PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “CPT codes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

CPT coding for upper airway endoscopies.

The Spring issue (Rudy, 2005) of ORL-Head and Neck Nursing presented a broad review of endoscopic procedures for evaluation and management of upper airway problems. Zarnitz (2005) briefly addressed billing for the most commonly performed upper airway endoscopies in that issue. This paper presents, in detail, the coding for a wider range of upper airway endoscopies performed in the office setting, along with how to report them to third-party payors.

Current Procedural Terminology↗

Make CPT codes public.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Current Procedural Terminology↗

Medicare CPT codes.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Abstracting and Indexing↗

Bisphosphonates are associated with increased risk for jaw surgery in medical claims data: is it osteonecrosis?

PURPOSE: Bisphosphonates (BPs) have recently been associated with increased risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw. Using a large automated insurance database, we searched the medical claims for common procedure codes (CPT codes) denoting major surgery to the mandible or the maxilla. The primary aim of this pilot study was to alert readers to clinically relevant but preliminary information regarding the risk of jaw surgery among patients who received BPs, as compared with patients who did not. METHODS: The study utilized 2001-2004 claims data from a large nationwide medical insurer. Medical claims from 255,757 cancer patients with breast, lung, or prostate malignancies, or multiple myeloma were analyzed for CPT codes 21015, 21025, 21026, 21034, 21040, 21045, 21046, and 21047. RESULTS: We identified 224 cases of jaw surgery; of those, 39 cases were found among 26,288 BP users and 185 cases were found among 229,469 never-users. The odds ratio of jaw surgery for intravenous BP users was 4.24 (P<.05). Breast cancer patients experienced a 6-fold increase in risk as compared with nonusers. A trend of increased risk was noted for those on orally administered BPs, but the association was not significant. CONCLUSION: A significant association was noted between the administration of IV BPs and oral surgery in cancer patients. More studies are needed to understand the role of BPs in bone biology and necrosis along with the associated biologic pathways.

Administration, Oral↗

Coding and payment for immunizations.

To maximize reimbursement rates for services related to immunization delivery, pediatricians must develop a best-practice five step action plan for providing immunizations in practice. These include: Implementing optimal coding practices for immunization administration and vaccine products; Capturing the work of associated evaluation and management services with coding; Supporting CPT coding with appropriate ICD-9-CM diagnostic coding links; Incorporating an immunization coding menu, including CPT and ICD-9-CM codes discussed in this article, into the standard practice encounter form; and Aggressively contracting with payers for adequate, flexible payment for immunization services. With knowledge of immunization CPT and ICD-9-CM coding, as well as coding for association E/M visits, the pediatrican is well prepared to deliver immunizations in the medical home.

Child↗

The academic radiologist's clinical productivity: an update.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this project was to further understand the academic radiologist's clinical workload with comparison to the prior studies in the past decade. This updated data is very important in determining faculty staffing requirements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey performed by the Society of Chairmen of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD) collected data in 2003 for radiologists in 23 departments. This data included Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes by radiologist. The CPT codes were converted into relative value units (RVUs) per full-time equivalent (FTE) faculty. By grouping the CPT codes into similar examination categories, adjustment factors were created for the RVU values for each CPT in order to compensate for workload variations. These adjustment factors are identical to the adjustments made in 2001 except for a new factor for nuclear medicine. RESULTS: Overall, the average clinical workload in 2003 was 5,872 RVU/FTE, a 32% increase compared to 4,458 RVU/FTE in 1998 and 55% increase compared to 3,790 RVU/FTE in 1996. The average number of examinations per FTE had a smaller (17%) increase since 1998. The adjustment factors remain very similar to those presented in 2001. The only change was a new adjustment factor of 1.3 for nuclear medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical workload as measured by RVU/FTE and adjusted RVU/FTE are very useful for determining optimal staffing in subspecialty sections and in the department as a whole. The workload continues to increase, but more in examination complexity than in numbers of procedures overall.

Academic Medical Centers↗

International classification of diseases and current procedural terminology codes underestimated thrombolytic use for ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of recently introduced International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision (ICD-9) procedure and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes designed for injection or infusion of thrombolytic agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined the accuracy of ICD-9 procedure code 99.10 and CPT codes 37201, 37202 for use of thrombolysis in ischemic stroke by comparing procedure codes of University Hospital discharge data with a concurrent prospective registry. RESULTS: Of the 369 ischemic stroke patients, 49 (13.3%) received either intravenous and/or intraarterial thrombolysis. The sensitivity and specificity for ICD-9 procedure code 99.10 was 55% and 98% and CPT procedure code 37201 and 37202 was 49% and 99%. Identification by either ICD-9 codes or CPT codes yielded a high sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 98%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ICD-9 and CPT codes alone may underestimate the use of thrombolytics using national and regional database. Best results are achieved when a combination of ICD-9 and CPT codes are used to identify the use of thrombolytics.

Brain Ischemia↗

Pharmacist compensation for ambulatory patient care services.

UNLABELLED: This activity is designed for pharmacists practicing in ambulatory, community, and managed care environments. GOAL: To discuss issues involved in the transition from product-based to patient-care-based reimbursement and compensation systems for pharmacists. OBJECTIVES: 1. Differentiate between reimbursement and compensation. 2. Describe the limitations of current third-party reimbursement and compensation systems. 3. Describe ways in which compensation for seemingly identical products and services can vary. 4. Discuss the use of Medicare's Resource-Based Value Scale and the relative value unit. 5. Define and differentiate between ICD-9-CM codes and E/M CPT codes. 6. List the three key components needed to determine an E/M CPT code for a new patient seen in the pharmacy. 7. Describe and provide examples of the SOAP method of documentation. 8. Understand why the referral process is an important step in the compensation process. 9. Discuss the importance of Form HCFA-1500 and other documentation in the compensation process.

Abstracting and Indexing↗

Frequently asked coding questions.

Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding is not an exact science. Although the CPT code set was developed to describe clearly and comprehensively services provided by health care professionals, the intended application of individual codes is not always clear. In addition, coding that may be correct in terms of CPT definitions and instructions may contradict instructions from payment policies set by insurers. This article provides answers to the gastroenterologists' most commonly asked questions and provides primary sources for coding and payment policies when possible. Answers to the questions are accurate as of the date of publication but may be subject to change.

Biopsy↗

Billing practices of North Carolina family physicians.

BACKGROUND: This study describes billing practices of family physicians. Significant increases in the reimbursement for family physicians are expected from implementation of the resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS). However, the real impact of the RBRVS is unknown since little is known about how family physicians use the present reimbursement system to charge their patients. METHODS: A random sample of 270 North Carolina family physicians was surveyed, using standardized progress notes of five hypothetical patients. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight (51%) physicians responded; 107 (77.5%) were in private practice. Family physicians in private and nonprivate practices were similar in their Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding and level of service for each hypothetical case. Family physicians in smaller communities showed greater variation in CPT coding of visits than did family physicians in larger communities, and they were more likely to use CPT codes that indicated a lower level of visit. Rural family physicians demonstrated a significant inverse relationship between the CPT level of visit coded (ranging from "brief," with a CPT code of 90040, to "comprehensive," coded CPT 90080) and the amount they charged established patients for a "limited" visit (CPT 90050). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the lower income of rural physicians is due, in part, to billing at a lower CPT code, and thus charging less for comparable services, than urban physicians. The findings also lend further support to contentions that federal reimbursement reforms will have less impact on the incomes of rural physicians than originally expected.

Abstracting and Indexing↗

Estimating the costs of VA ambulatory care.

This article reports how we matched Common Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes with Medicare payment rates and aggregate Veterans Affairs (VA) budget data to estimate the costs of every VA ambulatory encounter. Converting CPT codes to encounter-level costs was more complex than a simple match of Medicare reimbursements to CPT codes. About 40 percent of the CPT codes used in VA, representing about 20 percent of procedures, did not have a Medicare payment rate and required other cost estimates. Reconciling aggregated estimated costs to the VA budget allocations for outpatient care produced final VA cost estimates that were lower than projected Medicare reimbursements. The methods used to estimate costs for encounters could be replicated for other settings. They are potentially useful for any system that does not generate billing data, when CPT codes are simpler to collect than billing data, or when there is a need to standardize cost estimates across data sources.

Accounting↗

Predicting anesthesia times for diagnostic and interventional radiological procedures.

We studied anesthesia times for diagnostic and interventional radiology using anesthesia billing data and paper radiology logbooks. For computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging procedures, we tried to predict future anesthesia times by using historical anesthesia times classified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. By this method, anesthesia times were estimated even less accurately than operating room cases. Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging had many different CPT codes, most rare, and CPT codes reflected organs imaged, not scanning times. However, when, anesthesia times were estimated by expert judgment, face validity and accuracy were good. Lower and upper prediction bounds were also estimated from the expert estimates. For interventional radiology, predicting anesthesia times was challenging because few CPT codes accounted for most cases. Because interventional radiologists scheduled their elective cases into allocated time, the necessary goal was not to estimate the time to complete each case but rather the time to complete each day's entire series of elective cases including turnover times. We determined the time of day (e.g., 4 pm) up to when interventional radiology could schedule so that on 80% of days the anesthesia team finishes no later than a specified time (e.g., 6 pm). Both diagnostic and interventional radiology results were similarly less accurate when Version 9 of the International Classifications of Diseases' procedure codes was used instead of CPT.

Anesthesia↗