PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ANUS, IMPERFORATE”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1984

Imperforate anus: the neurologic implication of sacral abnormalities.

The association of imperforate anus with bony sacral abnormalities and neurologic deficits is well recognized. These neurologic deficits have been considered static rather than progressive. However, recent experience indicates that some patients may develop progressive neurologic problems due to spinal cord lesions that are amenable to neurosurgical correction. To investigate the frequency of such lesions, routine myelography of imperforate anus patients with sacral anomalies was undertaken. The extraordinarily high incidence of unsuspected lesions known to cause progressive bowel, bladder, and musculoskeletal dysfunction is the basis of this interim report. Thirty percent of patients with anorectal abnormalities had sacral dysplasia. Of the nine patients undergoing myelography to date, eight have been abnormal. Six children had a tethered spinal cord, one had narrowing of the bony spinal canal and dural sac stenosis, and one an anterior meningocele. Spinal cord conditions that may cause deterioration of bowel, bladder, and extremity function should be defined and corrected before irreversible damage occurs. Because of the high incidence of spinal cord lesions detected in these patients with coexisting anorectal and sacral anomalies, routine screening for spinal cord lesions is recommended.

Anus, Imperforate↗
PubMed1996

Does posterior sagittal anorectoplasty in patients with high imperforate anus provide superior fecal continence?

The posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) has become the primary surgical procedure for patients with high imperforate anus. Very few careful long-term follow-up studies have established the superiority of the PSARP procedure over other surgical repair techniques. The authors' goal was to evaluate the operation and to identify the factors associated with improved continence. The medical records, operative reports, and radiographs of 53 patients (46 male, 7 female) who underwent PSARP for high imperforate anus at Children's Hospital and Medical Center (CHMC) between 1982 and 1990 were reviewed retrospectively. Subjective follow-up data were collected by telephone questionnaire, assessing habits indicative of stool continence, and a "fecal continence score" (FCS) was calculated for each patient. A prospective, 7-day diary assessing similar patterns of fecal continence was completed by each patient's family. The mean age of the patients studied was 8.0 years, and the mean follow-up period was 6.8 years. The telephone questionnaire was completed for 48 patients (94%). Toilet training for bowel continence was successful in 20 patients (42%) and occasionally successful in another 20 patients (42%), but 8 patients (16%) had no awareness of impending stool. Forty-five (94%) were physically active, but 16 (33%) reported social problems related to offending odor. The mean fecal continence score for all patients was 3.0 +/- 1.4 (5=excellent, completely continent), which was nearly identical to published scores for the other types of surgical repair. The FCS did not improve with age. The parents' responses to the telephone questionnaire matched the results obtained from the prospectively collected continence diary data. The authors' results for PSARP in patients with high imperforate anus do not differ substantially from those achieved by other repair techniques. Previously cited prognostic factors such as fistula anatomy and sacral anomalies did not appear to alter the functional results in the authors' series. Aggressive postoperative bowel management should be anticipated in all patients who have high imperforate anus and may benefit those who otherwise would achieve less satisfactory continence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Male infertility after surgery for imperforate anus.

Congenital abnormalities of the genitourinary tract often coexist, and cryptorchidism is common in patients who have had imperforate anus. Twenty men who had pull-through procedures for imperforate anus in infancy have been evaluated for infertility. Seven had coexisting renal abnormalities, 4 had had recurrent epididymitis, 3 had had bilateral orchidopexies (at age 7 to 12), 2 had spina bifida, and 1 had a pituitary adenoma. Seven had no ejaculate (aspermia), 11 were azoospermic, 1 was severely oligozoospermic, and 1 had a normal sperm concentration in a small volume of ejaculate. Both vasa were blocked in 5 men, and this appeared to be a result of the original operative procedure. One vas was blocked in another 7 patients who had abnormalities on the contralateral side; three had epididymal blocks after epididymitis, and four had congenital malformations associated with an absent or ectopic kidney. After reconstruction (4), insertion of sperm reservoirs (4), microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration (2), or artificial insemination (1), sperm were retrieved from 9 men (ejaculated by 4) 2 pregnancies occurred. Male infertility after treatment of imperforate anus in infancy can be related to a wide variety of cause, some of which are amenable to treatment.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗
PubMed1996

Associated urologic anomalies in low imperforate anus are capable of causing significant morbidity: a 15-year experience.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and morbidity caused by urologic anomalies in patients with low imperforate anus. METHODS: The case records and imaging studies of 95 patients who underwent surgery for low imperforate anus over a 15-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 18 years (mean 5.4). RESULTS: Genitourinary abnormalities were seen in 29 patients (31%), whereas 10 (11%) had lumbosacral abnormalities. A micturating cystourethrogram was performed in 48 patients, 18 of whom were shown to have vesicoureteric reflux and 2 of whom required surgical correction. Three additional patients required bilateral ureteric reimplantation: 2 had megaureters whereas 1 had bilateral ectopic ureters. Four patients had evidence of chronic renal failure; these included 1 patient with reflux nephropathy, 2 with bilateral dysplastic kidneys, and 1 with neurogenic bladder. The patient with reflux nephropathy underwent renal transplantation at the age of 18 years. Two patients had proximal hypospadias and 4 had undescended testes. A neurogenic bladder was documented in 5 children, 4 of whom had lumbosacral abnormalities. One of these had a spinal lipoma and required excision of the lipoma and untethering of the spinal cord. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 30% of patients with low imperforate anus would have associated urologic anomalies, several of which are capable of causing significant morbidity. Thus, all patients with imperforate anus, whether high or low, need to be screened for associated urologic anomalies.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗
PubMed1985

The association of imperforate anus and Hirschsprung's disease in siblings.

The recognition of Hirschsprung's disease is often delayed in children with imperforate anus. Two siblings with imperforate anus who were born of consanguineous parents had persistent constipation after the repair of the anorectal malformation. Subsequently colon biopsy confirmed that each had long segment aganglionosis beginning at the splenic flexure. A suspicion that these two disorders may coexist is mandatory for early correct diagnosis.

Anus, Imperforate↗
PubMed1997

The use of augmented-pressure colostography in imperforate anus.

Colostomy is recommended in most newborns with imperforate anus (IA), except those with low-type anorectal malformations (ARM). Accurate demonstration of the anatomy of any associated fistula between the rectum and the urogenital tract is essential for optimal surgical management. Augmented-pressure distal colostography is recommended to fulfill this requirement prior to definitive surgical repair of IA. We examined 12 cases of high or intermediate-type ARM using this technique, which clearly demonstrated the distal perineal anatomy. All were confirmed at posterior sagittal anorectoplasty.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed1996

The anterior sagittal approach for high imperforate anus: a simplification of the Mollard approach.

High imperforate anus is a complex anomaly that requires a combination of careful preservation of native structures and precise anatomic reconstruction for optimal results. Previously the authors used an anterior perineal approach derived from the technique described by Mollard, with generally satisfactory results. The present report describes the authors' refinement of the technique to avoid skin perineal approach, via an anterior sagittal incision, usually is combined with a transverse suprapubic laparotomy. The technique includes division of the external sphincter and longitudinal muscle fibers anteriority, simple dilatation of the puborectalis, and division of the fistula close to the urethra, with preservation of the internal sphincter. The rectal pouch is brought down to the level of the puborectalis, without tapering, and the anoderm is brought up to the level of the rectal pouch to construct a shorter anal canal with a normal anorectal angle. This technique maximally preserves internal sphincter function, preserves specialized anoderm for the anal canal, and avoids extensive pelvic dissection and division of the levator sling. It also facilitates repair in the neonatal period, which may be optimal for long-term continence. The authors have used this technique in five patients, with good anatomic and short-term functional results. The authors believe that the technique provides optimal preservation of native tissues; only minimal destruction and dissection are required for reconstruction.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed1987

Intermediate imperforate anus: clinical and radiographic implications.

Five male infants are described with imperforate anus with external signs of a low lesion but with subsequent evidence of a higher lesion with demonstration of a fistula into the anterior urethra either at surgery or by radiographic studies. The cases should be considered an intermediate form of imperforate anus with external signs of a low lesion but with fistula characteristically to the membranous or bulbous urethra. These infants should be treated surgically as high lesions with initial diverting colostomies.

Anus, Imperforate↗
PubMed2004

Post-operative magnetic resonance evaluation of children after laparoscopic anorectoplasty for imperforate anus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Laparoscopic anorectoplasty (LAR) is a relatively new procedure in the treatment of imperforate anus. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we evaluated the anatomical features of the anorectal region of children treated with LAR and compared this with conventional posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). The findings were correlated with functional outcome. PATIENT/METHODS: A retrospective review of ten children with the high/intermediate types of imperforate anus underwent LAR between May 2000 and December 2002. MRI of the pelvis was performed post-operatively and a semi-quantitative score was used to assess the degree of sphincter symmetry, peri-rectal fibrosis, and the position of the pull-through rectum. The defecation status of these patients was also recorded. Eight historical patients who had undergone PSARP served as a control group. RESULTS/FINDINGS: When compared with PSARP patients, a significantly lower proportion of LAR patients had sphincter asymmetry (40 vs. 100%, p < 0.05) and peri-rectal fibrosis (40 vs. 87.5%, p < 0.05). The positioning of the rectum was, however, central for both groups (90 vs. 87.5%). No statistical correlation was found between defecation status and the degree of sphincter asymmetry or peri-rectal fibrosis. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSION: LAR allows more optimal anatomical reconstruction for patients with the high/intermediate types of imperforate anus. However, additional factors that are not correctable by surgery, such as intrinsic innervation deficiency, also influence the clinical outcome.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2002

Treatment of high imperforate anus with large omphalocele in a baby boy.

Synchronous treatment of high imperforate anus with large omphalocele is a challenge for pediatric surgeon. A case of this unusual condition in a male neonate is presented. The high imperforate anus was repaired by primary one-stage posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, and the omphalocele was treated nonoperatively. Recovery was uneventful.

Anus, Imperforate↗
PubMed1994

Preexisting neurogenic voiding dysfunction in children with imperforate anus: problems in management.

We evaluated 22 boys and 2 girls 1 month to 8 years old with imperforate anus to determine the relationship between neurogenic voiding dysfunction and bony sacral or spinal cord anomalies. Lower urinary tract function before anorectoplasty was normal in 12 children (group 1), abnormal (detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia) in 9 (group 2) and not evaluated in 3 (group 3). High lesions of imperforate anus were present in 22% of the patients in group 1 and in 100% of those in group 2. Plain radiography revealed partial sacral agenesis in 1 child in group 1 and 4 in group 2. Magnetic resonance imaging detected occult spinal dysraphism in 1 patient in group 1 and 2 in group 2. (Occult spinal dysraphism included sacral lipoma, tethered cord, syringomyelia and thick filum terminale.) Seven children in group 2 had vesicoureteral reflux before anorectoplasty. All children in group 2 were placed on clean intermittent catheterization for the management of neurogenic voiding dysfunction. Normal upper urinary tract function was maintained in all patients in group 1 and 6 in group 2. The remaining 3 children in group 2 had high grade reflux at presentation associated with severe renal damage or noncompliance with clean intermittent catheterization. These findings indicate that in children with imperforate anus lower urinary tract function should be evaluated before anorectoplasty because of the high incidence of associated congenital neurogenic voiding dysfunction and the potential risk for renal deterioration. When possible, neurogenic voiding dysfunction should be managed with clean intermittent catheterization to prevent renal damage.

Anus, Imperforate↗
PubMed1992

Anterior perineal approach and three-flap anoplasty for imperforate anus: optimal reconstruction with minimal destruction.

Despite progress in the treatment of imperforate anus, anal stenosis, rectal prolapse, and other late complications may still arise. In 1987, we described the three-flap anoplasty for the treatment of rectal prolapse following pull-through operations. Since 1986, we have performed 14 three-flap anoplasties in combination with an anterior perineal rectal pull-through for primary treatment of imperforate anus. The mean age at definitive repair was 4.4 months (range, 0 to 14 months). Eleven of the 14 primary pull-through procedures could be performed through a perineal approach only. There were no deaths. At a mean follow-up of 24.2 months, none of the patients has developed prolapse, and only one has had a temporary stenosis. Three children are already fully continent, and soiling is absent in 12. All have a good sphincter tone. Although it is too early to evaluate long-term results, it appears that the three-flap anoplasty prevents mucosal prolapse through the interposition of a skin-lined anal canal. Moreover, a combination of this technique with the anterior perineal approach provides an excellent exposure with minimal dissection of the perineal and pelvic musculature and allows for easy and safe pull-through of the rectal pouch, making an abdominal counterincision unnecessary in most cases. It reproduces at the same time a normal anatomy while taking advantage of all existing structures.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed1975

Urologic problems associated with imperforate anus.

A total of 120 children with both high, intermediate, and low types of imperforate anus were evaluated urologically. Genitourinary anomalies were associated with all types of imperforate anus but were found more often in children with high rectal deformities. Because the over-all incidence of genitourinary anomalies was high, early and complete urologic evaluation is necessary to achieve the best functional result.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Imperforate anus, malrotation and Hirschsprung's disease: a rare association.

The association of imperforate anus with anomalies of rectal innervation is very rare. Moreover, malrotation only rarely accompanies these malformations. We report 2 patients with this unusual triple association and its impact on their management. Retrospectively both patients presented at birth with the same radiological picture of distended distal colon and right-sided small bowel location. We discuss the importance of a systematic search for associated intestinal malformations in cases of imperforate anus in order to avoid serious complications and to choose the optimal operative strategy.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed1976

High-pouch imperforate anus treated by electromagnetic bougienage and subsequent perineal repair.

Four male infants with imperforate anus were treated by electromagnetic bougienage and subsequent perineal anoplasty with division of rectourethral fistula. Each had high-pouch imperforate anus of the supralevator type, with rectourethral fishtula at or above the level of the membranous urethra. Perineal anoplasty was accomplished in all four, with division of the rectourethral fistula, avoiding the need to do a sacral-abdominal-perineal procedure, as had been customary previously in similar cases.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2005

Midterm follow-up study of high-type imperforate anus after laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative anal function of high-type imperforate anus after laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP). METHODS: Between 2000 and 2002, LAARP was performed in 13 patients with high-type imperforate anus. Clinical data of the LAARP group were compared with the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) group (n = 7) operated before 2000. All patients were treated with initial colostomy in the newborn period. After anorectoplasty, daily glycerin enemas were given for postoperative bowel management. Anorectal function of these patients was evaluated using the Kelly score and manometry at the age of 3 to 5 years (LAARP) and 5 to 6 years (PSARP). RESULTS: Age at evaluation in the LAARP group was younger than that in the PSARP group (51 +/- 10 vs 73 +/- 12 months, P < .01). Kelly score was 3.8 +/- 1.3 vs 3.4 +/- 0.8, respectively. Resting pressure of internal sphincter was 31 +/- 11 vs 33 +/- 10 cm H(2)O, respectively. Relaxation reflex of the internal anal sphincter was observed in 62% (8/13) and 29% (2/7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Midterm follow-up study revealed that satisfactory fecal continence can be achieved in patients with high-type imperforate anus after LAARP. Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty may be a good alternative in this patient population. However, long-term follow-up is necessary to compare the benefits of LAARP against PSARP.

Anal Canal↗