SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Nephrectomy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation is being performed in increasing numbers with the goals of broadening organ supply while minimizing pain and duration of convalescence for donors. Relative advantages in terms of recovery provided by laparoscopy over standard open surgery have not been rigorously assessed. We hypothesized that laparoscopic as compared with open surgical live donor nephrectomy provides briefer, less intense, and more complete convalescence. METHODS: Of 105 volunteer, adult, potential living-renal donors interested in the laparoscopic approach, 70 were randomly assigned to undergo either hand-assisted laparoscopic or open surgical live donor nephrectomy at a single referral center. Objective data and subjective recovery information obtained with telephone interviews and validated questionnaires administered 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6-12 months postoperatively were compared between the 23 laparoscopic and 27 open surgical patients. RESULTS: There was 47% less analgesic use (P=0.004), 35% shorter hospital stay (P=0.0001), 33% more rapid return to nonstrenuous activity (P=0.006), 23% sooner return to work (P=0.037), and 73% less pain 6 weeks postoperatively (P=0.004) in the laparoscopy group. Laparoscopic patients experienced complete recovery sooner (P=0.032) and had fewer long-term residual effects (P=0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is associated with a briefer, less intense, and more complete convalescence compared with the open surgical approach.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2002

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive laparoscopic nephrectomy is a well-established alternative to open surgery in living donors for kidney transplantation. Donor mortality and morbidity rates as well as recipient outcome are comparable to the open approach. Furthermore, the procedure is associated with reduced donor discomfort, faster recovery, and improved cosmetic results. Recently, an advanced robotic system for laparoscopic surgery was approved for use in the United States. This system allows a greater freedom of movement and recreates the hand-eye coordination and three-dimensional vision that is lost in standard laparoscopic procedures. METHODS: We report the first 12 successful cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy performed using the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, CA). RESULTS: Our initial experience has shown that the system allows the performance of donor nephrectomy in a safe and accurate fashion. CONCLUSIONS: As technology continues to evolve, robotic-assisted surgery has the potential to become a widely used attractive alternative to standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted approaches to live-donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy has become a favored procedure for the procurement of kidneys from live donors. The optimal minimally invasive surgical approach has not been determined. In the current work, we compared the outcome of kidneys procured using the traditional open approach with two minimally invasive techniques: the standard laparoscopic procedure and a hand-assist procedure. METHODS: The function of live-donor kidneys procured by open versus minimally invasive procedures was compared (procedures compared were the traditional open donor nephrectomy [ODN], the standard laparoscopic [LAP] approach, and the hand-assisted [HA] laparoscopic technique). The length of donor operation, donor length of stay in the hospital, surgical complications, and cost of hospitalization for three groups of patients were assessed in a series of 150 live-donor nephrectomies. RESULTS: We found that both minimally invasive procedures yielded kidney allografts with excellent early function and a minimum of complications in the donor. The open procedure was associated with a reduced operative time but increased donor length of stay in the hospital. Resource utilization analysis revealed that both minimally invasive techniques were associated with a slight increase in costs compared with the open procedure, despite a shorter hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy is safe and effective for procuring normally functioning organs for live-donor transplantation. Of the two minimally invasive approaches examined, the hand-assisted technique was found to afford a number of important advantages, including facilitating teaching of residents and students, that it is more readily mastered by transplant surgeons, and that it may provide an additional margin of safety for the donor.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Use of heparin and protamine sulfate during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the necessity of heparin and protamine administration during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. METHODS: Data from 52 consecutive living-related laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed at University of California Los Angeles between August 1999 and August 2001 were used for this analysis. For the purpose of this analysis, the patients were divided into three cohorts: group A received both heparin and protamine; group B received heparin only; and group C received neither. Intraoperative blood loss, length of admission, recipient creatinine at follow-up, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to patient age and gender. Intraoperative blood loss did not differ between group B (99+/-73 mL) and group C (82+/-54 mL) ( =0.4). None of the patients required blood transfusion. No graft loss occurred in any group. Length of hospital stay, excluding any preoperative days, was similar (2.8+/-0.7, 2.9+/-1.6, and 2.5+/-0.8 days, for groups A, B, and C, respectively, ( >0.05). No systemic thromboembolic complications were noted in any of the groups. One patient in group B was converted to an open procedure because of a difficult dissection unrelated to heparin administration. The mean recipient creatinine levels at follow-up in the recipients of kidneys from groups A, B, and C were not significantly different (1.1, 1.3, and 1.3; >0.05) through the extended follow-up period of 691, 286, and 97 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, there is no apparent benefit in the administration of heparin alone or in the administration of protamine sulfate to reverse heparin anticoagulation during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy if heparin is given. This is not only in terms of bleeding complications but is also true in regard to recipient renal function through the follow-up period. It is important to note that our warm ischemic times were less than 2 minutes, because longer warm ischemic times may make the use of heparin a more important consideration. This is the first time that these questions have been studied in the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy population.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: an update.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was developed primarily to increase the number of kidneys available for donation. Further evidence of the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has been reported in the literature, as have studies on the cost-effectiveness of this procedure and its role in removing disincentives for renal donation. Specific technical modifications have been developed and refined that improve outcomes when performing laparoscopic harvesting of right kidneys. Other technical modifications have been developed for use in obese patients. With the adoption of these modified techniques, equivalent results to open donor nephrectomy have been reported. Recently, a wide range of alternative approaches (hand-assisted, retroperitoneal, and gasless laparoscopy) have been utilized for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed2003

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a new horizon.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The widespread use of available imaging techniques has resulted in an increased detection of incidental small renal tumors. For these small tumors, there has been a definite trend towards nephron-sparing surgery over the past decade. RECENT FINDINGS: With increasing experience, advanced ablative and complex reconstructive procedures are now being performed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has lagged behind while laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is widely practiced and has become an established procedure. This lag is largely due to the technical difficulty in achieving renal hypothermia and securing renal parenchymal hemostasis. SUMMARY: Advanced laparoscopic suturing skills and the availability of laparoscopic vascular instruments have allowed laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to become a viable option for select patients, wherein laparoscopic partial nephrectomy attempts to duplicate traditional, established open surgical techniques.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2003

Nephrogenesis is induced by partial nephrectomy in the elasmobranch Leucoraja erinacea.

The mammalian kidney responds to partial nephrectomy with glomerular and tubular hypertrophy, but without renal regeneration. In contrast, renal regeneration in lower vertebrates is known to occur. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of renal regeneration is highly important; however, a serviceable animal model has not been developed. A neonephrogenic zone has been identified in the European lesser spotted dogfish, Scyliorhinus caniculus (Hentschel H. Am J Anat 190: 309-333, 1991), as well as in the spiny dogfish Squalus acanthias and the little skate, Leucoraja erinacea. The zone features the production of new nephrons complete with a countercurrent system. To analyze this nephrogenic region of elasmobranch fish further, a renal reduction model was established. The neonephrogenic zone in the adult kidney of the little skate resembles the embryonic metanephric kidney and contains stem cell-like mesenchymal cells, tips of the branching collecting duct system, and outgrowth of the arterial system. Four stages of nephron development were analyzed by serial sections and defined: stage I, aggregated mesenchymal cells; stage II, S-shaped body-like structure with high-prismatic epithelial cells; stage III, segmental nephron segregation; stage IV, functioning nephron. The stages were analyzed after partial nephrectomy. In addition, cell proliferation was assessed by incorporation of bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU). New nephrons developed in animals undergoing partial nephrectomy. Growth was greatly stimulated in the nephrogenic zone, both in the remnant tissue and in the contralateral kidney within 10 wk. Mesenchymal cell aggregates increased significantly per renal cross-section compared with controls (stage I, 0.64 +/- 0.28 versus 0.27 +/- 0.25; P < 0.005; n = 10 animals per group). The same was the case for S-shaped body-like cysts (stage II, 0.24 +/- 0.19 versus 0.08 +/- 0.09; P < 0.02). Cellular proliferation in the neonephrogenic zone of the contralateral kidney was also greatly enhanced (14.42 +/- 3.26 versus 2.64 +/- 1.08 BrdU-positive cells per cross-section, P < 0.001). It is concluded that the skate possesses a nephrogenic zone containing stem cell-like mesenchymal cells during its entire life. Partial nephrectomy induces renal growth by accelerating nephrogenesis. This unique model may facilitate understanding renal regeneration.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in a pediatric series.

PURPOSE: Recent advances in laparoscopic surgery as well as increasing experience with these techniques have led to the selection of laparoscopic surgery for many urological procedures. A lesser number of pediatric laparoscopic surgical studies have been reported. Few pediatric comparative laparoscopic versus open surgical procedure studies have been published. We compared 2 groups of similar pediatric patients who underwent partial nephrectomy via the laparoscopic or open technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 consecutive partial nephrectomies were performed in pediatric patients 3 months to 15 years old. Of these procedures 11 chosen according to surgeon preference were performed laparoscopically and 11 were done by the open technique. Clinical data were obtained by chart review and compared retrospectively in the 2 groups. Demographic data, operative time and blood loss, the perioperative complication rate, hospital stay and costs, postoperative analgesic use and followup findings were compared. RESULTS: Mean operative time in the laparoscopic and open groups was 200.4 and 113.5 minutes, respectively (p <0.0005). Blood loss was less than 50 cc in all patients. In the laparoscopic and open groups mean hospital stay was 25.5 and 32.6 hours (p = 0.068), and mean cost was $6,125 and $4,244 (p = 0.016), respectively. Patients in the laparoscopic group required fewer doses of analgesics than those who underwent open surgery (mean 10.9 versus 21, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that increased operative time and costs are disadvantages of pediatric laparoscopic nephrectomy compared with open techniques. Conversely decreased hospital stay, lower analgesic requirements and cosmesis support the use of laparoscopy for pediatric partial nephrectomy. These differences must be considered when deciding which technique is best for overall patient care.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: single center experience comparing clamping and no clamping techniques of the renal vasculature.

PURPOSE: We performed a nonrandomized retrospective comparison of 2 techniques for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, that is without and with clamping the renal vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 1997 and February 2002, 28 consecutive patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor. In group 1 (12 patients) partial nephrectomy was performed with ultrasonic shears and bipolar cautery without clamping the renal vessels, while in group 2 (16 patients) the renal pedicle was clamped before tumor excision. In group 2 patients intracorporeal kidney cooling was achieved by a ureteral catheter connected to 4C solution. Intracorporeal freehand suturing techniques were used to close the collecting system when opened and approximate the renal parenchyma. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically. Mean renal ischemia time +/- SD was 27.3 +/- 7 minutes (range 15 to 47) in group 2 patients. Mean laparoscopic operating time was 179.1 +/- 86 minutes (range 90 to 390) in group 1 compared with 121.5 +/- 37 minutes (range 60 to 210) in group 2 (p = 0.004). Mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (708.3 +/- 569 versus 270.3 +/- 281 ml., p = 0.014). Three patients in group 1 and 2 in group 2 required blood transfusions. Immediately postoperatively mean creatinine was 1.26 +/- 0.36 and 1.45 +/- 0.61 mg./dl. in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.075). Surgical margins were negative in all specimens. Pathological examination revealed renal cell cancer in 18 cases (stages pT1 in 17 and pT3a in 1), oncocytoma in 4, angiomyolipoma in 5 and renal adenoma in 1. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy represents a feasible option for patients with small renal masses. Clamping the renal vessels during tumor resection and suturing the kidney mimics the open technique and seems to be associated with less blood loss and shorter laparoscopic operative time.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extension: biology, role of nephrectomy and response to immunotherapy.

PURPOSE: We outline the biology, prognosis and role of immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma with gross venous tumor thrombus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 207 patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and tumor thrombus into the renal vein (107) and inferior vena cava (100) who underwent nephrectomy and thrombectomy were compared with 607 without tumor thrombus. RESULTS: At diagnosis 77 patients (37%) had N0M0 disease and 130 (63%) had lymph node (N+) or distant (M1) metastases. Compared with nontumor thrombus cases tumor thrombus was associated with more advanced stage, N+ (26% versus 12%), M1 (54% versus 31%) disease, higher grade and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. In N0M0 cases with inferior vena caval tumor thrombus capsular penetration, collecting system invasion and extension into the hepatic vein were more important prognostic variables then the level of inferior vena caval thrombus. In patients with confined N0M0 tumors mean 2 and 5-year survival +/- SD was 83% +/- 8.8% and 72% +/- 10.7% in those with inferior vena caval tumor thrombus, and 90% +/- 9.4% and 68% +/- 16.1% in those with renal vein tumor thrombus, similar to the 93.4% +/- 1.7% and 81 +/- 3.1% rates, respectively, in those without thrombus who had no recurrence within 6 months after nephrectomy. Of patients with M1 disease in whom cytoreductive surgery was done those with and without thrombus showed a similar response to immunotherapy. When there was inferior vena caval and renal vein thrombus, mean 2-year survival was higher after nephrectomy and immunotherapy than after nephrectomy alone (41% +/- 9% and 52% +/- 7% versus 32% +/- 13% and 45% +/- 7%), immunotherapy alone (0% and 13% +/- 12%, respectively) and no treatment (0%). CONCLUSIONS: Renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus is associated with worse characteristics. Local tumor extension has greater prognostic importance than the level of inferior vena caval tumor thrombus. Survival is fair in patients with truly confined N0M0 disease and thrombus. The combination of surgery and immunotherapy has a role in thrombus cases. Our data provide the rationale for a prospective study of adjuvant immunotherapy after surgery in N0M0 cases with extensive tumor thrombus.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗

PubMed2003

Is there a place for radical nephrectomy in the presence of metastatic collecting duct (Bellini) carcinoma?

PURPOSE: We describe diagnostic and therapeutic characteristics, and long-term followup of collecting (Bellini) duct carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients underwent surgery, including radical nephrectomy in 9 and partial nephrectomy in 1, for collecting duct carcinoma diagnosed by histological and immunohistochemical criteria. RESULTS: Collecting duct carcinoma, which represented 1.3% of renal cell carcinomas diagnosed between 1986 and 1999, developed at a mean patient age of 66.2 years (range: 50.7 to 81). It was detected clinically but never because of macroscopic hematuria. Mean tumor size was 94 mm. (range 30 to 150). Stage was pT3, pT2 and pT1 in 7, 1 and 2 cases, respectively. Seven patients had lymph node or extranodal metastases, and 8 and 2 had Fuhrman grades 3 and 4 disease, respectively. Eight patients died, including 3 early during the perioperative or postoperative period, which was attributable to major surgical difficulties associated with these invasive tumors. Two of the 3 patients who did not have metastases were alive 99 and 100 months after surgery, respectively. Median overall survival +/- SD was 9 +/- 6 and 6 +/- 8 months for patients with metastases. The all survival rate was 20% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Most collecting duct carcinomas are already metastatic at presentation. Because the prognosis is dismal despite radical nephrectomy, biopsy should be performed first when radiological findings are suggestive of collecting duct carcinoma. For metastatic collecting duct carcinoma radical nephrectomy alone does not seem to be useful except for palliative reasons or in the framework of new multicentric chemotherapy protocols in progress.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Prospective comparison of 3-dimensional volume rendered computerized tomography and conventional renal arteriography for surgical planning in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: We prospectively assessed the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3-D) volume rendered computerized tomography (CT) and conventional renal arteriography to visualize renovascular anatomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (left side in 46 and right side in 14) prospectively underwent 3-D CT and renal angiography. A short videotape of 3-D CT was prepared using volume rendering software that demonstrated the anatomical location, number, anomalies and spatial interrelationships of the renal arteries and veins. These 3-D videotapes and arteriogram findings were directly correlated with intraoperative surgical findings at laparoscopy and during ex vivo bench preparation of the harvested kidney. The perceived intraoperative value of 3D-CT to delineate renovascular anatomical detail was scored subjectively by the laparoscopic surgeon for each case on a 10-point scale of 0--completely inaccurate to 10--completely accurate. RESULTS: There were no complications related to the 3-D CT protocol and volume rendering was successful in all patients. Three-D CT accurately identified the number of renal arteries in 59 patients (98%). In 1 patient with 3 renal arteries 3-D CT and arteriogram each identified only 2. In the 46 patients undergoing left donor nephrectomy 3-D CT accurately identified the number of veins and venous anomalies in 45 (98%), including 2 with a circumaortic left renal vein. Another case of circumaortic vein was misdiagnosed as 2 renal veins. On the right side in 14 patients 3-D CT accurately identified the renal veins in 13 (94%) and missed 1 vein in a patient with 2 renal veins. Angiography correctly identified the number of renal veins in only 52 cases (87%). Furthermore, it misdiagnosed all 3 cases of circumaortic left renal vein. The laparoscopic surgeon believed that 3-D CT accurately identified the location and anatomical interrelationship of the renal vessels with precision. Mean subjective score +/- SEM was 8.5 +/- 1 for the arterial system, 8.6 +/- 1.1 for the venous system and 9.2 +/- 0.5 for any vascular anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: Three-D CT accurately identifies renal vascular anatomy in a manner that may facilitate renal hilar dissection during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, especially during the initial surgeon experience. This imaging modality integrates essential information from angiography, venography and excretory urography into a single study, and it can obviate the need for more invasive vascular imaging in most cases.

Angiography↗

PubMed2004

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in the presence of circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is now an accepted alternative to open surgery in donors with normal renal vasculature. However, the suitability of laparoscopy for donors with anomalous vasculature is less well known. We compared the donor and recipient outcome data of 16 patients with circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein to 20 recent patients with normal left renal venous anatomy undergoing laparoscopic donor left nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 170 patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at our institution from October 1997 to October 2002, 18 (10.6%) had either a circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein (group 1). Demographic and perioperative parameters of these donors and their recipients were retrospectively compared to a contemporary cohort of 20 recent patients with a normal single left renal vein (group 2). RESULTS: All laparoscopic procedures were completed successfully without open conversion. Groups 1 and 2 were similar in regard to operative time (199 vs 226 minutes, p = 0.90), blood loss (125 vs 100 cc, p = 0.45), warm ischemia time (3.4 vs 3.9 minutes, p = 0.14) and hospital stay (2.9 vs 3.2 days, p = 0.45). Length of allograft renal artery and vein was similar between groups. Cold ischemia and revascularization times were also comparable between groups. Recipient serum creatinine was comparable at 5 days (1.7 vs 1.6 mg/dl), 3 months (1.5 vs 1.4 mg/dl) and 1 year (1.5 vs 1.5 mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of a circumaortic or retroaortic renal vein is not a contraindication to laparoscopic live donor left nephrectomy. A left kidney with vasculature anatomically adequate for transplantation can be achieved with excellent donor and recipient outcomes.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Closed suction or penrose drainage after partial nephrectomy: does it matter?

PURPOSE: Prospective studies in the general surgery literature have shown fewer wound related complications with closed suction drainage than with open passive drainage. Nevertheless, some urologists avoid closed suction drains after partial nephrectomy mainly because of a theoretical increased risk of a prolonged urinary leak or delayed hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 184 patients who underwent 197 consecutive partial nephrectomies at our institution. Closed suction or open passive (Penrose) drainage was used based on surgeon preference. Drain type was compared with duration of use and the incidence of relevant complications. RESULTS: A Penrose drain was used in 37.6% (74 of 197) of partial nephrectomies and a closed suction drain was used in 62.4% (123). Clinical characteristics were equivalent between both groups, including age, body mass index, tumor size (mean 3.1 cm), number of renal tumors excised, estimated blood loss and operative time. There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of drainage between the Penrose group (mean 7.1 days) and the closed suction group (7.8 days). While we found variation in the incidence of relevant complications by drain type, none of these differences was statistically significant. Complications included prolonged urinary drainage in 7.6% of cases (8.9% closed suction, 5.4% Penrose), wound infection or perinephric abscess in 3.6% (2.4% closed suction, 5.4% Penrose) and delayed hemorrhage in 1.5% (2.4% closed suction, 0 Penrose). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences in postoperative morbidity were observed between the use of closed suction or Penrose retroperitoneal drains after partial nephrectomy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of solid renal masses without hilar clamping using a monopolar radio frequency device.

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy is currently recommended for most amenable solid renal tumors, especially if they are exophytic and less than 4 cm. We reviewed our initial experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for solid renal masses without clamping the renal vasculature using a monopolar device that uses radio frequency energy with low volume saline irrigation for simultaneous blunt dissection, hemostatic sealing and coagulation of the renal parenchyma (TissueLink, TissueLink Medical, Inc., Dover, New Hampshire). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2002 to April 2003, 10 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, including 9 with solid renal masses and 1 with a complex cyst. In all cases the renal hilum was dissected and the renal vessels were isolated but none had renal vascular clamping. The TissueLink DS dissecting sealer or Floating Ball (TissueLink Medical, Inc.) was used to dissect the tumor free bluntly, while simultaneously sealing and coagulating bleeders. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 54.6 years (range 42 to 72). Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.3 (range 2 to 4). Mean tumor size was 3.9 cm (range 2.1 to 8). The mass had a peripheral location in 7 cases and a central location in 3. Mean operative time was 232 minutes (range 144 to 280) and mean blood loss was 352 ml (range 20 to 1000). One patient received blood transfusion and all tumor margins were negative. Mean hospital stay was 1.7 days (range 1 to 5) and pain medication use was minimal. One patient had a brief period of urine leakage from the lower pole calix, which was managed successfully by ureteral stenting and Foley catheter drainage of the bladder. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy can be performed without renal vascular clamping. TissueLink technology allows complete tumor resection and provides adequate parenchymal hemostasis of the tumor bed. Its scant tissue charring production does not interfere with the pathological assessment of the tumor margin status.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Vena caval transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: report of the complication and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Major vascular injuries are uncommon but serious complications of laparoscopic surgery. Early recognition and conversion to an open procedure may be required to avoid further complications. We report 2 cases in which the vena cava was transected during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, and review the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All urological laparoscopic cases from 1993 to 2002 at 2 institutions were reviewed to identify major vessel transection. Two cases of inadvertent transection of the vena cava were identified. Medical records were reviewed for clinical and pathological information to identify factors leading to this complication. A MEDLINE search was performed to identify similar reports in the literature. RESULTS: Two patients at 2 institutions were identified with vena caval transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. In both cases the vena cava was misidentified as a renal vein. The injury was recognized immediately in both cases and an open repair was performed by vascular surgery. Both patients recovered with no sequelae. In both cases a rotated camera on an angled laparoscope in addition to the relative lack of retroperitoneal landmarks may have contributed to a loss of orientation within the operative field. A similar report of an aortic transection was also found in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Disorientation of the operating surgeon within the surgical field secondary to rotation of the camera lens and lack of retroperitoneal landmarks may contribute to vena caval transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. This injury has not been found in transperitoneal nephrectomy, likely because more intra-abdominal landmarks exist, aiding in maintenance of orientation. Prompt intraoperative recognition and repair of the transection results in a favorable outcome.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Evaluation of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres as a novel hemostatic agent in open partial nephrectomy: favorable experimental results in the porcine model.

PURPOSE: Microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH, Medafor, Minneapolis, Minneapolis) are a novel hemostatic agent made from purified plant starch. MPH activates the clotting cascade and hyperconcentrates platelets and coagulation proteins, while enhancing a hemostatic plug. We evaluated the hemostatic efficacy of MPH compared with standard surgical technique in a porcine open partial nephrectomy model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized lower pole partial nephrectomy was consecutively performed in each kidney of 12 female pigs. Each pig was randomized to 2 groups, namely treatment with MPH application or control with the conventional surgical technique (oxidized cellulose with bolster sutures). The right kidney was harvested 1 half-hour after hemostasis was achieved and the left kidney was harvested after 7 days. RESULTS: Mean animal and resected renal tissue weight were comparable. Ischemic and hemostasis times were significantly decreased in the MPH treated group (2.67 and 4.67 minutes, respectively) vs the control group (8.33 and 7.75 minutes, respectively) (each p = 0.004). Blood loss was equivocal (0.88 gm in the treatment group vs 2.09 gm in the control group, p = 0.07). No hemostatic complications were noted in either group. No evidence of residual foreign material was found in the MPH group at 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: MPH provided rapid, effective and durable hemostasis in the porcine open partial nephrectomy model. Additional experimental and clinical evaluation is warranted to define the role of MPH assisted partial nephrectomy in humans.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases.

PURPOSE: We analyzed complications of the initial 200 cases treated with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for a suspected renal tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since August 1999, 200 consecutive patients have undergone laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Mean patient age was 61.6 years, mean body mass index was 29.9 and mean tumor size was 2.9 cm (range 1 to 10). There were 51 central tumors (25%) and 15 solitary kidneys (7.5%). A central tumor was defined as any tumor infiltrating up to the collecting system or renal sinus, during the excision of which entry into and repair of the collecting system was necessary. Mean estimated blood loss was 247 cc and mean operative time was 3.3 hours. Data on complications were obtained from a prospectively maintained computerized database and via telephone calls to patients and/or local referring physicians. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients (33%) had 1 or more complications, which were intraoperative in 11 (5.5%), postoperative in 24 (12%) and delayed in 31 (15.5%). Overall 30 patients (15%) had a non-urological complication and 36 (18%) had a urological complication, including hemorrhage in 19 (9.5%) and urine leakage in 9 (4.5%). Hemorrhage occurred intraoperatively in 7 cases (3.5%) and postoperatively in 4 (2%), while it was delayed in 8 (4%). Of patients with urine leakage none required reoperation, 6 (3%) required a Double-J stent (Medical Engineering Corp., New York, New York) only, 2 (1%) required a Double-J stent with computerized tomography guided drainage and 1 required no treatment. Open conversion was necessary in 2 patients (1%), reoperation was done in 4 (2%) and elective laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed in 1 (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is an advanced procedure with potential for complications. It requires considerable experience with reconstructive laparoscopy.

Adolescent↗