PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cochlear Implants”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant.

Results of place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons are presented in 21 cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant. Vowel-pitch comparisons were also carried out in 10 normal hearing subjects. A technique for the place-pitch ranking test has been developed. A graphic representation of the results shows the well-ranked electrodes in sequential pitch-order, and reveals any indication of abnormal place-pitch perception. It aids the selection of correctly place-pitch ranked electrodes. The vowel-pitch comparisons showed that both normal hearing subjects and cochlear implant patients are able to rank vowels according to 'vowel-pitch'. In normal hearing subjects, three main types of vowel-pitch processing have been found. Results indicate that an information selection and reduction process occurs at higher levels along the auditory pathway. Cochlear implant patients test results showed the limited contribution of the first and the virtual lack of the second formant's contribution to pitch-ranking the voiced vowels. These results indicate that fundamental frequency converted to pulse rate may not be adequate at certain segments along the cochlear partition. Vowels are not perceived by cochlear implant patients according to their first or second formant frequency converted to place-pitch. There would seem to be a need for alternative speech processing strategies in the Melbourne-Nucleus implant.

Adult↗

Aspects of temporal bone anatomy and pathology in conjunction with cochlear implant surgery.

Cochlear implantation is a treatment for patients with severe sensorineural hearing loss/deafness, who get no help from ordinary hearing aids. The cochlear implant is surgically placed under the skin near the ear and a very thin electrode array is introduced into the cochlea of the inner ear, where it stimulates the remaining nerve fibers (1,2). The operation is complicated; it is performed with the aid of a microscope, and involves drilling very close to vital vessels and important nerves. The method was introduced in Sweden in 1984 by Professor Göran Bredberg, then at Stockholm Söder Hospital. High resolution computed tomography (CT) of the temporal bone is a part of the preoperative evaluation preceding cochlear implantation. It is a method for visualizing the bony structures of the middle and inner ear - to diagnose pathology and to describe the anatomy. In Stockholm, these examinations have usually been performed at the Radiology Department of Stockholm Söder Hospital. Examinations of cochlear implant candidates from other parts of Sweden and from abroad are also sent there for special reviewing. The first work concerns CT of the temporal bone and cochlear implant surgery in children with CHARGE association. This is a rare condition with multiple congenital abnormalities, sometimes lethal. Children with CHARGE have different combinations of disabilities, of which impairments of vision and hearing, as well as balance problems and facial palsy can lead to developmental delay. There have been few reports of radiological temporal bone changes and none of cochlear implant surgery for this group. The work includes a report of the findings on preoperative CT and at surgery, as well as post-implant results in two children. A review of the latest diagnostic criteria of CHARGE and the temporal bone changes found in international literature is also included. The conclusion was that certain combinations of temporal bone changes in CHARGE are, if not specific, at least extremely rare in other materials. CT can visualize these changes and be used as a diagnostic tool. This is important, since some of the associated disabilities are not so obvious from the start. Early treatment is vital for the child's development. This work also shows that cochlear implantation may help some of these often very isolated children to communicate. The second work is a radioanatomic study of one of the structures of the inner ear - the bony canal for the cochlear nerve. It involves measurements of the dimensions of the canal on 117 silicone rubber casts of the temporal bone (from a unique collection of casts at Uppsala temporal bone laboratory) and on 50 clinical CT-studies (100 ears). The purpose was to show the normal variation, which is of use in the appraisal of congenital temporal bone malformations on CT. Based on our results we propose that if the canal is less than 1.4 mm, as measured on CT, the possibility of cochlear nerve abnormality should be considered. This is of interest since aplasia of the cochlear nerve is a contraindication to cochlear implantation. If the canal is wider than 3.0 mm, then other anomalies may coexist, with the risk of CSF gusher when a cochleostomy or stapedectomy is performed.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗

Cochlear implantation in congenital cochlear abnormalities.

Many children have benefited from cochlear implant device including those with congenital malformation of the inner ear. The results reported in children with malformed cochlea are very encouraging. We describe 2 cases of Mondini's malformation with severe sensorineural hearing loss. Cochlear implantation was performed and both of them underwent post-implantation speech rehabilitation. Post-implantation, both of them were noted to respond to external sound. But the second case developed facial twitching a few months after the device was switched on. It is important to evaluate the severity of the inner ear deformity and the other associated anomalies in pre-implantation radiological assessment in order to identify the problem that may complicate the surgery and subsequent patient management.

Child, Preschool↗

[Cochlear implants and total cochlear obstruction].

Total cochlea obstruction is not a contraindication for cochlear implant. We report our experience owing to the single channel cochlear implant Monosonic (9 cases), partial insertion of the electrodes-array (3 cases: 1 Digisonic and 2 minisystem) and, more recently the separate electrodes version of the Digisonic (6 cases). This new device is encouraging because it supplies 2/5 patients with telephone use.

Adolescent↗

Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation.

Most cochlear implant studies are focused on improvement of speech perception associated with implantation. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life changes in Spanish users. Thirty postlingually deaf patients fitted with a cochlear implant completed the Glasgow Benefit Inventory, a questionnaire dealing with communication abilities, and an open-ended questionnaire. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory revealed a positive effect in 93% of patients. The use of a cochlear implant significantly enhanced discrimination ability, telephone use and self-confidence. A high degree of satisfaction was achieved in all situations except with background noise. Ninety-six percent of patients would recommend the operation to a friend. A dramatic improvement in quality of life following cochlear implantation is revealed by a great majority of patients. The results cannot only be explained by enhancements to auditory perception.

Adolescent↗

Pediatric cochlear implants. Surgical aspects: the Nottingham pediatric cochlear implant programme.

The implantation of young children is widely accepted as a means of rehabilitating profoundly/totally deaf children. This paper will review the surgical aspects of implanting young children based on the first 50 children implanted in the Nottingham paediatric cochlear implant programme. Having thoroughly counselled the children's parents, the child is operated on under prophylactic antibiotic cover. The incision (extended endaural) is made directly down to bone and a full-thickness flap is elevated. Meticulous attention is paid to haemostasis. The steps involved in posterior tympanotomy, cochleostomy and implant insertion, often in the presence of osteogenesis, will be described. Electrophysiological testing is done systematically peroperatively. Surgical complications were few. There was no cases of facial weakness, haematoma, implant extrusion or infection. One patient, whose implant was laid in an extracochlear gutter, developed pain on electrical stimulation and was explanted. Another patient developed a retraction pocket cholesteatoma. These few complications are far outweighed by the overwhelming benefits accrued from implantation.

Child↗

Predicting the effect of post-implant cochlear fibrosis on residual hearing.

Intracochlear scarring is a well-described sequela of cochlear implantation. We developed a mathematical model of passive cochlear mechanics to predict the impact that this might have upon residual acoustical hearing after implantation. The cochlea was modeled using lumped impedance terms for scala vestibuli (SV), scala tympani (ST), and the cochlear partition (CP). The damping of ST and CP was increased in the basal one half of the cochlea to simulate the effect of scar tissue. We found that increasing the damping of the ST predominantly reduced basilar membrane vibrations in the apex of the cochlea while increasing the damping of the CP predominantly reduced basilar membrane vibrations in the base of the cochlea. As long as intracochlear scarring continues to occur with cochlear implantation, there will be limitations on hearing preservation. Newer surgical techniques and electrode technologies that do not result in as much scar tissue formation will permit improved hearing preservation.

Animals↗

Status of cochlear implantation in children. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Subcommittee on Cochlear implants.

The cochlear implant is a medical device, part of which is placed surgically, that uses electrical stimulation to provide hearing. For almost a decade, investigational studies have been ongoing to define its safety and efficacy in profoundly deaf children. During this period, more than 500 children aged 2 through 17 years have been implanted with either a single-electrode or multielectrode device. Extensive auditory, speech, educational, and psychologic testing has been performed before and after implantation. Results show that the cochlear implant provides auditory detection over much of the speech signal. Compared with the preimplant period, there is significant improvement in auditory discrimination and speech production skills. Limited open-set word and sentence recognition is possible for at least some children. Complications with the device have been minimal. The cochlear implant can provide sound to deaf children unable to benefit from hearing aids. The complex assessment, rehabilitation, and parent counseling should be performed by centers with the multidisciplinary staffs necessary to provide effective care for patients with this specialized auditory prosthesis.

Adolescent↗

Payment under public and private insurance and access to cochlear implants.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants are expensive, yet often cost-effective. However, among hundreds of thousands of potential US candidates, only about 3000 received implants in 1999. To analyze whether insurance reimbursement levels may contribute to low access rates. DESIGN: Surveys were performed during 1999 and 2000 of physicians and audiologists at clinics providing cochlear implant services, selected hospitals where surgery is performed, and state Medicaid agencies. Secondary data were obtained on Medicare payment rates and hourly incomes of otolaryngologists and audiologists. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-one physicians (response rate 67.9%), 111 audiologists (74.0%), 60 hospitals (73.2%), and 44 Medicaid agencies (86.3%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Reimbursement rates for selected Current Procedural Terminology codes and for cochlear implant systems (devices); time required to perform services; additional time not reimbursed; and device purchase prices. RESULTS: Medicare and Medicaid payment rates often fail to cover costs of aural rehabilitation. Medicare sometimes and Medicaid often fails to cover surgeon costs. Sometimes private insurance does not cover hospitals' device costs. Under Medicare, in 1999 hospitals lost more than $10 000 per device for inpatient surgery and about $5000 per device for each outpatient surgery. Device reimbursement in 2002 for outpatient surgery under Medicare is about $3773 higher than in 1999. Medicaid device payment policies vary greatly and fail to cover costs in at least 18 states, accounting for 44% of national Medicaid enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to expand access to cochlear implants may be impeded by financial incentives. Facilitating access for Medicare and Medicaid patients could require changes in payment policies.

Adult↗

Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants.

Although cochlear implants improve the ability of profoundly deaf children to understand speech, critics claim that the published literature does not document even a single case of a child who has developed a linguistic system based on input from an implant. Thus, it is of clinical and scientific importance to determine whether cochlear implants facilitate the development of English language skills. The English language skills of prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants were measured before and after implantation. We found that the rate of language development after implantation exceeded that expected from unimplanted deaf children (p < .001) and was similar to that of children with normal hearing. Despite a large amount of individual variability, the best performers in the implanted group seem to be developing an oral linguistic system based largely on auditory input obtained from a cochlear implant.

Child↗

Loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation.

Many cochlear implant recipients have some measurable hearing prior to implantation. Animal studies have demonstrated some loss of viable neural elements resulting from both mechanical insertion trauma and long-term electrical stimulation. The effect of implantation of a long intracochlear multichannel electrode array and subsequent electrical stimulation on residual hearing was evaluated. Forty consecutive cochlear implant recipients were assessed by audiometry at the Colorado Ear Clinic between July 1985 and June 1988. Twelve of these patients (30%) had some measurable residual hearing before implantation, although all had profound hearing loss, with no understanding of speech. All patients received a multichannel cochlear implant with all 22 electrodes inserted in each patient by an experienced cochlear implant surgeon. Audiometric testing was repeated between 2 and 24 months after implantation. Pure-tone threshold responses in the implanted ear were significantly reduced postimplant, while pure-tone threshold responses in the nonimplanted ear were stable.

Adult↗

[Surgical techniques and complications of pediatric cochlear implantation].

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implantation has been performed in children since 1980, with thousands of children already implanted. The incidence of complications is around 7 to 10% in the literature. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all children receiving a cochlear implant at the Hospital for Sick Children over 9 years. Surgical technique and outcome are analysed. RESULTS: There were 7 complications, all successfully treated, and involving no further consequences. 4 reimplantations were performed for device failure. DISCUSSION: Paediatric cochlear implantation is associated with a low incidence of complications. In this series, no complications were encountered on reimplantation.

Adolescent↗

Entertainment television and hearing students' attitudes regarding the pediatric cochlear implant.

The cochlear implant, a bionic technology that restores sound sensation in some patients, has become ethically controversial in the 20 years since its introduction. This controversy recently has entered American entertainment culture, with the issue of pediatric implants emerging in episodes of popular TV programs. This pilot study examines the effects of one such TV episode on the attitudes of hearing college students with minimal prior exposure to the controversy, using a posttest-only control group design. The control group (N = 17) watched an unrelated entertainment video and filled out an original 10-item attitude scale. The treatment group (N = 18), which viewed an episode of the dramatic series Gideon's Crossing addressing the cochlear implant issue, also filled out the attitude scale. A t test was applied, and it was determined that no significant difference existed between the two groups' attitudes regarding pediatric cochlear implants. Although there was wide variability on individual items, overall scores indicated that both groups were neutral, or undecided, regarding cochlear implantation in children.

Adolescent↗

Evaluating the health-related quality of life effects of cochlear implants: a prospective study of an adult cochlear implant program.

This paper prospectively documents the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and social participation benefits of adult patients receiving cochlear implants in Australia and New Zealand. Thirty-four consecutively implanted patients completed the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) and Hearing Participation Scale (HPS) instruments before implantation, and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Implantation resulted in significant improvements in AQoL and HPS scores, The effect size was 1.09 for both measures. Those in the top socio-economic tertile obtained the greatest gains. The HRQoL and social participation benefits were slightly larger than those reported elsewhere. This may be because participants used more recent technology (Nucleus 24 rather than Nucleus 22) and received auditory and self-efficacy training as part of their rehabilitation. The results suggest that cochlear implants have a large beneficial effect. They show that social and HRQoL outcomes can be parsimoniously measured using the HPS and AQoL instruments.

Cochlear Implantation↗

The Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system.

Cochlear implants have become the treatment of choice for profoundly deaf adults and children who obtain little or no benefit from conventional amplification. Sounds are translated into small electric currents that stimulate the auditory nerves in the cochlea and generate hearing sensations. The Nucleus cochlear implant is the result of more than 20 yr of research and development, first at the University of Melbourne, Australia and later by Cochlear Proprietary Limited (Sydney, Australia) in collaboration with the University of Melbourne. Today, the cochlear Mini-22 implant system is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in adults and children, and has been implanted in more than 3000 patients worldwide. Although this chapter describes the cochlear implant system and clinical issues related to its use in children, much of the material has been derived from experience with adults. Furthermore, the Nucleus system is not static. It is being continually improved both in performance and ease of use. The purpose of this chapter is to describe developments leading up to and including the present Nucleus cochlear implant system. Other chapters in this issue present results and procedures relating to pediatric applications of the device.

Adult↗

Cochlear implantation in children with cochlear malformations.

OBJECTIVE: To address the surgical and habilitative issues raised by cochlear implantation in children with cochlear dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: The English-language literature is reviewed and the New York University Medical Center experience with three patients is detailed. Two hundred institutions performing cochlear implants were queried by questionnaire. SETTING: Hospitals performing cochlear implantation. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients with a cochlear implant in an ear with a dysplastic cochlea. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative computed tomography analysis of cochlear anatomy was compared with operative findings, complications, and postoperative device use. RESULTS: Facial nerve anatomy was anomalous in 16% of patients, and there were two surgical injuries. There were no cases of meningitis. All patients who received multichannel implants derive benefit and wear their devices. CONCLUSIONS: All degrees of cochlear dysplasia, ranging from incomplete partition to common cavity, can be safely implanted and auditory responses expected.

Adult↗

Visualization of stimulation patterns in cochlear implants: application to event-related potentials (P300) in cochlear implant users.

Auditory P300 potentials obtained in cochlear implant users were evoked with tone bursts designed to reflect the frequency stimulation patterns of intracochlear electrodes. To visualize these stimulation patterns in MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implants, we calculated color-coded plots of the charge of each stimulus pulse as a function of time and stimulation channel (stimulograms). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of stimulation patterns on event-related potentials, such as the P300. The influence of electrode separation on the P300 response in postlingually deaf adults using a cochlear implant is demonstrated in two examples.

Adult↗

Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements.

Those suffering from a severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss can obtain substantial benefit from a cochlear implant prosthesis. An electrode array implanted in the inner ear stimulates auditory nerve fibers by direct injection of electrical current. A major limitation of today's technology is the imprecise control of intracochlear current flow, particularly the relatively wide spread of neural excitation. A better understanding of the intracochlear electrical fields is, therefore, required. This paper analyzes the structure of intracochlear potential measurements in relation to both the subject's anatomy and to the properties of the electrode array. An electrically equivalent network is proposed, composed of small lumped circuits for the interface impedance and for the cochlear tissues. The numerical methods required to estimate the model parameters from high-quality electrical potential recordings are developed. Finally, some models are presented for subjects wearing a Clarion CII device with a HiFocus electrode and discussed in terms of model reliability.

Cochlea↗