SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “RNA Editing”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Replicating hepatitis delta virus RNA is edited in the nucleus by the small form of ADAR1.

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) uses a host-encoded RNA-editing activity to express its two essential proteins from the same coding sequence. Adenosine deaminase that acts on RNA (ADAR)1 and ADAR2 are enzymes that catalyze such reactions, and each, when overexpressed, are capable of editing HDV RNA in vivo. However, the enzyme responsible for editing HDV RNA during replication has not been determined. Mammalian cells express two forms of ADAR1, a large form (ADAR1-L) that mainly localizes to the cytoplasm and a small form (ADAR1-S) that resides in the nucleus. Recently, we found that the specific activity of ADAR1-L within cells is much higher than that of ADAR1-S but only when the substrate can be edited in the cytoplasm. Here we observed that although both ADAR1-S and ADAR1-L were expressed throughout HDV replication, no ADAR2 could be observed at any time. Using expression vectors that individually overexpress either form of ADAR1, we found that ADAR1-S could stimulate editing during replication more efficiently. We next reduced ADAR1 levels during HDV replication. After transfection of an ADAR1-L-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA), we observed a significant loss of that protein and its associated cytoplasmic editing activity while the level of ADAR1-S remained unchanged. Transfection of this siRNA, however, did not reduce editing during HDV replication. In contrast, transfection of an siRNA that targets both forms of ADAR1 greatly reduced the expression of both proteins and potently inhibited editing during replication. We conclude that ADAR1-S edits HDV RNA during replication and that editing occurs in the nucleus.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed2024

Editing Approaches to Treat Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency.

TOPIC IMPORTANCE: Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is a genetic disorder most commonly due to a single G to A point mutation (E342K), leading to debilitating lung and/or liver disorders and is associated with increased mortality. The E342K point mutation causes a conformational change of the AAT protein resulting in its retention in liver hepatocytes. This reduces AAT secretion into the serum resulting in higher protease activities due to the lack of inhibition from AAT, causing damage to healthy lung tissue. The current standard of care for lung manifestations involves weekly IV augmentation therapy and is considered suboptimal for these patients. Furthermore, there is currently no approved treatment for liver manifestations. The unmet medical need for patients with AAT deficiency remains high, and new treatment options are needed to treat the underlying disease etiology. REVIEW FINDINGS: Advances in genomic medicines may enable treatment by editing the DNA or RNA sequence to produce wild-type AAT instead of the mutated AAT caused by the E342K mutation. One approach can be achieved by directing endogenous adenosine deaminases that act on RNA to the E342K RNA site, where they catalyze adenosine to inosine conversion through a process known as RNA editing. The A-I RNA change will be read as a G during protein translation, resulting in an altered amino acid and restoration of wild-type AAT secretion and function. SUMMARY: In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology of AAT deficiency and emerging treatment options with particular focus on RNA editing as a disease-modifying treatment for both liver and lung disease.

alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency↗

PubMed2005

Crystallization and X-ray diffraction analysis of the Trp/amber editing site of hepatitis delta virus (+)RNA: a case of rational design.

RNA editing by mammalian ADAR1 (Adenosine Deaminase Acting on RNA) is required for the life cycle of the hepatitis delta virus (HDV). Editing extends the single viral open reading frame to yield two protein products of alternate length. ADARs are believed to recognize double-stranded RNA substrates via a ;structure-based' readout mechanism. Crystals of 10-mer duplexes representing the HDV RNA-editing site diffracted to 1.35 A resolution, but suffered from merohedral twinning and averaging of the base registry. Expansion of the construct to include two flanking 3 x 1 internal loops yielded crystals in the primitive tetragonal space group P4(1)2(1)2 or P4(3)2(1)2. X-ray diffraction data were collected to 2.8 A resolution, revealing a unit cell with parameters a = 62.5, c = 63.5 A. The crystallization and X-ray analysis of multiple forms of the HDV RNA-editing substrate, encounters with common RNA crystal-growth defects and a strategy to overcome these problems are reported.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2024

Bioinformatic approaches for accurate assessment of A-to-I editing in complete transcriptomes.

A-to-I RNA editing is an RNA modification that alters the RNA sequence relative to the its genomic blueprint. It is catalyzed by double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase (ADAR) enzymes, and contributes to the complexity and diversification of the proteome. Advancement in the study of A-to-I RNA editing has been facilitated by computational approaches for accurate mapping and quantification of A-to-I RNA editing based on sequencing data. In this chapter we review some of the main computational approaches currently used, describe potential hurdles, challenges and pitfalls, and discuss possible ways to mitigate them.

RNA Editing↗

PubMed2005

An essential RNase III insertion editing endonuclease in Trypanosoma brucei.

RNA editing adds and deletes uridine nucleotides in many preedited mRNAs to create translatable mRNAs in the mitochondria of the parasite Trypanosoma brucei. Kinetoplastid RNA editing protein B3 (KREPB3, formerly TbMP61) is part of the multiprotein complex that catalyzes editing in T. brucei and contains an RNase III motif that suggests nuclease function. Repression of KREPB3 expression, either by RNA interference in procyclic forms (PFs) or by conditional inactivation of an ectopic KREPB3 allele in bloodstream forms (BFs) that lack both endogenous alleles, strongly inhibited growth and in vivo editing in PFs and completely blocked them in BFs. KREPB3 repression inhibited cleavage of insertion editing substrates but not deletion editing substrates in vitro, whereas the terminal uridylyl transferase, U-specific exoribonuclease, and ligase activities of editing were unaffected, and approximately 20S editosomes were retained. Expression of KREPB3 alleles with single amino acid mutations in the RNase III motif had similar consequences. These data indicate that KREPB3 is an RNA editing endonuclease that is specific for insertion sites and is accordingly renamed KREN2 (kinetoplastid RNA editing endonuclease 2).

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Micro-processing events in mRNAs identified by DHPLC analysis.

Post-transcriptional processes such as alternative splicing and RNA editing have a huge impact on the diversity of the proteome. Detecting alternatively spliced transcripts is difficult when they are rare. In addition, edited transcripts often differ from the genomic sequence by only a few nucleotides. Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) is routinely used for single nucleotide polymorphism detection and we used this method to detect alternatively spliced or edited transcripts. As the sites of RNA editing appear to be conserved within gene families, we investigated whether editing sites are conserved in the murine homologue of the Drosophila cacophony transcript encoding the alpha1 subunit of a voltage-gated calcium channel that is edited at 10 independent positions. Although DHPLC analysis detects RNA editing at as low as 3% in control transcripts, no evidence of RNA editing was found in the analysed murine transcript. However an alternative exon was identified at the 3' end of the mouse Cacna1alpha transcript and an alternative micro-exon encoding only two amino acids (NP) was found in the extracellular loop before the IVS4 helix in the same transcript. In the homologous Drosophila transcript a micro-exon also encoding two amino acids was found at the same position before the IVS4 helix.

Alternative Splicing↗

PubMed1998

Trypanosoma brucei U insertion and U deletion activities co-purify with an enzymatic editing complex but are differentially optimized.

RNA editing, the processing that generates functional mRNAs in trypanosome mitochondria, involves cycles of protein catalyzed reactions that specifically insert or delete U residues. We recently reported purification from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria of a complex showing seven major polypeptides which exhibits the enzymatic activities inferred in editing and that a pool of fractions of the complex catalyzed U deletion, the minor form of RNA editing in vivo . We now show that U insertion activity, the major form of RNA editing in vivo , chromatographically co-purifies with both U deletion activity and the protein complex. Furthermore, these editing activities co-sediment at approximately 20 S. U insertion does not require a larger, less characterized complex, as has been suggested and could have implied that the editing machinery would not function in a processive manner. We also show that U insertion is optimized at rather different and more exacting reaction conditions than U deletion. By markedly reducing ATP and carrier RNA and increasing UTP and carrier protein relative to standard editing conditions, U insertion activity of the purified fraction is enhanced approximately 100-fold.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Characterization of single base substitutions in edited apolipoprotein B transcripts.

Mature RNA transcripts from a single eukaryotic gene may contain different nucleotide sequences, ranging from alternately spliced exons to transcripts from separate alleles differing by only one base. Our laboratory and others have recently reported another class of RNA sequence differences, occurring in transcripts from the single copy apolipoprotein B (apoB) gene. A unique RNA editing mechanism allows expression of the CAA glutamine codon encoded by the apoB gene at nucleotide 6666, or terminates translation by the introduction of a premature UAA translational stop codon. In this study, we used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify and characterize edited apoB RNA transcripts differing by a single nucleotide. Amplification and sequence analysis from small quantities of total RNA will facilitate the study of RNA editing and transcription in general.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

RNA editing-like phenomenon in paramyxovirus V gene mRNA observed in insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus.

The V gene of the paramyxovirus human parainfluenza virus type 2 (hPIV2) is transcribed into both V and P mRNA. The V mRNA is a faithful transcript of the V gene; however, the P mRNA is transcribed by an RNA-editing mechanism in hPIV2-infected mammalian cells. Recombinant baculoviruses (rBV) were constructed containing the wild-type V gene, which has seven G residues at its editing site, and a manipulated V gene with ten G residues at its editing site. A small amount of the P protein was synthesized, in addition to the V protein, when the wild-type V gene was expressed in rBV-infected insect cells. Furthermore, synthesis of the P protein increased when rBV containing the manipulated V gene was used to infect insect cells. Both the P and V proteins were detected after in vitro translation of mRNA from rBV-infected cells. Moreover, G-residue insertions and a deletion were detected in mRNA. Since the P protein was not detected after in vitro translation of V RNA that had been transcribed in vitro by T7 RNA polymerase, these results suggest that the non-encoded G residues were inserted and deleted during transcription in insect cells. This RNA editing-like phenomenon and the implications of the length of the G cluster are discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

A deletion site editing endonuclease in Trypanosoma brucei.

RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei inserts and deletes uridines in mitochondrial mRNAs by a series of enzymatic steps that are catalyzed by a multiprotein complex, the editosome. KREPB1 and two related editosome proteins KREPB2 and KREPB3 contain motifs that suggest endonuclease and RNA/protein interaction functions. Repression of KREPB1 expression in procyclic forms by RNAi inhibited growth, in vivo editing, and in vitro endoribonucleolytic cleavage of deletion substrates. However, cleavage of insertion substrates and the exoUase, TUTase, and ligase catalytic activities of editing were retained by 20S editosomes. Repression of expression of an ectopic KREPB1 allele in bloodstream forms lacking both endogenous alleles or exclusive expression of KREPB1 with point mutations in the putative RNase III catalytic domain also blocked growth, in vivo editing, and abolished cleavage of deletion substrates, without affecting the other editing steps. These data indicate that KREPB1 is an endoribonuclease that is specific for RNA editing deletion sites.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

PREP-Mt: predictive RNA editor for plant mitochondrial genes.

BACKGROUND: In plants, RNA editing is a process that converts specific cytidines to uridines and uridines to cytidines in transcripts from virtually all mitochondrial protein-coding genes. There are thousands of plant mitochondrial genes in the sequence databases, but sites of RNA editing have not been determined for most. Accurate methods of RNA editing site prediction will be important in filling in this information gap and could reduce or even eliminate the need for experimental determination of editing sites for many sequences. Because RNA editing tends to increase protein conservation across species by "correcting" codons that specify unconserved amino acids, this principle can be used to predict editing sites by identifying positions where an RNA editing event would increase the conservation of a protein to homologues from other plants. PREP-Mt takes this approach to predict editing sites for any protein-coding gene in plant mitochondria. RESULTS: To test the general applicability of the PREP-Mt methodology, RNA editing sites were predicted for 370 full-length or nearly full-length DNA sequences and then compared to the known sites of RNA editing for these sequences. Of 60,263 cytidines in this test set, PREP-Mt correctly classified 58,994 as either an edited or unedited site (accuracy = 97.9%). PREP-Mt properly identified 3,038 of the 3,698 known sites of RNA editing (sensitivity = 82.2%) and 55,956 of the 56,565 known unedited sites (specificity = 98.9%). Accuracy and sensitivity increased to 98.7% and 94.7%, respectively, after excluding the 489 silent editing sites (which have no effect on protein sequence or function) from the test set. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that PREP-Mt is effective at identifying C to U RNA editing sites in plant mitochondrial protein-coding genes. Thus, PREP-Mt should be useful in predicting protein sequences for use in molecular, biochemical, and phylogenetic analyses. In addition, PREP-Mt could be used to determine functionality of a mitochondrial gene or to identify particular sequences with unusual editing properties. The PREP-Mt methodology should be applicable to any system where RNA editing increases protein conservation across species.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1991

Synthesis of leader RNA and editing of the P mRNA during transcription by purified measles virus.

A transcription system with detergent-disrupted purified measles virus was developed. Synthesis of authentic, full-length measles virus N, P, M, and F mRNAs by purified virus occurred as identified by dot-blot hybridization analysis of individual measles virus clones and gel electrophoresis. The relative abundance of the first five viral mRNAs synthesized in vitro decreased significantly with their distance from the 3' end. The addition of the soluble protein fraction from uninfected A549 cells stimulated overall viral RNA synthesis but did not alter the relative abundance of each of the mRNAs. Measles virus synthesized in vitro a leader RNA of approximately 55 nucleotides in length, suggesting that like other negative-strand viruses, transcription initiated only at the 3' end of the genome RNA. Purified measles virus also catalyzed RNA editing during the synthesis of the P mRNA as shown by modified primer extension analysis of the mRNA products and by translation of the modified RNA into the V protein in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. These data suggested that the RNA editing activity was virus encoded.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Synthesis of leader RNA and editing of P mRNA during transcription by rinderpest virus.

Purified rinderpest virus was earlier shown to transcribe in vitro, all virus-specific mRNAs with the promoter-proximal N mRNA being the most abundant. Presently, this transcription system has been shown to synthesize full length monocistronic mRNAs comparable to those made in infected cells. Small quantities of bi- and tricistronic mRNAs are also synthesized. Rinderpest virus synthesizes in vitro, a leader RNA of approximately 55 nucleotides in length. Purified rinderpest virus also exhibits RNA editing activity during the synthesis of P mRNA as shown by primer extension analysis of the mRNA products.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

RNAi is antagonized by A-->I hyper-editing.

RNA interference (RNAi) and adenosine to inosine conversion are both mechanisms that respond to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and have been suggested to have antiviral roles. RNAi involves processing of dsRNA to short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), which subsequently mediate degradation of the cognate mRNAs. Deamination of adenosines changes the coding capacity of the RNA, as inosine is decoded as guanosine, and alters the structure because A-U base pairs are replaced by I*U wobble pairs. Here we show that RNAi is inhibited if the triggering dsRNA is first deaminated by ADAR2. Moreover, we show that production of siRNAs is progressively inhibited with increasing deamination and that this is sufficient to explain the inhibition of RNAi upon hyper-editing of dsRNAs.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1995

In vitro RNA editing-like activity in a mitochondrial extract from Leishmania tarentolae.

A mitochondrial extract from Leishmania tarentolae directs the incorporation of uridylate (U) residues within the pre-edited domain of synthetic cytochrome b (CYb) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 7 mRNA. This has several characteristics of an in vitro RNA editing activity, but no direct evidence for involvement of guide RNAs was obtained. Inhibition by micrococcal nuclease suggests a requirement for some type of endogenous RNA. The limitation of internal U-incorporation to the pre-edited region in the CYb mRNA and the inhibition by deletion or substitution of both mRNA anchor sequences for CYb gRNA-I and -II could be consistent either with a gRNA-mediated process or a secondary structure-mediated process. A low level of incorporation of [alpha-32P]CTP occurs at the same sites as UTP. Internal U-incorporation activity is selectively inhibited by heterologous RNAs, suggesting an involvement of low affinity RNA-binding proteins which can be competed by the added RNA.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

SUMO-1 modification alters ADAR1 editing activity.

We identify ADAR1, an RNA-editing enzyme with transient nucleolar localization, as a novel substrate for sumoylation. We show that ADAR1 colocalizes with SUMO-1 in a subnucleolar region that is distinct from the fibrillar center, the dense fibrillar component, and the granular component. Our results further show that human ADAR1 is modified by SUMO-1 on lysine residue 418. An arginine substitution of K418 abolishes SUMO-1 conjugation and although it does not interfere with ADAR1 proper localization, it stimulates the ability of the enzyme to edit RNA both in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, modification of wild-type recombinant ADAR1 by SUMO-1 reduces the editing activity of the enzyme in vitro. Taken together these data suggest a novel role for sumoylation in regulating RNA-editing activity.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed2003

Dyskinetoplastic Trypanosoma brucei contains functional editing complexes.

Mitochondrial pre-mRNAs undergo posttranscriptional RNA editing as directed by small guide RNAs (gRNAs) to produce functional mRNAs in kinetoplastid protozoa. The pre-mRNAs and gRNAs are encoded in the maxicircle and minicircle components, respectively, of the kinetoplastid mitochondrial DNA (kDNA), and editing is catalyzed by a multienzyme protein complex. Trypanosoma evansi AnTat3/3, which lacks maxicircles but retains a single class of minicircles, and a dyskinetoplastic mutant of Trypanosoma brucei EATRO164, which is devoid of kDNA, were both shown to retain genes and proteins for the editing complex. The proteins are present in complexes that immunoprecipitate and sediment indistinguishably from wild-type complexes. The complexes catalyze precleaved insertion and deletion editing as well as full-round deletion editing in vitro. Thus, mutants which lack the natural substrates for RNA editing and all or most gRNAs retain editing complexes that contain the four primary catalytic activities of editing and function in editing, at least in vitro. Therefore neither pre-mRNA nor gRNA is required to form functional RNA-editing complexes.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Modulation of ADAR1 editing activity by Z-RNA in vitro.

RNA editing by A-to-I modification has been recognized as an important molecular mechanism for generating RNA and protein diversity. In mammals, it is mediated by a family of adenosine deaminases that act on RNAs (ADARs). The large version of the editing enzyme ADAR1 (ADAR1-L), expressed from an interferon-responsible promoter, has a Z-DNA/Z-RNA binding domain at its N-terminus. We have tested the in vitro ability of the enzyme to act on a 50 bp segment of dsRNA with or without a Z-RNA forming nucleotide sequence. A-to-I editing efficiency is markedly enhanced in presence of the sequence favoring Z-RNA. In addition, an alteration in the pattern of modification along the RNA duplex becomes evident as reaction times decrease. These results suggest that the local conformation of dsRNA molecules might be an important feature for target selectivity by ADAR1 and other proteins with Z-RNA binding domains.

Adenosine Deaminase↗