PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DENTAL MATERIALS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

Dental materials related to prevention--fluoride incorporation into dental materials: reaction paper.

Rather than a specific commentary to Dr. Rawls' presentation, this reaction paper discusses the general concept of fluoride addition to dental materials. The genesis of the concept is reviewed, but more important is a critique of the rationale for the deliberate addition of fluoride to dental materials. Researchers and practicing dentists should realize that if the principal reason for the addition of fluoride is to prevent dental caries, the ultimate test of that rationale is a controlled clinical trial. Thus, although a number of questions need to be answered when fluoride is introduced into dental materials, the most important is: Does it inhibit dental caries?

Delayed-Action Preparations↗
PubMed2004

Patients' choice of dental treatment following examination at a specialty unit for adverse reactions to dental materials.

The Dental Biomaterials Adverse Reaction Unit in Bergen, Norway, is a national unit for the examination of patients with suspected adverse reactions to dental materials. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with suspected adverse reactions to dental materials experienced improvement in health after dental restorations had been replaced, and whether they had acted according to the recommendations of the Unit. A questionnaire was sent to 358 patients who had been examined at the Unit 18 months to 7 years earlier. Of the 207 patients who completed the questionnaire, 85 had had restorative materials replaced with other types of materials. A majority had had amalgam fillings replaced. After replacement, 51 patients reported an improvement in health. Twelve patients reported that they felt worse after replacement. The Unit recommended replacement of materials in 31 patients, of whom 24 followed the recommendation. Among 176 patients who were not given specific recommendations as to replacement of dental materials, 67 had had their restorations replaced, and 40 had started to have them replaced. It appears that the examination at the Dental Biomaterials Adverse Reaction Unit is one of several inputs that influence a person's decision to replace dental materials.

Adolescent↗