SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DNA Mismatch Repair”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Expression of DNA mismatch repair genes in naevi.

The significant difference of DNA mismatch repair genes expression between naevi and melanomas was demonstrated by our research group in the previous study. The main aim of this study was to compare the expression of MLH1, MSH2, PMS1 and PMS2 in 31 naevus cell naevi, 12 fibromatous naevi and 30 dysplastic naevi. The expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins was found in all naevi investigated. However, the expression (percentage of positively stained cells) was significantly higher in naevus cell naevi than in dysplastic and fibromatous ones.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed2002

DNA methyltransferase deficiency modifies cancer susceptibility in mice lacking DNA mismatch repair.

We have introduced DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1) mutations into a mouse strain deficient for the Mlh1 protein to study the interaction between DNA mismatch repair deficiency and DNA methylation. Mice harboring hypomorphic Dnmt1 mutations showed diminished RNA expression and DNA hypomethylation but developed normally and were tumor free. When crossed to Mlh1(-/-) homozygosity, they were less likely to develop the intestinal cancers that normally arise in this tumor-predisposed, mismatch repair-deficient background. However, these same mice developed invasive T- and B-cell lymphomas earlier and at a much higher frequency than their Dnmt1 wild-type littermates. Thus, the reduction of Dnmt1 activity has significant but opposing outcomes in the development of two different tumor types. DNA hypomethylation and mismatch repair deficiency interact to exacerbate lymphomagenesis, while hypomethylation protects against intestinal tumors. The increased lymphomagenesis in Dnmt1 hypomorphic, Mlh1(-/-) mice may be due to a combination of several mechanisms, including elevated mutation rates, increased expression of proviral sequences or proto-oncogenes, and/or enhanced genomic instability. We show that CpG island hypermethylation occurs in the normal intestinal mucosa, is increased in intestinal tumors in Mlh1(-/-) mice, and is reduced in the normal mucosa and tumors of Dnmt1 mutant mice, consistent with a role for Dnmt1-mediated CpG island hypermethylation in intestinal tumorigenesis.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed1997

Cell cycle regulation of the human DNA mismatch repair genes hMSH2, hMLH1, and hPMS2.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is a cancer susceptibility syndrome that has been found to be caused by mutations in any of several genes involved in DNA mismatch repair, including hMSH2, hMLH1, or hPMS2. Recent reports have suggested that hMSH2 and hMLH1 have a role in the regulation of the cell cycle. To determine if these genes are cell cycle regulated, we examined their mRNA and protein levels throughout the cell cycle in IMR-90 normal human lung fibroblasts. We demonstrate that the levels of hMSH2 mRNA and protein do not change appreciably throughout the cell cycle. Although hMLH1 mRNA levels remained constant, there was a modest (approximately 50%) increase in its protein levels during late G1 and S phase. The levels of hPMS2 mRNA fluctuated (decreasing 50% in G1 and increasing 50% in S phase), whereas hPMS2 protein levels increased 50% in late G1 and S phase. Our data indicate that, at least in normal cells, the machinery responsible for the detection and repair of mismatched DNA bases is present throughout the cell cycle.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Relationship between DNA mismatch repair genes expression, Ku-genes expression and ploidy-related parameters in the progression of pigmented lesions of the skin.

Defects of DNA repair systems in cutaneous tumours are related to DNA mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, PMS1, PMS2) and Ku70/80 genes involved in double- strand repair. In this study we investigated the statistical relationship between these systems and DNA-ploidy-related parameters in 19 naevus cell naevi, 23 lentigos maligna, 76 primary melanomas and 31 melanoma metastases, applying the correlation coefficient according to Spearman. In naevi significant correlations were found between Ku70/80 gene expression and some ploidy-related parameters. In lentigos, additionally, some significant correlations between the expression of DNA mismatch repair genes were found. Similar results were demonstrated for primary melanomas. In metastases no one significant correlation between DNA mismatch repair genes and Ku-genes was present. We postulate that DNA mismatch repair genes and Ku70/80 genes are functionally independent and that some of them are able to influence ploidy-related parameters.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed2004

DNA mismatch repair and the significance of a sebaceous skin tumor for visceral cancer prevention.

DNA mismatch repair is a postreplicative DNA repair cascade ensuring genomic integrity. Inactivating germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes are responsible for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma syndrome (HNPCC), which predisposes to various types of visceral cancer. Most associated tumors exhibit high-grade microsatellite instability. Some patients develop skin tumors of the sebaceous glands. This combined occurrence is known as Muir-Torre syndrome, which has a high probability of an underlying DNA mismatch repair defect. This is also true for individuals selected solely on the basis of sebaceous neoplasias, tumors with the highest frequency of high-grade microsatellite instability. This article focuses on the recent advances in molecular diagnostics for the detection of DNA mismatch repair defects in patients with sebaceous neoplasias, and the potential significance for the secondary prevention of visceral cancer in these patients.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Analysis of the DNA mismatch repair proteins expression in malignant melanomas.

The importance of properly functioning DNA mismatch repair has been shown in several tumour types both hereditary and sporadic, but not yet in malignant melanomas. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of DNA mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, PMS1 and PMS2) in primary melanomas and to define their possible prognostic impact in 106 primary melanomas. MLH1 was found in 64 and MSH2 in 61 out of 106 melanomas. PMS1 and PMS2 proteins were present in 69 and 67 tumours, respectively. Loss of the expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins correlated with the increase of Clark levels. Cox regression analysis demonstrated some prognostic significance for PMS1 (forward p = 0.0018 and backward selections p = 0.0277), MLH1 (only forward selection p = 0.0081) and MSH2 (only backward selection p = 0.0115).

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed2000

MLH3: a DNA mismatch repair gene associated with mammalian microsatellite instability.

DNA mismatch repair is important because of its role in maintaining genomic integrity and its association with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). To identify new human mismatch repair proteins, we probed nuclear extracts with the conserved carboxy-terminal MLH1 interaction domain. Here we describe the cloning and complete genomic sequence of MLH3, which encodes a new DNA mismatch repair protein that interacts with MLH1. MLH3 is more similar to mismatch repair proteins from yeast, plants, worms and bacteria than to any known mammalian protein, suggesting that its conserved sequence may confer unique functions in mice and humans. Cells in culture stably expressing a dominant-negative MLH3 protein exhibit microsatellite instability. Mlh3 is highly expressed in gastrointestinal epithelium and physically maps to the mouse complex trait locus colon cancer susceptibility I (Ccs1). Although we were unable to identify a mutation in the protein-coding region of Mlh3 in the susceptible mouse strain, colon tumours from congenic Ccs1 mice exhibit microsatellite instability. Functional redundancy among Mlh3, Pms1 and Pms2 may explain why neither Pms1 nor Pms2 mutant mice develop colon cancer, and why PMS1 and PMS2 mutations are only rarely found in HNPCC families.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2000

The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G x T mismatch.

DNA mismatch repair ensures genomic integrity on DNA replication. Recognition of a DNA mismatch by a dimeric MutS protein initiates a cascade of reactions and results in repair of the newly synthesized strand; however, details of the molecular mechanism remain controversial. Here we present the crystal structure at 2.2 A of MutS from Escherichia coli bound to a G x T mismatch. The two MutS monomers have different conformations and form a heterodimer at the structural level. Only one monomer recognizes the mismatch specifically and has ADP bound. Mismatch recognition occurs by extensive minor groove interactions causing unusual base pairing and kinking of the DNA. Nonspecific major groove DNA-binding domains from both monomers embrace the DNA in a clamp-like structure. The interleaved nucleotide-binding sites are located far from the DNA. Mutations in human MutS alpha (MSH2/MSH6) that lead to hereditary predisposition for cancer, such as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, can be mapped to this crystal structure.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

PubMed1995

DNA mismatch repair mutants do not increase N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine tolerance in O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase-deficient yeast cells.

Treatment of cells with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) produces, among other lesions, mutagenic and carcinogenic lesions such as O6-methylguanine (O6MeG) and O4-methylthymine in DNA. An O6MeG DNA methyl-transferase (MTase) specifically and efficiently repairs such lesions. MTase-deficient bacterial, yeast and mammalian cells exhibit increased sensitivity not only to MNNG-induced mutagenesis, but also to MNNG-induced killing, suggesting that O6MeG-type lesions are also lethal to the cells. The lethal effect caused by O6MeG is not clear. Results from several recent experiments indicate that some MNNG-tolerant cell lines exhibit a loss of DNA mismatch binding/repair activity, suggesting that functional mismatch repair is probably responsible for the cellular sensitivity to DNA methylating agents. We tested this abortive O6MeG-T mismatch repair hypothesis in a well-defined lower eukaryote, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that while mgt1-deleted MTase-deficient yeast strains are hypersensitive to MNNG-induced killing, combination of this mutation with any of the mlh1, msh2 or pms1 mutations did not render cells more tolerant to killing. msh3 mutation also did not rescue MNNG-induced genotoxicity. Furthermore, through the isolation and characterization of MNNG-tolerant cell lines from the MTase-deficient mutants we demonstrated that a DNA mismatch repair defect is neither sufficient nor required for this process. Since both DNA repair MTases and mismatch repair proteins are highly conserved between yeast and mammalian cells, our results could suggest alternative mechanisms in the cellular tolerance to O6MeG-induced killing.

Cells, Cultured↗

PubMed1998

DNA mismatch repair and cancer.

Mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Studies in bacteria, yeast and mammals suggest that the basic components of the MMR system are evolutionarily conserved, but studies in eukaryotes also imply novel functions for MMR proteins. Recent results suggest that mutations in MMR genes lead to tumorigenesis in mice, but DNA replication errors appear to be insufficient to initiate intestinal tumorigenesis in this model system. Additionally, MMR-deficient cell lines display a mutator phenotype and resistance to several cytotoxic agents, including compounds widely used in cancer chemotherapy.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

DNA mismatch repair enzyme activity and gene expression in prostate cancer.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) of short repetitive sequences in human chromosomal DNA can result from defective DNA mismatch repair function in tumor cells. We hypothesize that DNA mismatch repair (MMR) activity is down-regulated during prostatic carcinogenesis. To test this hypothesis, MMR activities and mismatch repair-related genes were analyzed in five different prostate cancer cell lines. Our results demonstrate that MMR activities were decreased as compared to MMR proficient HeLa cells. Interestingly, LNCaP, PC-3 and DU145 had much lower MMR activities as compared to DUPro and TSUPr1. The MMR-related genes (hMLH1, hPMS1, hPMS2, hMSH2, hMSH3, hMSH6) showed mRNA transcripts in all prostate cancer cell lines. However, Western blotting showed decreased or absent hMLH1 protein expression in PC-3, DU145, DUPro and TSUPr1 cells. Similarly, the hMSH2 protein expression was low or absent in DU145 and LNCaP cells. This is the first report that demonstrates decreased MMR activities is associated with low expression of hMLH1, hMSH2 and other MMR-related proteins in prostate cancer.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed2001

Genotypic and phenotypic progression in endometrial tumorigenesis: determining when defects in DNA mismatch repair and KRAS2 occur.

We set out to determine the relative timing of loss of DNA mismatch repair and KRAS2 mutation in endometrial tumorigenesis. We studied endometrial carcinoma (CA) and synchronous atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), the premalignant precursor of endometrial cancer. Carcinoma and hyperplasia were investigated for loss of mismatch repair as evidenced by microsatellite instability (MSI) and for KRAS2 mutations. Endometrial cancers previously shown to be MSI-positive were evaluated for KRAS2 codon 12 and 13 mutations. DNA was isolated from foci of AEH concomitant with, but physically remote from, the cancers by use of tissues prepared by laser capture microdissection (LCM). The AEH DNAs were then assessed for MSI and KRAS2 mutations. Of 210 endometrial CAs investigated, 51 (26%) were MSI-positive, and among those, 21 (41%) arose concomitantly with AEH. Of 41 foci of AEH (mean, two foci per patient) investigated, 34 (83%) were MSI-positive. KRAS2 mutations were seen in 5/51 (10%) MSI-positive carcinomas. From the five patients informative for both KRAS2 mutation and MSI, 10 foci of AEH were available for investigation. All 10 AEH specimens (100%) were MSI-positive, and six (60%) had the KRAS2 mutation present in the coexisting CA. The observation that some MSI-positive AEH specimens lack the KRAS2 mutation seen in the coexisting CA supports a model in which loss of DNA mismatch repair precedes KRAS2 mutation. However, in addition to the absence of KRAS2 mutations in AEH, we discovered mutations in LCM hyperplasia and carcinoma specimens that were not present in the portion of the cancers originally investigated. These discordant genotypes suggest genetic heterogeneity in endometrial hyperplasia and concomitant cancer.

Base Pair Mismatch↗

PubMed2002

Human colon cancer cells surviving high doses of cisplatin or oxaliplatin in vitro are not defective in DNA mismatch repair proteins.

PURPOSE: Alterations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins have been associated with an increased resistance of many cancer cell lines to cisplatin. The aim of this work was to investigate whether defects in DNA MMR proteins are involved in the survival of human colorectal cancer cells in the presence of high concentrations of cisplatin and oxaliplatin, a diaminocyclohexane (DACH) platinum compound whose adducts are not recognized by the MMR system. METHODS: Six unselected human colon cancer cell lines (HT29, HCT15, HCT116, Caco2, SW480 and SW620) were treated with a single 3-h exposure to cisplatin or oxaliplatin at suprapharmacological concentrations, ranging from 50 to 200 microg/ml. The microsatellite stability and the expression of MMR proteins in the parental cell lines and in the drug-selected subpopulations were studied. RESULTS: Most cells underwent apoptosis in the days following the cisplatin or oxaliplatin treatment, but some colonies expanded 3 to 4 weeks after, suggesting the presence of innately resistant cells in the six parental cell lines. Microsatellite instability (MIN), which reflects genetic defects in the DNA MMR system, was detected only in the HCT116 parental cell line and its drug-selected counterparts, due to a known mutation in the hMLH1 gene. No acquired MIN was observed in the other cisplatin-selected sublines derived from the HT29, HCT15, Caco2, SW480 or SW620 parental cells. In the same way, Western blot analysis showed that expression of the DNA MMR proteins hMLH1, hPMS1, hPMS2, hMSH2 and hMSH6 did not differ between the parental and the drug-surviving cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that high-level resistance of human colon cancer cells to high doses of cisplatin and oxaliplatin does not seem to be related to acquired defects in the DNA MMR proteins.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed2003

DNA mismatch repair proteins: potential guardians against genomic instability and tumorigenesis induced by ultraviolet photoproducts.

In addition to their established role in repairing post-replicative DNA errors, DNA mismatch repair proteins contribute to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to a wide range of exogenous DNA damage (e.g., alkylation-induced lesions). The role of DNA mismatch repair in response to ultraviolet-induced DNA damage has been historically controversial. Recent data, however, suggest that DNA mismatch repair proteins probably do not contribute to the removal of ultraviolet-induced DNA damage, but may be important in suppressing mutagenesis, effecting apoptosis, and suppressing tumorigenesis following exposure to ultraviolet radiation.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Testing for defective DNA mismatch repair in colorectal carcinoma: a practical guide.

CONTEXT: Significant bench and clinical data have been generated during the last decade regarding DNA mismatch repair in colorectal carcinoma. OBJECTIVES: To review clinically relevant aspects of defective DNA mismatch repair in colorectal carcinoma and to suggest testing algorithms for identification of these tumors in the sporadic and familial settings. DATA SOURCES: This article is based on literature review and clinical testing experience of more than 2000 patient samples. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 15% of colorectal carcinomas arise as a result of defective DNA mismatch repair. Ninety percent of these carcinomas are sporadic, arising as a result of methylation of the MLH1 gene promoter, silencing expression. These sporadic carcinomas have improved stage-specific prognosis and can be identified by demonstrating aberrant loss of expression with an MLH1 immunoperoxidase stain. Familial colorectal carcinomas with defective DNA mismatch repair (Lynch syndrome) are due to a germline defect in one of several DNA mismatch repair genes. The familial carcinomas are best identified with a combination of immunohistochemistry and molecular microsatellite analysis. This testing facilitates subsequent directed genetic testing of the proband and family members.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed1994

Detection of DNA point mutations with DNA mismatch repair enzymes.

We have developed a simple and reliable procedure to screen gene mutations using DNA mismatch repair (MR) specific mut Y enzyme of Escherichia coli and thymidine DNA glycosylase from HeLa cells. The mut Y enzyme cleaves A of G/A mismatches in DNA duplex and thymidine glycosylase cleaves T at G/T mismatches. Previously, we showed the determination of G:C-->T:A mutations in the N-ras gene in two human tumor samples with mut Y G/A MR enzyme. As low as 1-2% mutant DNAs in a sample of mutant and wild-type DNA can be detected with a synthetic DNA to create G/A mispairing for the assay. In this paper, we simplify the assay, include G/T MR thymidine glycosylase from HeLa cells and evaluate the application for screening DNA point mutations of p53 and ras genes. In this method, DNA fragments amplified from normal and mutated genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were mixed and annealed to create DNA mismatches for cleavage by mismatch repair enzymes. The cleaved products and the substrates were separated by gel electrophoresis and detected by autoradiography. In theory, the enzymes that cut G/A or G/T mispairs will detect the mutations of G:C-->A:T, A:T-->G:C, G:C-->T:A and T:A-->G:C. Several human tumor samples were examined for p53 or K-ras mutations with G/A and G/T mismatch repair enzymes. The reliability of mutation detection was evaluated by comparing the results with reported mutations or confirmed by DNA sequencing of the same PCR-amplified DNA fragments. Our data showed that, following mismatch repair enzyme cleavage, all mutated DNA samples yielded cleaved products with sizes as expected. In addition, our assay is able to characterize the nature of mutation by 5' end-labeling of 32P on mutant or wild-type DNA fragments. The low background, reliability and the determination of the sites of mutations as well as the types of DNA base changes indicate the advantages of the method over other techniques in testing DNA mutants.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2001

Human DNA mismatch repair in vitro operates independently of methylation status at CpG sites.

Whereas in Escherichia coli DNA mismatch repair is directed to the newly synthesized strand due to its transient lack of adenine methylation, the molecular determinants of strand discrimination in eukaryotes are presently unknown. In mammalian cells, cytosine methylation within CpG sites may represent an analogous and mechanistically plausible means of targeting mismatch correction. Using HeLa nuclear extracts, we conducted a systematic analysis in vitro to determine whether cytosine methylation participates in human DNA mismatch repair. We prepared a set of A.C heteroduplex molecules that were either unmethylated, hemimethylated or fully methylated at CpG sequences and found that the methylation status persisted under the assay conditions. However, no effect on either the time course or the magnitude of mismatch repair events was evident; only strand discontinuities contributed to strand bias. By western analysis we demonstrated that the HeLa extract contained MED1 protein, which interacts with MLH1 and binds to CpG-methylated DNA; supplementation with purified MED1 protein was without effect. In summary, human DNA mismatch repair operates independently of CpG methylation status, and we found no evidence supporting a role for CpG hemimethylation as a strand discrimination signal.

Base Pair Mismatch↗

PubMed1998

Requirement for DNA mismatch repair proteins in the transcription-coupled repair of thymine glycols in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Defects in DNA mismatch repair have been shown to lead to increased genomic instability and mutability. We recently found that human cells defective in the DNA mismatch repair gene, hMSH2, were deficient in the transcription-coupled repair (TCR) of both oxidative DNA damage, including thymine glycols, and UV-induced DNA damage. However, in a hMLH1 mutant, only a reduction in the TCR of UV damage was observed. In this study, we examined whether TCR of thymine glycols in Saccharomyces cerecisiae also requires the genes involved in DNA mismatch repair. We found that yeast cells containing mutations in MSH2 were deficient in the removal of thymine glycols from the transcribed strand of the RPB2 gene, while cells with mutations in either MLH1 or PMS1 alone showed near normal levels of TCR of thymine glycols. Interestingly, double mutants in the MLH1 and PMS1 genes were deficient in TCR of thymine glycols. Taken together, these results suggest that these two MutL homologues can act independently of each other, but that they have overlapping roles in TCR. Overall levels of thymine glycol removal were not reduced in the mismatch repair mutants. In contrast to the results with thymine glycols, no defects in TCR of pyrimidine dimers were found in cells with mutations in MSH2, MLH1, PMS1, and MLH1/PMS1.

DNA Damage↗