PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Signal Recognition Particle”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources

A GTPase cycle in initiation of protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

In higher eukaryotes proteins bearing a signal sequence are translocated across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The initial events of protein translocation are the binding of the signal sequence by the 54 kDa subunit (SRP54) of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the targeting of the ribosome nascent chain complex to the ER. Targeting is mediated by the binding of SRP to the SRP receptor, a membrane protein comprising two different subunits, SR alpha and SR beta. Interaction of SRP and SR alpha/SR beta causes release of the signal and the engagement of the nascent chain with the membrane-bound translocation apparatus. Both SRP54 and SR alpha contain homologous domains which include a predicted GTPase fold. The transmembrane protein SR beta also contains a GTPase domain, but it is not closely related to those of SRP54 and SR alpha. All three proteins bind GTP specifically, and the SR alpha/SR beta complex stimulates both GTP binding to and GTP hydrolysis by SRP54. We suggest a model for the initiation of protein translocation across the ER in which SR alpha beta catalyses a cycle of GTP binding, hydrolysis and release by SRP54 that regulates its dissociation from the signal sequence.

Animals↗

Protein targeting to and translocation across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum.

Several approaches are currently being taken to elucidate the mechanisms and the molecular components responsible for protein targeting to and translocation across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. Two experimental systems dominate the field: a biochemical system derived from mammalian exocrine pancreas, and a combined genetic and biochemical system employing the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Results obtained in each of these systems have contributed novel, mostly non-overlapping information. Recently, much effort in the field has been dedicated to identifying membrane proteins that comprise the translocon. Membrane proteins involved in translocation have been identified both in the mammalian system, using a combination of crosslinking and reconstitution approaches, and in S. cerevisiae, by selecting for mutants in the translocation pathway. None of the membrane proteins isolated, however, appears to be homologous between the two experimental systems. In the case of the signal recognition particle, the two systems have converged, which has led to a better understanding of how proteins are targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

Animals↗

Signal sequence-dependent function of the TRAM protein during early phases of protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

Cotranslational translocation of proteins across the mammalian ER membrane involves, in addition to the signal recognition particle receptor and the Sec61p complex, the translocating chain-associating membrane (TRAM) protein, the function of which is still poorly understood. Using reconstituted proteoliposomes, we show here that the translocation of most, but not all, secretory proteins requires the function of TRAM. Experiments with hybrid proteins demonstrate that the structure of the signal sequence determines whether or not TRAM is needed. Features that distinguish TRAM-dependent and -independent signal sequences include the length of their charged, NH2-terminal region and the structure of their hydrophobic core. In cases where TRAM is required for translocation, it is not needed for the initial interaction of the ribosome/nascent chain complex with the ER membrane but for a subsequent step inside the membrane in which the nascent chain is inserted into the translocation site in a protease-resistant manner. Thus, TRAM functions in a signal sequence-dependent manner at a critical, early phase of the translocation process.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Structural determinants for signal sequence function in the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum.

Signal sequences function in protein targeting to and translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. To investigate the structural requirements for signal sequence function, chimeras of the Escherichia coli LamB signal peptide and prolactin were prepared. The LamB signal peptide was chosen by virtue of the extensive biophysical and biological characterization of its activity. In vitro, nascent prolactin chains bearing the LamB signal peptide (LamB) were targeted in a signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent manner to rough microsomes but remained protease- and salt-sensitive and translocated at low efficiency. Full translocation activity was obtained in a gain of function mutant (LamB*) in which three hydrophobic residues in the LamB hydrophobic core were converted to leucine residues. Cross-linking studies demonstrated that the LamB* signal sequence displayed markedly enhanced interactions with SRP and integral membrane proteins. In contrast, chemically denatured LamB and LamB*-precursors bound with identical efficiencies and in a salt-resistant manner to rough microsomes, suggesting that during de novo synthesis the signal sequence of LamB-bearing precursors assumes a conformation refractory to translocation. These data indicate that a leucine-rich signal sequence is necessary for optimal interaction with SRP and suggest that SRP, by maintaining the signal sequence in a conformation suitable for membrane binding, performs a chaperone function.

Animals↗

Evidence against the double-arginine motif as the only determinant for protein translocation by a novel Sec-independent pathway in Escherichia coli.

Proteins which are synthesized with a signal peptide containing a 'double-arginine' motif may be translocated across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane by a mechanism that is different from the known Sec and signal recognition particle pathways. The function of the double-arginine motif as a determinant for this novel pathway was studied by expressions of gene constructs coding for the high potential iron-sulfur protein (HiPIP) from Chromatium vinosum D in Escherichia coli. When the protein was produced with its original double-arginine motif-containing signal peptide, it was in part translocated into the periplasm and thereby processed, as shown by immunoblots after cell fractionation and N-terminal sequencing of purified HiPIP. Processing was not inhibited significantly by 3 mM sodium azide, indicating that translocation of HiPIP occurs by a SecA-independent pathway. Translocation of HiPIP could be altered to the SecA-dependent mode when its signal peptide was substituted by that of PelB from Erwinia carotovora. When the HiPIP double-arginine motif (SRRDAVK) was introduced into the corresponding position of the PelB signal peptide, the transport pathway remained SecA-dependent. This indicates that additional determinants are required for translocation by the Sec-independent pathway.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Substrate-specific function of the translocon-associated protein complex during translocation across the ER membrane.

Although the transport of model proteins across the mammalian ER can be reconstituted with purified Sec61p complex, TRAM, and signal recognition particle receptor, some substrates, such as the prion protein (PrP), are inefficiently or improperly translocated using only these components. Here, we purify a factor needed for proper translocation of PrP and identify it as the translocon-associated protein (TRAP) complex. Surprisingly, TRAP also stimulates vectorial transport of many, but not all, other substrates in a manner influenced by their signal sequences. Comparative analyses of several natural signal sequences suggest that a dependence on TRAP for translocation is not due to any single physical parameter, such as hydrophobicity of the signal sequence. Instead, a functional property of the signal, efficiency of its post-targeting role in initiating substrate translocation, correlates inversely with TRAP dependence. Thus, maximal translocation independent of TRAP can only be achieved with a signal sequence, such as the one from prolactin, whose strong interaction with the translocon mediates translocon gating shortly after targeting. These results identify the TRAP complex as a functional component of the translocon and demonstrate that it acts in a substrate-specific manner to facilitate the initiation of protein translocation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Structural RNA has lower folding energy than random RNA of the same dinucleotide frequency.

We present results of computer experiments that indicate that several RNAs for which the native state (minimum free energy secondary structure) is functionally important (type III hammerhead ribozymes, signal recognition particle RNAs, U2 small nucleolar spliceosomal RNAs, certain riboswitches, etc.) all have lower folding energy than random RNAs of the same length and dinucleotide frequency. Additionally, we find that whole mRNA as well as 5'-UTR, 3'-UTR, and cds regions of mRNA have folding energies comparable to that of random RNA, although there may be a statistically insignificant trace signal in 3'-UTR and cds regions. Various authors have used nucleotide (approximate) pattern matching and the computation of minimum free energy as filters to detect potential RNAs in ESTs and genomes. We introduce a new concept of the asymptotic Z-score and describe a fast, whole-genome scanning algorithm to compute asymptotic minimum free energy Z-scores of moving-window contents. Asymptotic Z-score computations offer another filter, to be used along with nucleotide pattern matching and minimum free energy computations, to detect potential functional RNAs in ESTs and genomic regions.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

Targeting and membrane-insertion of a sunflower oleosin in vitro and in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the central hydrophobic domain contains more than one signal sequence, and directs oleosin insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane using a signal anchor sequence mechanism.

A range of N- and C-terminal deletions of an oleosin from Helianthus annuus L. were used to study the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) targeting and membrane insertion of this protein both in vitro and in vivo in yeast ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Neither the N- nor the C-terminal hydrophilic domains are important for targeting and/or membrane insertion, with all the information required for these processes located within the central hydrophobic region of the protein. However, in vitro membrane-insertion experiments suggest that these domains are important for a correct topology of the oleosin within the ER membrane. The first half of the hydrophobic central domain, flanked by the positively charged N-terminal domain, is likely to function as a type-II signal-anchor (SAII) sequence. However, in the absence of the N-terminal 26 residues of this domain, the proline-knot region and the second half of this hydrophobic domain are sufficient to direct oleosin to the ER and to allow stable (but far less efficient) integration of the protein into the membrane. Taken together, these results indicate that oleosin contains more than one domain that is capable of interacting with the signal recognition particle to direct the protein to the ER membrane.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Biogenesis of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, an integral glycoprotein of the endoplasmic reticulum.

Using a cell line, C100, that overproduces 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase; EC 1.1.1.34) 100-fold, we have studied the synthesis and insertion of this protein into the endoplasmic reticulum. The enzyme is synthesized on membrane-bound polysomes. It is cotranslationally but not post-translationally inserted into dog pancreatic microsomes. This cotranslational insertion is dependent upon signal recognition particle. HMG-CoA reductase is glycosylated with an oligosaccharide(s) of the "high-mannose" type sensitive to endo-beta-D-N-acetylglucosaminidase H. Partial determination of the NH2-terminal amino acid sequence of the in vitro translation product and the mature polypeptide indicate they are the same and demonstrate there is no cleavage of an NH2-terminal signal sequence.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Cloning and characterization of the goadsporin biosynthetic gene cluster from Streptomyces sp. TP-A0584.

The biosynthetic gene cluster of goadsporin, a polypeptide antibiotic containing thiazole and oxazole rings, was cloned from Streptomyces sp. TP-A0584. The cluster contains a structural gene, godA, and nine god (goadsporin) genes involved in post-translational modification, immunity and transcriptional regulation. Although the gene organization is similar to typical bacteriocin biosynthetic gene clusters, each goadsporin biosynthetic gene shows low homology to these genes. Goadsporin biosynthesis is initiated by the translation of godA, and the subsequent cyclization, dehydration and acetylation are probably catalysed by godD, godE, godF, godG and godH gene products. godI shows high similarity to the 54 kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle and plays an important role in goadsporin immunity. Furthermore, four goadsporin analogues were produced by site-directed mutagenesis of godA, suggesting that this biosynthesis machinery is used for the heterocyclization of peptides.

Cloning, Molecular↗

The role of molecular chaperones in protein transport into the endoplasmic reticulum.

In eukaryotic cells export of the vast majority of newly synthesized secretory proteins is initiated at the level of the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (microsomal membrane). The precursors of secretory proteins are not transported across the microsomal membrane in their native state. Typically, signal peptides in the precursor proteins are involved in preserving the transport-competent state. Furthermore, there are two alternatively acting mechanisms involved in preserving transport competence in the cytosol. The first mechanism involves two ribonucleoparticles (ribosome and signal recognition particle) and their receptors on the microsomal surface and requires the hydrolysis of GTP. The second mechanism does not involve ribonucleoparticles and their receptors but depends on the hydrolysis of ATP and on cis-acting molecular chaperones, such as heat shock cognate protein 70 (hsc 70). In both mechanisms a translocase in the microsomal membrane mediates protein translocation. This translocase includes a signal peptide receptor on the cis-side of the microsomal membrane and a component that also depends on the hydrolysis of ATP. At least in certain cases, an additional nucleoside triphosphate-requiring step is involved which is related to the trans-acting molecular chaperone BiP.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Endoplasmic reticulum-bound ribosomes reside in stable association with the translocon following termination of protein synthesis.

In current views, translation-coupled ribosome binding to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane is transient, with association occurring via the signal recognition particle pathway and dissociation occurring upon the termination of protein synthesis. Recent studies indicate, however, that ribosomal subunits remain membrane-bound following the termination of protein synthesis. To define the mechanism of post-termination ribosome association with the ER membrane, membrane-bound ribosomes were detergent-solubilized from tissue culture cells at different stages of the protein synthesis cycle, and the composition of the ribosome-associated membrane protein fraction was determined. We report that ribosomes reside in stable association with the Sec61alpha-translocon following the termination stage of protein synthesis. Additionally, in vitro experiments revealed that solubilized, gradient-purified ribosome-translocon complexes were able to initiate the translation of secretory and cytosolic proteins and were functional in assays of signal sequence recognition. Using this experimental system, synthesis of signal sequence-bearing polypeptides yielded a tight ribosome-translocon junction; synthesis of nascent polypeptides lacking a signal sequence resulted in a disruption of this junction. On the basis of these data, we propose that in situ, ribosomes reside in association with the translocon throughout the cycle of protein synthesis, with membrane release occurring upon translation of proteins lacking topogenic signals.

Biological Transport↗

Protein traffic in bacteria: multiple routes from the ribosome to and across the membrane.

Bacteria use several routes to target their exported proteins to the plasma membrane. The majority are exported through pores formed by SecY and SecE. Two different molecular machineries are used to target proteins to the SecYE translocon. Translocated proteins, synthesized as precursors with cleavable signal sequences, require cytoplasmic chaperones, such as SecB, to remain competent for posttranslational transport. In concert with SecB, SecA targets the precursors to SecY and energizes their translocation by its ATPase activity. The latter function involves a partial insertion of SecA itself into the SecYE translocon, a process that is strongly assisted by a couple of membrane proteins, SecG, SecD, SecF, YajC, and the proton gradient across the membrane. Integral membrane proteins, however, are specifically recognized by a direct interaction between their noncleaved signal anchor sequences and the bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP) consisting of Ffh and 4.5S RNA. Recognition occurs during synthesis at the ribosome and leads to a cotranslational targeting to SecYE that is mediated by FtsY and the hydrolysis of GTP. No other Sec protein is required for integration unless the membrane protein also contains long translocated domains that engage the SecA machinery. Discrimination between SecA/SecB- and SRP-dependent targeting involves the specificity of SRP for hydrophobic signal anchor sequences and the exclusion of SRP from nascent chains of translocated proteins by trigger factor, a ribosome-associated chaperone. The SecYE pore accepts only unfolded proteins. In contrast, a class of redox factor-containing proteins leaves the cell only as completely folded proteins. They are distinguished by a twin arginine motif of their signal sequences that by an unknown mechanism targets them to specific pores. A few membrane proteins insert spontaneously into the bacterial plasma membrane without the need for targeting factors and SecYE. Insertion depends only on hydrophobic interactions between their transmembrane segments and the lipid bilayer and on the transmembrane potential. Finally, outer membrane proteins of Gram-negative bacteria after having crossed the plasma membrane are released into the periplasm, where they undergo distinct folding events until they insert as trimers into the outer membrane. These folding processes require distinct molecular chaperones of the periplasm, such as Skp, SurA, and PpiD.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Distinct Albino3-dependent and -independent pathways for thylakoid membrane protein insertion.

The homologous proteins Oxa1, YidC, and Alb3 mediate the insertion of membrane proteins in mitochondria, bacteria, and chloroplast thylakoids, respectively. Depletion of YidC in Escherichia coli affects the integration of every membrane protein studied, and Alb3 has been shown previously to be required for the insertion of a signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent protein, Lhcb1, in thylakoids. In this study we have analyzed the "global" role of Alb3 in the insertion of thylakoid membrane proteins. We show that insertion of two chlorophyll-binding proteins, Lhcb4.1 and Lhcb5, is almost totally blocked by preincubation of thylakoids with anti-Alb3 antibodies, indicating a requirement for Alb3 in the insertion pathway. Insertion of the related PsbS protein, on the other hand, is unaffected by Alb3 antibodies, and insertion of a group of SRP-independent, signal peptide-bearing proteins, PsbX, PsbW, and PsbY, is likewise completely unaffected. Proteinase K is furthermore able to completely degrade Alb3, but this treatment does not affect the insertion of these proteins. Among the thylakoid proteins studied here, Alb3 requirement correlates strictly with a requirement for stromal factors and nucleoside triphosphates. However, the majority of proteins tested do not require Alb3 or any other known form of translocation apparatus.

Arabidopsis Proteins↗

Translocation of secretory proteins across the microsomal membrane occurs through an environment accessible to aqueous perturbants.

We have characterized the association of a nascent secretory protein with the microsomal membrane at two distinct stages in cell-free synthesis and translocation. Stage one corresponded to a nascent chain of approximately 70 residues generated via elongation arrest by the signal recognition particle (SRP). Binding to microsomal membranes occurred independently of chain elongation and required SRP receptor. Following binding, the 70-mer remained attached to the membrane after extraction of the ribosome. However, protein denaturants (4 M urea or alkaline pH) extracted the 70-mer from the membrane. Stage two of synthesis corresponded to nascent chains of approximately 158 residues generated by oligonucleotide-mediated hybrid arrest of translation. Again, these partially translocated nascent chains were extracted by 4 M urea. Therefore, the initial interaction of the signal sequence with the membrane as well as subsequent chain conductance occur in a microenvironment that is accessible to aqueous reagents. Thus, both processes probably require integral membrane proteins.

Animals↗

Characterization of secretory protein translocation: ribosome-membrane interaction in endoplasmic reticulum.

Secretory proteins are synthesized on ribosomes bound to the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). After the selection of polysomes synthesizing secretory proteins and their direction to the membrane of the ER via signal recognition particle (SRP) and docking protein respectively, the polysomes become bound to the ER membrane via an unknown, protein-mediated mechanism. To identify proteins involved in protein translocation, beyond the (SRP-docking protein-mediated) recognition step, controlled proteolysis was used to functionally inactivate rough microsomes that had previously been depleted of docking protein. As the membranes were treated with increasing levels of protease, they lost their ability to be functionally reconstituted with the active cytoplasmic fragment of docking protein (DPf). This functional inactivation did not correlate with a loss of either signal peptidase activity, nor with the ability of the DPf to reassociate with the membrane. It did correlate, however, with a loss of the ability of the microsomes to bind ribosomes. Ribophorins are putative ribosome-binding proteins. Immunoblots developed with monoclonal antibodies against canine ribophorins I and II demonstrated that no correlation exists between the protease-induced inability to bind ribosomes and the integrity of the ribophorins. Ribophorin I was 85% resistant and ribophorin II 100% resistant to the levels of protease needed to totally eliminate ribosome binding. Moreover, no direct association was found between ribophorins and ribosomes; upon detergent solubilization at low salt concentrations, ribophorins could be sedimented in the presence or absence of ribosomes. Finally, the alkylating agent N-ethylmaleimide was shown to be capable of inhibiting translocation (beyond the SRP-docking protein-mediated recognition step), but had no affect on the ability of ribosomes to bind to ER membranes. We conclude that potentially two additional proteinaceous components, as yet unidentified, are involved in protein translocation. One is protease sensitive and possibly involved in ribosome binding, the other is N-ethylmaleimide sensitive and of unknown function.

Binding Sites↗

Signal sequences specify the targeting route to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, only a subset of preproteins that are translocated across the ER membrane require the function of the signal recognition particle (SRP), suggesting that an alternative, SRP-independent pathway must exist (Hann, B.C., and P. Walter. 1991. Cell. 67:131-144). We have established that the two targeting pathways function in parallel. Mutant alleles of SEC62 and SEC63 were isolated that specifically impaired the translocation of SRP-independent preproteins in vivo and in vitro, whereas SRP-dependent preproteins were unaffected. Based on this analysis, preproteins fall into three distinct classes: SRP dependent, SRP independent, and those that can use both pathways. Pathway specificity is conferred by the hydrophobic core of signal sequences. Our studies show a previously unrecognized diversity in ER-directed signal sequences, that carry structural information that serves to identify the route taken.

Base Sequence↗

The moving parts of the nucleolus.

The cell nucleolus is the subnuclear body in which ribosomal subunits are assembled, and it is also the location of several processes not related to ribosome biogenesis. Recent studies have revealed that nucleolar components move about in a variety of ways. One class of movement is associated with ribosome assembly, which is a vectorial process originating at the sites of transcription in the border region between the fibrillar center and the dense fibrillar component. The nascent preribosomal particles move outwardly to become the granular components where further maturation takes place. These particles continue their travel through the nucleoplasm for eventual export to the cytoplasm to become functional ribosomes. In a second kind of motion, many nucleolar components rapidly exchange with the nucleoplasm. Thirdly, nucleolar components engage in very complex movements when the nucleolus disassembles at the beginning of mitosis and then reassembles at the end of mitosis. Finally, many other cellular and viral macromolecules, which are not related to ribosome assembly, also pass through or are retained by the nucleolus. These are involved in nontraditional roles of the nucleolus, including regulation of tumor suppressor and oncogene activities, signal recognition particle assembly, modification of small RNAs, control of aging, and modulating telomerase function.

Animals↗