PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Estrus Detection”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Reproductive management of lactating dairy cows using synchronization of ovulation.

Lactating dairy cows have poor reproductive efficiency because of low fertility and low rates of estrus detection. To eliminate the dependence on detection of estrus, we have recently developed a timed artificial insemination (AI) protocol that synchronized the time of ovulation using GnRH and PGF2 alpha. The effectiveness of this protocol as a management tool was compared with standard reproductive management. Lactating dairy cows (n = 333) from three herds were randomly assigned at parturition to two groups. Control cows were managed according to the typical reproductive strategy of the farm that relied on detection of estrus, the a.m.-p.m. breeding rule, and periodic use of PGF2 alpha. Treated cows had timed AI after synchronization of ovulation with GnRH and PGF2 alpha. For both groups, the voluntary waiting period was 50 d postpartum. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by ultrasound between 32 and 38 d post-AI. Nonpregnant cows were inseminated again using the original treatment until diagnosed as pregnant or until culled from the herd. Median days to first AI (54 vs. 83) and days open (99 vs. 118) were lower for treated cows than for control cows, respectively. Pregnancy rates for the first AI were similar (37% vs. 39%) for the two groups even though treated cows were bred at an earlier time postpartum. More treated cows than control cows were pregnant at 60 d (37% vs. 5%) and at 100 d (53% vs. 35%) after calving. Thus, this protocol allowed effective management of AI in lactating dairy cows without the need for estrus detection.

Animals↗

Effect of GnRH pretreatment on reproductive performance of postpartum suckled beef cows following synchronization of estrus using GnRH and PGF2alpha.

The effect of GnRH pretreatment on estrus detection rate, precision of estrus, and reproductive performance of postpartum beef cows synchronized to estrus using GnRH and PGF2alpha was evaluated. In Exp. 1, Angus cows (n = 87) were randomly assigned by parity, postpartum interval, and body condition score (BCS) to receive either 1) GnRH on d -7 and PGF2alpha on d 0 (GP) or 2) the GP treatment and an additional injection of GnRH on d -16 (GGP). Estrus detection and AI were conducted twice daily from d -3 to d 3. At 72 h after PGF2alpha, all animals not previously detected in estrus were bred by AI and received a concurrent injection of GnRH (TAI). Synchronized pregnancy rates were numerically increased (P = 0.15) in cows treated with GGP (55%) compared with those on the GP treatment (44%). In Exp. 2, 1,276 spring-calving, suckled beef cows in nine herds were randomized to treatments as described for Exp. 1, except that the initial GnRH injection for the GGP treatment was administered on d -14. Herd affected all indicators of reproductive performance (P < 0.05). The percentage of animals detected in estrus prematurely (d -3 to d 0; 7%) was not affected by treatment. Estrus response rate was influenced by postpartum interval (< 60 vs > or = 60; 61 vs 73%; P < 0.01) and a three-way interaction of parity, BCS, and treatment (P < 0.01). Within animals with a BCS > or = 5.5, the GGP treatment tended to increase the detection of estrus in primiparous cows (GP vs GGP; 76 vs 91%; P = 0.11) and decrease detection in multiparous cows (GP vs GGP; 78 vs 72%; P < 0.10). However, because conception rate to TAI in animals with a BCS > or = 5.5 was greater (P < 0.05) in the GGP than in the GP group (28 vs 8%, respectively), this interaction was interpreted to represent a shift in interval to estrus induced by the GGP treatment, rather than a reduction in the synchronization of ovarian function. Conception rates of animals inseminated to an observed estrus did not differ among treatments (P = 0.15). Synchronized pregnancy rate tended (P = 0.06) to be greater in GGP- (53%) than in GP-treated animals (47%). In conclusion, pretreatment with GnRH tended to increase pregnancy rates during a 6-d synchronization period, primarily through enhanced conception rates of cows bred by TAI. In contrast to our hypothesis, GnRH pretreatment did not increase the percentage of animals detected in estrus or the precision of estrus expression.

Animal Husbandry↗

Factors associated with first service conception in artificially inseminated nulliparous Holstein heifers.

Animal and management factors associated with first service conception in nulliparous dairy heifers were determined in 601 Holstein heifers from a dairy farm in north central Florida. Animal data collected included body weight, height at the withers and tail head, body condition score at 6 months of age and just prior to first artificial insemination (AI), and pelvimetry measurements taken just prior to first AI. Management data included season of first AI, inseminator, service sire, method of estrus detection, whether the estrus of first insemination was induced using prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)), and whether the heifer received a modified live virus (MLV) vaccine within 21 days of first insemination. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Heifers inseminated in the summer were more than four times less likely to become pregnant to first insemination than heifers bred during the rest of the year (odds ratio (OR)=0.24; 95% CI=0.14, 0.41). Using secondary signs for estrus detection instead of standing estrus resulted in significantly reduced odds of conception to first service (OR=0.37; 95% CI 0.13, 1.02). Also, heifers inseminated at estrus induced by PGF(2alpha) were approximately one-third less likely to conceive than those heifers inseminated to a naturally occurring estrus (OR=0.66; 95% CI 0.46, 0.95). An interaction between pelvic size and breeding season was found indicating that large pelvic size had a significant positive effect on fertility in the summer, but was not associated with conception to first service in the winter.

Analysis of Variance↗

Methods to reduce or eliminate detection of estrus in a melengestrol acetate-PGF2alpha protocol for synchronization of estrus in beef heifers.

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate methods to decrease or eliminate the detection of estrus inherent to a melengestrol acetate (MGA)-PGF2alpha (PGF) protocol for synchronization of estrus in heifers. In each experiment, all heifers received 0.5 mg of MGA x animal(-1) x d(-1) for 14 d (d -32 to -19) and PGF (25 mg, i.m.; d 0, 0 h) 19 d after the last feeding of MGA (MGA-PGF protocol). In Exp. 1, heifers (n = 709) were assigned to each of the following protocols: 1) the MGA-PGF protocol with AI 6 to 12 h after detection of estrus (estrus AI; MGA-PGF); 2) MGA-PGF plus 100 microg, i.m. of GnRH on d -7 (1x GnRH) and estrus AI; or 3) MGA-PGF, GnRH on d -7, and GnRH (100 microg, i.m.) at 48 h after PGF, coincident with insemination (2x GnRH-TB48). In Exp. 2, heifers (n = 559) received the MGA-PGF protocol and were inseminated by either estrus AI or fixed-time AI (TAI) at 60 h, coincident with an injection of GnRH (GnRH-TB60). In Exp. 3, all heifers (n = 460) received the MGA-PGF protocol and were inseminated by estrus AI when detected up to 73 h. Heifers not observed in estrus by 73 h received TAI between 76 and 80 h. Half the heifers inseminated by TAI received no further treatment (TB80), and the remaining half was injected with GnRH at insemination (GnRH-TB80). Variance associated with the interval to estrus and the proportion in estrus from d 0 to 5 was similar for 1x GnRH and MGA-PGF treatments in Exp. 1. Pregnancy rate (d 0 to 5) did not differ for the MGA-PGF and 1x GnRH treatments (62.5 and 60.4%, respectively), and both were greater (P < 0.05) than TAI pregnancy rate in the 2x GnRH-TB48 treatment (42.3%). In Exp. 2, the peak estrous response occurred 60 h after PGF. Pregnancy rate during the synchrony period was greater (P < 0.05) for the MGA-PGF (255/401; 63.6%) than the GnRH-TB60 (74/158; 46.6%) treatment. In Exp. 3, 75.7% of heifers (348/460) were detected in estrus by 73 h and were inseminated, with a conception rate of 74.4%. Pregnancy rates after TAI did not differ between TB80 and GnRH-TB80 (14/56 = 25% and 19/ 56 = 33.9%, respectively). Total pregnancy rate was 63.5% for heifers inseminated after detected estrus and by TAI. Collectively, these data indicate that the exclusive use of TAI for heifers treated with the MGA-PGF protocol resulted in lower pregnancy rates than when AI was performed after detection of estrus. However, estrus AI for 3 d and TAI at the end of d 3 could result in pregnancy rates similar to those achieved after a 5-d period of detecting estrus.

Animals↗

Follicular size and response to Ovsynch versus detection of estrus in anovular and ovular lactating dairy cows.

In a commercial dairy herd, 316 lactating Holsteins were studied to determine the percentage of anovular cows, to examine follicular sizes in anovular cows, and to compare synchronized ovulation (Ovsynch) versus detection of estrus on fertility of ovular and anovular cows. Ultrasonography examinations at 47 to 53 d and at 54 to 60 d postpartum were used to measure follicles and to classify cows as ovular or anovular. Anovular cows were identified as those with no detectable luteal tissue by ultrasonography and by low progesterone in blood samples collected weekly. Anovular cows included 28% of 122 primiparous cows and 15% of 194 multiparous cows. Of 64 anovular cows, 20% had follicles > or = 25 mm that might be considered cystic (4% of total cows), 58% had 15- to 24-mm follicles, and 22% had 9- to 14-mm follicles. Cows identified as ovular and anovular were randomly assigned within cyclic status to one of two artificial insemination (AI) strategies: 1) AI after detected estrus during 21 d, or 2) timed AI after a 10-d Ovsynch protocol. Weekly ultrasonography continued for 21 d to detect ovulations. For the Ovsynch sub-groups, 97% of ovular and 94% of anovular cows ovulated after the second GnRH injection. Within 21 d, spontaneous ovulations for the detection of estrus sub-groups were 42% of anovular cows vs. 89% of ovular cows. Conception rates were greater for ovular cows regardless of treatment, but conception rates between respective Ovsynch and estrus detection groups for ovular (32%, 35%) or anovular (9%, 11%) cows were similar. Although 20% of lactating cows were not cyclic by about 60 d postpartum, nearly all ovulated following Ovsynch. However, anovular cows had lower conception than ovular cows whether inseminated after detected estrous or after Ovsynch.

Animals↗

Greater participation by veterinarians in the reproductive management of dairy cattle.

A program involving greater veterinary participation in detection of estrus and artificial insemination of cattle was evaluated in a 700-cow dairy herd from January 1987 through August 1988. Previous reproductive performance was below normal. First-service pregnancy rate from artificial insemination was 42%, and mean number of nonpregnant days for the cows was 120. Between postpartum days 55 and 62, all cows with functional corpus luteum assessed by rectal palpation were administered prostaglandin each Monday morning. Return visits were made to the herd each Thursday and Friday to observe cows and to inseminate those in estrus. On the other 5 days of the week, the owner or his employees inseminated all cows in estrus. The first-service pregnancy rate for 842 cows observed in estrus and inseminated by the veterinarian was 59%. The pregnancy rate for cows inseminated by the owner and his employees increased from 42% to 50%. The mean number of nonpregnant days for all 700 cows decreased from 120 to 98 days, resulting in approximately $46,000 of increased income for the dairyman or approximately a 4 to 1 return on investment in veterinary service. Results indicate that veterinarians could improve herd reproductive performance and solve chronic herd breeding problems by more actively participating with their clients in estrus detection and artificial insemination programs in cattle. The program allows practicing veterinarians an opportunity to observe cows for estrous behavior, establish their own pregnancy rate data, demonstrate to owners the importance of observing primary signs of estrus, and teach expert artificial insemination techniques.

Animals↗

Short communication: Conception rates following detection of estrus and timed AI in dairy cows synchronized using GnRH and PGF2alpha.

The objective of this study was to compare conception rates of cows exhibiting spontaneous estrus and receiving artificial insemination (AI) before completion of a timed AI protocol with cows that did not display estrus spontaneously, but were inseminated after 1 of 3 GnRH-PGF2alpha protocols. Cows (n = 432) in 2 herds were administered GnRH on d -7 and were tail-chalked daily. Cows detected in estrus before d 0 were inseminated immediately. Cows not detected in estrus by d 0 were administered PGF2alpha and were tail-chalked daily until 48 h after PGF2alpha. Cows detected in estrus from d -7 to 48 h after PGF2alpha were inseminated and designated as treatment A (n = 46). Cows not detected in estrus and not inseminated by 48 h after PGF2alpha were assigned randomly to receive either GnRH 48 h after PGF2alpha and timed AI 16 h later (treatment B; n = 132), or GnRH and timed AI 64 h after PGF2alpha (treatment C; n = 127), or timed AI 64 h after PGF2alpha (treatment D; n = 127). Pregnancy was diagnosed 38 to 45 d after AI by palpation per rectum of uterine contents. Nearly 11% of all cattle exhibited spontaneous estrus and received immediate AI. Herd did not influence the percentage of cows detected in estrus and inseminated. Conception rates did not differ among treatments. Conception rates differed between herds, but no interaction of herd x treatment was detected. No differences were detected between herds for days in milk, milk production, AI service number, or parity.

Animals↗

Automated electronic activity measurement for detection of estrus in dairy cattle.

Two trials were conducted to characterize the performance of an automated electronic activity tag system as an aid for detection of estrus in dairy cattle. In trial 1, activity tags were attached to the rear leg of 24 cows at approximately 35 d postpartum and remained attached until pregnancy. Data collection included 66 periods of predicted estrus (cyclic periods of 18 to 24 d prior to the date of pregnancy). A summary of the data recorded in the activity tags was transmitted telemetrically to a personal computer at each milking via stationary antenna in the milking parlor. An electronic flag used an increased activity ratio to determine the ratio of activity in a test period of the previous 12 h to activity in the same 12 h during the 2 d previous to the test period, thus indicating estrus. Activity patterns were characterized from data recorded on the tags at 2-h intervals. The tag detected 74% of predicted periods of estrus versus 58% reported by herders. An increased activity ratio for at least 4 consecutive h reduced false-positive designations. In trial 2, activity tags were attached to front and rear legs on five cows, and activity patterns from the two sites were compared for 2 mo. Patterns of activity were similar from tags attached at either site, and the sites were not different in their discrimination between periods in which estrus did or did not occur. The activity tag system was an effective practical tool to detect estrus.

Activity Cycles↗

Comparison of on-farm laboratory milk progesterone assays for identifying errors in detection of estrus and diagnosis of pregnancy.

A field study was conducted in 10 commercial dairy herds to test the efficacy of a rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to identify errors in detection of estrus and diagnosis of pregnancy. Milk samples were collected at the milking following detection of estrus and on d 21 postinsemination. Progesterone was measured on-farm by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and in the laboratory by radioimmunoassay. Agreement between the two methods of progesterone analysis (n = 820) was 89.8%. There were 93 cows (18.7%) by laboratory analysis and 126 cows (25.4%) by on-farm analysis for which concentration of progesterone in the sample collected at suspected estrus (n = 497) was higher than normal estrual values. Exclusion of these cases increased the overall accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis by 6.8 and 6.4% for laboratory and on-farm methods. Overall agreement between pregnancy diagnosis by milk progesterone at d 21 postinsemination and diagnosis by return to estrus or palpation of reproductive organs was 80.5 and 75.8% for laboratory and on-farm methods (75.0% and 69.7% for pregnant cows and 94.5 and 93.9% for nonpregnant cows). These results indicate that an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for milk progesterone performed on-farm was equal in accuracy to a laboratory radioimmunoassay for identifying errors in detection of estrus and diagnosis of pregnancy.

Animals↗

Fertility in estrus-cycling and noncycling virgin heifers and suckled beef cows after induced ovulation.

A procedure was developed to either induce or synchronize ovulation in heifers and suckled cows. Beef females were assigned to two breeding programs: 1) two injections of prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) given 14 d apart to synchronize estrus (PGF2alpha control; n = 179), with inseminations 12 to 16 h after detected estrus or at 80 h in the absence of estrus, or 2) two injections of PGF2alpha (d -14 and 0) plus 100 microg of GnRH on d -7 when 6 mg of norgestomet was implanted (PGF2alpha/NORG/GnRH treatment; n = 173). Implants were removed 24 h after the second PGF2alpha injection (d +1) and females were inseminated 12 to 16 h after detected estrus until 54 h after PGF2alpha. The remaining cattle were given a second 100-microg GnRH injection 54 h after PGF2alpha and inseminated 18 to 20 h later. Percentages of noncycling females with subsequently elevated progesterone (P4) on d 0 or +1 were not different between treatment groups (20.4 vs 25%), but conception rate was greater (P < .05) in noncycling treated females than in noncycling controls (55 vs 12.8%). Conception rates in cycling (59.2%) and noncycling (62.2%) treated females were similar to those in cycling controls (56.2%) but greater (P = .06) than those in noncycling controls (26.5%). Conception rates in treated females inseminated 12 to 16 h after detected estrus (63.1%) or at one fixed time (58.3%) were similar to those in controls inseminated 12 to 16 h after detected estrus (68.7%). This treatment procedure produced fertility after one timed insemination that was equal to controls inseminated after detected estrus and induced equally fertile ovulations in noncycling heifers and cows.

Aging↗

Reproductive performance of dairy cows in various programmed breeding systems including OvSynch and combinations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and prostaglandin F2 alpha.

In Experiment 1, 308 Holstein cows were assigned randomly to four treatments: 1) GnRH injection followed in 7 d by PGF2 alpha injection, then another GnRH injection 33 h later, and artificial insemination (AI) 16 to 18 h after the second GnRH injection; 2) GnRH injection followed in 7 d by PGF2 alpha injection and AI only after detected estrus; 3) injections of PGF2 alpha 14 d apart, GnRH injection 33 h after the second PGF2 alpha injection, and AI 16 to 18 h later; and 4) injections of PGF2 alpha 14 d apart, AI only after detected estrus following the second PGF2 alpha injection or, in the absence of detected estrus, at 80 h after the second PGF2 alpha injection. In Experiment 2, 227 Holstein cows were assigned randomly to two treatments: 1) GnRH injection followed in 7 d by PGF2 alpha injection, then another GnRH injection 48 h later, and AI 16 to 18 h after the second GnRH injection; and 2) GnRH injection followed in 7 d by PGF2 alpha injection and AI only after detected estrus. Although conception rates in both experiments resulting from AI made after detected estrus either tended to be greater or were consistently greater than those following GnRH injection and one fixed-time AI, pregnancy rates were of greater magnitude after fixed-time AI because of poor expression or detection of estrus.

Animals↗

Postpartum reproductive management of dairy cows in a large Florida dairy herd.

Dairy cows (n = 199) were assigned randomly at Day 14 post partum to a control group or a programmed reproductive treatment group (PRT). Cows in the PRT group received 8 ug of GnRH on Days 14 and 50 post partum and 25 mg of PGF2alpha injected on Days 21, 34 and 57 post partum. Cows in the PRT group had a greater frequency of progesterone (P4) concentrations > 1 ng/ml (50% vs 30%; P < 0.01). Frequency of cows having P4 > 1 ng/ml at both Days 21 and 34 post partum was greater in the PRT group than in the control group (39% vs 20%; P < 0.01). Accumulation of days with a palpable cystic ovary was lower in the PRT than the control group (11.4% vs 6.5%; P < 0.05). The frequency of anestrous cows through Day 57 post partum was not different between the 2 groups. Cows that were anestrous had a lower body condition score throughout the postpartum period than the cyclic cows (2.7 vs <3.0; P < 0.01). Conception rate to first service, conception rate to all services, services per conception and days open were not different between the groups. Intensity of estrus detection was low for the study based on a low estrus detection rate (42%) and a low palpation pregnancy rate index (below 68%) throughout the study period. Accuracy of estrus detection was low based on the distribution of normal interestrus intervals for the study (19 to 23 d; 13.5%). It is concluded that programmed reproductive treatments during the postpartum period are functionally effective relative to altered ovarian activity; however, potential advantages to such a system are not evident without good estrus detection practices in a large commercial herd.

Journal Article↗

Comparison of estrus induction and subsequent fertility with two different intravaginal devices in ewes during the non-breeding season.

Two experiments were conducted to compare the effect of estrus induction by controlled internal drug release (CIDR) and intravaginal cream containing 500 mg progesterone (P cream) in ewes during the non-breeding season. In the first experiment, twenty-four ewes were randomly grouped for two treatments with the different intravaginal devices for 12 days: Group A was the CIDR group and Group B was the P cream group. Blood was collected from all treated ewes, and progesterone (P(4)), estradiol 17-beta (E(2)) and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were measured by enzyme immunoassay. In the second experiment, the conception rates from natural mating, estrus-detected AI (inseminated 12 h after estrus detection), or fixed-time AI (inseminated 42 h after removal of an intravaginal device) in 127 ewes treated with CIDR or P cream were compared. In Experiment 1, the rate of estrus induction and the time of estrus onset after device removal were 91.7% and 36.3 +/- 15.7 h in Group A, and 100% and 35.0 +/- 12.6 h in Group B, respectively. There were no significant differences between the devices. The mean plasma P(4) concentration in Group B was significantly (P < 0.01) lower than Group A between day -9 and day -1 (Day 0: the day of device removal). However, no significant differences were found in the mean E(2) concentrations of the two groups after treatment. The mean time of estrus onset in ewes with an observed LH surge and the time of LH surge after treatment were 23.3 +/- 8.7 h and 30.3 +/- 5.0 h for Group A and 27.6 +/- 6.5 and 26.3 +/- 8.0 h for Group B, respectively, and there were no significant differences. However, a significant difference (P < 0.05) was found in the mean time from the time of estrus onset to LH surge between Group A (6.4 +/- 6.7 h) and Group B (-1.3 +/- 4.1 h). In Experiment 2, the conception rates for natural mating, estrus-detected AI, and fixed-time AI were 55.0, 29.4, and 25.0% for Group A and 40.7, 25.0, and 42.1% for Group B, respectively, and there were no significant differences. These results suggest that the effect of induction of estrus and ovulation and the rate of conception after treatment were comparable to CIDR even though the plasma P(4) concentration of the P cream method tended to be low during the insertion period.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

Reproductive traits of Holsteins and Jerseys. Effects of age, milk yield, and clinical abnormalities on involution of cervix and uterus, ovulation, estrous cycles, detection of estrus, conception rate, and days open.

Two hundred and twelve Holstein and Jersey cows were in a study to determine factors that affected reproductive traits. First ovulation occurred about 3 wk postpartum, and interval to first ovulation was greater in cows that had clinical abnormalities postpartum than in normal cows. Jerseys producing more milk ovulated sooner postpartum than lower producing herdmates. Involution of cervix and uterus occurred later postpartum in cows that had clinical problems postpartum. Involution of genital tract occurred later postpartum in older cows and sooner postpartum in cows that had higher milk yields. Duration of first postpartum estrous cycle was 4 days less than for second postpartum cycle. Percentages of estrous cycles detected by standing estrus were 43 and 73% for Holsteins and Jerseys. Estrous detection rates were highest for cows that produced slightly above the mean milk yield and did not differ between cows in highest and lowest milk production quartiles. First detected estrus and days to first insemination occurred later postpartum in Holsteins as milk yield deviation from herdmates increased, regardless of sign. In Jerseys, days to first insemination and days open increased linearly as milk yield increased. Days to first insemination and conception were greater in cows with postpartum clinical problems. Conception rate at first insemination postpartum increased in proportion to concentration of progesterone in blood samples collected during 12 days before first insemination. Overall, clinical problems at parturition and postpartum lowered reproductive performance in both breeds. There was a slight antagonism between milk yield and reproductive performance (days open) in Jerseys but not in Holsteins.

Age Factors↗

The timing of ovulation and insemination schedules in superstimulated cattle.

The development of treatments that control follicular wave dynamics during the bovine estrous cycle has resulted in interesting possibilities for the precise control of follicular wave emergence and the time of ovulation. For superstimulation, follicular wave emergence can be controlled by ultrasound-guided follicle ablation with FSH treatments initiated 1 or 2 d later, or injection of estradiol combined with progesterone at the time of insertion of a progestogen releasing device and FSH treatments beginning 4 d later. These are the most widely used protocols for superstimulation of donor cows because they offer the convenience of being able to initiate treatments quickly and at a self-appointed time, without reducing the number of transferable embryos. However, these protocols still require precise estrus detection of donors following superstimulation in order to conduct AI at the most appropriate time. Recent studies have been designed to develop superstimulation protocols that involve fixed-time AI of donors, without regard to estrus detection. Results presented herein indicate that delaying the removal of a progestogen releasing device, combined with the administration of GnRH or porcine LH (pLH) 12 or 24 h later results in predictable, synchronous ovulations, permitting fixed-time AI without reducing the numbers or quality of embryos. These protocols facilitate the application of on-farm embryo transfer programs because they are practical, easy to administer by farm personnel, and more importantly, they eliminate the need for detecting estrus.

Animals↗

An evaluation of estrus synchronization programs in reproductive management of dairy herds.

The objectives of this experiment were to evaluate the effect of various estrus synchronization programs on estrus detection rate (EDR) and pregnancy rate (PR) in lactating cows. Spring-calving, lactating dairy cows (n = 3,096) were allocated to one of six treatments: 1) PG (n = 514), estrus detection for 10 d before the onset of the breeding season (BS), cows detected in estrus received PGF2 alpha (PGF) 8 d after estrus, and all cows to be bred by d 11 of BS; 2) PG+EBZ (n = 510), as in PG plus cows treated with PGF received 1 mg of estradiol benzoate 48 h later; 3) C (n = 522), progestogen (controlled intravaginal drug release; CIDR) inserted per vaginum 10 d before BS for 8 d, PGF treatment on the day before CIDR removal, and AI within 6 d after CIDR withdrawal; 4) C+EBZ (n = 520), as in C, plus 10 mg of estradiol benzoate 10 d before BS; 5) C+BUS (n = 517), as in C plus 10 micrograms of buserelin on the day of CIDR insertion; or 6) CON (n = 513), no treatment, and a 32-d period of AI. Relative to other CIDR-treated groups, estradiol benzoate at the time of CIDR insertion reduced (P < .05) the EDR (C, 85.0%;C+EBZ, 75.9%; C+BUS, 88.5%). The PR to first AI was reduced (P < .05) by C compared with other treatments (PG, 60.9%; PG+EBZ, 57.2%; C, 46.6%; C+EBZ, 60.5%; C+BUS, 57.9%; CON, 60.1%). The interval from the onset of BS to AI and pregnancy was reduced (P < .05) by up to 9 d by estrus synchronization relative to controls (PG, 5.5 +/- .2 d; PG+EBZ, 5.2 +/- .2 d; C 1.7 +/- .1 d; C+EBZ, 2.3 +/- .1 d; C+BUS, 106 +/- .04d, CON, 10.4 +/- .3 d). In conclusion an 8-d progestogen-buserelin-PGF treatment resulted in the best overall estrus detection and pregnancy rates, which would be beneficial to a compact calving program.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

The educational implications of reproductive problems identified during investigations at Michigan dairy farms.

This study constitutes the review of 44 dairy herd investigations that were initiated because of complaints relating to decreased reproductive efficiency. Each investigation was conducted at the request of the veterinary practitioner who provided the routine reproductive examinations and consultations at the farm. Thus the types of problems identified were those not resolved by routine veterinary care and management practices. A total of 4.5, 27.3 and 31.8% of the farms, respectively, failed to keep reproductive records, failed to maintain accurate records on events such as breeding dates, or failed to evaluate available summary reports with the local veterinary practitioner. Of the 44 farms, 50.0, 38.6, 54.5 and 11.4%, respectively, reported problems related to estrus detection rate, number of days to first service (for reasons other than estrus detection), conception rate and early embryonic death. Within each of these reproductive parameters specific problems were defined and discussed. Reproductive inefficiency was found to be most commonly associated with ineffective estrus detection and decreased conception rate. Most importantly, farm managers and employees frequently misunderstood the relationship between the accuracy of estrus detection and the conception rate (61.4% of the farms). We therefore identified factors which have an impact on dairy herd reproductive efficiency to suggest topics for training programs for producers and practicing veterinarians as well as for elective courses for veterinary students in the area of theriogenology.

Journal Article↗

[Automated detection of estrus and mastitis in dairy cows].

The development and test of detection models for oestrus and mastitis in dairy cows is described in a PhD thesis that was defended in Wageningen on June 5, 2000. These models were based on sensors for milk yield, milk temperature, electrical conductivity of milk, and cow activity and concentrate intake, and on combined processing of the sensor data. The models alert farmers to cows that need attention, because of possible oestrus or mastitis. A first detection model for cows, milked twice a day, was based on time series models for the sensor variables. A time series model describes the dependence between successive observations. The parameters of the time series models were fitted on-line for each cow after each milking by means of a Kalman filter, a mathematical method to estimate the state of a system on-line. The Kalman filter gives the best estimate of the current state of a system based on all preceding observations. This model was tested for 2 years on two experimental farms, and under field conditions on four farms over several years. A second detection model, for cow milked in an automatic milking system (AMS), was based on a generalization of the first model. Two data sets (one small, one large) were used for testing. The results for oestrus detection were good for both models. The results for mastitis detection were varying (in some cases good, in other cases moderate). Fuzzy logic was used to classify mastitis and oestrus alerts with both detection models, to reduce the number of false positive alerts. Fuzzy logic makes approximate reasoning possible, where statements can be partly true or false. Input for the fuzzy logic model were alerts from the detection models and additional information. The number of false positive alerts decreased considerably, while the number of detected cases remained at the same level. These models make automated detection possible in practice.

Animals↗