SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DIPYRIDAMOLE”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1988

Dipyridamole cardiac imaging.

Dipyridamole cardiac imaging is a useful alternative technique to exercise stress testing in the evaluation of patients with ischemic heart disease. Intravenous dipyridamole is still in the investigational phase, while oral dipyridamole is widely available. The hemodynamic effects of dipyridamole include an increase in coronary blood flow (due to coronary vasodilation) which is in excess of the increase in myocardial oxygen consumption and cardiac output. The disparity in the increase in coronary blood flow relative to the cardiac output results in an increase in myocardial thallium activity and an increase in the myocardial/background activity ratio. The quality of the thallium images is better or similar to that of exercise thallium images. The optimal dose of intravenous dipyridamole is 0.56 mg/kg, and of the oral dose it is 300 to 400 mg, although higher doses may be necessary in some patients. Analysis of the thallium images has been to a large extent based on visual inspection of the planar images. Delayed images are helpful to establish the nature of the perfusion abnormalities (transient or fixed). The process of redistribution is based on disparate rates of washout from the normal and abnormal zones. The sensitivity and specificity of dipyridamole thallium imaging, whether intravenous or oral, have been shown in a number of studies to be quite adequate and comparable to that achieved during exercise thallium imaging. Dipyridamole two-dimensional echocardiography has also been used in the detection of coronary artery disease; transient (new or worsening of preexisting) wall motion abnormalities have been found to be a specific marker of coronary artery disease. Transmural as well as regional coronary steal phenomena have been postulated as the mechanism for dipyridamole-induced regional wall motion abnormalities. Compared to exercise two-dimensional echocardiography, dipyridamole echocardiography provides high-quality studies and in higher proportions of patients. The results of dipyridamole thallium imaging have also been extremely important in identifying high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction or patients with peripheral vascular disease undergoing elective vascular surgery; the presence of a dipyridamole-induced perfusion abnormality identifies patients at high risk for future cardiac events. Thus, dipyridamole cardiac imaging is helpful in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and in risk stratification.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Combined dipyridamole and dobutamine echocardiography in myocardial hibernation: comparison with thallium uptake in patients after percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization under circulatory support.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the specificity and sensitivity of the combination of dipyridamole and dobutamine echocardiography for predicting functional recovery in patients with reduced ventricular function after coronary angioplasty. METHODS: Twenty-five patients, mean (SD) age 60.8 (10) years, with previous myocardial infarction (> 3 months), angiographically assessed coronary artery disease, and resting regional dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%) were studied. They underwent rest-redistribution thallium Tl-201 single photon emission computed tomography, and low-dose pharmacologic stress echocardiography with dobutamine (up to 10 microg/kg per minute), ultra low-dose dipyridamole (0.28 mg/kg over 4 minutes), and combined dipyridamole-dobutamine administration. RESULTS: The rate of agreement between Tl-201 and stress echo was 59% for dipyridamole, 62% for dobutamine, and 71% for combined dipyridamole-dobutamine (P <.05 vs dipyridamole and vs dobutamine). Combined dipyridamole-dobutamine showed a higher sensitivity (89%) than Tl-201, dobutamine, or dipyridamole (84%, 78%, and 80%). Specificity was lower for functional recovery prediction with Tl-201 (60%) compared with dobutamine (89%), dipyridamole (90%), and combined dipyridamole-dobutamine (91%). CONCLUSION: Thallium is more sensitive than dipyridamole or dobutamine; the sensitivity gap is filled with combined dipyridamole-dobutamine. Pharmacologic stress echocardiography is more specific than Tl-201 scintigraphy.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Protective effect of nisoldipine on dipyridamole-induced myocardial ischemia: correlation with exercise electrocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Nisoldipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker with strong coronary dilatative action, is commonly used in the treatment of myocardial ischaemia; its beneficial effect on effort angina has been demonstrated by several previous reports. Infusion of dipyridamole in doses sufficient to provoke myocardial ischaemia in patients with significant coronary artery disease is used safely in imaging studies for diagnostic purposes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential effect of nisoldipine on dipyridamole-induced ischaemia and to compare the results with the effect of nisoldipine on exercise-induced ischaemia. METHOD: Twelve patients (10 men and two women, mean age 62 +/- 8 years) with significant coronary artery disease (at least 70% lumen reduction in at least one major coronary vessel) were selected for inclusion in the study. In accordance with the inclusion criteria, the patients exhibited an ischaemic diagnostic response to a multistage exercise electrocardiography stress test (> 0.15 mV ST segment depression compared with the resting electrocardiographic tracing) and to a dipyridamole-echocardiography test (transient left ventricular dyssynergy of contraction during infusion of dipyridamole up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 min), after 3 days' cessation of antianginal treatment. After treatment with oral nisoldipine (10 mg twice daily) was introduced, the patients repeated the two tests, within 18 days of the first evaluation. RESULTS: The dipyridamole-echocardiography test was positive for ischaemia in 12 patients who were not receiving nisoldipine and in eight patients who were receiving the drug (100% and 67% respectively, P < 0.05). In the eight patients who gave positive dipyridamole-echocardiography tests both with and without treatment, dipyridamole time (time to onset of dyssynergy during the test) increased from 7.9 +/- 2.9 min to 10.2 +/- 3.1 min (P < 0.01). In these patients, no significant changes were observed, at ischaemia, in the severity and extent of induced dyssynergy, evaluated as wall motion score index (each of 16 left ventricular segments scored from 1 = normal to 4 = dyskinetic) after treatment (score variations from baseline to ischaemia: 0.20 +/- 0.11 without nisoldipine and 0.16 +/- 0.06 with nisoldipine; NS). Variations in dipyridamole time (arbitrarily considered to be 15 min in the negative dipyridamole-echocardiography test) were significantly correlated with variations in exercise time (duration of exercise to exhaustion or diagnostic positive response on the electrocardiogram): r = 0.75 (P < 0.01). No significant differences were recorded in rate-pressure product (beats/min x mmHg x 100) at peak ischaemia between patients who were or were not receiving nisoldipine, during either the exercise electrocardiography stress test (233 +/- 36 with nisoldipine and 244 +/- 39 without nisoldipine; NS) or the dipyridamole-echocardiography test (147 +/- 21 with nisoldipine and 133 +/- 30 without nisoldipine; NS). CONCLUSION: Nisoldipine treatment can protect from dipyridamole-induced ischaemia, being associated with a longer stress time, and completely preventing the development of ischaemia in some patients. The therapy-induced changes in ischaemic threshold during the dipyridamole-echocardiography test correlate with variations in exercise tolerance.

Calcium Channel Blockers↗

PubMed1994

Diagnostic and prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Comparison with exercise electrocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Before any new diagnostic test is accepted in clinical practice, such a test should be compared with established diagnostic tools in an appropriately large series of patients encompassing the complete spectrum of challenges to which the test is exposed. The aim of the present study was to assess the relative diagnostic and prognostic accuracies of high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography (two-dimensional echocardiographic monitoring during dipyridamole infusion up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 hours) versus maximal symptom-limited bicycle exercise ECG test in patients with angina. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 429 consecutive in-hospital patients who met the following inclusion criteria: history of chest pain, off antianginal therapy for at least 2 days (1 week for beta-blockers), no previous myocardial infarction and/or obvious regional left ventricular dyssynergy of contraction (akinesis or dyskinesis) at baseline, and acceptable acoustic window under resting conditions. All patients underwent dipyridamole echocardiography and exercise ECG--on different days and in random order--within 1 week of coronary angiography (which was performed independent of test results) and were followed up for 37.8 +/- 14 months (range, 1 to 73 months). Criteria of positivity were for dipyridamole echocardiography, a transient regional dyssynergy absent in the baseline examination; for exercise ECG, an ST-segment shift of > or = 0.1 mV from baseline; and for coronary angiography, a luminal reduction of > or = 75% in at least one major coronary vessel (50% for left main). There were 183 patients without and 246 with coronary artery disease; 132 had one-, 70 had two-, and 44 had three- and/or left main vessel disease. The specificity was higher for dipyridamole echocardiography than for exercise ECG (90% versus 51%, P < .001). The overall sensitivity of dipyridamole echocardiography was similar to that of exercise ECG (75% versus 74%, P = NS), with no significant differences in the subset with one- (67% versus 69%, P = NS), two- (79% versus 77%, P = NS), or three- (93% versus 86%, P = NS) vessel disease. During the follow-up, there were 20 deaths, 13 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and 126 revascularization procedures. In the univariate analysis, dipyridamole resulted in higher chi 2 values than did exercise stress testing. A Cox forward stepwise survival analysis identified the dipyridamole time as the most powerful prognostic predictor of death (chi 2 = 19.4, P < .0001) of all invasive and noninvasive parameters. The dipyridamole time also provided independent and additional prognostic information when it was adjusted for age, diabetes, resting ECG, and exercise stress test according to a modified, interactive stepwise procedure. This is true when death only, death and myocardial infarction, and death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization procedures were considered end points. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with no previous myocardial infarction and good resting left ventricular function, compared with exercise ECG, dipyridamole echocardiography has a similar sensitivity and a higher specificity for the noninvasive detection of angiographically assessed coronary artery disease. Dipyridamole echocardiography also provides information in addition to that provided by exercise ECG for predicting death, infarction, and all events when the presence as well as the timing, severity, and extension of dipyridamole-induced wall motion abnormalities are considered.

Coronary Angiography↗

PubMed1994

Stress echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia. Head-to-head comparison of exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole tests.

BACKGROUND: Exercise and pharmacological stress echocardiography have emerged as convenient alternatives to myocardial scintigraphy. The objective of this study was to compare in the same patients the diagnostic values of exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole stress echocardiography tests for detection of myocardial ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed exercise (maximal treadmill Bruce protocol), dobutamine (up to 40 micrograms/kg per minute) and dipyridamole (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 minutes) stress echocardiography tests, in random sequence and on separate days, in 136 consecutive patients. All patients underwent coronary angiography. Significant coronary artery disease was defined by quantitative coronary angiography as a lesion with a diameter stenosis > or = 50%. A stress echocardiogram was considered positive when new or worsening of preexisting wall motion abnormality was observed. Most of the patients (94%) were receiving the same antianginal medication for each stress test; 59 patients were receiving concomitant beta-blocker therapy. The prevalence of coronary artery disease was 87.5%, with 108 patients having one-vessel coronary artery disease. Peak heart rate and systolic blood pressure were higher with exercise than with dobutamine or dipyridamole (P < .01). Sensitivity of exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole stress echocardiography was 88%, 82%, and 74% (dipyridamole versus exercise, P < .01), respectively. Specificity was 82%, 77%, and 94%, respectively. The overall accuracy was 87%, 82%, and 77% (dipyridamole versus exercise, P < .01), respectively. The accuracy of dipyridamole was higher (P = .02) in the group of patients not receiving beta-blockers (84%) than in the patients receiving beta-blocker therapy (66%), whereas the accuracy of exercise and dobutamine were only slightly higher in the patients not receiving beta-blockers. Significant side effects occurred in 3%, 11%, and 1% of patients during exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the different hemodynamic effects, exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole echocardiography have high overall diagnostic values. In this group of patients with a predominance of one-vessel coronary artery disease, the overall diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography tests was higher for exercise than for dobutamine or dipyridamole. Concomitant beta-blocker therapy significantly decreased the accuracy of the dipyridamole stress echocardiography test. Pharmacological stress testing (dipyridamole without beta-blockers) can therefore be used as an efficient option for detection of myocardial ischemia in patients who are unable or poorly motivated to exercise adequately.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed1998

Dipyridamole potentiates pulmonary vasodilation induced by acetylcholine and nitric oxide in the ovine fetus.

Nitric oxide (NO) modulates pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in the normal fetus by increasing the cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cGMP) content of pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cells. Although several vasodilator stimuli, including acetylcholine, decrease fetal PVR through the release of endogenous NO, fetal pulmonary vasodilation is often transient despite prolonged treatment. Because cGMP is hydrolyzed and inactivated by cGMP-specific (type 5) phosphodiesterases (PDE5), we hypothesized that PDE5 activity contributes to high fetal PVR and limits the capability of the fetal pulmonary circulation to dilate or sustain vasodilation in response to cGMP-dependent stimuli. To test this hypothesis, we studied the hemodynamic effects of dipyridamole in 19 late-gestation fetal lambs. To determine whether dipyridamole-induced vasodilation is dependent upon basal NO release, we measured the response to dipyridamole before and after pretreatment with the NO synthase antagonist nitro-L-arginine (L-NA) in five fetal lambs. L-NA completely blocked dipyridamole-induced pulmonary vasodilation. To evaluate the effect of dipyridamole on pulmonary vasodilation due to the stimulated release of NO, we studied effects of prolonged intrapulmonary acetylcholine infusions, with and without concomitant administration of low-dose dipyridamole, in six fetal lambs. During prolonged (2-h) infusions, acetylcholine and dipyridamole individually caused transient pulmonary vasodilation. When administered together, pulmonary vasodilation was of greater magnitude and was sustained for the entire study period. To determine the effects of dipyridamole on endothelium-independent pulmonary vasodilation, we investigated the hemodynamic effects of inhaled NO (5 and 20 ppm) alone and in combination with dipyridamole during mechanical ventilation with low FlO2. The combination of dipyridamole with inhaled NO resulted in a greater degree of pulmonary vasodilation than that achieved with inhaled NO alone. We conclude that dipyridamole-induced pulmonary vasodilation is dependent on endogenous (basal) NO production and that dipyridamole potentiates vasodilator responses to endothelium-dependent and -independent dilators in the ovine fetal pulmonary circulation. We speculate that PDES activity opposes vasodilation and maintains high PVR in the normal fetal lung.

Acetylcholine↗

PubMed1992

Thallium-201 myocardial imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison of intravenous adenosine and oral dipyridamole.

OBJECTIVE: To compare thallium-201 (201Tl) myocardial perfusion imaging following intravenous adenosine and oral dipyridamole. DESIGN: Open-label, randomized, comparison. SETTING: Outpatient, university-affiliated clinic. PATIENTS: Fifteen patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. INTERVENTIONS: Planar 201Tl myocardial perfusion imaging following both intravenous adenosine 140 micrograms/kg/min for six minutes and oral dipyridamole suspension 300 mg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comparison between adenosine and dipyridamole was made in the following areas: concordance in interpretation of 201Tl scintigrams, cardiac and noncardiac 201Tl uptake and clearance, hemodynamic and electrocardiographic changes, and adverse effects. RESULTS: The scintigraphic studies showed perfusion defects in 13 patients (87 percent) after dipyridamole and in 15 patients (100 percent) after adenosine. 201Tl uptake and clearance were quantitated in nine myocardial segments and in four extracardiac segments in each patient. 201Tl uptake was not significantly different between adenosine and dipyridamole studies in most cardiac regions. Extracardiac 201Tl uptake was significantly less in the liver and splanchnic regions following adenosine compared with dipyridamole. 201Tl clearance was not significantly different following adenosine and dipyridamole except in the anterolateral region in the anterior view. Hemodynamic changes following administration of intravenous adenosine and oral dipyridamole were not significantly different. Adverse effects were more common with adenosine than with dipyridamole. Adverse effects with adenosine were transient; however, adverse effects with dipyridamole were prolonged and required reversal with aminophylline in 2 patients. No patients required termination of the adenosine infusion or administration of aminophylline. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that adenosine 201Tl imaging may be a useful alternative to dipyridamole 201Tl imaging. Although adenosine produces more frequent adverse effects, they are generally better tolerated than those associated with dipyridamole.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1992

Biochemical modulation of fluorouracil by dipyridamole: preclinical and clinical experience.

In the HCT 116 human colon carcinoma cell line, dipyridamole, an inhibitor of nucleoside transport, increases the toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in a dose-dependent manner. While dipyridamole inhibits thymidine transport, interference with thymidine salvage did not appear to be a critical factor. Dipyridamole altered 5-FU metabolism, producing a selective increase in fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate levels by blocking the efflux of fluorodeoxyuridine. Deoxyuridine monophosphate levels were greatly increased when cells were exposed to 5-FU alone, and were even larger with the addition of dipyridamole. Dipyridamole did not alter the absolute amount of 5-FU incorporated into either RNA or DNA. Exposure to either 5-FU or dipyridamole alone was associated with the generation of alkaline labile sites in newly synthesized DNA. Concurrent exposure to 5-FU with dipyridamole resulted in a striking increase in the alkaline labile sites. Thus, increased DNA damage appears to correlate with the enhanced cytotoxicity of this combination. The results of a clinical trial evaluating concurrent intravenous infusion of 5-FU with dipyridamole over 72 hours are reviewed. At maximally tolerated doses of infusional dipyridamole, the steady-state concentration of bioactive, non-protein-bound drug is in the range of 25 nM. While this concentration may be sufficient to perturb thymidine salvage in some cell types, it is 20-fold lower than the optimal concentration of bioactive dipyridamole needed to modulate 5-FU toxicity, metabolism and DNA damage in the HCT 116 tissue culture model. In addition, an unexpected pharmacokinetic interaction was seen: dipyridamole increased 5-FU clearance and decreased its steady-state plasma concentration. It remains to be determined whether dipyridamole with 5-FU alone or with leucovorin will translate into an improved therapeutic outcome.

Colonic Neoplasms↗

PubMed1986

Prevention of myocardial platelet deposition and thromboxane release with dipyridamole.

Although current methods of myocardial preservation for coronary bypass surgery provide excellent protection, perioperative ischemic injury persists. Platelet activation and myocardial deposition may contribute to perioperative ischemic injury and early postoperative graft occlusion. Dipyridamole may reduce platelet activation and myocardial deposition and reduce perioperative ischemic injury. A prospective randomized trial was instituted in 40 patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery to evaluate the effects of dipyridamole on myocardial platelet and leukocyte deposition and the cardiac release of thromboxane and prostacyclin. Twenty patients received intravenous dipyridamole (0.24 mg/kg/hr) beginning 20 hr before surgery and continuing for 24 hr after surgery. Autologous platelets, leukocytes, and erythrocytes were labeled with 111In, 99mTc, and 51Cr, respectively, and were infused before release of the cross-clamp. Myocardial biopsy samples were obtained 10, 20, and 30 min after aortic declamping and indicated that platelets and leukocytes were deposited in the myocardium during reperfusion. Dipyridamole reduced both platelet (with dipyridamole 1540 +/- 2100 cells/mg, no dipyridamole 14,500 +/- 33,000 cells/mg) and leukocyte deposition (with dipyridamole 16 +/- 32 cells/mg, no dipyridamole 63 +/- 110 cells/mg). Cardiac release of thromboxane B2 (the stable metabolite of thromboxane A2) occurred in the early postoperative period and was reduced by dipyridamole (with dipyridamole 0.039 +/- 0.16 mg/liter, no dipyridamole 0.27 +/- 0.18 micrograms/liter, p less than .05). Dipyridamole reduced cardiac platelet deposition and thromboxane release and may reduce perioperative ischemic injury and early graft occlusion.

Arteries↗

PubMed2004

Dipyridamole for preventing recurrent ischemic stroke and other vascular events: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Results from randomized controlled trials of dipyridamole, given with or without aspirin, for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) have given conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis using individual patient data from relevant randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials involving dipyridamole in patients with previous ischemic stroke or TIA were sought from searches of the Cochrane Library, other electronic databases, references lists, earlier reviews, and contact with the manufacturer of dipyridamole. Individual patient data were merged from 5 of 7 relevant trials involving 11 459 patients. Results were adjusted for age, gender, qualifying event, and history of previous hypertension. RESULTS: Recurrent stroke was reduced by dipyridamole as compared with control (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.00), and by combined aspirin and dipyridamole versus aspirin alone (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.93), dipyridamole alone (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.90), or control (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.71). The point estimates obtained for the comparisons of aspirin and dipyridamole versus control (OR, 0.63; significant) or versus aspirin (OR, 0.88; nonsignificant) were similar if the data from the largest trial, ESPS II (which provided 57% of data), were excluded. Similar findings were observed for nonfatal stroke. The combination of aspirin and dipyridamole also significantly reduced the composite outcome of nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and vascular death as compared with aspirin alone (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.97), dipyridamole alone (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.90), or control (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.75). Vascular death was not altered in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Dipyridamole, given alone or with aspirin, reduces stroke recurrence in patients with previous ischemic cerebrovascular disease. The combination of aspirin and dipyridamole also reduces the composite of nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and vascular death as compared with aspirin alone.

Aspirin↗

PubMed1999

Dipyridamole plus aspirin in cerebrovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: The second European Stroke Prevention Study (ESPS-2) recently reported a substantial benefit of dipyridamole combined with aspirin over aspirin alone in the prevention of stroke. This appears to be at odds with previous studies suggesting that dipyridamole adds nothing to aspirin alone. OBJECTIVES: To review and compare the results of ESPS-2 and previous studies of dipyridamole plus aspirin and aggregate them in a meta-analysis. METHODS: We combined the detailed data provided by the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration on the previous studies of dipyridamole plus aspirin with the results from ESPS-2. The data on the previous trials were listed in the appendix of the 1994 publication of the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. RESULTS: The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate that for the outcome of nonfatal stroke, ESPS-2 overwhelms previous data, which, even in the aggregate, did not include enough patients or outcome events to exclude efficacy for the combination of dipyridamole and aspirin. Differences between ESPS-2 and previous studies, which may have contributed to different results, include the doses and preparations of aspirin and dipyridamole. CONCLUSIONS: The ESPS-2 showed that dipyridamole alone prevents stroke. More importantly, it showed a substantial benefit for dipyridamole combined with aspirin over aspirin alone. When the ESPS-2 data are aggregated with the 14 previous trials of dipyridamole combined with aspirin over aspirin alone, the combination reduces the risk of stroke by 23% over aspirin alone. Nevertheless, important questions remain unanswered. We conclude that another randomized clinical trial showing a significant benefit of the combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin over aspirin alone may be needed before the addition of dipyridamole to aspirin is widely accepted for prevention of stroke.

Aspirin↗

PubMed2006

Dipyridamole for preventing stroke and other vascular events in patients with vascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with limited cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin are at risk of serious vascular events (4% to 11% annually). Aspirin reduces that risk by 13%. In one trial, adding dipyridamole to aspirin was associated with a 22% risk-reduction compared with aspirin alone. However, a systematic review of all trials of antiplatelet agents by the Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration showed that, in high-risk patients, there was virtually no difference between the aspirin-dipyridamole combination and aspirin alone. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of dipyridamole versus control in the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with vascular disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register (searched November 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2005) and EMBASE (1980 to November 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised long-term secondary prevention trials with concealed treatment allocation, treatment for more than one month, starting within six months after presentation of an arterial vascular disease were selected. Treatment consisted of dipyridamole with or without other antiplatelet drugs compared with no drug or an antiplatelet drug other than dipyridamole. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. Data were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-seven trials were included, with 20242 patients, among whom 1399 vascular deaths and 3090 fatal and non-fatal vascular events occurred during follow up. Compared with control, dipyridamole had no clear effect on vascular death (relative risk (RR) 1.02, 95% confidence internal (CI) 0.90 to 1.17). This result was not influenced by the dose of dipyridamole or type of presenting vascular disease. In the presence of aspirin, dipyridamole appeared to reduce the risk of vascular events compared with control (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.97), due to a single large trial in patients presenting with cerebral ischaemia. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For patients who presented with arterial vascular disease, there was no evidence that dipyridamole, in the presence or absence of another antiplatelet drug reduced the risk of vascular death, though it may reduce the risk of further vascular events. However, this benefit was found in only one single large trial and only in patients presenting after cerebral ischaemia. There was no evidence that dipyridamole alone was more efficacious than aspirin. Further trials comparing the effects of the combination of dipyridamole with aspirin versus aspirin alone are justified.

Anticoagulants↗

PubMed1990

Dipyridamole for coronary artery bypass surgery.

A randomized trial to compare the effects of oral and intravenous dipyridamole was conducted in 58 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Preoperative oral administration of dipyridamole resulted in lower plasma drug concentrations in the early postoperative period than perioperative intravenous administration. Postoperative platelet counts were highest in the patients receiving intravenous dipyridamole, intermediate in those receiving oral dipyridamole and lowest in the control group. Postoperative blood loss was significantly reduced with both oral and intravenous dipyridamole. A second randomized trial was conducted in an additional 40 patients undergoing CABG surgery to evaluate the effects of dipyridamole on myocardial platelet and leukocyte deposition and the cardiac release of thromboxane. Twenty patients received intravenous dipyridamole perioperatively. Autologous platelets and leukocytes were labeled with 111In and 99mTc respectively and were infused before release of the crossclamp. Myocardial biopsies were obtained after aortic declamping and indicated that platelets and leukocytes were deposited in the myocardium during reperfusion. Dipyridamole reduced both platelet and leukocyte deposition. Cardiac release of thromboxane B2 occurred in the early postoperative period and was reduced by dipyridamole. In conclusion, dipyridamole preserved platelets and reduced postoperative bleeding and blood product transfusions in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Dipyridamole also reduced cardiac platelet deposition and thromboxane release and may reduce perioperative ischemic injury.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2001

Action of dipyridamole and warfarin on growth of human endothelial cells cultured in serum-free media.

OBJECTIVE: To study the anti-proliferative effect of Dipyridamole (anti-platelet), Dipyridamole with Warfarin, and Warfarin (anticoagulant) alone, in human endothelial cells in vitro. DESIGN AND METHODS: Human endothelial cells were harvested from umbilical cords. Primary cultures were usually successful. However, subculture yields were usually contaminated with smooth muscle cells. We have developed an improved method for the isolation of endothelial cells by using Collagenase II, coating the culture flask with fibronectin and using serum-free media. The endothelial cells were characterised by anti-PECAM-1/PE (CD31) using Flow Cytometry with viability of 95% after trypsinization with 0.05% Trypsin and 1 mM EDTA. Growth and proliferation studies were performed in vitro in the presence of 5 microM Dipyridamole, 5 microM Dipyridamole with 5 microM Warfarin, 5 microM Warfarin alone by cell counts, (3)H-thymidine and (3)H-leucine incorporation. RESULTS: The incorporation of (3)H-Leucine at day 6 in each test condition revealed no significant change. Control 12678 +/- 2968 CPM, Dipyridamole 8698 +/- 189 CPM, Dipyridamole and Warfarin 7541 +/- 413 CPM, and Warfarin alone 10711 +/- 732 CPM. With the incorporation of (3)H-Thymidine, Dipyridamole alone as well as Dipyridamole with Warfarin reduced the basal proliferation rates significantly when compared to controls. Control 14355 +/- 4441 CPM, Dipyridamole 1100 +/- 152 CPM (p<0.05), Dipyridamole with Warfarin 1092 +/- 272 CPM (p<0.05). Warfarin alone did not reduce proliferation significantly 12870 +/- 2677 CPM (NS). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a method to isolate pure endothelial cells from human umbilical cords using Serum-Free Media (SFM). EC with high purity was characterised by anti-PECAM-1/PE (CD31) using Flow Cytometry. Dipyridamole at a concentration of 5 microM inhibited the proliferation of endothelial cells at day 6 by 93%. These techniques can be used for routine analysis and proliferation studies.

Anticoagulants↗

PubMed1998

Pharmacological analysis of the activity of the adenosine uptake inhibitor, dipyridamole, on the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes of the guinea-pig.

1. Dipyridamole potentiates the effects of adenosine on the heart by inhibiting adenosine uptake. The effects of dipyridamole on both adenosine and N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) concentration-effect (E/[A]) curves were compared on the AV node, in guinea-pig isolated perfused hearts, and on the SA node, in isolated right atria, by measuring dromotropic and chronotropic responses, respectively. In the absence of dipyridamole, adenosine was significantly more potent on the AV node than SA node (AV p[A]5, = 4.95+/-0.10. SA p[A]50=3.62+/-0.10). In contrast, NECA and adenosine in the presence of dipyridamole were approximately equiactive in the two assays (NECA: AV p[A]50=7.07+/-0.07; SA p[A]50=7.30+/-0.08: adenosine: AV p[A]50=6.49+/-0.08; SA p[A]50=6.27+/-0.05). Dipyridamole was significantly more potent in enhancing the effects of adenosine on the SA node than on the AV node (pKi values estimated by Kenakin's method (1981): AV node 8.18+/-0.14; SA node=8.75+/-0.08). 2. The difference in pKi values did not appear to be due to dipyridamole expressing other actions because concentrations of dipyridamole which saturated the adenosine transporter had no effect on the NECA E/[A] curves in either assay. However, the test of another assumption of Kenakin's method, that adenosine taken up into cells is pharmacologically inactive, failed on the AV node assay because a significant potentiating interaction was found between adenosine and NECA. The interaction was concentration-dependent, reciprocal to the extent that pre-incubation with either agonist potentiated the other and was concluded to be due to an intracellular action of adenosine as the potentiation disappeared in the presence of dipyridamole. 3. An explanatory model was developed to account for the data obtained using existing pharmacological concepts of ligand action in isolated tissue bioassays. In the model, adenosine, but not NECA, was assumed to be subject to saturable agonist uptake, an uptake which was competitively blocked by dipyridamole. Adenosine and NECA were assumed to act extracellularly at adenosine A1-receptors. In the AV node, but not the SA node, the adenosine transported into the cells was assumed to potentiate the effects of adenosine A1-receptor activation. For the AV node assay, the model predicted that potentiation of adenosine by uptake blockade is offset by a simultaneous decrease in potentiation due to the intracellular action of adenosine. All of the experimental data obtained in the study could be accounted for by the model including the apparent differences in potency of adenosine in the absence of dipyridamole and the pKi values for dipyridamole.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2000

The comparable diagnostic accuracies of dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies are widely used for pharmacological stress echocardiography, with wide geographical variations. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether evidence derived from the literature indicates or disapproves that either stress modality confers diagnostic superiority. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed literature of published trials with head-to-head comparison, on the same population, of high-dose (0.84 mg/kg) dipyridamole-stress versus high-dose (up to 40 micrograms/kg per min) dobutamine-stress echocardiography. Data from 12 studies performed in 12 institutions in seven countries were analysed. Angiographic information about 818 patients was considered. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracies of the two tests were similar (631 of 818, 77%, for dipyridamole versus 654 of 818, 80%, for dobutamine, NS). Overall sensitivities were 403 of 568 (71%) for dipyridamole and 437 of 568 (77%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Sensitivities for patients with single-vessel disease were 177 of 275 (64%) for dipyridamole and 203 of 275 (74%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Sensitivities for patients with multivessel disease were 162 of 203 (80%) for dipyridamole and 163 of 203 (80%) for dobutamine (NS). Specificities were 232 of 250 (93%) for dipyridamole and 217 of 250 (87%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Data from an additional 26 studies with dipyridamole alone and 47 studies with dobutamine alone were analysed. The diagnostic accuracies were 80% for dipyridamole (n = 2038 patients; 95% confidence interval 75-82%) and 82% for dobutamine (n = 4264 patients; 95% confidence interval 79-84%). CONCLUSION: High-dose dobutamine-stress and high-dose dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies have comparable diagnostic accuracies, with a slightly higher sensitivity with dobutamine and a slightly higher specificity with dipyridamole.

Cardiotonic Agents↗

PubMed1992

Heterogeneity of [3H]dipyridamole binding to CNS membranes: correlation with [3H]nitrobenzylthioinosine binding and [3H]uridine influx studies.

The relationship between the nucleoside transport system and the nitrobenzylthioinosine-sensitive and -resistant [3H]dipyridamole binding sites was examined by comparing the characteristics of [3H]dipyridamole binding with those of [3H]nitrobenzylthioinosine binding and [3H]-uridine influx in rabbit and guinea pig cerebral cortical synaptosomes. Two distinct high-affinity synaptosomal membrane-associated [3H]dipyridamole binding sites, with different sensitivities to inhibition by nitrobenzylthioinosine, were characterized in the presence of 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS, 0.01%) to prevent [3H]dipyridamole binding to glass tubes and filters. The nitrobenzylthioinosine-resistant [3H]-dipyridamole binding sites represented a greater proportion of the total membrane sites in guinea pig than in rabbit (40 vs. 10% based on inhibition studies). In rabbit, nitrobenzylthioinosine-sensitive [3H]dipyridamole binding (KD = 1.4 +/- 0.2 nM) and [3H]nitrobenzylthioinosine binding (KD = 0.30 +/- 0.01 nM) appeared to involve the same membrane site associated with the nitrobenzylthioinosine-sensitive nucleoside transporter. By mass law analysis, [3H]-dipyridamole binding in guinea pig could be resolved into two components based on sensitivity to inhibition by 1 microM nitrobenzylthioinosine. The nitrobenzylthioinosine-resistant [3H]dipyridamole binding sites were relatively insensitive to inhibition by all of the nucleoside transport substrates and inhibitors tested, with the exception of dipyridamole itself. In guinea pig synaptosomes, 100 microM dilazep blocked nitrobenzylthioinosine-resistant [3H]uridine transport completely but inhibited the nitrobenzylthioinosine-resistant [3H]dipyridamole binding component by only 20%. Furthermore, a greater percentage of the [3H]dipyridamole binding was nitrobenzylthioinosine resistant in guinea pig compared with rabbit, yet both species had a similar percentage of nitrobenzylthioinosine-resistant [3H]uridine transport.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed2005

The effect of dipyridamole on vascular cell-derived reactive oxygen species.

Platelet and vascular stimulation leads to release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are known to influence vascular reactivity and thrombosis. Dipyridamole is a vasodilator and platelet inhibitor that has previously been shown to have direct antioxidant properties. The antioxidant effects of dipyridamole on vascular cell-derived ROS are not known; therefore, dipyridamole was incubated with endothelial cells and platelets and cellular redox status and release of endogenous ROS were assessed. Dipyridamole decreased intracellular basal ROS generation from endothelial cells as measured by DCFDA (2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate) oxidation. Incubation of endothelial cells with dipyridamole also attenuated t-butylhydroperoxide-induced oxidative stress. Using a redox-sensitive fluorescent dye, dipyridamole improved cellular activity after treatment with t-butylhydroperoxide. Incubation with dipyridamole did not alter platelet release of nitric oxide or hydrogen peroxide but significantly attenuated superoxide release. Using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy, dipyridamole decreased platelet ROS generation. Dipyridamole also suppressed platelet-soluble CD40 ligand release. In summary, at therapeutically relevant concentrations, dipyridamole suppresses the formation of ROS in platelets and endothelial cells and improves cellular redox status. These data suggest that the redox-dependent properties of dipyridamole have a direct effect on vascular cells.

Antioxidants↗