PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Euthanasia, Passive”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38Linked to original sources

Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from severely brain-damaged persons.

Ventilator support is commonly withdrawn from unconscious patients who cannot breathe when it is reasonably certain that their condition is permanent and further medical treatment is futile. However, there is no consistent practice with permanently unconscious patients who can breathe but cannot swallow, despite the fact that ongoing treatment of these patients is similarly futile. In both groups of patients, the withdrawal of treatment is not euthanasia, and the cause of death is properly considered to be the underlying illness. A review of the medical, legal and ethical literature shows that there is much disagreement about when and how to withdraw tube feeding from patients with severe brain damage. Criteria for withdrawal of treatment should include the permanent unconsciousness of the patient, the permanent absence of a life-sustaining function, the elapse of sufficient time to be certain about the prognosis, the concurrence of at least one independent and qualified medical specialist, and the informed consent of the patient's family or other legally qualified agents.

Australia↗

Decisions at the end of life.

This paper presents a system for making decisions at the end of life. It emphasizes the role of patient autonomy and the importance of patient and family participation with the physician in decision-making. Definitions are presented for the terms: terminal illness, withholding and withdrawing life sustaining treatment, physician assisted suicide and euthanasia. Three cases are briefly described to illustrate the application of the decision-making system. A detailed discussion is then presented of the divergent views expressed by different authors about the moral differences or similarities between foregoing life sustaining treatment and physician assistance in dying. It is concluded that the view that these two actions are fundamentally different, as supported by the United States Supreme Court, in 1997, is the correct one. Physician assisted suicide (PAS) remains a controversial issue. Physicians and societies in individual countries must work out their own approaches to PAS. However, foregoing invasive or intensive life support in terminally ill patients consistent with their wishes is considered appropriate.

Aged↗