PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Biotechnology”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Biotechnology research in Thailand and applications to the study of animal parasites and their vectors.

Biotechnology research in Thailand owes its origins to the strength in biomedical and life sciences in the academia, and the importance of agriculture in the economy. With growing awareness of the impact of new biotechnology including genetic engineering, biotechnology R & D centres were set up in the universities, and the National Centre for Genetic Engineering and biotechnology was created in 1983. The National Center functions as the center for policy and planning in biotechnology, for support of important research, development and technology transfer projects in designated institutions, and serves to link these institutions with the private sector. The aim is to develop specific biotechnology areas from laboratory stages up to pilot-scale, with emphasis on transfer and utilization of genetic engineering and biotechnology in various fields including public health had on strengthening of basic infrastructure in relevant disciplines. The National Center has 4 affiliated laboratories, including pilot plants, and over 30 projects in 9 institutions in the network. Recently the Science and Technology for Development Program has also devoted a part of its substantial funding to support various biotechnology research projects. With regard to biotechnology research relevant to the study of animal parasites and their vectors, the work in Thailand has up to now concentrated more on the application of new techniques in clinical laboratory and field work than in industrial productions. Specific contributions from the Unit of Parasite Biochemistry, Mahidol University, were given as illustrative examples.

Animals↗

Medical biotechnology in India.

The potential of biotechnology has just began to emerge in the 20th century. After the full knowledge of human genomes is available, biotechnology is going to play a major role in shaping the concept of future drug discovery, drug delivery, diagnostic methodology, clinical trials, and to a great extent the major lifestyle of the human society. This article is a comprehensive review of the major impact of biotechnology in diagnostics, antibiotics, r-proteins, vaccines, and antibodies production. It also highlights the future aspects of gene therapy in the management of healthcare. A comprehensive list of biotech products in healthcare management has been given. Also, the growth of biotechnology throughout the world at large and in the Indian industries in particular has been highlighted. Constraints, concerns and difficulties in biotechnology in India have been addressed mainly related to human resources, training institutions in India, funding in biotechnology, patent-related issues and regulatory hurdles. Like in information technology, India has great potential in bioinformatics as well. Some of the recent information on bioinformatics centers in India has been summarized. Indian biotechnology industries have the potential to use the modern discoveries in life sciences to reach an enviable position in the world of biotechnology.

Antibodies↗

Barriers to Alzheimer disease drug discovery and development in the biotechnology industry.

The major barrier to Alzheimer disease (AD) drug discovery and development in the biotechnology industry is scale. Most biotechnology companies do not have the personnel or expertise to carry a drug from the bench to the market. Much effort in the industry has been directed toward the elucidation of molecular mechanisms of AD and the identification of new targets. Advances in biotechnology have generated new insights into disease mechanisms, increased the number of lead compounds, and accelerated biologic screening. The majority of costs associated with drug development are in clinical testing and development activities, many of which are driven by regulatory issues. For most biotechnology companies, the costs of such trials and the infrastructure necessary to support them are prohibitive. Another significant barrier is the definition of therapeutic benefit for AD drugs; Food and Drug Administration (FDA) precedent has established that a drug must show superiority to placebo on a performance-based test of cognition and a measure of global clinical function. This restrictive definition is biased toward drugs that enhance performance on memory-based tests. Newer AD drugs are targeted toward slowing disease progression; however, there is currently no accepted definition of what constitutes efficacy in disease progression. Despite these obstacles, the biotechnology industry has much to offer AD drug discovery and development. Biotechnology firms have already developed essential technology for AD drug development and will continue to do so. Biotechnology companies can move more quickly; of course, the trick is to move quickly in the right direction. Speed may offset some of the problems associated with lack of scale. Additionally, biotechnology companies can afford to address markets that may be too restricted for larger pharmaceutical companies. This advantage will have increasing importance, as therapies are developed to address subtypes of AD.

Alzheimer Disease↗

A long-term study of knowledge, risk, and ethics for students enrolled in an introductory biotechnology course.

Since 1989, an undergraduate course addressing issues concerning biotechnology in agriculture has been taught annually. To determine the extent to which students were engaged in classroom instruction and assimilated knowledge from the course, students were asked to complete an "Attitudes About Biotechnology" questionnaire. Students were queried about their knowledge of biotechnology, perceptions of risks associated with biotechnology, and ethics and attitudes toward the use of biotechnology in agriculture. Responses to the survey questions were evaluated both pre-and postcourse. Data were collected from 13 classes over a 10-yr period. Inspection of the precourse grade point average and the course grades for these students revealed no trends up or down over the period of this study. Similarly, inspection of the data revealed no effect from problem-based learning, student-facilitated group work, or technology on student attainment of knowledge, perception of risk, or ethical views. For each of the five knowledge questions, the average score increased as a result of taking the course. On two of the knowledge questions, the average score increase for females from pre- to postcourse was greater than for males. Based on our measurements using the postcourse questionnaire, the correlation between perceived and actual knowledge was not significantly different from zero. In two of the four risk questions, there was no change in average score as a result of the course; however, student perception of risk associated with genetic engineering of plants increased. Although average scores for student perception of risk due to the perceived impact of genetically engineered products on people or the environment decreased from pre- to postcourse assessment, the average score was higher (P < 0.01) for females than for males. Males were more accepting of genetic manipulation of cells in a laboratory than were females both pre- and postcourse. Although student knowledge of biotechnology was increased and the perceived risk due to biotechnology was altered, there was no evidence that students altered their ethical position on biotechnology as a result of this course.

Adult↗

Biotechnology awareness study, Part 2: Meeting the information needs of biotechnologists.

The second part of the biotechnology awareness study focused on health sciences libraries and how well they are meeting the needs of biotechnologists working in the study's nine medical centers. A survey was conducted over a three-month period to assess the demand for biotechnology-related reference services at nine libraries and the sources the librarians used to answer the questions. Data on monographic and current serial holdings were also collected. At the end of the survey period, librarians were asked for their perceptions about biotechnology research at their institutions and in their geographic areas. Their responses were compared to the responses the scientists at the nine schools gave to the same or similar questions. Results showed few biotechnology-related reference questions were asked of the librarians. The recorded questions dealt with a range of biotechnology subjects. MEDLINE was used to answer 77% of the questions received during the survey period. More detailed notes in MeSH and a guide to online searching for biotechnology topics were suggested by the librarians as ways to improve reference service to this group of researchers. Journal collections were generally strong, with libraries owning from 50% to 87% of the titles on a core list of biotechnology journals compiled for this study. All libraries subscribed to the five titles most often cited by the scientists surveyed. Generally, librarians were unaware of the biotechnology-related research being done on their campuses or in their geographic areas.

Awareness↗

The attitudes of religious, environmental, and science policy leaders toward biotechnology.

Biotechnology is an increasingly visible and important item on the national science policy agenda. With growing corporate and governmental funding, basic research in recombinant DNA and related technologies is expanding rapidly. In a parallel and related process, new agricultural, medical, and other applications are being developed and a growing list of genetically-engineered products is ready for field testing and market distribution. In the months and years ahead, the flow of genetically-engineered products into the marketplace and the media coverage related to those new products will increase the public's awareness of biotechnology. In addition, it is possible that some public policy debate will occur over the issue of field testing new genetically-engineered materials. Media coverage of this type of controversy will also heighten awareness and influence the aggregate level of public awareness of biotechnology. The prospect of a public debate or controversy over any biotechnology issue illustrates a fundamental problem in the formulation of science policy within a democratic political system. The processes and techniques involved in genetic engineering and complex and require some level of scientific background knowledge. A 1979 study found that only seven per cent of American adults met a minimal definition of scientific literacy. It is clear that the current levels of public awareness and knowledge about biotechnology will not allow a public policy debate similar to those associated with controversies involving Social Security or gasoline prices. How, then, does a democratic society establish public policies on advanced technical issues like biotechnology? This report will outline a model of policy formulation for specialized issues and describe the results of a national study of relevant policy leaders concerning biotechnology. To understand the formulation of public policy toward biotechnology, it is necessary to focus on the role of the policy leaders in a stratified model. In general, when there is agreement on a given policy between the decision-makers and the policy leaders, the policy is implemented and there is no wider involvement in the policy formulation process. A large number of science and technology policy issues have been handled in this manner in the decades since the Second World War and it is likely that most science policy matters will continue to be resolved directly between policy leaders and decision-makers. Looking at the general science policy formulation process, it is clear that policy leaders are an important component.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Attitude↗

Impact of biotechnology in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of cardiovascular disorders.

Although biotechnology has been useful in the development of new diagnostic methods and drugs for the management of cardiovascular disorders, there are several issues which raise certain questions on the global use of biotechnology based drugs and diagnostic methods (Piascik, 1991; Fareed, 1993a; Fareed, 1994a). The cost is rather prohibitive in the development of this type of technology. Most diagnostic methods and drugs developed utilizing biotechnology based methods are relatively expensive. The second important consideration is the equivalence of the newer biotechnology derived drugs to the natural products. Many of the biotechnology derived drugs are obtained in prokaryotic systems (E. coli). Post-transcriptional modifications such as glycosylation are often important in determining the function of various proteins. On the other hand, biotechnology based diagnostic methods exhibit somewhat different specificity in comparison to conventional methods. Thus, it is rather important to assess the developments in this area in a careful manner. Furthermore, validation of the clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of biotechnology derived diagnostic devices and drugs is a prerequisite for their use in cardiovascular medicine.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Biotechnology and potential nutritional implications for children.

The tools of biotechnology have enormous potential to develop new, safe, and nutritious foods and food products that could benefit the immediate and long-term nutritional and health needs of the pediatric population. This is especially true as more emphasis is placed on the prevention, rather than the treatment, of chronic degenerative and metabolic diseases. But the promise of biotechnology for nutritional and health benefits of children's diets must be accepted with cautious optimism. Many advances in food technology and nutritional composition of food animals and plants have already been made through biotechnology, but they represent only the beginning of the necessary research. These advances have been based on relatively little knowledge of basic human nutritional needs, particularly during the dynamic pediatric period of growth and development. More importantly, these advances have been predicated with no understanding of dietary nutrient interactions. Changing nutrient composition of foods through biotechnology may alter nutrient interactions, nutrient-gene interactions, nutrient bioavailability, nutrient potency, and nutrient metabolism. Biotechnology has the potential to produce changes in our foods and in our diet at a pace far greater than our ability to predict the significance of those changes on pediatric nutrition. The Human Genome Project, which relies on biotechnology, will revolutionize science and medicine. Pediatrics will be one of the first medical specialties to benefit from the outcome of this project as recombinant DNA manipulations will replace diet therapies for treating metabolic diseases. Somatic gene therapy eventually may be the ideal means for diagnosis, treatment, and cure of inherited diseases and metabolic disorders; however, many problems exist, especially in situations in which nutrients are involved in the complex regulation of gene expression. DNA and genes themselves do not determine the fate of an individual. The genetic material provides the potential for the individual, but this potential can be modified by environmental factors. The interaction of nutrients with genes is a major determinant in the final outcome of the individual. Biotechnology promises children a more productive and better quality of life, but achieving the full potential of this promise demands a continued diligent search for knowledge of nutrition and nutrient-gene interactions.

Biotechnology↗

Using the written description requirement to limit broad patent scope, allow competition, and encourage innovation in biotechnology.

The biotechnology research and development process is extremely expensive and companies must attract investors to this high-risk industry to pay for these costs. Biotechnology companies rely on their ability to exclude others from exploiting the benefits of their research through patent protection to attract these investors. Consequently, they seek strong patent protection for their inventions by claiming a broad scope of patent protection for their inventions. Biotechnology is an industry where the scope of protection should be limited. Science-based technologies exploit the perceived technological opportunities from recent scientific developments, concentrating the attention of many inventors on the same areas. This poses several unique problems. First, only the first of several inventors will receive a patent to the invention. Second, due to publicly available, basic techniques, the actual contribution made by the inventor may be relatively small. Finally, there is a significant risk that permitting an overbroad patent scope may permit original patentees to control a variety of improvements and a number of applications. Additionally, a broad scope of protection for an invention tends to cause underutilization of many potential inventions or improvements. By limiting the scope of protection, one allows competitors to utilize these potential inventions or improvements and encourages the advancement of the technology. Traditionally, courts have used the scope of the disclosure to limit a patent with an overly broad scope of protection. The Federal Circuit is correctly applying the written description requirement as part of the disclosure to limit broad claim scope in biotechnology patents. The written description requirement is separate from the enablement requirement and applies to all claims. By requiring a written description to allow a PHOSITA to determine the structural characteristics of the claimed invention, the Federal Circuit is able limit biotechnology patents with overly broad patent scope. Recognizing that particular technologies will become more established as biotechnology matures giving rise to different issues in setting the appropriate level of patent scope, the court allowed the written description requirement to mature in tandem with advances in biotechnology to meet these new developments.

Biotechnology↗

Regulation of biotechnology products in the global pharmaceutical market: the case of the European community and the United States.

Biotechnology represents an opportunity for innovative products, new markets, or capital investments, depending on one's perspective. A primary consideration in regulating this industry is to ensure that innovation is not stifled yet the public is protected from potentially unsafe or ineffective products. We compared the regulatory requirements and procedures for obtaining marketing approval for biotechnology products in the European Community (EC) and the United States and identified key concerns of the biotechnology industry regarding the regulatory aspects of these products. The methodology consisted of a secondary literature review and mail survey. Biotechnology products are approved faster in the EC than the US. Both the EC and the US use advisory or expert committees in their respective approval procedures, although the EC does so more regularly. Market exclusivity provisions for biotechnology products range from 6 to 10 years in the EC compared with 7 years for "orphan" biotechnology products in the US. Regulatory affairs managers of the biotechnology industry were most concerned about application review time periods, communication with regulatory agencies, consistency in implementing regulations, and public policy changes. These concerns provide insight into the deficiencies that exist in regulatory processes and are valuable in identifying problems and implementing improvements.

Biotechnology↗

The role of biotechnology in art preservation.

Biotechnology has played a key role in medicine, agriculture and industry for over 30 years and has advanced our understanding of the biological sciences. Furthermore, the tools of biotechnology have a great and largely untapped potential for the preservation and restoration of our cultural heritage. It is possible that these tools are not often applied in this context because of the inherent separation of the worlds of art and science; however, it is encouraging to see that during the past six years important biotechnological applications to artwork preservation have emerged and advances in biotechnology predict further innovation. In this article we describe and reflect upon a unique example of a group of scientists and art restoration technicians working together to study and treat of a piece of colonial art, and review some of the new applications in biotechnology for the preservation of mankind's cultural heritage. We predict an expansion in this field and the further development of biotechnological techniques, which will open up new opportunities to both biologists and artwork preservers.

Animals↗

The command of biotechnology and merciful conquest in military opposition.

Biotechnology has an increasingly extensive use for military purposes. With the upcoming age of biotechnology, military operations are depending more on biotechnical methods. Judging from the evolving law of the theory of command, the command of biotechnology is feasible and inevitable. The report discusses some basic characteristics of modern theories of command, as well as the mature possibility of the command theory of military biotechnology. The evolution of the command theory is closely associated with the development of military medicine. This theory is expected to achieve successes in wars in an ultramicro, nonlethal, reversible, and merciful way and will play an important role in biotechnological identification and orientation, defense and attack, and the maintenance of fighting powers and biological monitoring. The command of military biotechnology has not become a part of the virtual military power yet, but it is an exigent strategic task to construct and perfect this theory.

Biological Warfare↗

Biotechnology products: new opportunities and responsibilities for the pharmacist.

The opportunities and responsibilities of pharmacists with respect to the new biotechnology products are described. Recent advances in the fields of molecular genetics and nucleic acid chemistry have resulted in a proliferation of biotechnology products. Those produced by recombinant DNA techniques offer particular promise for the treatment of a wide variety of medical disorders such as cancer, anemia, neutropenia, diabetes, and myocardial infarction. Since the turn of the century, the pharmacy profession has expanded its role from drug preparation and distribution to modern clinical pharmacy, in which pharmacists act as a source of drug information for physicians, nurses, and patients. In response to the new biotechnology revolution, pharmacists must once again undergo a role expansion, this time actively assuming responsibility for educating themselves about the nature and clinical use of the new biopharmaceuticals. The curriculum of students undergoing training in pharmacy should cover such areas as immunoglobulins, immunomodulators, growth hormones, targeted drug-delivery systems, and advanced diagnostic techniques that use biotechnology products. Continuing-education programs in these areas will update currently practicing pharmacists on the new biotechnology products. Although use of biologic proteins is currently targeted toward hospitalized patients, future advances may allow for dispensing these new drugs through community pharmacies as well. Therefore, change will be necessary at all levels of the pharmacy profession. As pharmacists accept the responsibility of dispensing, monitoring, and providing information about the new biotechnologic agents, they will enhance the rational use of these compounds.

Biotechnology↗

[Biotechnology and food products].

Biotechnology is a prominent example of the interdisciplinary field of science based on the biology, biochemistry, microbiology, gene engineering, colloid chemistry and the totality of other sciences. The biotechnology includes a biotechnique which allow realisation of the resolutions of the engineering issues in the specific fields of science such as gene engineering, enzyme, cell, immune and microbiology technique. The biotechnological concepts are used to best advantage in the agriculture for the design and development of embryonic and gene-cell methods of animals. The biotechnology is also widely in chemical, pharmaceutical, food, oil-refinery and gas industries for the biotechnological conversion of the matter. It is applied in a power industry during the production of the bioenergy by photosynthesis, in the ecology for the microbiological destruction of water, treatment of sewage and in medicine for the production of antibiotics, hormones, amino acids ets. The biotechnology occupies the distinctive place in the food productions, in this context the analysis of the trends of its perspective development is reviewed.

Biotechnology↗

Reimbursement and pharmacoeconomic perspectives in biotechnology.

Problems associated with reimbursement for biotechnology agents and strategies for solving these problems are reviewed. Because of the many different insurers in the U.S. health care system, a variety of reimbursement strategies have been developed for the biotechnology drugs that are now reaching the market. These strategies can vary by insurer, contract, treatment setting, and patient condition. With the advent of high-cost biotechnology drugs, pharmacists have taken on the additional roles of institutional educators and reimbursement specialists. Case studies involving three biotechnology agents illustrate how insurers deal with reimbursement for these drugs. Thrombolytic agents are reimbursed under Medicare, but the diagnosis-related-group (DRG) payment for myocardial infarction was not changed until two years after alteplase was marketed. Septic shock therapies potentially face similar reimbursement problems, which are compounded because the drugs can be lifesaving--leading to longer hospital stays. When filgrastim is administered, the amount reimbursed depends on the treatment setting. When claims for biotechnology agents are denied, the institution or provider should contact the payer to provide the needed information (in the case of missing information) or to discuss payer policies that may need review. Through proper case management, pharmacists and other institutional personnel can ensure reimbursement for these lifesaving biotechnology therapies.

Biotechnology↗

Development of biotechnology education in Turkey.

For sometime Turkish scientists have been actively involved in biotechnology related research. However, biotechnology educa-tion in Turkey is a relatively recent phenomenon. The subject has not been addressed at the undergraduate level in a serious way until recently. This is evident from the lack of undergraduate degree programmes in biotechnology at Turkish Universities. The Turkish scientific establishment is very much aware of the importance of biotechnology and has identified this subject as one of the priority areas. The Universities are taking positive steps towards enhancing Biotechnology education. This article focuses on the emergence, as well as the problems and prospects of Biotechnology education in Turkey.

Journal Article↗

White biotechnology: ready to partner and invest in.

It needs three factors to build an industry: market demand, product vision and capital. White biotechnology already produces high volume products such as feed additive amino acids and specialty products like enzymes for enantioselective biocatalysis. It serves large and diverse markets in the nutrition, wellness, pharmaceutical, agricultural and chemical industry. The total volume adds up to $ 50 billion worldwide. In spite of its proven track record, white biotechnology so far did not attract as much capital as red and even green biotechnology. However, the latest finance indicators confirm the continuously growing attractiveness of investment opportunities in white biotechnology. This article discusses white biotechnology's position and potential in the finance market and success factors.

Biotechnology↗

White biotechnology for green chemistry: fermentative 2-oxocarboxylic acids as novel building blocks for subsequent chemical syntheses.

Functionalized compounds, which are difficult to produce by classical chemical synthesis, are of special interest as biotechnologically available targets. They represent useful building blocks for subsequent organic syntheses, wherein they can undergo stereoselective or regioselective reactions. "White Biotechnology" (as defined by the European Chemical Industry [ http://www.europabio.org/white_biotech.htm ], as part of a sustainable "Green Chemistry,") supports new applications of chemicals produced via biotechnology. Environmental aspects of this interdisciplinary combination include: Use of renewable feedstock Optimization of biotechnological processes by means of: New "high performance" microorganisms On-line measurement of substrates and products in bioreactors Alternative product isolation, resulting in higher yields, and lower energy demand In this overview we describe biotechnologically produced pyruvic, 2-oxopentaric and 2-oxohexaric acids as promising new building blocks for synthetic chemistry. In the first part, the microbial formation of 2-oxocarboxylic acids (2-OCAs) in general, and optimization of the fermentation steps required to form pyruvic acid, 2-oxoglutaric acid, and 2-oxo-D-gluconic acid are described, highlighting the fundamental advantages in comparison to chemical syntheses. In the second part, a set of chemical formula schemes demonstrate that 2-OCAs are applicable as building blocks in the chemical synthesis of, e.g., hydrophilic triazines, spiro-connected heterocycles, benzotriazines, and pyranoic amino acids. Finally, some perspectives are discussed.

Biotechnology↗