PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Blood Component Transfusion”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Pediatric transfusion: considerations by age and blood component.

Transfusion in the pediatric age group requires careful consideration of the patient's weight and age because of potential problems with intravascular volume and difficulty with administration of the blood product. Different age groups have varied disease processes that require specific blood components. A correct diagnosis is essential for their proper choice and use. Common blood components used include red blood cells, platelets, granulocytes, factor VIII preparations, and prothrombin complex concentrates. Bone marrow transplantation and apheresis are new therapeutic modalities available through immunohematology-hemotherapy units. Adverse reactions to blood components include immediate and delayed types. The choice of a blood component should be related to clinical need, with overall concern for benefit-to-risk potential for the pediatric patient.

Age Factors↗

Con: whole blood transfusions are not useful in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Data supporting fresh whole blood transfusion or fresh component therapy are nonblinded, and although both are conceptually attractive, neither can be considered proven. Recent blinded studies reflect fresh blood ineffectiveness. Larger, blinded, randomized trials will need to be performed. Proven methods of blood conservation as well as standardized criteria for transfusion of blood components will more effectively decrease homologous blood transfusion. Transfusion of fresh or banked whole blood, or its components, has yet to be shown to decrease the usage of homologous blood products.

Blood↗

Principles of transfusion medicine in small animals.

The purpose of this review was to provide the reader with an updated overview of small animal transfusion medicine, and an approach to integrating it into private practice, based on a review of the veterinary and human literature spanning the last 3 decades. Electronic, online databases that were searched included CAB International and Medline; multiple keywords or subject headings were searched that were appropriate to each of the sections reviewed: canine and feline blood groups, blood-typing and crossmatching, donors, blood collection, storage, blood components, blood transfusion, blood component therapy, blood substitutes, and adverse reactions. The safe use of blood component therapy requires knowledge of blood groups and antibody prevalence, and knowledge of the means to minimize the risk of adverse reactions by including the use of proper donors and screening assays that facilitate detection of serological incompatibility. The 2 assays available to the practitioner are crossmatching, which is readily done in-house, and blood typing. Blood typing is available in the form of a commercial testing kit, through use of purchased reagents, or via a request to an external laboratory. The risk of potentially fatal adverse reactions is higher in cats than in dogs. The decision to transfuse and the type of product to administer depend on several factors, such as the type of anemia and the size of the animal. In conclusion, transfusion medicine has become more feasible in small animal practice, with improved access to blood products through either on-site donors, the purchase of blood bank products, external donor programs, or the availability of blood component substitutes.

Animals↗

The effect of coagulation protection with combination of epsilon aminocaproic acid and plasma saver in open-heart surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding remains a major complication and a major determinant in the prognosis of open-heart surgery. Coagulopathy related to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) seems to be the culprit. Since homologous blood transfusion in many occasions is not only responsible for mobidity and mortality but also increases medical costs. Therefore, the application of autologous blood transfusion including components such as PRBC, FFP and platelets concentrate is inevitable and comes in its stead. To reduce the use of homologous plasma and platelets transfusion in open-heart surgery, we designed a study to utilize the combination of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) to evaluate its effects on blood loss and blood component transfusion in open-heart patients. METHODS: Sixty patients who received elective cardiac surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups: 1. Control group; 2. EACA group (150 mg/kg, i.v. before CPB); 3. PRP-EACA group (PRP 10 ml/kg harvested with a plasma saver followed by i.v. EACA 150 mg/kg). Anesthesia was uniform in all patients. Coagulation profile was evaluated by thromboelastography (TEG) during the operation. Blood loss during operation and the amount of drainage from the chest tubes in the postoperative period were recorded and compared between groups. RESULTS: Patients who were given EACA injection before CPB saw less blood loss perioperatively and received less transfusion of blood components. TEG analysis showed that patients who received EACA injection had a better coagulation profile and the platelet function was also better after CPB. However, no additive effect can be attained from combination of autologous PRP transfusion and EACA injection. CONCLUSIONS: With Pre-CPB EACA as protection, reduction of both blood loss and blood transfusion could be realized in open-heart surgery.

Adult↗

Blood donors on medication. Are deferral periods necessary?

OBJECTIVES: Drugs and their metabolites in transfused blood components may cause effects in the recipient. If the treated disorder is not to be regarded as an exclusion criterion from blood donation, donors on medication should be deferred for a period consistent with the drug's pharmacokinetics. GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND METHODS: Peak plasma drug concentrations of 3% or less of the therapeutic concentration were regarded to be safe for the recipient of a blood product. For teratogenic drugs a much lower safety level of less than 0.000001% has been proposed. For the calculation of deferral periods, both the type of blood component to be prepared and the drug's pharmacokinetics for a given formulation were considered. SUGGESTED WAITING PERIODS: For drugs with known teratogenic risks, we suggest a deferral period of 28 plasma-elimination half-lives. For non-teratogenic drugs, a simple, conservative approach could be based on waiting for five plasma-elimination half-lives, thus reaching the required 3% safety level already in any donor. If, however, the type of blood component to be prepared is also considered, a more differentiated approach appears to be appropriate: for blood components containing 50 ml or less plasma from a single donor, donor medication may be disregarded because of the high dilution in the recipient's plasma volume, whereas for blood components with higher plasma contents (250 ml on average) from a single donor on medication the 3% safety level will be achieved by observing the deferral period of five plasma-elimination half-lives mentioned. A guideline for 191 drugs and drug classes has been elaborated accordingly.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

Transfusion of blood components to persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1: relationship to opportunistic infection.

BACKGROUND: Although a recent study reported shorter survivals in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients who received transfusions, no study has analyzed the relationship in such patients between the frequency of opportunistic infection and transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Records of 196 HIV-1-infected subjects with CD4 lymphocyte counts below 250 cells per mm3 were reviewed to determine if there were more opportunistic infections in patients who previously received transfusions than in those who received no transfusions. The decline in CD4 cells was also compared, and the frequency of transfusion reactions and red cell alloantibodies was assessed. RESULTS: The frequency of cytomegalovirus (CMV), wasting, and bacterial infections (p < 0.01), but not the frequency of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) (p > 0.2), was significantly increased in the patients who had previously received transfusions, and this effect was independent of CD4 count, race, or risk factor. The frequency of CMV infection, but not of PCP, was also related to the number of units of blood received (p < 0.01). Significant bacterial infections occurred primarily in persons with CMV infection, of whom there were more in the transfusion cohort. When analyzed separately in the group of patients without CMV infection, the frequency of bacterial infection was unrelated to transfusion. The death rate in those who received transfusions was also greater than that in patients who had never received a transfusion. None of the 130 patients who received red cell transfusions developed red cell alloantibodies. CONCLUSION: The higher incidence of certain infectious complications in HIV-1-infected patients who received transfusions indicates that the relationship of transfusion to virus activation in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and the potential benefits of modifying the preparation of blood components should be investigated further.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Inactivation of infectious pathogens in labile blood components: meeting the challenge.

Substantial improvement in the safety of blood transfusion has been achieved through the addition of new tests, such as nucleic acid tests, yet residual risk associated with transfusion of blood components persists. Transfusion of blood components has been implicated in the transmission of viruses, bacteria, and protozoa. While it is commonly recognized that hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and the retroviruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the human lymphotrophic viruses (HTLV) can be transmitted through cellular components, other pathogens are emerging as potentially significant transfusion-associated infectious agents. For example, transmission of protozoan infections due to trypanosomes and babesia have been reported. In addition to viral and protozoal infectious agents, bacterial contamination of platelet and red cell concentrates continues to be reported; and may be an under-reported transfusion complication. More importantly, new infectious agents may periodically enter the donor population before they can be definitively identified and tested for to maintain consistent safety of the blood supply. The paradigm for this possibility is the HIV pandemic, which erupted in 1979. During the past decade a number of methods to inactivate infectious pathogens in labile blood components have been developed and have entered the advanced clinical trial phase.

Blood Coagulation Factors↗

High-level long-term white blood cell microchimerism after transfusion of leukoreduced blood components to patients resuscitated after severe traumatic injury.

BACKGROUND: Long-term white blood cell (WBC) microchimerism (MC), of at least 2 years, has been reported in trauma patients receiving fresh nonleukoreduced (non-LR) blood. It is unknown, however, whether this occurs with LR blood products that are nearly devoid of WBCs. Twenty-seven patients transfused with LR and non-LR blood products were studied after severe traumatic injury. A secondary aim was to explore donor-recipient mixed lymphocyte reactivity in vitro. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To quantify MC, allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction assays were developed targeting HLA Class II sequence polymorphisms. Extensive validation showed that these assays reliably detect a single copy of target sequence in a complex allogeneic background without false positivity. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 24-39 months), long-term MC was observed in 3 of 20 patients (15%) who received non-LR blood products and 2 of 7 (29%) who received LR blood products. The maximum MC ranged from 0.40 to 4.90 percent of circulating WBCs and appeared, by Class II genotype analysis, to be attributable to a single donor. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that robust levels of long-term MC, apparently traceable to a single donor, occur at similar frequency despite leukoreduction of transfused blood products. Exploratory analysis of donor-recipient mixed lymphocyte reactivity suggests that long-term MC may require a state of bidirectional tolerance before transfusion.

Blood Component Transfusion↗

[The influence of dose of transfusion and component of blood on the incidence of post-transfusion hepatitis].

Two thousand five hundred ninety-six consecutive patients who received blood transfusion for the first time within one week and had no liver dysfunction before transfusion had been selected from 8637 patients who received blood transfusion at the hospital between 1982 and 1987. The influence of dose, components of transfused blood and sex, age of recipients on the incidence of post-transfusion hepatitis was investigated. The rate of development of hepatitis depended on the dose of transfusion, not on sex and age of recipients. The rate of development of hepatitis raised as number of transfused blood increased without limiting point to 100%. The carrier rate of healthy population of non-A, non-B hepatitis virus was estimated 1.39%. Stored blood, concentrated red blood cell and fresh blood are high risk components and fresh frozen plasma was low risk component.

Hepatitis↗