SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “randomized crossover trial”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

Comparison of the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and NPH-based multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) on glycaemic control and quality of life: results of the 5-nations trial.

AIMS: The goal of the study was to determine whether continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) differs from a multiple daily injection (MDI) regimen based on neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) as basal insulin with respect to glycaemic control and quality of life in people with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: The 5-Nations trial was a randomized, controlled, crossover trial conducted in 11 European centres. Two hundred and seventy-two patients were treated with CSII or MDI during a 2-month run-in period followed by a 6-month treatment period, respectively. The quality of glycaemic control was assessed by HbA(1c), blood glucose values, and the frequency of hypoglycaemic events. For the evaluation of the quality of life, three different self-report questionnaires have been assessed. RESULTS: CSII treatment resulted in lower HbA(1c) (7.45 vs. 7.67%, P < 0.001), mean blood glucose level (8.6 vs. 9.4 mmol/l, P < 0.001) and less fluctuation in blood glucose levels than MDI (+/- 3.9 vs. +/- 4.3 mmol/l, P < 0.001). There was a marked reduction in the frequency of hypoglycaemic events using CSII compared with MDI, with an incidence ratio of 1.12 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.17] and 2.61 (95% CI: 1.59-4.29) for mild and severe hypoglycaemia, respectively. The overall score of the diabetes quality of life questionnaire was higher for CSII (P < 0.001), and an improvement in pump users' perception of mental health was detected when using the SF-12 questionnaire (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CSII usage offers significant benefits over NPH-based MDI for individuals with Type 1 diabetes, with improvement in all significant metabolic parameters as well as in patients' quality of life. Additional studies are needed to compare CSII with glargine- and detemir-based MDI.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

The effect of polyphenols in olive oil on heart disease risk factors: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Virgin olive oils are richer in phenolic content than refined olive oil. Small, randomized, crossover, controlled trials on the antioxidant effect of phenolic compounds from real-life daily doses of olive oil in humans have yielded conflicting results. Little information is available on the effect of the phenolic compounds of olive oil on plasma lipid levels. No international study with a large sample size has been done. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the phenolic content of olive oil further benefits plasma lipid levels and lipid oxidative damage compared with monounsaturated acid content. DESIGN: Randomized, crossover, controlled trial. SETTING: 6 research centers from 5 European countries. PARTICIPANTS: 200 healthy male volunteers. MEASUREMENTS: Glucose levels, plasma lipid levels, oxidative damage to lipid levels, and endogenous and exogenous antioxidants at baseline and before and after each intervention. INTERVENTION: In a crossover study, participants were randomly assigned to 3 sequences of daily administration of 25 mL of 3 olive oils. Olive oils had low (2.7 mg/kg of olive oil), medium (164 mg/kg), or high (366 mg/kg) phenolic content but were otherwise similar. Intervention periods were 3 weeks preceded by 2-week washout periods. RESULTS: A linear increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels was observed for low-, medium-, and high-polyphenol olive oil: mean change, 0.025 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.003 to 0.05 mmol/L), 0.032 mmol/L (CI, 0.005 to 0.05 mmol/L), and 0.045 mmol/L (CI, 0.02 to 0.06 mmol/L), respectively. Total cholesterol-HDL cholesterol ratio decreased linearly with the phenolic content of the olive oil. Triglyceride levels decreased by an average of 0.05 mmol/L for all olive oils. Oxidative stress markers decreased linearly with increasing phenolic content. Mean changes for oxidized low-density lipoprotein levels were 1.21 U/L (CI, -0.8 to 3.6 U/L), -1.48 U/L (-3.6 to 0.6 U/L), and -3.21 U/L (-5.1 to -0.8 U/L) for the low-, medium-, and high-polyphenol olive oil, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The olive oil may have interacted with other dietary components, participants' dietary intake was self-reported, and the intervention periods were short. CONCLUSIONS: Olive oil is more than a monounsaturated fat. Its phenolic content can also provide benefits for plasma lipid levels and oxidative damage. International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial number: ISRCTN09220811.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Effect of sodium chloride- and sodium bicarbonate-rich mineral water on blood pressure and metabolic parameters in elderly normotensive individuals: a randomized double-blind crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of sodium chloride- and sodium bicarbonate-rich mineral water on blood pressure and parameters of glucose and lipid metabolism in elderly normotensive individuals. METHODS: We examined 21 healthy men and women aged 60-72 years in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover trial. After reducing dietary salt intake to below 100 mmol/day, study participants were randomly assigned to drink 1.5 l daily of a sodium chloride-rich (sodium 84.5 mmol/l, chloride 63.7 mmol/l, bicarbonate 21.9 mmol/l), a sodium bicarbonate-rich (sodium 39.3 mmol/l, chloride 6.5 mmol/l, bicarbonate 48.8 mmol/l) and a low-sodium (placebo: sodium, chloride and bicarbonate < 0.02 mmol/l) mineral water for 4 weeks each in a three-phase crossover order. Each phase was separated by a 2-week washout period in which the study participants remained on a low-salt diet. Compliance was assessed by biweekly urinary electrolyte excretion and five study participants were excluded from analysis for failing to complete the trial or to fulfil the compliance criteria. RESULTS: Mean arterial blood pressure was significantly lower during the periods of consuming low-sodium -7.0 +/- 7.2 mmHg, P < 0.001) or sodium bicarbonate-rich (-5.7 +/- 6.4 mmHg, P < 0.05) water than at baseline. In contrast, blood pressure during the phase of drinking sodium chloride-rich water was identical to that at baseline. Ambulatory 24 h blood pressure, oral glucose tolerance and plasma lipids were not affected by the different regimens. Urinary calcium excretion was significantly reduced by drinking low-sodium or sodium bicarbonate-rich water but was unchanged under the sodium chloride-rich water. CONCLUSION: Consumption of sodium chloride-rich mineral water can abolish the blood pressure reduction induced by dietary salt restriction in elderly individuals. Sodium bicarbonate-rich mineral water in conjunction with a low-salt diet may have a beneficial effect on calcium homeostasis.

Aged↗

PubMed1992

Amitriptyline versus maprotiline in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

Amitriptyline (AT) relieves some patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Many patients suffer side effects and better therapies are necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of maprotiline (MT) (noradrenergic) compared to AT (mixed noradrenergic and serotonergic) in this disorder. Thirty-five patients entered a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial of these two agents. We found that MT relieved PHN in many patients but was not as effective as AT. Side effects were troublesome with both agents. Relief of steady pain, brief pain and pain on tactile stimulation occurred. Four groups of responses were identified. Some patients reported relief with both agents, some with neither agent and others with only one of the drugs. Most patients were not depressed and analgesia was observed to occur without change in depression ratings in most patients who responded. This result provides evidence that in some patients AT may act via a selective noradrenergic mechanism in relieving PHN and that individuals may differ in the balance and type of neurotransmitters inhibiting pain. Selective noradrenergic agents may be effective if AT fails.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

A multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-period crossover trial comparing glycemic control, satisfaction, and preference achieved with a 31 gauge x 6 mm needle versus a 29 gauge x 12.7 mm needle in obese patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Optimal needle length for subcutaneous insulin injection may differ for obese and nonobese patients, which could affect management of diabetes mellitus (DM). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether 31 gauge (G) x 6 mm (shorter) needles are appropriate alternatives to 29 G x 12.7 mm (longer) needles in obese patients with DM. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover trial was conducted in insulin-treated patients with type 1 or 2 DM with body mass index >or=30 kg/m(2) and glycosylated hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) concentration <or=10%. All patients used the same injection device and were randomized to receive 12 weeks of therapy with 1 injection site (thigh or abdomen) and 1 of the 2 needle lengths. Patients used the same injection site but the alternate needle during the second 12-week period. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (31 men, 31 women; mean [SD] age, 50.5 [10.6] years; age range, 20-73 years) received treatment. Fifty-six patients completed all 24 weeks of treatment. No differences in glycemic control were found. Double-blind assessments of pain scores and leakage measurements, and results from the World Health Organization Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire and most sections of the Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ), indicated no differences. However, patients indicated greater satisfaction with the shorter needle on the ITSQ (P < 0.001). The most common adverse event was injection-site bruising (51% [30/59] for the longer needle vs 34% [21/61] for the shorter needle; P = NS). Eighty-nine percent of patients (49/55) preferred the shorter needle (P < 0.001), and 76% (42/55) had a strong, very strong, or extremely strong preference for it. CONCLUSIONS: In obese patients, use of 31 G x 6 mm and 29 G x 12.7 mm needles produced comparable HbA(1c) values, double-blind pain and leakage scores, convenience, and ease of use. However, patients preferred the shorter needle.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

An open-label, randomized, three-way crossover trial of the effects of coadministration of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate on the pharmacokinetic properties of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid in healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Rosuvastatin and fenofibrate are lipid-regulating agents with different modes of action. Patients with dyslipidemia who have not achieved treatment targets with monotherapy may benefit from the combination of these agents. OBJECTIVE: The effect of coadministration of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid (the active metabolite of fenofibrate) was assessed in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover trial consisting of three 7-day treatment periods. Healthy male volunteers received one of the following treatment regimens in each period: rosuvastatin 10 mg orally once daily; fenofibrate 67 mg orally TID; and rosuvastatin + fenofibrate dosed as above. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid, both as substrate and as interacting drug, were investigated on day 7 of dosing. Treatment effects were assessed by construction of 90% CIs around the ratios of the geometric least-square means for rosuvastatin + fenofibrate/rosuvastatin and rosuvastatin + fenofibrate/fenofibrate for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (derived from analysis of variance of log-transformed parameters). RESULTS: Fourteen healthy male volunteers participated in the study. When rosuvastatin was coadministered with fenofibrate, there were minor increases in the AUC from 0 to 24 hours and maximum concentration (Cmax) of rosuvastatin: the respective geometric least-square means increased by 7% (90% CI, 1.00-1.15) and 21% (90% CI, 1.14-1.28). The pharmacokinetic parameters of fenofibric acid were similar when fenofibrate was dosed alone and with rosuvastatin: the geometric least-square means for fenofibric acid AUC from 0 to 8 hours and Cmax decreased by 4% (90% CI, 0.90-1.02) and 9% (90% CI, 0.84-1.00), respectively. The treatments were well tolerated alone and in combination. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate produced minimal changes in rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid exposure.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Renoprotective effects of adding angiotensin II receptor blocker to maximal recommended doses of ACE inhibitor in diabetic nephropathy: a randomized double-blind crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the renoprotective effects as reflected by short-term changes in albuminuria of dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by adding an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) to treatment with maximal recommended doses of an ACE inhibitor (ACEI) in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients (17 men and 3 women) with type 2 diabetes along with hypertension and nephropathy were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized, two-period, crossover trial of 8 weeks of treatment with the ARB candesartan 16 mg daily and placebo added in random order to existing treatment with lisinopril/enalapril 40 mg daily or captopril 150 mg daily. At the end of each treatment period, we evaluated albuminuria in three 24-h urinary collections by turbidimetry, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) using the Takeda-TM2420, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the (51)Cr-EDTA plasma-clearance technique. RESULTS: During monoblockade of the RAS by ACEI treatment, albuminuria was 706 (349-1,219) mg/24 h [geometric mean (IQR)]; 24-h ABP was 138 +/- 3/72 +/- 2 mmHg (mean +/- SE); and GFR was 77 +/- 6 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2) (mean +/- SE). During dual blockade of the RAS by addition of candesartan 16 mg daily, there was a mean (95% CI) reduction in albuminuria of 28 (17-38) compared with ACEI alone (P < 0.001). There was a modest reduction in systolic/diastolic 24-h ABP of 3/2 mmHg (-2 to 8 systolic, -2 to 5 diastolic; NS). Changes in albuminuria did not correlate to changes in ABP. Addition of candesartan 16 mg daily induced a small, insignificant decrease in GFR of 4 (-1 to 9) ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2). CONCLUSIONS: Dual blockade of the RAS provides superior short-term renoprotection independent of systemic blood pressure changes in comparison with maximally recommended doses of ACEI in patients with type 2 diabetes as well as nephropathy.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Effects of nicotinic acid and lovastatin in renal transplant patients: a prospective, randomized, open-labeled crossover trial.

Lipid abnormalities are seen frequently in renal transplant patients. Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the lipid-lowering drugs, nicotinic acid (short acting) and lovastatin, the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. Twelve renal transplant patients who had persistent hyperlipidemia despite 6 weeks of dietary treatment participated in this prospective, randomized, open-labeled crossover trial. At 16 weeks, when compared with control values, nicotinic acid (> or = 1.5 g twice a day) significantly reduced the total cholesterol (from 312 +/- 18 [+/- SEM] mg/dL to 229 +/- 19 mg/dL; P = 0.03) and the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 218 +/- 15 mg/dL to 142 +/- 13 mg/dL; P = 0.03) and significantly increased the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 44 +/- 3 mg/dL to 58 +/- 5 mg/dL; P = 0.03). The triglyceride level was reduced from 255 +/- 40 mg/dL to 150 +/- 23 mg/dL (P = 0.09). At 16 weeks, lovastatin therapy (40 mg/d) significantly reduced the total cholesterol (from 285 +/- 13 mg/dL to 233 +/- 10 mg/dL; P = 0.005) and the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 201 +/- 11 mg/dL to 147 +/- 7 mg/dL; P = 0.001). There were no significant changes in the triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Although flushing developed in 67% of patients treated with nicotinic acid, this was not a reason for any of the study dropouts. During this short-term study period no adverse biochemical effects were noted with either of the drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1996

A randomized, double-blind crossover trial of fluoxetine and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of fluoxetine (FL) and amitriptyline (AM), alone and in combination, in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: Nineteen patients with FM completed a randomized, double-blind crossover study, which consisted of 4 6-week trials of FL (20 mg), AM (25 mg), a combination of FL and AM, or placebo. Patients were evaluated on the first and last day of each trial period. Outcome measures included a tender point score, the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale, and visual analog scales (VAS) for global well-being (1 completed by the physician and 1 by the patient), pain, sleep trouble, fatigue, and feeling refreshed upon awakening. RESULTS: Both FL and AM were associated with significantly improved scores on the FIQ and on the VAS for pain, global well-being, and sleep disturbances. When combined, the 2 treatments worked better than either medication alone. Similar, but nonsignificant, improvement occurred in the BDI scale, the physician global VAS, and the VAS for fatigue and feeling refreshed upon awakening. Trends were less clear for the tender point score. CONCLUSION: Both FL and AM are effective treatments for FM, and they work better in combination than either medication alone.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of danazol for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome.

To investigate whether danazol is more effective than placebo for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome (PMS), we conducted a randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing three successive cycles of danazol (200 mg bid) to three cycles of placebo. Thirty-one women meeting rigorous criteria for a diagnosis of severe PMS over two pretreatment cycles were enrolled; 28 of these subjects completed at least one cycle of treatment with symptom recordings, which were entered into the analysis. A significant period effect confounded the planned within-subject analysis and therefore, the main treatment comparisons were confined to the first period only. Symptom scores on the Premenstrual Tension Self-Rating Scale (PMTS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were compared for the premenstrual week in the last cycle of treatment. For the 16 patients on danazol, scores on the PMTS decreased by an average of 14.0 (10.7) (standard deviation) points from a baseline of 25.4 (5.6) points. For the 12 patients on placebo, PMTS scores decreased by an average of 3.6 (9.5) points from a baseline of 23.5 (5.8) points (14.0 vs. 3.6; p = .0133, unpaired t-test). Seven (43.8%) of the subjects on danazol achieved a clinically relevant reduction of symptoms into the asymptomatic range (PMTS scores < or = 5) as compared to one (8.3%) of the subjects on placebo. Thus, danazol (200 mg bid) provided greater relief from severe PMS during the premenstrual week than did placebo.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

The treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension with 3,4-DL-threo-dihydroxyphenylserine: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the therapeutic effect and mechanism of action of 3,4-DL-threodihydroxyphenylserine (DL-DOPS) in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. METHODS: The blood pressure (BP) response to an orthostatic challenge on DL-DOPS was compared with that of placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in 10 patients. The mechanism of action of DOPS was studied by measuring forearm vascular resistance and changes in supine and upright plasma DL-DOPS and norepinephrine levels. The effect of DL-DOPS on the quality of life was determined by questionnaire. RESULTS: DL-DOPS increased the supine (p<0.001) and upright (p<0.05) systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (both p<0.01). The peak SBP on DL-DOPS in the supine position occurred 300 minutes after ingestion of the medication. The increase in BP was accompanied by an increase in plasma levels of norepinephrine and DL-DOPS in both the supine and upright positions after DL-DOPS ingestion (p<0.0001). There was a trend toward improvement in symptoms of orthostatic intolerance. CONCLUSION: DL-DOPS improved features of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in patients with central and peripheral autonomic nervous system disease. There was an increase in plasma norepinephrine. No major side effects occurred.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Tic reduction with risperidone versus pimozide in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the tic suppression, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, weight gain, and side effect profiles of pimozide versus risperidone in children and adolescents with tic disorders. METHOD: This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover (evaluable patient analysis) study. Nineteen children aged 7 to 17 years with Tourette's or chronic motor tic disorder were randomized to 4 weeks of treatment with pimozide or risperidone, followed by the alternate treatment after a 2-week placebo washout. The primary efficacy outcome measure was change in tic severity assessed by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS). ECG results, weight gain, and side effects were also compared. RESULTS: Compared to pimozide treatment, risperidone treatment was associated with significantly lower tic severity scores (YGTSS: baseline 43.3 +/- 17.5, pimozide 34.2 +/- 14.2, risperidone 25.2 +/- 13.6; p =.05). Weight gain during the 4-week treatment periods was greater for risperidone (mean 1.9 kg) than pimozide (1.0 kg). No patient suffered a serious adverse event, but 6 of 19 subjects failed to complete the protocol. Neither medication was associated with ECG changes. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, risperidone appeared superior to pimozide for tic suppression but was associated with greater weight gain.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1986

Comparison of verapamil and propranolol therapy for angina pectoris at rest: a randomized, multiple-crossover, controlled trial in the coronary care unit.

The effects of oral verapamil (V), 400 mg/day, oral propranolol (P), 300 mg/day, and placebo were compared in 10 patients admitted to the coronary care unit because of frequent attacks of angina at rest. Testing was done according to a randomized, double-blind, multiple-crossover, placebo-controlled trial, consisting of 8 consecutive 48-hour treatment periods with V or P or placebo. Three patients had variant angina, 5 had episodes of both ST-segment elevation and depression and 2 had only ST-segment depression. One patient had no critical coronary stenoses, 1 had 1-vessel disease, 7 had 2-vessel disease and 1 had 3-vessel disease. Electrocardiographic monitoring and tape recording were continued during the 16 days of the trial. A total of 1,602 episodes of transient diagnostic ST shift were recorded during the trial (1,309 episodes of ST-segment elevation, 293 of ST-segment depression); 43% were painless. Mean blood levels of V and P at the end of the active phases were 161 +/- 89 and 120 +/- 45 ng/ml, respectively. In the group as a whole, the average number of diagnostic ischemic ST-segment shifts per 24 hours was significantly reduced relative to corresponding placebo periods during V (2.6 +/- 2.4 vs 11.9 +/- 8.6; p less than 0.01) but not during P treatment (11.9 +/- 8.6 vs 12.0 +/- 7.3). Similar statistically significant reductions were observed in the number of anginal attacks and nitroglycerin tablets consumed. Considering individual patients, V reduced ischemic episodes during both active phases in all patients, whereas P was effective only in 1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Sustained-release diltiazem reduces myocardial ischemic episodes in end-stage renal disease: a double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis and suffering from coronary artery disease (CAD) often receive doses of calcium channel antagonists that are too low. This may be the result of physician's desire to avoid adverse side effects during hemodialysis. The aim of this study was the assessment of the safety and efficacy of incremental doses of diltiazem for the treatment of myocardial ischemia in ERSD patients with CAD to identify the optimal dose of the drug. A total of 196 chronic hemodialysis patients were enrolled with CAD showing more than 5 min of transient myocardial ischemia during a 48-h Holter ECG monitoring. A double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial design was used. Incremental doses of diltiazem (120 to 240 mg/d) were administered in 4 mo. With a dose of 120 and 180 mg/d, a significant reduction in the number and duration of total and symptomatic ischemic episodes was observed (P < 0.001), but the number and the duration of silent ischemic episodes were not reduced. Conversely, the efficacy on silent myocardial ischemia was obtained with a dosage of diltiazem of 240 mg/d (P < 0.001). In addition, with a sustained-release formulation (120 mg twice daily), the efficacy was similar to that obtained with four 60-mg tablets, but the safety was improved, especially during hemodialytic session. The circadian variations analysis of transient ischemic episodes showed a significant reduction in both ischemic peaks observed at baseline only with 240 mg/d of diltiazem. The findings emphasize that sustained-release diltiazem (120 mg twice daily) can be largely useful in uremic patients with CAD on maintenance dialysis. Diltiazem reduces the number and the duration of silent ischemic episodes, has a good tolerability, and positively modifies the circadian pattern of ischemic episodes.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Tourette's syndrome improvement with pergolide in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pergolide, a mixed D1-D2-D3 dopamine agonist, is efficacious and safe in the treatment of children with Tourette's syndrome. BACKGROUND: Neuroleptics, which block dopamine transmission, are currently used for treatment of children with severe tics, but major side effects and limited efficacy reduce clinical utility. Prior open-label reports of pergolide suggest potential benefit. METHODS: The authors enrolled 24 children age 7 to 17 years with Tourette's disorder, chronic motor tic disorder, or chronic vocal tic disorder by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.) criteria, plus severity criteria on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) of > or =20, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Children were randomized to receive either placebo or up to 300 microg/day pergolide for the first 6-week treatment period, with a 2-week placebo washout, followed by crossover to the alternate treatment. The primary outcome measure was tic severity assessed by YGTSS. RESULTS: Compared with placebo treatment, pergolide treatment was associated with significantly lower YGTSS scores (42.0 +/- 20.4 versus 23.5 +/- 18.7; F = 12.0, df = 1, 17, p = 0.0011). No patient had a serious adverse event and pergolide was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, pergolide appeared to be a safe and efficacious treatment for Tourette's syndrome in children.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Comparative study of autotitrating and fixed-pressure CPAP in the home: a randomized, single-blind crossover trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare compliance and treatment response between continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and auto-titrating positive airway pressure (APAP) and to develop selection criteria for the use of APAP. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blinded, parallel crossover study. SETTING: Tertiary referral sleep disorders center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome requiring treatment with CPAP. INTERVENTIONS: 2-month treatment each of conventional CPAP and APAP in random order comparing objective compliance, Epworth Sleepiness Score, SF-36 Health Survey, visual-analog measures of ease of and attitude to treatment, side effects, and treatment pressures or system leaks obtained from the Autoset T device. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: There were no differences between treatment modes in overall compliance (CPAP 4.86 +/- 2.65, APAP 5.05 +/- 2.38 hours per night, P = .14), Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores (baseline 12.4 +/- 5.1, CPAP 8.4 +/- 5.2, APAP 7.9 +/- 4.8, P < .001 relative to baseline, NS between modes), SF-36 scores (significant improvements in Role Physical and Vitality domains relative to baseline, P < .001 but NS between modes). There were fewer reported side effects in APAP mode (CPAP 28, APAP 15 reports, P = .02) and compliance was greater with APAP in those reporting any side effect (95% confidence interval CPAP 0-6.8, APAP 2.9-7.8 hours per night, P < .001). APAP delivered significantly lower median and 95th centile airway pressures and fewer system leaks. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance, subjective sleepiness, and quality of life are similar between patients who used CPAP and APAP. APAP delivers lower pressures and results in lower-pressure leaks and fewer reported side effects. Compliance is higher with APAP in subjects reporting any side effect. APAP may be indicated in patients reporting side effects with conventional CPAP.

Body Mass Index↗

PubMed1998

Dexamethasone inner ear perfusion for the treatment of Meniere's disease: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the benefits of intratympanic administration of dexamethasone in the treatment of unilateral Meniere's disease, with particular attention to the symptoms of hearing loss and tinnitus. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing improvements in hearing loss, tinnitus, aural fullness, and caloric vestibular response secondary to intratympanic dexamethasone and sodium hyaluronate injection versus placebo consisting of saline and sodium hyaluronate. SETTING: A private otology/neurotology practice. PATIENTS: Twenty patients diagnosed with either definite or probable Meniere's disease as defined by the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium. All patients were < or =21 years old and were not receiving any other form of treatment for their Meniere's disease. Each patient's primary symptoms of concern were hearing loss, aural fullness, and roaring tinnitus. INTERVENTIONS: Three consecutive daily administrations of intratympanic dexamethasone or placebo to the involved ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in audiometric pure-tone averages, speech reception thresholds, caloric vestibular responses, scores on the tinnitus handicap inventories, questionnaires, and telephone interview responses. RESULTS: No significant changes were observed in any measured parameter. Patients were unable to consistently identify which medication was dexamethasone and which was placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Intratympanic administration of dexamethasone in a group of patients with unilateral Meniere's disease (Shea's stage IV) showed no benefit over placebo for the treatment of hearing loss and tinnitus.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Propafenone treatment of symptomatic paroxysmal supraventricular arrhythmias. A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in patients tolerating oral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that propafenone, administered orally, prevents symptomatic paroxysmal supraventricular arrhythmias. DESIGN: a 6-month, open-label, dose-finding phase followed by a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase, with each treatment period lasting up to 60 days. SETTING: An outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: Thirty-three patients with either paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (n = 16) or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n = 17) were enrolled. Their arrhythmias were documented by electrocardiogram before enrollment. Twenty-three patients (14 with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and 9 with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) were randomized and the data obtained from these patients were used in the efficacy analysis. INTERVENTION: Propafenone (300 mg three times daily in 19 patients, 300 mg twice daily in 3 patients, and 150 mg twice daily in 1 patient) and matching placebo tablets were administered in a randomized sequence. MEASUREMENTS: Symptomatic arrhythmia was documented by telephone transmission of the electrocardiogram. MAIN RESULTS: The time to first recurrence was prolonged for the overall group of 23 patients while they received propafenone (P = 0.004). The recurrence rate of arrhythmia during treatment with propafenone was estimated to be approximately one fifth of the recurrence rate during treatment with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Propafenone is effective in reducing symptomatic paroxysmal supraventricular arrhythmias.

Adult↗