PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources

[Common abdominal emergency cases a the end of the 20th century].

Despite the marked decline in mortality of acute appendicitis over the past 50 years, the rate of perforation and negative appendectomy remains unchanged. The most effective means of controlling human suffering and economic cost associated with appendicitis is the identification and correction of factors responsible for perforation. Negative appendectomy rates have been relatively stable over the decades. Progress in diagnosis and diagnostic imaging still has not provided a foolproof non-invasive test to rule out the presence of appendicitis accurately. Clinical assessment determines the treatment and the clinical observation should be done by the surgeon. The use of H2-receptor antagonists has not reduced emergency admission of patients with duodenal ulcer. Mortality associated with perforated peptic ulcer remains high in spite of advances in surgical management. The patients with acute obstructed cholecystitis usually reach the surgeon with more advanced stage of the disease which results in increased morbidity and subsequently increased cost for undergoing cholecystectomy. If the patient develops severe diffuse peritonitis, the mortality could reach 30%. This is in spite of aggressive surgical treatment, potent antibiotics, modern intensive care and diagnostic procedures. To improve the results, more advanced treatment to avoid the development of peritonitis and more effective antibiotics to control the inflammation will be needed.

Abdomen, Acute↗

Laparoscopic suture closure of perforated duodenal peptic ulcer.

The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a continuous series of 30 patients with perforated duodenal peptic ulcers treated by a laparoscopic approach. Between January 1996 and December 1998, 30 patients (24 males, 6 females) with a mean age of 69.2 years were operated on with a laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic treatment included peritoneal lavage, suture of the perforation, and omental patching in 24 cases. A conversion to laparotomy was necessary in five patients (16.6%). Mean operative time was 92 minutes (range: 58-114) and mean hospital stay was 6 days (range: 4-16). Mortality and morbidity rates were 6.6% (n = 2) and 16.6% (n = 5). With a median follow-up of 12 months, 96% of the patients were in good condition; one patient had recurrent duodenal ulceration. The results of our study show the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach for perforated peptic ulcer repair, with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates.

Aged↗

Perforated peptic duodenal ulcer in a paraesophageal hernia--a case report of a rare surgical emergency.

BACKGROUND: Paraesophageal hernias are quite common and sometimes feared due to the risk of incarceration and strangulation of any herniated organ. The hereby reported combination of an incarcerated paraesophageal hernia containing a perforated peptic ulcer is extremely rare. CASE PRESENTATION: An elderly man with multiple medical conditions was admitted due to severe upper abdominal pain. The patient was found to have a paraesophageal hernia and underwent a laparotomy. In the hernia, a perforated benign peptic duodenal ulcer was found. The duodenal defect was over-sewn, the hernial defect was closed and the former hernial cavity was drained by a right-sided chest tube. The patient was discharged one month after surgery and was found to do well at follow-up one month after discharge. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of a patient surviving the extremely rare and life-threatening combination of a perforated peptic duodenal ulcer in a paraesophageal hernia.

Abdominal Pain↗

Association of Helicobacter pylori with peptic perforation in Chattisgarh region of India.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori is present in over 90% cases of peptic ulcer. There are very few reports regarding prevalence of H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer perforation which is the commonest complication of peptic ulcer disease. In the present study we have drawn this association. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 44 cases of peptic perforation were included in this study. Per-operative biopsy was taken from the margin of perforation. The criteria for H. pylori positivity were, Positive Rapid Urease Test and evidence of H. pylori infection on histological examination using Modified Giemsa and H&E stains. RESULTS: Prevalence of H. pylori infection in peptic perforation was 61.4%. This is well above the usual prevalence in normal population of 45%. H. pylori infection was significantly more common in cases of chronic dyspepsia (> 6 months) and not significantly related to sex, blood group, addiction, family history of acid peptic disease and previous H2 blocker therapy. INFERENCE: H. pylori is found more commonly in patients with peptic ulcer perforation than in those without.

Adult↗

Duodenal ulcer perforation and pneumothorax: a case report.

Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum are rarely observed as a complication of perforated peptic ulcer, which is a common cause of acute abdomen. We report a case of a 30-year-old male patient with abdominal pain and respiratory distress. Resulting from physical examination and laboratory data of the patient, acute abdomen and pneumothorax were diagnosed simultaneously. Laparotomy revealed duodenal ulcer perforation and a simple patch closure was performed. No complications were observed during the postoperative course of the patient.

Adult↗

Role of Helicobacter pylori infection in perforation of peptic ulcer: an age- and gender-matched case-control study.

Evidence showed a marked decrease in recurrence rate of peptic ulcer after eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, whether H. pylori infection is etiologically related to perforation of peptic ulcer remains to be clarified. We therefore conducted an age- and gender-matched case-control study between perforated and nonsurgical peptic ulcers in H. pylori infection and examined differences in the cytotoxin genes cagA and vacA. Serum H. pylori IgG antibody (ELISA) was positive in 20/21 (95%) of perforated vs. 37/40 (93%) of nonsurgical duodenal ulcers and in 5/5 (100%) of perforated vs. 24/28 (86%) of nonsurgical gastric ulcer patients. Positivity of H. pylori DNA in gastric juice, which was amplified by PCR and identified by Southern blot hybridization, was 17/23 (74%) of perforated vs. 32/45 (71%) in the nonsurgical duodenal ulcer group. Positivity of the cytotoxin genes cagA and vacA in H. pylori DNA-positive gastric juice was as follows: perforated vs. nonsurgical duodenal ulcer, cagA 11/ 13 (85%) vs. 24/27 (89%); vacA1: 9/13 (69%) vs. 22/27 (82%); vacA2 8/13 (62%) vs. 21/27 (78%). There were no significant differences between the perforated and nonsurgical peptic ulcer groups for these H. pylori serum and gene markers. It is assumed that H. pylori infection is not etiologically related to perforation of peptic ulcer.

Antigens, Bacterial↗