PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Azabicyclo Compounds”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Benzodiazepine receptor binding of nonbenzodiazepines in vivo: alpidem, zolpidem and zopiclone.

Several classes of nonbenzodiazepine compounds, including imidazopyridines such as alpidem and zolpidem and cyclopyrrolones, e.g., zopiclone, have effects similar to benzodiazepines and may act at the benzodiazepine receptor in brain. We characterized the binding of these compounds to the benzodiazepine site in three brain regions using specific uptake of the high-affinity ligand [3H]Ro15-1788 (flumazenil). For alpidem, benzodiazepine binding was decreased in cortex and hippocampus with increasing drug dose. For zolpidem, receptor binding was reduced in cortex without a dose-response effect and no effect was observed on cerebellar binding. Zopiclone did not alter binding except for a decrease in binding at the lowest dose evaluated and an increase in binding above control at the highest dose. These data corroborate prior studies indicating that the imidazopyridines appear to act at the benzodiazepine receptor, but do not support receptor subtype selectivity of zolpidem. The limited effect of zopiclone except for increased binding at high doses is also consistent with prior studies suggesting that zopiclone acts at a site distinct from the benzodiazepine receptor.

Animals↗

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for detection of low concentrations of 21 benzodiazepines, metabolites, and analogs in urine: method with forensic applications.

BACKGROUND: Commonly used methods for detecting benzodiazepines (BZPs) and BZP-like substances, such as zolpidem and zopiclone, may not detect low concentrations of these drugs. We developed a liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method for identifying these drugs and their relevant metabolites. METHODS: We extracted BZPs from urine by solid-phase extraction with a mixed-mode phase (OASIS HLB cartridges). Chromatographic separation was performed with a Waters XTerra MS C18 [150 x 2.1 mm (i.d.); bead size, 5 microm] reversed-phase column with deuterated analogs of the analytes as internal standards (IS). Detection was performed with a triple-quadruple mass spectrometer that monitored 2 specific transitions per compound in the electrospray, positive-ion selected-reaction monitoring mode. We tested this technique on urine samples from 12 healthy volunteers and 1 forensic sample obtained in a case of alleged drug-facilitated sexual assault. RESULTS: Chromatographic separation was achieved within 18 min. The linear dynamic ranges extended from 0.02 or 0.1 microg/L (depending on the drug or metabolite) to 50 microg/L. Extraction recovery (range) was 77%-110%. Limits of detection were < or = 0.05 microg/L. No ion suppression was seen except for alprazolam, for which baseline decreased by almost 20%. In the forensic urine sample, the method detected alprazolam (3.5 microg/L) and its characteristic metabolite, alpha-hydroxyalprazolam (0.17 microg/L). CONCLUSION: This method measured low concentrations of BZPs and BZP-like substances and might be useful for analyses of urine in suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault cases.

Azabicyclo Compounds↗

Studies on the dependence-inducing potential of zopiclone and triazolam.

We carried out a randomized double-blind study. This was a crossover design with two periods of 2 days each with one compound (either zopiclone or triazolam). The next 2 days of active trial periods the patients were allowed to choose the preferred coloured capsule of which both neither the patients nor the investigators knew about its real contents. 40 volunteers were chosen from our patients suffering from chronic alcoholism who just finished their detoxification. There were given coloured coded capsules, each of them containing either 0.25 mg triazolam or 3.75 mg zopiclone. The capsules should be swallowed when patients felt a desire for alcohol. The maximal dosage was 8 capsules per day (2.0 mg triazolam and 30 mg zopiclone). There was a significant difference of degrees of freedom and probability at a level of 0.0005 for the items of the Addiction Research Centre Inventory and a level of 0.0005 for the items of the 'profile of mood states'. None of the volunteers developed a special desire for zopiclone after withdrawal of the medication.

Adult↗

Stereochemical features controlling binding and intrinsic activity properties of benzodiazepine-receptor ligands.

Benzodiazepine-receptor ligands belong to several different chemical classes. All of them bind to the receptor but display a variety of biological effects ranging from agonist to inverse agonist to antagonist. The properties of the most representative compounds for each class are briefly reviewed as concerns their receptor binding affinities, gamma-aminobutyric acid ratios, photoaffinity labeling ratios, and pharmacological properties. Their geometries, as obtained by X-ray crystallography, are discussed and missing crystal and molecular structures of two of them (zopiclone and CL 218-872) are reported. Binding and intrinsic activity properties of series of benzodiazepines and beta-carbolines are extensively analyzed and correlated with their molecular structures. A general stereochemical model accounting for both binding abilities and kinds of biochemical and pharmacological activities for all benzodiazepine-receptor ligands is proposed. This is based on the assumption of a rather diffuse and substantially planar recognition site where the main drug-receptor interactions are mediated by the drug carbonylic or iminic groups via hydrogen bonding and the observed differences in pharmacological profiles are accounted for by the different localization of the different ligands inside this unique binding site.

Animals↗

Studies on the dependence-inducing potential of zopiclone and triazolam.

We carried out a randomized double-blind study. This was a crossover design with two periods of 2 days each with one compound (either zopiclone or triazolam). The next 2 days of active trial periods the patients were allowed to choose the preferred coloured capsule of which both neither the patients nor the investigators knew about its real contents. 40 volunteers were chosen from our patients suffering from chronic alcoholism who just finished their detoxification. There were given coloured coded capsules, each of them containing either 0.25 mg triazolam or 3.75 mg zopiclone. The capsules should be swallowed when patients felt a desire for alcohol. The maximal dosage was 8 capsules per day (2.0 mg triazolam and 30 mg zopiclone). There was a significant difference of degrees of freedom and probability at a level of 0.0005 for the items of the Addiction Research Centre Inventory and a level of 0.0005 for the items of the 'profile of mood states'. None of the volunteers developed a special desire for zopiclone after withdrawal of the medication.

Adult↗

New drugs for insomnia: comparative tolerability of zopiclone, zolpidem and zaleplon.

Insomnia affects 30-35% of people living in developed countries. The impact of insomnia on daytime functioning and its relationship with medical and psychiatric illnesses necessitate early treatment to prevent insomnia becoming persistent and to avoid the development of complications. However, pharmacological strategies must achieve a balance between sedative and adverse effects. In the last 30 years, benzodiazepines have been the preferred drugs for the treatment of insomnia. Benzodiazepines act nonselectively at two central receptor sites, named omega(1) and omega(2), which are located in different areas of the CNS. The sedative action of benzodiazepines is related to omega(1) receptors, whereas omega(2) receptors are responsible for their effects on memory and cognitive functioning. According to their pharmacokinetic profile, benzodiazepines can be classified into three groups: short half-life (<3 hours), medium half-life (8-24 hours) and long half-life (>24 hours). The newer non-benzodiazepine agents zopiclone, zolpidem and zaleplon have a hypnosedative action comparable with that of benzodiazepines, but they display specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. These three 'Z' agents all share a short plasma half-life and limited duration of action. In addition, these agents are selective compounds that interact preferentially with omega(1) receptors (sedative effect), whereas benzodiazepines also interact with omega(2) receptors (adverse effects on cognitive performance and memory). Zaleplon is characterised by an ultrashort half-life (approximately 1 hour). Zolpidem and zopiclone have longer half-lives (approximately 2.4 and 5 hours, respectively). These properties, together with the low risk of residual effect, may explain the limited negative influences of these agents on daytime performance. Psychomotor tasks and memory capacities appear to be better preserved by non-benzodiazepine agents than by benzodiazepines. When present, cognitive deficits almost exclusively coincide with the peak plasma concentration. In particular, impairment can emerge in the first hours after drug administration, whereas psychomotor and memory tests carried out 7-8 hours later (i.e. in the morning) generally show no relevant alterations. As with benzodiazepines, the three 'Z' non-benzodiazepine agents should be used for a limited period, even in chronic relapsing conditions. Further evaluation is needed of the safety of hypnosedative medications in the long-term management of insomnia.

Acetamides↗

Testing for zopiclone in hair application to drug-facilitated crimes.

The use of a drug to modify a person's behaviour for criminal gain is not a recent phenomenon. However, the recent increase in reports of drug-facilitated crimes (sexual assault, robbery) has caused alarm in the general public. The drugs involved can be difficult to detect due to low dosages or chemical instability. They possess amnesic properties and can be quickly cleared from the body fluids. In these situations, blood or even urine can be of poor interest. This is the reason why this laboratory developed an original approach based on hair testing by LC-MS/MS. Zopiclone (Imovane), due to its short half-life associated with rapid hypnotic activity, is considered as a compound of choice to sedate victims. To document the detection of zopiclone in hair, we first tested specimens obtained from two volunteers who had ingested a single 7.5 mg Imovane tablet, and from repetitive consumers of zopiclone. After pH 8.4 buffer incubation and extraction with methylene chloride/diethyl ether (80/20 (v/v)), hair extracts were separated on a Xterra MS C18 column using a gradient of acetonitrile and formate buffer. Zopiclone and diazepam-d5, used as internal standard, were detected by tandem mass spectrometry. A single exposure to zopiclone was detectable in the first hair segment of two volunteers at concentration of 5.4 and 9.0 pg/mg, respectively. Hair from repetitive consumers tested positive for zopiclone at concentrations of 37 and 66 pg/mg. Hair analysis was applied to two authentic criminal cases. In the first one, zopiclone tested positive in the corresponding hair segment at 4.2 pg/mg, in accordance with a single exposure to the drug. In the other expertise, zopiclone was detected in the two segments analyzed, at 21.3 and 21.5 pg/mg, making unlikely the hypothetical single exposure to zopiclone.

Adolescent↗

Among fatal poisonings dextropropoxyphene predominates in younger people, antidepressants in the middle aged and sedatives in the elderly.

To compare the characteristics of dextropropoxyphene (DXP) poisoning victims with those of victims of poisonings by antidepressants and sedatives, we examined all fatal poisonings due to DXP, antidepressants or sedatives among autopsies performed at one department of forensic medicine in Sweden during the six-year period from 1992 to 1997. In 202 cases, death was classified as fatal poisonings by DXP, antidepressants or sedatives. DXP caused death in 78 cases (39%), antidepressants in 49 (24%), and sedatives in 75 (37%). DXP as a single preparation was predominant in causing death. The second compound, flunitrazepam, caused death in 30 cases (15%). The victims of poisonings by DXP, antidepressants, or sedatives shared a similar history of alcohol/drug abuse, depression and somatic illness. They were mostly living alone at the time of death (>60%), the majority died at home (81%), and suicide was the most frequent manner of death (73%). Age seemed to be an important characteristic regarding the choice of drug. Younger people predominantly died of DXP (mean age 43 years, 95% confidence interval, CI 39-47), and elderly people of sedatives (mean age 59 years, CI 55-63). Antidepressants were found mainly in middle-aged victims (mean age 51 years, CI 48-54). The predominance of sedatives among the elderly might be explained by a very high prescription rate of such drugs in older age groups, but prescription rate could not explain the DXP predominance among younger people. We hypothesize that younger people are more prone to abuse therapeutic drugs for euphoric reasons than elderly people, and that because of its high toxicity, DXP leads to accidental deaths more often than sedatives.

Adult↗

Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of the electroencephalogram effects of GABAA receptor modulators: in vitro-in vivo correlations.

A mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for neuroactive steroids, comprising a separate characterization of 1) the receptor activation process and 2) the stimulus-response relationship, was applied to various nonsteroidal GABAA receptor modulators. The EEG effects of nine prototypical GABAA receptor modulators (six benzodiazepines, one imidazopyridine, one cyclopyrrolone, and one beta-carboline) were determined in rats in conjunction with plasma concentrations. Population PK/PD modeling revealed monophasic concentration-EEG effect relationships with large differences in potency (EC50) and intrinsic activity between the compounds. The data were analyzed on the basis of the mechanism-based PK/PD model for (synthetic) neuroactive steroids on the assumption of a single and unique stimulus-response relationship. The model converged yielding estimates of both the apparent in vivo receptor affinity (KPD) and the in vivo intrinsic efficacy (ePD). The values of KPD ranged from 0.41 +/- 0 ng.ml(-1) for bretazenil to 436 +/- 72 ng.ml(-1) for clobazam and the values for e(PD) from -0.27 +/- 0 for methyl 6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate to 0.54 +/- 0.02 for diazepam. Significant linear correlations were observed between KPD for unbound concentrations and the affinity in an in vitro receptor bioassay (r = 0.93) and between e(PD) and the GABA-shift in vitro (r = 0.95). The findings of this investigation show that the in vivo effects of nonsteroidal GABAA receptor modulators and (synthetic) neuroactive steroids can be described on the basis of a single unique transducer function. In this paradigm, the nonsteroidal GABAA receptor modulators behave as partial agonists relative to neuroactive steroids.

Algorithms↗

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of short-acting hypnosedatives: zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone.

Benzodiazepines have historically been the mainstay of treatment for sleeping disorders, yet they have many shortcomings. A new group of sedative hypnotic agents has been developed for this purpose. Similar to the benzodiazepines, zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone have activity at the GABA receptor complex, yet they appear to have more selectivity for certain subunits of the GABA receptor. This produces a clinical profile that is more efficacious with fewer side effects. Zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone are structurally distinct. Due to variation in binding to the GABA receptor subunits, these three compounds show subtle differences in their effect on sleep stages, and as antiepileptics, anxiolytics and amnestics. The duration of action of zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone can be related to their individual pharmacokinetic profile, which subsequently determines the time course of drug effect. Each of these compounds has a unique pharmacokinetic profile with different bioavailability, volume of distribution and elimination half-lives. Zaleplon has a rapid elimination so there are fewer residual side effects after taking a single dose at bedtime. By comparison, zolpidem and zopiclone have a more delayed elimination so there may be a prolonged drug effect. This can result in residual sedation and side effects but may be useful for sustained treatment of insomnia with less waking during the night. There are also differences in potency based on plasma concentrations suggesting that there are differences in binding to the GABA receptor complex. Although zaleplon has a much lower bioavailability (30%), the treatment dose is similar to zolpidem and zopiclone (bioavilaibility of 70%) because of the increased potency of zaleplon. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone are significantly different from benzodiazepines. The new drugs are sufficiently unique from each other to allow customisation of treatment for various types of insomnia. While zaleplon may be best indicated for the delayed onset of sleep, zolpidem and zopiclone may be better indicated for maintaining a complete night's sleep. Only the patient's symptoms and response to treatment will dictate the best course of treatment.

Acetamides↗

Characterization of two novel N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists: EAA-090 (2-[8,9-dioxo-2,6-diazabicyclo [5.2.0]non-1(7)-en2-yl]ethylphosphonic acid) and EAB-318 (R-alpha-amino-5-chloro-1-(phosphonomethyl)-1H-benzimidazole-2-propanoic acid hydrochloride).

Two novel N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists with unique chemical structures, EAA-090 (2-[8,9-dioxo-2, 6-diazabicyclo[5.2.0]non-1(7)-en2-yl]ethylphosphonic acid) and EAB-318 (R-alpha-amino-5-chloro-1-(phosphonomethyl)-1H-benzimidazole-2-propanoic acid hydrochloride), were compared with CGS-19755 (Selfotel) in ligand binding, electrophysiology, and neuroprotection assays. CGS-19755, EAA-090 and EAB-318 inhibited [(3)H]3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acid binding to NMDA receptors with IC(50) values of 55, 28, and 7.9 nM, respectively. All three compounds decreased the duration of spontaneous synaptic currents and inhibited NMDA-activated currents in rat hippocampal neurons. IC(50) values for inhibition of current induced by 10 microM NMDA were 795, 477, and 69 nM for CGS-19755, EAA-090, and EAB-318, respectively. The NMDA antagonists protected chick embryo retina slices and cultured rat hippocampal and cortical neurons from glutamate- and NMDA-induced neurotoxicity. In experiments in which different NMDA receptor splice variants and subtypes were expressed in Xenopus oocytes, all three antagonists preferentially blocked NMDA-elicited currents mediated by N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NR)1 splice variants containing the N-terminal insertion. They also favored NR2A-versus NR2B- or NR2C-containing NMDA receptors, with EAA-090 showing the greatest selectivity. EAA-090 was 10 times more potent at blocking NR2A-versus NR2B- or NR2C-containing NMDA receptors. In addition to being the most potent NMDA antagonist, EAB-318 inhibited alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and kainate receptors. The combination of NMDA and AMPA/kainate block enabled EAB-318 to protect neurons against ischemia induced cell death.

Animals↗

Residual effect of zolpidem 10 mg and zopiclone 7.5 mg versus flunitrazepam 1 mg and placebo on driving performance and ocular saccades.

RATIONALE: Studies report contradictory results concerning the residual effects of zolpidem and zopiclone. Moreover, residual effects of these compounds on healthy subjects have not yet been simultaneously assessed. OBJECTIVE: The present study with healthy subjects investigated the residual effects of zolpidem 10 mg and zopiclone 7.5 mg on driving performance and on ocular saccade and compared them to those under flunitrazepam 1 mg and placebo. METHODS: The study involved 16 subjects divided into two groups, a 9:00 a.m. group and a 11:00 a.m. group, in a balanced, double-blind, cross-over design. RESULTS: In the 9:00 a.m. group, zolpidem had no residual effects while zopiclone and flunitrazepam both impaired driving performance (P < 0.001 for both) and increased saccadic latency (P < 0.005; P = 0.052, respectively). Zopiclone impaired driving performance 5 times less than did flunitrazepam. In the 11:00 a.m. group, zolpidem and zopiclone had no residual effects, while flunitrazepam increased saccadic latency (P = 0.065) but did not impair driving performance. CONCLUSIONS: Zopiclone and flunitrazepam had residual effects in the first part of the morning, whereas zolpidem had no residual effects. The hierarchical character of the effects of the molecules differed according to the test administered. This is probably linked more to drug-induced specific alterations than to different sensitivities of the tests.

Adult↗

The antinociceptive effect of zolpidem and zopiclone in mice.

Zolpidem and zopiclone are two of a newer hypno-sedative class of drugs, the "Z compounds". Their use for the treatment of short-term insomnia has been expanding constantly during the last two decades. The "Z compounds" are considered to cause less significant rebound insomnia or tolerance than the conventional hypnotic benzodiazepines. Their possible antinociceptive effect and interaction with the opioid system has not been studied yet. Our results demonstrate a significant difference between the antinociceptive properties of zopiclone and zolpidem when injected s.c. in the hotplate analgesic assay in mice. Zopiclone induced a weak, dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, antagonized only by the alpha2-adrenergic receptor antagonist yohimbine. Zolpidem induced a weak, biphasic dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, antagonized primarily by the non-selective opioid antagonist naloxone and by yohimbine. The weak antinociceptive effect of both drugs, evident only at very high doses (far beyond those used clinically to induce sleep), implies no clinical use for zopiclone or zolpidem in the management of pain. However, the possible interaction of zolpidem with the opioid system should be further investigated (in behavioral models, which do not overlap with the acute-pain antinociception model we used), both for possible side effects in special populations (i.e. elderly) and for possible drug-drug interactions, in order to minimize possible hazards and maximize clinical beneficial effects of its use for sleep.

3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cycloh↗

Radiopacity of clomipramine conglomerations and unsuccessful endoscopy: report of 4 cases.

BACKGROUND: The radiopacity of ingested substances may serve as a clue to the presence of particular compounds, as this characteristic varies considerably among medications and household products. Tablet conglomerations are also variably radiopaque. We report 4 cases of clomipramine poisoning associated with formation of radiopaque masses, believed to be clomipramine, in the area of the stomach. CASE REPORTS: Four patients were admitted to the Toxicological Intensive Care Unit after ingestions of, respectively, 8.5 g (180 tablets of mixed strength), 7.5 g (100 tablets), 10.5 g (140 tablets), and 4.5 g (60 tablets) of clomipramine, along with other sedatives and antipsychotics. In each case, a rounded density was observed in the gastric area on plain chest radiograph. The hospital courses of each patient were marked by tachycardia, hypotension, QRS and QT prolongation, seizures, and decreased mental status. Three of 4 patients underwent unsuccessful endoscopy to remove tablet fragments and subsequently suffered gastrointestinal hemorrhage requiring transfusion. All patients were discharged recovered from the hospital. DISCUSSION: Clomipramine, a potent tricyclic antidepressant, has been previously reported to be nonradiopaque, and has not been reported to induce formation of concretions. These cases suggest that massive ingestions of clomipramine may form bezoars which are radiopaque and may be associated with serious toxicity. Careful consideration should be given prior to the use of gastric endoscopy for the retrieval of tablet fragments since significant hemorrhage, attributed to the procedure itself rather than to clomipramine toxicity, may ensue.

Acepromazine↗

The effect of cyclopyrrolones on GABAA receptor function is different from that of benzodiazepines.

The effects of the cyclopyrrolones zopiclone and suriclone on the function of the central gamma-amino-butyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor complex in mouse brain were evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. Added in vitro to mouse cerebral cortical membranes, these compounds potently inhibited [3H]flumazenil binding with IC50 (50% inhibitory concentration) values of 35.8 nM (zopiclone) and 1.1 nM (suriclone). Similar results were obtained with cerebellar membranes, indicating that these drugs do not discriminate between putative type I and type II benzodiazepine receptors. The interaction of cyclopyrrolones with recognition sites present at the level of the GABA receptor complex appears to be competitive, because zopiclone decreased the affinity of the receptors for [3H]flumazenil without affecting the maximal number of binding sites. Moreover, zopiclone and suriclone did not affect the rate of dissociation of [3H]flumazenil from benzodiazepine receptors. The in vitro efficacy of zopiclone appeared different from that of suriclone and the benzodiazepines diazepam and flunitrazepam. Thus, zopiclone failed to affect muscimol-stimulated 36Cl- uptake and only slightly inhibited t-[35S]butylbicyclophosphorothionate ([35S]TBPS) binding. In contrast, like diazepam and flunitrazepam, suriclone increased muscimol-stimulated 36Cl- uptake and markedly inhibited [35S]TBPS binding. In contrast, like diazepam and flunitrazepam, suriclone increased muscimol-stimulated 36Cl- uptake and markedly inhibited [35S]TBPS binding. On the other hand, suriclone, like zopiclone, did not modify [3H]muscimol binding to mouse cerebral cortical membranes. Moreover, zopiclone antagonized the reduction in [35S]TBPS binding elicited by the benzodiazepine receptor full of agonist diazepam. Consistent with its low efficacy in vitro, oral administration of zopiclone (2.5 to 100 mg/kg, p.o.) in mice failed to modify [35S]TBPS binding subsequently measured in cerebral cortical membranes "ex vitro".(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Critical factors for pharmacokinetics of zopiclone in the elderly and in patients with liver and renal insufficiency.

Zopiclone, a new hypnotic cyclopyrrolone, undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism. The carrier of hypnotic activity is the parent compound; however, knowledge of its metabolic profile is essential for the understanding of pharmacokinetic changes in various pathophysiological conditions. In 45 healthy young volunteers, zopiclone had a Tmax of 0.5. A first-pass effect of 20% resulted in an absolute bioavailability, F, of 77%. The volume of distribution ratio Vdc/Vdt was 3.2. The plasma half-life (t1/2) was 5.1 h. A metabolic ratio of 3.7 and 4.6 was found for the two main urinary metabolites, N-oxide and N-desmethyl derivatives. No modifications of kinetics were seen after chronic treatment. In eight patients with liver insufficiency, the main changes (delayed Tmax, 3.5 h, higher plasma concentrations with an increased F of 97%, prolonged t1/2 of 8.4 h) were essentially due to a reduced hepatic metabolic clearance, as shown by a decreased metabolic ratio for the two main metabolites. In 18 patients with renal insufficiency, the only major modification was an increased bioavailability (F of 115%) probably due to a relative decrease of the Vdc. In 19 elderly subjects, the main findings were a decreased metabolic clearance, as shown by decreased metabolic ratios, and an inversion of the Vdc/Vdt ratio, evoking the changes seen in renal insufficiency. The increase in F (168%) and the age-dependent increase in plasma t1/2 (8.1 h) in the oldest subjects (over 74 years of age) can be explained by this double mechanism. On the basis of these findings, a reduction of the initial zopiclone dose from 7.5 to 3.5 mg/day is recommended for patients with severe liver insufficiency and patients over 70 years of age with liver insufficiency.

Adult↗

Comparative cue generalization profiles of L-838, 417, SL651498, zolpidem, CL218,872, ocinaplon, bretazenil, zopiclone, and various benzodiazepines in chlordiazepoxide and zolpidem drug discrimination.

The zolpidem discriminative cue is mediated by GABA(A)-alpha1 receptors, whereas the chlordiazepoxide cue may be mediated via non-alpha1 GABA(A) receptors because compounds with selective affinity for GABA(A)-alpha1 receptors fully generalize to the former cue. We predicted that L-838,417 [7-tert-butyl-3-(2,5-difluorophenyl)-6-(2-methyl-2H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylmethoxy)-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine], a partial agonist at non-alpha1 GABA(A) receptors and an antagonist at GABA(A)-alpha1 receptors, would generalize to the chlordiazepoxide but not the zolpidem-discriminative cue. SL651498 [6-fluoro-9-methyl-2-phenyl-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl-carbonyl)-2,9-dihydro-1H-pyridol[3,4-b]indol-1-one] is a full agonist at GABA(A)-alpha2 receptors, with lower efficacy at GABA(A)-alpha3 receptors and least efficacy at GABA(A)-alpha1 and GABA(A)-alpha5 receptors. Because SL651498 has efficacy at GABA(A)-alpha1 receptors, we anticipated that it would generalize to both discriminative cues. Rats were trained to discriminate either zolpidem (3 mg/kg) or chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) from vehicle using a two-lever operant procedure. The generalization profiles of L-838,417 and SL651498 were compared with nonselective full agonists, GABA(A)-alpha1-selective ligands zolpidem and CL218,872 [3-methyl-6-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine], the nonselective partial agonist bretazenil, and the novel anxioselective drug ocinaplon. A nonselective partial agonist was included because L-838,417 and SL651498 are partial agonists at some GABA(A) receptors, and this property may influence their generalization profiles. All nonselective full agonists and ocinaplon fully generalized to both cues. CL218,872 and zolpidem generalized to zolpidem only, whereas L-838,417 fully generalized to chlordiazepoxide only. SL651498 fully generalized to chlordiazepoxide and occasioned significant zolpidem-appropriate responding. Bretazenil was similar to SL651498. In conclusion, at this training dose, the chlordiazepoxide-discriminative stimulus is mediated primarily via non-alpha1 GABA(A) receptors and the generalization profiles of the ligands tested seem to correspond with their in vitro profiles at GABA(A) receptor subtypes.

Animals↗

Cognitive behavioral therapy vs zopiclone for treatment of chronic primary insomnia in older adults: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Insomnia is a common condition in older adults and is associated with a number of adverse medical, social, and psychological consequences. Previous research has suggested beneficial outcomes of both psychological and pharmacological treatments, but blinded placebo-controlled trials comparing the effects of these treatments are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To examine short- and long-term clinical efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and pharmacological treatment in older adults experiencing chronic primary insomnia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 46 adults (mean age, 60.8 y; 22 women) with chronic primary insomnia conducted between January 2004 and December 2005 in a single Norwegian university-based outpatient clinic for adults and elderly patients. INTERVENTION: CBT (sleep hygiene, sleep restriction, stimulus control, cognitive therapy, and relaxation; n = 18), sleep medication (7.5-mg zopiclone each night; n = 16), or placebo medication (n = 12). All treatment duration was 6 weeks, and the 2 active treatments were followed up at 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ambulant clinical polysomnographic data and sleep diaries were used to determine total wake time, total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and slow-wave sleep (only assessed using polysomnography) on all 3 assessment points. RESULTS: CBT resulted in improved short- and long-term outcomes compared with zopiclone on 3 out of 4 outcome measures. For most outcomes, zopiclone did not differ from placebo. Participants receiving CBT improved their sleep efficiency from 81.4% at pretreatment to 90.1% at 6-month follow-up compared with a decrease from 82.3% to 81.9% in the zopiclone group. Participants in the CBT group spent much more time in slow-wave sleep (stages 3 and 4) compared with those in other groups, and spent less time awake during the night. Total sleep time was similar in all 3 groups; at 6 months, patients receiving CBT had better sleep efficiency using polysomnography than those taking zopiclone. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that interventions based on CBT are superior to zopiclone treatment both in short- and long-term management of insomnia in older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00295386.

Aged↗