PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DENTAL AMALGAM”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloy compared with a high copper dental amalgam in a simulated clinical trial.

The aim of the current study was to compare the handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloys (Galloy) with those of a high-copper amalgam (Permite C). The study had a particular interest in the evaluation of the direct placement delivery system used with both alloys. Ten dentists participated in the current study. Each placed two amalgam and two gallium-based alloy restorations in conventional class II cavities prepared in acrylic typodont teeth. None of the participating dentists had used the direct placement delivery system or had any previous experience with gallium-based alloy and no practice was allowed beforehand. The restorations were evaluated according to the following criteria: ease of loading the cavity (delivery system), ease of condensation, capacity to produce and sustain contact area, ease of carving, resistance to damage during removal of the matrix band, overall quality of the restoration and the available working time. Each criterion was given a score on a scale of 1-5 (1: very poor, 2: poor, 3: fair, 4: good, 5: very good). The results showed no statistically significant difference in the evaluated criteria between the two alloys (P > 0.05) except for criterion number 2 (ease of condensation, P=0.0005).

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1992

[Mercury concentration in blood and urine--before and after the placement of dental amalgam fillings].

70 patients of dentist's surgery were given MOD amalgam fillings (non-gamma-2 amalgam) for molars. They were allocated for comparison to four groups defined by their treatment, i.e. the number of old and new restorations and whether a rubber dam was used. Blood and urine samples were collected at regular intervals before and during a 14-day period after treatment and tested for mercury concentration (Hg). Over the observation period the groups with the highest exposure (1-2 old restorations replaced by new ones) showed a tendency, in contrast to the less exposed groups (1 new filling with or without dam), towards increases (p less than 0.10) in group average Hg values of approx. 0.2 microgram/L (blood) and 0.3 microgram/g creatinine (urine) as acute treatment effects. The highest values recorded before and after the treatment, 3.3 micrograms/L (blood) and 16.5 micrograms/L (urine) are higher than normal but do not indicate any increase in the risk to health especially if they are not persistent.

Creatinine↗
PubMed1992

[The toxicity of mercury in amalgam dental fillings].

1. A survey on the literature concerning the toxicity of amalgam is presented. 2. Opinions from various sources are discussed. It is found that there are no conclusive experimental results of clinical importance. Existing results on adults cannot be applied to children, who are more sensitive to amalgam. 3. Research into the toxicity of amalgam in children has begun. Results are expected later in 1992.

Acrodynia↗
PubMed1998

[Mercury and dental amalgam fillings].

During 1993-95 a total of 169 patients (112 women, 57 men) with a wide range of complaints associated with earlier or present amalgam fillings were seen by the "Dental Biomaterials Adverse Reaction Unit" in Norway. Most patients had amalgam fillings; 19 had removed all amalgam, and 14 were in the process of replacing the amalgam fillings with other materials. Predominant symptoms were of a subjective and general nature (96% of the patients). Muscle and joint pain, headache, dizziness and feeling exhausted comprised the most common symptoms. Intra-oral pathology was observed in 48%. There was a correlation between the amount of amalgam ("amalgam score") and urinary mercury. Those without amalgam fillings and significantly lower values (median = 1.6 micrograms mercury/g creatinine) than those with amalgam fillings (medians: with amalgam = 3.5 micrograms/g; with partial removal of amalgam = 2.7 micrograms/g). Overall, in the present group of patients, no statistically significant correlation seemed to exist between the type and number of subjective symptoms or objective findings and the urinary mercury. This would indicate therefore that there is no straightforward association between urinary mercury and symptoms in the present group of patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Clinical evaluation of four dental amalgams over a two year period.

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical durability of two locally manufactured amalgams. In each of eighty-two patients one class II cavity was restored with Dispersalloy (Johnson and Johnson) which served as the control and all the other class II cavities were randomly restored with one of the following amalgams: Amalgaphase, Amalga 43 (Amalgam Alloys-South Africa) or Permite C (Southern Dental Industries). Matrix bands were placed. Kalzinol bases and Polyvar varnish were applied in all cavities. All amalgams were mixed according to the manufacturers' instructions. The cavities were overpacked with amalgam, and the amalgam condensed by hand, carved and then burnished with a ball burnisher. Twenty-four hours later all restorations were polished with a Shofu polishing system and colour photographs were taken. The restorations were evaluated using the Ryge and Snyder (1973) evaluation system, as well as comparison of the colour photos. The Fisher's Exact Test was used for the statistical analysis. During the second year there were no significant (p < 0.05) differences between the four brands of amalgam restorations except as regards the gloss category. The two South African manufactured amalgams compared well with the two imported amalgams. During the second year the marginal integrity and surface texture of Amalgaphase compared well with that of Permite C. Dispersalloy and Permite C showed more deterioration in anatomic form than the two South African amalgams. Amalgaphase was the only amalgam to show no bulk fracture within a period of two years. Amalgaphase performed better in the gloss category than the other three amalgams during the second year evaluation. According to the weighted product calculation Amalgaphase was the best amalgam followed by Dispersalloy, Amalga 43 and Permite C.

Dental Alloys↗