PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Tooth Root”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 703 records · Page 39Linked to original sources
PubMed1980

A new implant philosophy.

This form of tooth implant appears to exhibit great potential since it eliminates the disorganized connective tissue layer present at the implant/bone interface of most other devices. Also, as established for other implants, as long as a tight cuff of relatively immovable tissue exists around the polished cervical collar of an implant, an effective seal against the ingress of oral fluid and toxic irritants appears to be maintained, although the nature of this seal has yet to be determined. In addition, the epimobile superstructure serves to dissipate occlusal stress on the "ankylosed" implant. The prognosis of an implant is determined in part by its associated superstructure. There is a need for research into the loading that can be accommodated by an implant. Further study is required to ascertain the full potential of this implant system.

Aluminum Oxide↗
PubMed1992

Retentive properties of threaded split-shaft posts with titanium-reinforced composite cement.

The retention of posts in tooth roots is vital to the success of the restoration. This study compared the retention of posts of various sizes and diameters cemented with a titanium-reinforced composite cement with that of posts previously reported cemented with zinc phosphate cement. Four groups made up of 10 samples each were used and retention values were compared using a universal testing machine. Two-way analysis of variance and the Newman-Keuls multiple range comparison test were performed. Larger diameter posts cemented with titanium cement had better retention than similar posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement. The statistical increase in retention for the larger size posts is probably the result of the deeper channels (threads) in the dentin and the higher cohesive strength for the titanium-reinforced composite resin.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed1976

Idiopathic failure of eruption of permanent molar teeth.

Failure of permanent teeth to erupt without any known cause is a seldom occurring phenomenon. However, it brings to light our ignorance of the basic physiologic mechanism of tooth eruption. In this article we present five patients with unerupted permanent molar teeth. In all instances, no obvious cause exists. Indications for operative intervention and management are discussed, but the cases are also presented to focus attention on our lack of knowledge of the physiology of tooth eruption.

Child↗
PubMed1987

Extraradicular cemental fragments in the alveolar bone of prehistoric American Indians: report of three cases.

Heretofore unreported, grossly observable structures composed of cementum were found in the superficial alveolar bone--but not attached to the tooth root--in three prehistoric American Indian skeletons from South Dakota. The macroscopic, radiographic, and histologic morphology of these fragments is described and compared with other cemental structures that occur in the alveolar process.

Alveolar Process↗
PubMed1989

A scanning electron microscopic and tensile bond strength evaluation of Gluma dentin bond application, as a function of dentinal pretreatment.

Scanning Electron Micrographs (SEM) and Tensile Bond Strength (TBS) measurements were used to evaluate the influence of three different dentinal pretreatments. A new testing device was developed for the TBS measurements. Human tooth roots were ground with a diamond bur. Tap water, Gluma Cleanser, and Neo-Sabenyl-Tubulicid were used to clean the surfaces before SEM inspection. The adhesion between root dentin and Lumifor Composite restorations was mediated by Gluma Bond. SEM observations revealed that a 30-second application of Gluma Cleanser removes the smear layer totally. Neo-Sabenyl-Tubulicid produced a very smooth surface. Application of Gluma Bond did not alter this appearance. Mean TBS values for surfaces sprayed with tap water, Gluma Cleanser, and Neo-Sabenyl-Tubulicid were 10 MPa, 7.3 MPa, and 10 MPa, respectively. There was a significant difference between group 2 (Gluma Cleanser) and the other groups. From this in vitro study, it is concluded that total removal of the smear layer with opening of the dentinal tubules (e.g., by means of Gluma Cleanser) reduces the TBS of Gluma Dentin Bond-Lumifor restorations to ground root dentin.

Aldehydes↗