibrosis patients: a two-part clinical study.

Recombinant adeno-associated serotype 2-based vectors (rAAV2) possess a number of theoretical advantages for cystic fibrosis (CF) gene therapy because they elicit little or no inflammatory response and generally result in stable expression. rAAV2 vectors expressing the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene have previously been shown to mediate stable correction of the CF defect in CF bronchial epithelial cells and stable expression of CFTR in rabbit and nonhuman primate models. Here we report the results of the first trial initiated with rAAV in humans, a phase I study in 25 adult and adolescent CF patients with mild to moderate lung disease. Doses of the rAAV-CFTR vector (tgAAVCF) ranging from 3 x 10(1) to 1 x 10(9) replication units (RU), which is equivalent to approximately 6 x 10(4) to 2 x 10(12) DNase resistant particles (DRP), were administered to one side of the nose and to the superior segment of the lower lobe of the right lung. Several adverse events were noted prior to and/or after vector delivery, but most of them appeared to be related to the endogenous CF lung disease or a result of the bronchoscopic procedures. Only one of the serious events was judged to be possibly vector-related (based on temporal association), and this event was a pulmonary exacerbation very similar to several others experienced by the same subject in the three months preceding vector delivery. Vector shedding was minimal throughout the study, and serum-neutralizing antibodies were detected after vector delivery to subjects in the highest dosage cohorts. Gene transfer as measured by DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was not observed until cohort 10 in nasal and bronchial epithelia. Sporadic low-level copy numbers suggested gene transfer of anywhere from 0.002 copies per cell up to 0.5 copies per cell was possible; however, DNA PCR was positive in lungs prior to direct dosing suggesting aspiration from the nasal dosing. These data indicate the need for continued evaluation of rAAV-CFTR vectors in additional clinical trials.

Administration, Intranasal↗