PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Diverticulitis, Colonic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2007

Conservative treatment of acute colonic diverticulitis: are antibiotics always mandatory?

OBJECTIVE: Most patients admitted for acute colonic diverticulitis (AD) are managed conservatively and receive antibiotics, although it is uncertain whether all patients with AD benefit from this treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of antibiotic treatment on outcome in the conservative management of patients with mild AD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective audit of 311 patients (64% F, mean age 60 years) hospitalized for AD was carried out. All patients were initially treated conservatively with observation and restriction of oral intake. Patients receiving antibiotics (n=118) were compared with patients treated with observation and restriction of oral intake only (n=193). Mean follow-up time (FU) was 30 months. RESULTS: Inflammation in patients treated with antibiotics was more pronounced (laboratory parameters (C-reactive protein, white blood cell count) were higher (p<0.01), fever was more common (p<0.01) and CT grading of inflammation was classified as severe in a higher proportion (p<0.01)) compared with patients treated without antibiotics. When initially treated with antibiotics, 3 patients (3%) failed to respond to treatment and had to undergo surgery. There were 7 (4%) failures in patients initially treated without antibiotics, and antibiotics were then added. During FU, 29% of patients treated with antibiotics had further events (recurrent AD and/or subsequent surgery) compared with 28% (NS) among those treated without antibiotics. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of a further event was not influenced by antibiotic treatment (OR 1.03, CI 95% 0.61-1.74). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that antibiotics are not mandatory in mild AD. Treatment without antibiotics appears to be safe and seems not to change the rate of further events. These results warrant further randomized prospective studies.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Acute left colonic diverticulitis: can CT findings be used to predict recurrence?

OBJECTIVE: We explored CT and demographic predictors for unfavorable outcome of nonoperative treatment in patients with a first event of left colonic diverticulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical files and CT scans of 312 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as having diverticulitis on an admission CT report or who had a final diagnosis of left colonic diverticulitis. Patients who did not undergo nonoperative treatment or were lost to follow-up (n = 144) were excluded from the study. Admission CT scans of 168 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of left colonic diverticulitis who underwent nonoperative treatment and had an 18-month follow-up were reassessed by three radiologists unaware of the clinical findings. Nonoperative treatment was defined as an attempt to treat the patient with only antibiotics without scheduling them for elective (delayed) surgery. Unfavorable outcome was defined as a failure of nonoperative treatment 18 months after admission that required either surgery or rehospitalization for antibiotic treatment. The risk of unfavorable outcome was modeled using logistic regression as a function of sex, age, and CT criteria including the maximum number of diverticula per 10 cm of colon; the presence of intraabdominal abscess or extraintestinal gas bubbles (< 5 mm diameter) or gas pockets (>or=5 mm); the length and location of the abnormal colonic segment; the maximum thickness of the colonic wall; the presence of associated free intraperitoneal fluid; and the extent of fatty infiltration. RESULTS: Among these 168 patients, 115 (68%) had an uneventful outcome, but nonoperative treatment failed in 53 (32%). The presence of an abscess (n = 19) or extraintestinal gas pocket (n = 14) were the only CT findings significantly associated with failure of nonoperative treatment. Adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for failure were 6.18 (1.76-21.68) when an abscess was diagnosed and 4.26 (1.04-17.57) when pockets of free air were observed. Sex and age were not significantly associated with unfavorable outcome of nonoperative treatment. CONCLUSION: Abscess and pockets of extraintestinal gas 5 mm in diameter or larger correlated with unfavorable outcome of nonoperative treatment. None of the other criteria evaluated were predictive of failure of nonoperative treatment, including bubbles of extraintestinal gas smaller than 5 mm in diameter.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Colonic diverticulitis diagnosed by computed tomography in the ED.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the application of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of colonic diverticulitis in the emergency department (ED). Clinical information and CT images of 38 proved cases of colonic diverticulitis were reviewed retrospectively. The most common CT findings were pericolic fat infiltration (100%), thickened fascia (78.9%), muscular hypertrophy (26.3%), and arrowhead sign (23.7%). The CT findings were correlated with clinical prognosis and 3 parameters were found to be indicators for poor prognosis: older age, abscess formation, and presence of free air. The patients with diverticulitis on right side colon were found to be younger in age and the lesions were shorter in involved length with higher incidence of muscular hypertrophy and less incidence of perforation, as compared with the left side group.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Acute left colonic diverticulitis--compared performance of computed tomography and water-soluble contrast enema: prospective evaluation of 420 patients.

PURPOSE: The most valuable radiologic examination to be done initially when acute left colonic diverticulitis is suspected is still a matter of controversy. This study compares the performance between water-soluble contrast enema and computed tomography. METHODS: From 1986 to 1997, all patients admitted in our emergency center with clinically suspected left-colonic diverticulitis had a contrast enema and a computed tomography within 72 hours of their admission, unless clinical findings required immediate laparotomy. They were prospectively included in the study if one or both radiologic examinations showed signs of acute diverticulitis or diverticulitis was surgically removed and histologically proven or both. Diverticulitis was considered moderate when computed tomography showed localized thickening of the colonic wall (5 mm or more) and inflammation of pericolic fat and contrast enema showed segmental lumen narrowing and tethered mucosa; it was considered severe when abscess or extraluminal air or contrast or all three were observed on computed tomography and when one or both of the last two signs were seen on contrast enema. Of 542 patients, 420 who had both computed tomography and contrast enema entered the study. RESULTS: The performance of computed tomography was significantly superior to contrast enema in terms of sensitivity (98 vs. 92 percent; P = 0.01), which was calculated from patients who had their colon removed and whose diverticulitis was histologically proven, and in the evaluation of the severity of the inflammation (26 vs. 9 percent; P = 0.02). Moreover, of 69 patients who had an associated abscess seen on computed tomography, only 20 (29 percent) had indirect signs of this complication on contrast enema. CONCLUSIONS: In the diagnostic evaluation of acute left-colonic diverticulitis, computed tomography should be preferred to contrast enema as the initial radiologic examination because of its statistically significant superiority in sensitivity and for its significantly better performance in the detection of severe infection, especially when an abscess is associated with the disease.

Abscess↗
PubMed2000

[Surgical therapy of colonic diverticulitis--how reliable is primary anastomosis?].

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the modern principles of surgery in diverticulitis, e.g. early elective resection and primary anastomosis. METHODS: The data of 445 consecutive patients were retrospectively analysed after classifying all cases in four subgroups according to a modified Hinchey classification (stages 0-III). RESULTS: Within our study group the morbidity was 26.5% (n = 118) and the mortality was 1.6% (n = 7). In 96% (n = 425) of all cases and in 64% (21/33) of patients with perforated diverticulitis and peritonitis (stage III), a primary anastomosis was performed. Four patients of the study group showed insufficient anastomosis (0.9%). No leakage was observed from any of the anastomoses performed in stage III diverticulitis. Stage of inflammation and age of patient correlate with morbidity and mortality. Some 53% (94/177) of the patients in stage II and 67% (22/33) of the patients in stage III had never showed symptoms of diverticulitis before. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic surgery to avoid life-threatening situations, including abscess formation or perforation, is not possible in many cases. However, especially patients at risk (age, coexisting illness) should undergo early surgery. Primary anastomosis can be performed safely even at an advanced stage.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis, management and evolutive prognosis of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis: a review of 208 patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of acute diverticulitis and its capacity to predict posterior complications in patients undergoing medical treatment. A review was made of the histories of 208 hospitalized patients (262 admissions) initially diagnosed with acute diverticulitis over a 5-year period. Ultrasound was performed in all patients upon first admission. Diverticulitis was retrospectively classified as either simple or complicated, the latter being defined by the presence of extraluminal air and/or abscesses. Diverticulitis was finally diagnosed in 203 patients. Ultrasound exhibited a sensitivity of 86% in 77 cases subjected to surgery, and of 94% in the global 203 patients (192 true-positive and 11 false-negative findings). Of 34 patients with diverticulitis and emergency surgery, 10 had false-negative US exams. Twenty of the 73 cases (27%) with signs of complicated diverticulitis in the initial ultrasound study required emergency surgery, compared with only 4 of the 119 patients (3%) with US evidence of simple diverticulitis (p<0.001). Of the 169 patients with diverticulitis undergoing conservative management, 54 (32%) developed complications during follow-up. The patients under age 50 years with signs of complicated diverticulitis suffered more complications (65%) than the rest of groups (p<0.001). In subjects with recurrences (26%), these were either similar to or less than the first episode in 84% of the cases. The present study shows that ultrasound constitutes a feasible technique for diagnosing acute diverticulitis. The severity of diverticulitis according to US is statistically predictive of surgical risk during the acute phase. Severity is also related to the appearance of posterior complications in patients undergoing conservative management, although only in younger patients (<50 years).

Acute Disease↗