PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Ferric Compounds”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

A comparison of oral and intravenous iron supplementation in preterm infants receiving recombinant erythropoietin.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intravenously administered iron supplements would improve the hematologic response to recombinant erythropoietin in stable preterm infants. METHODS: Forty-two preterm infants (<33 weeks' gestation, birth weight < 1500 gm, hematocrit <38%) were treated with recombinant human erythropoietin (Eprex), 600 U/kg per week, and randomly assigned to receive either an oral preparation of ferrous lactate (elemental iron, 12 mg/kg per day) or an intravenous preparation of iron sucrose (6 mg/kg per week). RESULTS: Hematocrits, reticulocyte counts, and transfusions were similar in the oral group (OG) and the intravenous group (IVG). However, markedly higher serum ferritin concentrations were noted in the IVG (p <0.001), and by completion of the study the arithmetic mean values were 265 +/- 127 microg/L versus 137 +/- 65 microg/L in the IVG and the OG, respectively. The numbers of hypochromic erythrocytes increased in both groups during the study but were significantly higher in the OG (p = 0.04). Mean daily weight gain in the IVG (27 +/- 6.4 gm/day) was greater than in the OG (22.9 +/- 4.78 gm/day; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: High doses of both orally administered iron and intravenously administered iron sucrose appear to supply sufficient iron for erythropoiesis in stable infants. Storage iron may become depleted after oral supplementation. The intravenous preparation appears to be safe and maintains serum ferritin concentrations, and it may be indicated for patients with low ferritin levels and for those not established on enteral feedings.

Administration, Oral↗

A randomized study of oral vs intravenous iron supplementation in patients with progressive renal insufficiency treated with erythropoietin.

BACKGROUND: Correction of anaemia as a result of renal failure improves cardiovascular function and also provides significant cognitive and emotional benefits. The most appropriate route for iron supplementation has not been determined for patients with chronic renal failure who are not yet on dialysis. METHODS: Forty-five anaemic patients with progressive renal insufficiency (PRI) were prospectively randomized to receive oral (ferrous sulphate 200 mg tds) or intravenous (300 mg iron sucrose monthly) iron treatment. Erythropoietin (rHuEpo) was simultaneously commenced and the dose adjusted according to a pre-established protocol. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics between the two groups. The average follow-up was 5.2 months. Three patients suffered possible allergic reactions to iron sucrose. Haemoglobin response and changes in red cell hypochromasia were similar in the two groups, but serum ferritin was significantly higher in the intravenous group. The starting dose of rHuEpo could be temporarily discontinued in 43% of patients on oral iron and 33% of patients receiving iron sucrose (NS). rHuEpo was increased after 3 months in 9% of patients on oral iron and 19% of patients receiving iron sucrose (NS). Final doses of rHuEpo were 33.5 (0-66) and 41.6 (0-124) U/kg/week respectively in the oral and intravenous groups (NS). Although gastro-intestinal symptoms were more commonly reported in patients taking oral iron, these were mild according to scores on visual analogue scales. Dietary protein and energy intake were not significantly different in the two groups at 0, 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In pre-dialysis patients, the efficacy of monthly 300 mg iron sucrose given intravenously is not superior with regard to haemoglobin response and rHuEpo dose as compared with a daily oral dose of 600 mg of ferrous sulphate or equivalent. Where intravenous iron is preferred, lower doses may help to reduce the incidence of allergic or "free iron" reactions, especially in patients with low body mass.

Administration, Oral↗

Non-transferrin-bound iron in the serum of hemodialysis patients who receive ferric saccharate: no correlation to peroxide generation.

Intravenous iron (iv.Fe) is used to optimize response to recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) in ESRD, but no consensus exists with respect to the best regimen to avoid transferrin "oversaturation," oxidative stress, and the occurrence of non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI). Iv.Fe was stopped for 1 wk in 35 hemodialysis (HD) patients who were routinely receiving iv.Fe and r-HuEPO. The iv.Fe group received 100 mg of ferric saccharate (Venofer) at the end of the first HD session, whereas the time-control group was treated under the same conditions but received no iv.Fe. Serum samples were taken before the first HD session, immediately and 60 min after iv.Fe administration, and before the next HD session. Sera were analyzed for NTBI and peroxides; transferrin saturation was analyzed by urea-PAGE and Western blot. In an in vitro model system with HepG2 cells, the effects of ESRD serum on the labile iron pool (LIP) were assayed using the fluorescence calcein assay. NTBI significantly increased after iv.Fe-administration and returned to baseline values before the next HD-session. There was a shift from apo- to monoferric transferrin, but no "oversaturation" of transferrin after iv.Fe-treatment. Peroxides increased in both groups after HD. Hemodialysis decreased bioavailable iron for the LIP in HepG2-cells, whereas serum of iv.Fe-treated HD patients highly increased the LIP in these cells. A total of 100 mg of iv.Fe led to NTBI generation but not to an oversaturation of transferrin. Peroxide concentrations significantly increased during HD but were not correlated to iv.Fe administration and seemed to result from other sources of oxidative stress related to HD. NTBI can enter liver cells and increase the potentially harmful LIP.

Blotting, Western↗

The fragments of the photosynthetic electron transfer chain in model systems.

In this paper the recent research from our laboratory is reviewed. Short fragments of the photochemical electron transfer chain of photosynthesis were reproduced in aqueous detergent solutions or in organic solvents. The function of photosystem I is reproduced in a ternary system of chlorophylls, electron donors (dienols, sulfhydryl compounds, hydrazine, etc.), and electron acceptors (viologens, nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide [NAD], flavines, etc.). Chlorophyll-photosensitized reduction of viologens in some cases is activated by oxygen at the expense of active reductants formed during the photosensitized oxidation of an initial electron donor (thiourea). Chlorophyll-photosensitized oxidoreduction of cytochromes is activated by flavines, viologens, vitamin K derivatives, and some other redox systems (cofactors of cyclic photophosphorylation). The primary mechanism of the reactions studied depends on the reversible chlorophyll photooxidoreduction. In binary systems, chlorophyll (monomeric or aggregated) and electron donor or electron acceptor, reversible photoreduction or photooxidation is observed. Irreversible bacteriochlorophyll oxidation leads to the formation of chlorophyll and protochlorophyll analogues; irreversible protochlorophyll photoreduction results in chlorophyll-like pigment appearance. The photodisaggregation of chlorophyll was observed. The models of photosystem II studied were the photochemical oxygen evolution in aqueous solutions of electron acceptors (ferric compounds, quinone), photosensitized in the near UV part of the spectrum by inorganic semiconductors (tungsten, titanium, and zinc oxides). All reactions described are based on electron (hydrogen) transfer photosensitized by pigment system.

Chlorophyll↗

Parenteral iron therapy options.

Parenteral iron therapy is occasionally necessary for patients intolerant or unresponsive to oral iron therapy, for receiving recombinant erythropoietin therapy, or for use in treating functional iron deficiency. There are now three parenteral iron products available: iron dextran, ferric gluconate, and iron sucrose. We summarize the advantages and disadvantages of each product, including risk of anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, dosage regimens, and costs. The increased availability of multiple parenteral iron preparations should decrease the need to use red cell transfusions in patients with iron-deficiency anemia.

Anemia, Iron-Deficiency↗

Intravenous iron in a primary-care clinic.

The preferable route of iron delivery for most iron-deficient patients is oral. Parenteral iron therapy is used in patients who cannot tolerate oral iron or in cases in which oral iron is not sufficiently effective. The most frequent indications for parenteral iron therapy are unbearable gastrointestinal side effects induced by oral iron itself, worsening of inflammatory bowel disease symptoms, insufficient intestinal absorption, renal failure-caused anemia that is treated with erythropoietin, and unresolved ongoing bleeding, which would cause the acceptable oral doses of iron therapy to be exceeded. The serious adverse effects of iron dextran that was used in the past could explain the reluctance of medical personnel to prescribe this effective treatment. Patients with iron deficiency anemia were treated with intravenous iron in a primary care clinic. The iron gluconate was given in a dosage of 62.5 mg diluted in 150 mL of normal saline and was infused intravenously over 30 min, while iron sucrose was given in a dosage of 100 mg diluted in the same volume of normal saline and given at the same rate. In total, 724 infusions were administered to 57 patients. Iron sucrose was used in 628 infusions, and iron gluconate was used in the remaining 96. The frequency of the infusion treatments depended on the underlying disease and ranged from three times a week to once a month. Adverse effects were seldom observed and were minor in patients receiving iron gluconate, and were not registered at all in patients treated with iron sucrose. Two cases of flushing with paresthesias occurred. Slowing the infusion rate successfully eliminated these side effects. One case of hypotension was treated successfully with 500 cc of normal saline infusion. One case of dropout occurred, due to the patient's refusal to cooperate. No anaphylactic reactions were observed. Iron gluconate and iron sucrose are effective and safe for use in primary care clinics. The risk of adverse effects is low.

Anemia, Iron-Deficiency↗

A spectrophotometric method for the determination of proteins damaged by oxidized lipids.

The Ehrlich reaction was optimized to determine pyrrolized proteins produced as a consequence of lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. The procedure consisted of the treatment of the modified protein with p-(dimethylamino)benzaldehyde at a controlled acidity and temperature, and the determination of adducts produced against the blank obtained in the absence of the reagent. The extinction coefficient of Ehrlich adducts was calculated by using epsilon-N-pyrrolylnorleucine (Pnl) as standard and was 35,000 M-1 cm-1. The response was linear and reproducible within the range 0. 16-20 microM Pnl. The assay was applied to determination of pyrrole content in bovine serum albumin, bovine alpha-globulins, bovine gamma-globulins, and mixtures of them, incubated overnight with 1 mM of 4,5(E)-epoxy-2(E)-heptenal, obtaining results similar to those from determination of Pnl by capillary electrophoresis after basic hydrolysis of the protein. The method was also applied to pyrrole determination in bovine plasma proteins either incubated with epoxyalkenals, hydroxyalkenals, lipid hydroperoxides, and secondary products of lipid peroxidation, or oxidized with Fe3+/ascorbate. All these treatments produced pyrrolization of plasma proteins and all Ehrlich adducts gave very similar absorbance spectra with the exception of that produced in the treatment with hydroxyalkenals. The above results suggest that protein pyrrolization is a normal consequence of the lipid peroxidation process and of oxidative stress, and that Ehrlich adducts may be valid to determine this pyrrolization.

Aldehydes↗