PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “External Fixators”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Influence of bolt tightening torque, wire size, and component reuse on wire fixation in circular external fixation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of bolt torque, wire size, and component reuse on the ability to maintain wire tension in 3 external skeletal fixation systems. STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical study. METHODS: Yield strength in tension of 1.0-, 1.2-, 1.5-, and 1.6-mm-diameter wires, and yield strength in torque of Hofmann Small Bone Fixation (SBF) cannulated and slotted bolts and IMEX regular and miniature bolts were determined on a testing machine. The minimum bolt tightening torque needed to prevent wire slippage at clinically recommended wire tensions was determined. Components were tested 10 times, and loads at slippage were recorded. RESULTS: The IMEX system required a mean of 8 Nm of bolt tightening torque to maintain 900 N (1.6-mm wires). The SBF system required a mean of 3 Nm bolt torque to maintain 300 N (1.0-mm wires) and 5 Nm to maintain 600 N (1.2-mm wires). The SBF cannulated bolt required 9 Nm of torque to maintain 900 N (1.5-mm wires). The SBF slotted bolts could only maintain 800 N before yield. The IMEX miniature system required a mean bolt torque of 1.1 Nm to maintain 300 N. The cannulated and slotted bolts from both manufacturers failed to maintain 70% of initial wire tension after 7 and 4 uses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The IMEX systems and the SBF system using 1.0- and 1.2-mm wires could maintain clinically recommended wire tension safely. Only the IMEX system could maintain clinically recommended wire tension safely using 1.5- or 1.6-mm wires. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The SBF system using 1.0- and 1.2-mm wires and the IMEX system using all wire sizes can maintain clinically relevant wire tension. The SBF system using 1.5-mm wires could not. Cannulated and slotted bolts should not be used more than 6 and 3 times, respectively. Nuts should not be reused.

Animals↗

The treatment of infected non-union of the tibia by compression-distraction techniques using the Ilizarov external fixator.

Circular external fixation using the Ilizarov apparatus combined with compression-distraction techniques was used to treat 11 patients with infected non-union and segmental bone loss of the tibia. The series comprised 8 males and 3 females, with an average age of 27 years (range 17-51 years). The average number of previous failed surgical attempts at union was 2 per patient (range 1 to 4). Three infected non-unions without shortening were treated with complete resection of the site and conversion of the diaphysis into a segmental defect. The functional results were excellent in 5, good in 3, fair in 2 and poor in one patient. No additional procedures were used in any of the patients.

Adolescent↗

Experience with the Sukhtian--Hughes external fixation system.

External fixation of fractures is now used frequently in orthopaedics. This paper reviews the results of 30 fractures treated by a single bar system, the Sukhtian-Hughes, over a period of 4 years. The results are encouraging, particularly in compound tibial fractures and in patients with non-union of fractures.

Adolescent↗

[High tibial osteotomy--fixation by means of external fixation--indication, technique, complications (author's transl)].

High tibial osteotomy has proved its value in the treatment of gonarthrosis with or without axis deformity. The thrust of weight-bearing and other stresses is lessened on the degenerated tibial condyle and transferred to the more normal condyle. The stable fixation by means of external fixation allows early movement of the knee joint.-R-ferences to operative technique, indication, complications and after-treatment.

Arthrodesis↗

[Treatment of metaphyseal fractures of the tibia by the Ilizarov external fixator].

PURPOSE: This external fixation was used for 46 of 60 cases of proximal tibial metaphyseal fractures, over a 10 years period. The choice of an external fixation was determined by the poor reputation of internal fixation for even complex closed fractures. The reasons for the choice of the Ilizarov device were: the possibility of fitting the fixation pins close to the knee joint if necessary, the circular nature of the system, and finally the possibility of adding an intrafocal mounting (I.F.M.) which can bring the displaced bone fragments together using shaped blockstops pins. The program theoretically foresaw an initial sequence using external fixation until bone continuity was achieved, followed by a complementary plaster for one or two months. MATERIALS: 7 of the 46 fractures were lost for follow-up. Of the remaining 39 cases, there were 5 early complications: one knee septic arthritis which led to stop the method before the second month. Each of these 5 failures were due to improper use of the method. 34 cases have been followed for more than two years. RESULTS: 29 cases of consolidation of which 3 initial displacements were wrongly considered as acceptable. There was no case of displacement while the fixation was in place. There were 5 nonunions: 2 at the diaphyseal level in long metaphyso-diaphyseal fractures, 2 were comminutive metaphyseal fractures in which the fixation had been removed by error before the third month. With this fixation, neither the traumatic opening, nor the presence of a fibular fracture significantly affected consolidation. The healing period was however longer when the fracture was more extensive and comminutive. The bone gaps were treated by interfocal mounting (I.F.M.) but loss of bone stock persisted; they affected the occurrence of nonunion. CONCLUSION: Each failure of the method is explained by its improper use. The Ilizarov fixation is an excellent mechanical response to these fractures: on condition that the technical rules are respected, that an intrafocal mounting is used to remove interfragmentary gaps, and that the fixator is kept in place long enough, according to the size and comminutive nature of the fracture. This fixation is reliable in these conditions but does not compensate intrafocal bone loss exceeding 40 per cent of the metaphyseal bone mass.

Adult↗

Treatment of unstable tibial diaphyseal fractures with minimal internal and external fixation.

We prospectively studied 20 patients whose selected unstable tibial diaphyseal fractures were treated with the combined techniques of minimal internal fixation and external fixation. Five fractures were closed and 15 were open (six Grades I and II, nine Grade III). Seventeen were due to high-energy injuries. The minimum followup was 2 years. All fractures healed, one with malalignment. Time to union averaged 12 weeks in closed fractures and 19 weeks in open fractures. All high-energy fractures underwent bone grafting. The external fixation was removed by dynamization. Thirteen complications occurred in nine patients, all with open fractures. Three of 120 pins became infected (2.5%). Early bone grafting and dynamization of the external fixation prevented the malunions and nonunions reported previously with this technique.

Adolescent↗

Limited internal fixation of the tibia with external fixation: an in vivo canine study.

This study reports the results of the healing of canine tibial osteotomies with external fixation alone or in combination with a single lag screw. Twelve dogs had a midshaft tibial osteotomy performed at a 45 degree obliquity. Half of the dogs had a six-pin, unilateral, medial, external half-frame applied after the osteotomy. The remaining six had an identical frame plus a lag screw placed perpendicular to the osteotomy site. When compared with their contralateral controls, the fixator-alone group had a 16.3% (p < 0.05) decrease in bone density, whereas no significant density change was seen in the group with the additional lag screw. Torsional stiffness was 29% higher in the osteotomies treated, and tested, with the lag screw, but this did not achieve statistical significance. Computed tomography scanning revealed that the surface area was increased by an average of 30-40% in both groups, relative to contralateral controls, but there was no difference between the two treatment groups. Three tibias in the group with external fixation alone, and two tibias in the screw group showed primary bone healing without evidence of callus formation. The combination of a semirigid external fixation construct with a lag screw resulted in increased torsional stiffness but healing equal to that seen with external fixation alone.

Animals↗

Conversion from temporary external fixation to definitive fixation: shaft fractures.

Temporary external fixation is the most common method of initial stabilization of diaphyseal fractures in forward surgical hospitals. Once the patient arrives at a stable environment, usually the United States, the fracture is managed with intramedullary nailing, small-pin external fixation, or a modified external fixator. Future research should be directed toward improving methods of care. It is not precisely known when is the best time to convert to definitive fixation without increasing the risk of infection. The risk factors leading to infection and nonunion are not well-established, making that determination even more difficult. Clinical studies of a suitable size should provide insight into these problems. Although temporary external fixation is commonly used, an optimal construct has not been determined. Data from studies of in vivo fracture-site motion after application of the temporary external fixator should be compared with biomechanical testing of similar constructs. These data could be used to recommend optimal temporary external fixation constructs of tibia, femur, and humerus fractures using currently available devices as well as to provide groundwork for the next generation of fixators.

External Fixators↗

The role of external fixation in acute ankle trauma.

The use of external fixation methods has become increasingly popular throughout the past decade in the treatment of tibial pilon fractures to prevent the dreaded soft tissue complications after high velocity injuries. A variety of methods has been proposed, including ankle-spanning half-pin frames; circular (Ilizarov) frames with tensioned wires; or hybrid frames, either as the sole treatment or, more frequently, in conjunction with limited internal screw fixation. External fixation also has a role in staged protocols as a primary tool for reduction and preliminary fixation until soft tissue consolidation makes internal fixation feasible. Although good to excellent results are reported in a high percentage of cases in most studies and infection rates have dropped to less than 10%, even for high velocity injuries with considerable soft tissue compromise, no single form of treatment seems to be suitable for all types of pilon fractures. Major concerns after external fixation are the development of pin track infections, malunions or nonunions, and the danger of imperfect reduction of the articular surface. Staged protocols that are based on the severity of the fracture and soft tissue injury are likely to play a major role in the future treatment of pilon fractures. In the treatment of acute malleolar fractures, ankle-spanning external fixation is reserved for fractures with considerable soft tissue compromise, open fractures, or compartment syndrome as a temporary transfixation until internal fixation becomes feasible.

Acute Disease↗

Fracture treatment with circular external fixation.

Circular external skeletal fixation (CEF) has been used in recent years to treat acute and chronic fractures and bone deformities, to stabilize joints while maintaining range of motion, and to perform arthrodeses and limb-sparing in dogs. Dr. Ilizarov defined the general principles and methods of CEF. This article reviews these principles. It also describes the indications, preoperative planning, surgical placement, postoperative management, clinical results, and complications of CEF used to treat fractures in dogs.

Animals↗

Mini external fixation in the hand.

External fixation is an effective means of addressing several pathologies of the hand. The advantages of its use include the ability to achieve stable fixation, minimize soft tissue trauma at the site of injury, and allow wound care and mobilization of adjacent joints. External fixators can be constructed from material readily available in the operating room or obtained from a commercial source. Sufficient rigidity can be achieved by any of these means. Improper placement, although achieving rigid fixation, may compromise motion and overall function if basic principles of external fixation are not followed or if the anatomy of the hand is not taken into consideration. The objective of this article is to describe the technique of application of mini external fixation, emphasizing the basic principles of external fixation as they relate to the specific anatomy of the hand. In addition to fracture fixation, various other uses are described including distraction lengthening, arthrodesis, treatment of nonunion, and infection.

Arthrodesis↗

Biomechanics of the Ilizarov external fixator.

The Ilizarov external fixator exhibits more isotropic mechanical properties in bending and nonlinear axial stiffness than do unilateral and bilateral external fixators. Each frame element--wire size, tension, and orientation, as well as ring type--contributes to overall frame rigidity and stability. These factors and the specific clinical situation must be considered for the successful application of the Ilizarov fixator.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

Avoiding the material nonlinearity in an external fixation device.

BACKGROUND: External fixation devices are widely used for treating unstable bone fractures because of their attractive features including minimal invasiveness, maximum tailorability, and extreme versatility. In one type of these devices (i.e., the fine-wire fixators), these unique features are made possible by the use of tensioned wires to support bone fragments. The major problem with these wires is their yielding. Once the wires yield, the fracture healing process will be adversely affected. A recent study showed that the nonlinear behavior observed in these tensioned wires can be geometric and material, and the geometric nonlinearity will stiffen the wires while the material nonlinearity will cause the wires to yield. This study is to investigate if it is possible to avoid the material nonlinearity in order to retain the elastic and repeatable performance for the wires. METHODS: Nonlinear and large deformation finite element analyses were conducted. Models of a bone segment transfixed by pairs of cross-aligned wires subjected to various levels of pre-tension were developed. The bone segment was subjected to a vertical load, and the load-displacement curves, wire tensions and wire tensile stresses were obtained under a full cycle of loading and unloading regime. FINDINGS: Pre-tensioning the wires is beneficial for stiffening a fixation device, but is disadvantageous to maintaining the wire elasticity. By limiting the level of the pre-tension, we can avoid the material nonlinearity. Doing so we will be able to stiffen the fixation device and retain elastic and predictable mechanical performance at the same time. INTERPRETATION: The findings will lead to a new paradigm toward enhancing the performance of external fixation devices.

Bone Wires↗

Forefoot applications of external fixation.

The use of external fixation in foot and ankle surgery has steadily increased with the advent of devices geared toward the foot and ankle that have evolved over the past decade, as well as a greater understanding of the indications and advantages of external fixation. The application of external fixators in the forefoot may at first glance seem both limited and possibly overkill, but once the basics of external fixation and the types of devices available are understood the options for use become numerous.

Arthrodesis↗

The external fixator: a tool for evaluation of complex low back pain problems.

BACKGROUND: The selection of patients with low back pain for fusion is especially difficult when previous surgical interventions failed and/or invasive tests (discograms, facet blocks) do not allow or do not clearly identify the painful motion segment. Test fixation with an external fixator may mimic a definite internal fixation, such as a fusion, and may help select patients for a more favorable result. The purpose of the study was to clarify if temporary back pain relief by external fixation is predictive for back pain relief after final internal fixation and fusion. METHODS: A retrospective study of 63 patients up to 6 years after evaluation of low back pain problems with an external fixator (index operation) was conducted. The data were collected from the charts based on a protocol that patients had to fill in during evaluation, and the actual state was checked during a clinical investigation at the outpatient clinic. The protocol monitored pain (Visual Analog Scale), pain medication, and work status. Based on the first two parameters, the effect of external fixation was defined as a general estimation as positive, doubtful, or negative. The same parameters were reassessed at follow-up control. RESULTS: In 38 patients, the immobilization test did improve the pain situation, in 11 it remained unchanged, and in 14 the pain got worse. Thirty-eight patients (not identical with the above) underwent definitive fusion afterward, whereas 25 were not operated on. Twenty-one of 30 patients with a positive effect undergoing surgery showed an improved situation after fusion, and 8 of 22 patients without further operation were improved at follow-up. Nine of 12 patients with a negative immobilization test did stay in a bad situation at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The external fixator as a tool for evaluation of patients with low back pain is an expensive measure with a considerable complication risk and only justified in selected patients when any other measure fails to assess and evaluate a patient's situation. If the test fixation reveals no benefit, the patients will remain in a bad situation whatever the therapeutic measure will be. Therefore the main value of the external fixator assessment is the selection of these patients that should not undergo surgery. A positive test fixation means a 72% chance for a satisfactory outcome at least two years after surgery, whereas without surgery the chance for some spontaneous improvement is 57% if the test immobilization did show some improvement. With respect of the "negative" selection of this group of patients (complex history, previous interventions) in our as well as in others series, the obtained results seem acceptable and the use of this invasive diagnostic measure in this group of patients seems justified. Statistical analysis did not show differences of significance as the numbers in the individual groups was too small.

Adult↗

Tensioning technique and fixator stability of a circular external fixator with threaded fine wires.

Hybrid external fixators have become more popular over recent years, and although biomechanical tests show varying results from paper to paper, a consistent finding is shear motion occurring at the fracture/osteotomy site during loading. This can be reduced to some extent by frame configuration, and with the use of olive stop wires, but both of these have limitations. We have investigated the use of threaded fine wires in a circular hybrid fixator. A reliable tensioning method is described which minimises movement at the wire-bone interface during tensioning, and threaded wires are seen to offer a significant improvement in fracture site shear stiffness when compared to smooth fine wires.

Animals↗

External fixation of the wrist.

External fixation for fractures of the distal radius has been used for almost 80 years. The main objective is to gain reduction and maintain the reduction throughout the treatment period. Several fixator concepts are available and selection is based on the complexity of the case to be treated as well as the surgeon's experience. Periarticular application of the fixator with immediate use of the wrist joint is recommended whenever possible. In intra-articular fractures transarticular application is advisable. External fixation in complex fractures has to be supplemented by bone grafting, fixation wires and stabilization of the radioulnar joint. Associated injuries in distal radius fractures need to be identified and treated. The possible complications of external fixation are discussed and means to prevent them are referred to. External fixation of the distal radius has found its place as an established method in treating certain types of this common fracture.

Colles' Fracture↗

Management of comminuted closed tibial plafond fractures using circular external fixators.

Various types of external fixators have been used to treat Ruedi and Allgöwer Type III pilon fractures, as serious complications can occur using conventional treatment principles. However, insufficient reduction and loss of reduction are two of the main disadvantages of external fixator treatments. We conducted a retrospective review of 14 patients with severe highly comminuted closed fractures of the distal tibia (Ruedi type III) treated using cross-ankle external fixators. Five patients underwent closed reduction, while the others required open reduction using minimal incision techniques. The reduction score, reduction loss, early and late complications, and ankle symptoms and functions were evaluated. The patients were followed for an average of 48 months (range: 31 to 84); superficial wound infection developed in one case and minimal angular deformity in another. In ten cases, the reduction of the articular surface was anatomical; in the other four cases, it was non-anatomical. Except for one case which developed an angular deformity, no loss of reduction was observed. On radiological control, only one case did not display osteoarthrosis; in the other 13 cases, osteoarthrosis was diagnosed at different levels. The most important disadvantage of this technique is retarded joint movement. Nevertheless, for such fractures, we consider cross-ankle circular external fixators as an alternative treatment method because it combines the advantage of a minimal risk of deep infections with better stabilisation of the limb, while providing early mobilisation.

Adolescent↗